Suprasensitivity to calcitonin gene-related peptide but not vasoactive intestinal peptide in women with chronic pelvic pain

Hemodynamic and neurobiological factors for the development of chronic pelvic pain in patients with pelvic venous disorder

OBJECTIVE

The study was aimed at the identification of hemodynamic and neurobiological factors for the development of chronic pelvic pain (CPP) in patients with pelvic venous disorder (PeVD) using ultrasound, radionuclide, and enzyme immunoassay methods.

METHODS

This cohort study included 110 consecutive patients with PeVD and 20 healthy controls. Seventy patients with PeVD had symptoms (CPP in 100% of cases, discomfort in hypogastrium, dyspareunia, vulvar varices, and dysuria), and 40 were asymptomatic. Patients underwent clinical examination, duplex ultrasound study of the pelvic veins and lower extremities, and single-photon emission computed tomography of the pelvic veins with in vivo labeled red blood cells. The prevalence, duration, severity, and pattern of reflux in the pelvic veins, as well as the severity of pelvic venous congestion, were evaluated. Healthy controls underwent only clinical and duplex ultrasound examination. All 130 patients were assessed using enzyme immunoassays to determine plasma levels of calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) and substance P (SP).

RESULTS

Symptomatic patients with PeVD had a higher prevalence of reflux in the ovarian veins (OVs) than asymptomatic ones (45.7% vs 10%, respectively; P = .001) and a greater reflux duration (4.1 ± 1.7 seconds vs 1.4 ± 0.3 seconds; P = .002), although no differences in the OV diameter were found. Similar results were obtained when comparing the diameters of the parametrial veins (PVs) and the duration of reflux in them. Type II/III reflux (greater than 2 seconds) was identified in 41.4% of symptomatic and in only 5% of asymptomatic patients (P = .001). Among patients with CPP, 24.2% had a combined reflux in the OVs, PVs, and uterine veins, and 45.7% had a combined reflux in the OVs and PVs, whereas 90% of patients without CPP had only an isolated reflux in the PVs. The pelvic venous congestion was moderate or severe in 95.7% of patients with CPP and in only 15% patients without CPP (P = .001). In patients with PeVD, the presence of CPP was associated with higher levels of CGRP and SP compared with asymptomatic patients (CGRP: 0.48 ± 0.06 vs 0.19 ± 0.02 ng/mL, respectively, P = .001; SP: 0.38 ± 0.08 vs 0.13 ± 0.03 ng/mL, P = .001).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with PeVD, significant hemodynamic and neurobiological factors for the CPP development were found to be reflux in the pelvic veins greater than 2 seconds, involvement of several venous collectors, and increased plasma levels of CGRP and SP.

Stratification of pelvic venous reflux in patients with pelvic varicose veins

OBJECTIVE

We investigated the association between the pattern and duration of pelvic venous reflux (PVR) and pelvic pain severity in patients with pelvic varicose veins (PVVs).

METHODS

The present retrospective study included 600 female patients with PVVs. Of the 600 patients, 453 had had PVVs and pelvic congestion syndrome (group 1) and 147 had had an asymptomatic disease course (group 2). Pelvic venous pain (PVP) was assessed using a visual analog scale. All the patients had undergone duplex ultrasound of the left and right renal veins, external, internal, and common iliac veins, and parametrial, uterine, gonadal, and vulvar veins (PV, UV, GV, and VV, respectively), with an assessment of their patency and diameter and the presence and duration of reflux. Reflux in the pelvic veins was considered pathologic if it lasted for >1 second.

RESULTS

In group 1, PVR type I (1-2 seconds), II (3-5 seconds), and III (>5 seconds or spontaneous reflux in the absence of a loading test) was found in 31%, 58%, and 11% of the patients, respectively. Moderate and severe reflux (types II and III) was associated with severe PVP (mean score, 8.3 ± 0.5) in 69% of the group 1 patients. A combination of reflux in the GV, PV, UV, and internal iliac vein was associated with severe PVP (mean score, 8.1 ± 0.3) in 51% of these patients. A combination of reflux in the PVs, UVs, and VVs was associated with moderate pain (mean score, 5.3 ± 0.2) in 49.2% of group 1. In group 2, PVR type I, II, and III was present in 95%, 4%, and 1% of the patients, respectively, and was observed in the PV only in patients with type I; in the GVs, PVs, UVs, and internal iliac veins in those with type II; and in the PVs and GVs in the patients with type III reflux. Reflux in the GVs and UVs was significantly more prevalent in group 1 than in group 2 (GVs, 51% vs 6%; P = .0001; UVs, 57% vs 7%; P = .0001). A combination of reflux in the GVs and UVs was a predictor of severe PVVs (odds ratio, 19.7; 95% confidence interval, 11.3-34.6).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with PVVs, the presence and severity of pelvic pain will be determined by the type of PVR and its distribution in the pelvic veins. The combination of moderate to severe reflux (types II and III) in the PVs, UVs, and GVs was a predictor of severe PVP. Patients with asymptomatic PVVs were characterized by mild reflux (type I) in the PVs, with rare involvement of the GVs and UVs.

