Quantification of pulmonary and systemic blood flow by magnetic resonance velocity mapping in the assessment of atrial-level shunts

Quantification of pulmonary/systemic shunt ratio by single-acquisition phase-contrast cardiovascular magnetic resonance

PURPOSE

Phase-contrast cardiovascular magnetic resonance (PC-CMR) quantification of intracardiac shunt (measuring the pulmonary to systemic flow ratio, Qp/Qs) is typically determined by measuring flow through planes perpendicular the pulmonary trunk (PA) and ascending aorta (Ao). This method is subject to error from presence of background velocity offsets and requires two scan acquisitions. We evaluated an alternate PC-CMR technique for quantifying Qp/Qs using a single modified plane that encompasses both the PA and Ao.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

In 53 patients evaluated for intracardiac shunting, PC-CMR measurement in the individual Ao and PA planes and also in a single-acquisition plane was obtained and Qp/Qs calculated by each method. Bland-Altman analysis was performed to evaluate the agreement between the two methods.

RESULTS

The 95% confidence limits of agreement ranged from -0.52 to +0.34 indicating good agreement between the two methods. There was excellent agreement on the clinically relevant threshold value of Qp/Qs ratio of 1.5 (representing criteria for surgical correction of shunt).

CONCLUSIONS

Qp/Qs determined from the single-acquisition approach agrees well with that of the individual PA and Ao method and offers potential improved accuracy (due to background velocity offset).

Cardiac Physiology for Radiologists: Review of Relevant Physiology for Interpretation of Cardiac MR Imaging and CT

Cardiac computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance (MR) imaging provide clinicians with important insights into cardiac physiology and pathology. However, not all radiologists understand the language and concepts of cardiac physiology that are used daily by cardiologists. This review article covers basic cardiac physiology as it relates to cardiac CT and MR imaging. Topics include a review of the cardiac cycle and left ventricular pressure-volume loops as they relate to different pathologic states, evaluation of cardiac function, and calculation of key parameters such as left ventricular volumes and the ejection fraction. The hemodynamics of cardiac shunts are covered, with an emphasis on factors important to cardiologists, including the ratio of pulmonary flow to systemic flow. Additionally, valvular physiologic function is reexamined, with a focus on understanding pressure gradients within the heart and also the changes associated with valvular pathologic conditions, including measurement of regurgitant fractions in patients with valvular insufficiency. Understanding these basic concepts will help radiologists tailor the reporting of cardiac studies to clinically relevant information.

Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in children

MRI is an important additional tool in the diagnostic work-up of children with congenital heart disease. This review aims to summarise the role MRI has in this patient population. Echocardiography remains the main diagnostic tool in congenital heart disease. In specific situations, MRI is used for anatomical imaging of congenital heart disease. This includes detailed assessment of intracardiac anatomy with 2-D and 3-D sequences. MRI is particularly useful for assessment of retrosternal structures in the heart and for imaging large vessel anatomy. Functional assessment includes assessment of ventricular function using 2-D cine techniques. Of particular interest in congenital heart disease is assessment of right and single ventricular function. Two-dimensional and newer 3-D techniques to quantify flow in these patients are or will soon become an integral part of quantification of shunt size, valve function and complex flow patterns in large vessels. More advanced uses of MRI include imaging of cardiovascular function during stress and tissue characterisation of the myocardium. Techniques used for this purpose need further validation before they can become part of the daily routine of MRI assessment of congenital heart disease.

Phase-contrast MRI and applications in congenital heart disease

A review of phase-contrast magnetic resonance imaging techniques, with specific application to congenital heart disease, is presented. Theory, pitfalls, advantages, and specific examples of multiple, well-described congenital heart disease presentations are discussed.

Evaluation of intracardiac shunts with cardiac magnetic resonance

Intracardiac shunts including atrial septal defect, ventricular septal defect, endocardial cushion defects, and surgical baffles may be identified, localized, and quantified using cardiac MRI methods. Both dark-blood and bright-blood techniques are helpful to identify anatomy. Contrast enhancement is especially useful for identifying associated vascular anomalies. Dynamic first-pass contrast agent signal-time studies may demonstrate rapid recirculation and shunting. Volumetric and phase contrast cine methods are useful to quantify flow. Pulmonary to systemic (Qp/Qs) flow ratios may be calculated noninvasively by comparing the pulmonary artery flow to the aortic flow measurement.

Right ventricular function

This article describes the importance of the right ventricle in both the normal circulation, and in the abnormal milieu of previously palliated or corrected congenital heart disease. The latter group represents natural models of abnormal right ventricular loading that do not exist in any other experimental arena, and their study has provided insights into chronic adaptation of the right ventricle, in terms of cardiopulmonary haemodynamics, right-left heart interactions and mechano-electric inter-relationships.

Quantification of shunt volumes in congenital heart diseases using a breath-hold MR phase contrast technique--comparison with oximetry

AIMS

Comparison of breath-hold MR phase contrast technique in the estimation of cardiac shunt volumes with the invasive oximetric technique.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Seventeen patients with various cardiac shunts (10 ASD, 3 VSD, 1 PDA, 3 PFO) and five healthy volunteers were investigated using a 1.5 Tesla system. The mean flow velocity, the mean volume flow and the transverse area in the ascending aorta and the left and right pulmonary artery were measured using the MR phase contrast breath-hold technique (through plane, FLASH 2D-sequence, TR/TE 11/5 ms, phase length 106 ms, VENC 250 cm/s). The ratio of mean flow in the pulmonary (Qp: sum of mean flows in the left and right pulmonary arteries) and the systemic circulation (Qs: mean flow in the ascending aorta) was calculated and compared with invasively measured Qp:Qs ratios. Oximetry was performed within 24 h of the MR investigation. The non-invasive shunt measurement in the 17 patients showed a mean Qp:Qs ratio of 2.00 +/- 0.86. Comparing the MR data with the invasively measured Qp:Qs showed a correlation coefficient of r = 0.91 (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Cardiac shunt volumes can be measured reliably using a shorter acquisition time with breath-hold MR phase contrast technique.

Noninvasive Quantification of Left-to-Right Shunt in Pediatric Patients

Background —Blood flow can be quantified noninvasively by phase-contrast cine MRI (PC-MRI) in adults. Little is known about the feasibility of the method in children with congenital heart disease.

Methods and Results —In 50 children (mean age 6.2 years, range 1.1 to 17.7 years) with an atrial- or ventricular-level shunt, blood flow rate in the great vessels was determined by PC-MRI, and the ratio of pulmonary to aortic flow (Q̇p/Q̇s) was compared with Q̇p/Q̇s by oximetry. We found a difference of 2% and a range of −20% to +26% (limits of agreement, mean±2 SD). In another 7 children with congenital heart disease but no cardiac shunting (mean age 7.9 years, range 1.3 to 13.5 years), Q̇p/Q̇s by PC-MRI was 1.02 (SD ±0.06). No difference between systemic venous and aortic flow volumes was found (range −17% to +20%, n=37). Blood flow through a secundum atrial septal defect as assessed by PC-MRI (n=24) overestimated the shunt compared with the difference between pulmonary and aortic flows. The mean difference between 3 repeated PC-MRI measurements in each location was 5.3% (SD ±4.0%, n=522), demonstrating good precision. The interobserver variability was low. The accuracy of PC-MRI was confirmed by in vitro experiments.

Conclusions —Determination of Q̇p/Q̇s by PC-MRI in children is quick, safe, and reliable compared with oximetry. Systemic venous flow can be quantified by PC-MRI, whereas through-plane shunt measurement within an atrial septal defect is inaccurate.

Left-to-right cardiac shunts: comparison of measurements obtained with MR velocity mapping and with radionuclide angiography

PURPOSE

To investigate the agreement between two noninvasive methods, magnetic resonance (MR) velocity mapping and first-pass radionuclide angiography, to quantify the pulmonary-to-systemic blood flow ratio (QP/QS) in adults, adolescents, and children with left-to-right cardiac shunts.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The accuracy and precision of MR velocity mapping were studied in 12 control subjects (six men, six women) and in a phantom. MR velocity mapping and radionuclide angiography were performed on the same day in 24 patients (16 adults, two adolescents, six children; five male patients, 19 female patients).

RESULTS

The mean error in QP/QS at MR velocity mapping in phantom experiments was -1% +/- 1 (mean +/- SD). In control subjects, QP/QS at MR velocity mapping was 1.03 +/- 0.03, and the cardiac index was 3.1 L/min/m2 +/- 0.2 and 3.2 L/min/m2 +/- 0.3 for women and men, respectively. In patients, QP/QS at radionuclide angiography was 14% +/- 13, higher than at MR velocity mapping. Interobserver variability was four times higher for radionuclide angiography compared with MR velocity mapping, 0% + 16 versus 0% +/- 4 (n = 12). The difference between repeated MR flow measurements in the same vessel was -1% +/- 5 (n = 36).

CONCLUSION

The data suggest that MR velocity mapping is accurate and precise for measurements of shunt size over the whole range of possible QP/QS values.

MRI and echocardiography: how do they compare in adults?

TTE with color flow imaging remains the most appropriate initial method for imaging CHD in adults. In many patients with minor abnormalities, this will be the only imaging required. For complicated intracardiac anomalies not well shown by TTE, TEE or MRI are usually adequate with the choice of technique being dependent on the availability of appropriate equipment and expertise. For great vessel abnormalities, further evaluation with MRI and MRA is most appropriate. In patients suspected of having significant systemic or pulmonary venous abnormalities or abnormalities of the aortic arch, MRI and MRA should be regarded as the definitive imaging technique. MRI and MRA are robust methods for evaluating intracardiac disease and can provide accurate information on cardiac chamber anatomy relationships, valvar lesions, and shunts. However, in most patients, this information is provided more rapidly and cost effectively by color Doppler echocardiography.