[Neurobiological aspects of venous pelvic pain]

Mechanisms of the development of pain in chronic venous diseases (CVD), including pelvic congestion syndrome (PCS), are understudied. The existing hypotheses of the occurrence of venous pelvic pain (VVP) do not allow to answer the question why some patients have no pain syndrome while others have very pronounced pain despite the same morphofunctional changes in the pelvic veins. This review presents current hypotheses of the VPP development, data on some vasoactive neuropeptides (endothelin, calcitonin gene-related peptide, and substance P), their role in the modulation of vascular tone and sensation of pain, possible association between neurogenic inflammation and VPP and provides a rationale for studying the activity of these neurotransmitters in the treatment of PCS and pelvic pain.

Calcitonin Gene-Related Peptide and Substance P As Predictors of Venous Pelvic Pain

The purpose of this work was to study the contents of calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) and substance P (SP) in the blood plasma of patients with pelvic varicose veins. Thirty women with pelvic varicosities and a reflux blood flow were investigated using duplex ultrasonography. Group 1 included 18 patients with clinical signs of the pelvic congestion syndrome (PCS), including venous pelvic pain (VPP). Group 2 consisted of 12 patients with pelvic varicosities with no clinical signs of PCS. Group 1. The score of VPP intensity ranged from 4 to 8; the mean score being 4.84 ± 0.43. The CGRP level in the studied group ranged from 0.39 to 1.01 ng/mL; the SP level ranged from 0.005 to 1.33 ng/mL. Group 2. The CGRP values were 0.15–0.32 ng/mL, and the SP range was 0.003–0.3 ng/mL. In this group, the levels of the studied peptides were 3–5 times lower than those for the patients with VPP. Group 3. The mean CGRP values were 0.06 ± 0.003 ng/mL, and the mean SP values were 0.03 ± 0.001 ng/mL. These values were considered as the reference parameters; a statistical analysis was performed for them. The correlation analysis revealed a strong relationship between the CGRP and VPP levels (r = 0.82) and a medium correlation between the SP level and pelvic pain in Group 1. The CGRP and SP levels in blood plasma highly correlate with the presence of pelvic venous pain.

The role of vasoactive neuropeptides in the genesis of venous pelvic pain: A review

Mechanisms of the development of pain in chronic venous diseases, including pelvic congestion syndrome, are not studied in detail so far. The existing hypotheses of the occurrence of venous pelvic pain do not allow to answer the question why some patients have no pain syndrome, while others have very pronounced pain despite the same morphofunctional changes in the pelvic veins. This review presents current hypotheses of the venous pelvic pain development, data on some vasoactive neuropeptides (endothelin, calcitonin gene-related peptide, and substance P), their role in the modulation of vascular tone and sensation of pain, and possible association between neurogenic inflammation and venous pelvic pain, as well as provides rationale for studying the activity of these neurotransmitters in the treatment of pelvic congestion syndrome and pelvic pain.

Pelvic congestion syndrome: etiology of pain, diagnosis, and clinical management

Pelvic congestion syndrome is associated with pelvic varicosities that result in chronic pelvic pain, especially in the setting of prolonged standing, coitus, menstruation, and pregnancy. Although the underlying pathophysiology of pelvic congestion syndrome is unclear, it probably results from a combination of dysfunctional venous valves, retrograde blood flow, venous hypertension, and dilatation. Asymptomatic women may also have pelvic varicosities, making pelvic congestion syndrome difficult to diagnose. This article explores the etiologies of pain, use of imaging techniques, and clinical management of pelvic congestion syndrome. Possible explanations for the spectrum of pain among women with pelvic varicosities are also discussed.

Neurobiological mechanisms of pelvic pain

Pelvic pain is a common condition which significantly deteriorates health-related quality of life. The most commonly identified causes of pain in the pelvic region are gynaecologic, urologic, gastrointestinal, neurological, and musculoskeletal. However, in up to 33% of patients the source of this symptom is not identified, frustrating both patients and health-care professionals. Pelvic pain may involve both the somatic and visceral systems, making the differential diagnosing challenging. This paper aimed to review the mechanisms involved in pelvic pain perception by analyzing the neural plasticity and molecules which are involved in these complex circuits.

The Preclinical Pharmacology of BIBN4096BS, a CGRP Antagonist

CGRP is an important neuropeptide found throughout the cardiovascular system. However, until recently it has been difficult to define its pharmacology or physiological role because of the lack of suitable antagonists. BIBN4096BS is a high-affinity, nonpeptide antagonist that shows much greater selectivity for human CGRP1 receptors compared to any other drug. Its pharmacology has been defined with studies on transfected cells or cell lines endogenously expressing receptors of known composition. These have allowed confirmation that in many human blood vessels, CGRP is working via CGRP1 receptors. However, it also interacts with other CGRP-activated receptors, of unknown composition. In vivo, clinical studies have shown that BIBN4096BS is likely to be useful in the treatment of migraine. It has also been used to define the role of CGRP in phenomena such as plasma extravasation and cardioprotection following ischemia.

Anti-inflammatory actions of acupuncture

Acupuncture has a beneficial effect when treating many diseases and painful conditions, and therefore is thought to be useful as a complementary therapy or to replace generally accepted pharmacological intervention. The attributive effect of acupuncture has been investigated in inflammatory diseases, including asthma, rhinitis, inflammatory bowel disease, rheumatoid arthritis, epicondylitis, complex regional pain syndrome type 1 and vasculitis. Large randomised trials demonstrating the immediate and sustained effect of acupuncture are missing. Mechanisms underlying the ascribed immunosuppressive actions of acupuncture are reviewed in this communication. The acupuncture-controlled release of neuropeptides from nerve endings and subsequent vasodilative and anti-inflammatory effects through calcitonine gene-related peptide is hypothesised. The complex interactions with substance P, the analgesic contribution of beta-endorphin and the balance between cell-specific pro-inflammatory and anti-inflammatory cytokines tumour necrosis factor-alpha and interleukin-10 are discussed.

Species differences in the actions of sensory neuropeptides on contractility of the smooth muscle of the rat and guinea-pig prostate

1. The present review describes the actions of sensory neuropeptides on the contractility of the rat and guinea-pig prostate gland and discusses the differences in sensitivity of the smooth muscle of the prostates taken from these species to these neuropeptides. 2. Nerve fibres immunoreactive for the tachykinins substance P and neurokinin A, as well as for the sensory neuropeptide calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP), are sparsely distributed throughout the fibromuscular stroma of the prostate gland in both the rat and guinea-pig. 3. In functional experiments, tachykinin agonists potentiate electrical field stimulation-induced contractile responses of prostates taken from guinea-pigs, but have no effect on those taken from rats. This potentiation is through stimulation of tachykinin NK1-receptors. 4. Conversely, CGRP inhibits electrical field stimulation-induced contractile responses of prostates taken from rats, but has no effect on those taken from guinea-pigs. 5. It is concluded that although the sensory innervation to the prostate glands of the rat and guinea-pig appears similar, the nature and sensitivity of the contractile response of the prostatic smooth muscle to applied sensory neuropeptides is vastly different in the two species.

Calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) inhibits contractions of the prostatic stroma of the rat but not the guinea-pig

This study investigated the presence and effects of calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) within the rat and guinea-pig prostate glands. Immunohistochemical studies demonstrated that CGRP immunoreactive nerve fibres are sparsely distributed throughout the prostatic fibromuscular stroma in both species. These CGRP immunopositive nerve fibres shared a similar distribution profile but were not colocalized with tyrosine hydroxylase immunopositive nerve fibres which also innervate the prostatic stroma of these species. Nerve terminals within rat and guinea-pig prostatic tissues were electrically field stimulated (60 V, 0.5 ms, 10 Hz, 20 pulses every 60 s). In guinea-pig preparations, application of human alpha-CGRP, rat adrenomedullin or rat amylin (0.1 nM-1 microM) had no effect on responses to field stimulation. In contrast, both rat and human alpha-CGRP (10 pM-300 nM), rat adrenomedullin (0.3 nM-1 microM) and rat amylin (3 nM-1 microM) concentration-dependently inhibited electrically evoked contractile responses in the rat prostate. The relative order of potency was rat alpha-CGRP=human alpha-CGRP>rat adrenomedullin>rat amylin. The inhibition by rat alpha-CGRP of field stimulation-induced contractions in the rat prostate was competitively antagonized by human CGRP((8-37)) (1, 3 and 10 microM) with a pA(2) of 6.20+/-0.13. Rat alpha-CGRP (10 nM) attenuated contractile responses of the rat prostate to exogenously added noradrenaline (1-100 microM). Inhibitory concentration-response curves to rat alpha-CGRP in rat prostates were unaffected by preincubation in either glibenclamide (10-100 microM), N-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester (L-NAME) (10 microM), bestatin (10 microM), captopril (10 microM) or phosphoramidon (3 microM). Our results indicate that CGRP-induced inhibition of electrically evoked contractions in the rat prostate occurs through activation of postjunctional CGRP(2) receptors which act independently of a K(ATP) channel or nitrergic mechanisms. Degradation of rat alpha-CGRP via peptidases does not appear to occur in the rat prostate.

Neuropeptides in drug research

Neuropeptides have been a subject of considerable interest in the pharmaceutical industry over the last 20 years or more. Many drug discovery teams have contributed to our understanding of neuropeptide biology but no significant drugs that act selectively upon neuropeptide receptors have yet emerged from the clinic. There are, however, a plethora of clinically useful drugs that act at other classes of neurotransmitter and neuromodulator receptors, many of them discovered over the last 20 years. Nevertheless, we think that the future for the discovery of novel drugs acting at neuropeptide receptors looks bright for two reasons: (1) there has been a substantial increase in our understanding of the function of neuropeptides; and (2) high-throughput screening (HTS) against neuropeptide receptors has now begun to yield many interesting drug-like molecules, rather than peptides, that have the potential to become clinically useful drugs. The objective of this review is to summarise our current understanding of specific areas of neuropeptide biology and pharmacology in the CNS as well as the PNS. We will also speculate on where we think the new generation of neuropeptide agonists and antagonists could emerge from the clinic.