Acute and chronic effects of a diuretic monotherapy with piretanide in congestive heart failure--a placebo-controlled trial

Diuretic Treatment in Patients with Heart Failure: Current Evidence and Future Directions - Part I: Loop Diuretics

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Fluid retention or congestion is a major cause of symptoms, poor quality of life, and adverse outcome in patients with heart failure (HF). Despite advances in disease-modifying therapy, the mainstay of treatment for congestion-loop diuretics-has remained largely unchanged for 50 years. In these two articles (part I: loop diuretics and part II: combination therapy), we will review the history of diuretic treatment and the current trial evidence for different diuretic strategies and explore potential future directions of research.

RECENT FINDINGS

We will assess recent trials including DOSE, TRANSFORM, ADVOR, CLOROTIC, OSPREY-AHF, and PUSH-AHF amongst others, and assess how these may influence current practice and future research. There are few data on which to base diuretic therapy in clinical practice. The most robust evidence is for high dose loop diuretic treatment over low-dose treatment for patients admitted to hospital with HF, yet this is not reflected in guidelines. There is an urgent need for more and better research on different diuretic strategies in patients with HF.

WITHDRAWN: Diuretics for heart failure

This protocol was withdrawn in April 2016 as the author team was unable to progress to the final review stage. An editorial decision was taken not to pursue this title.

The editorial group responsible for this previously published document have withdrawn it from publication.

Diuretics for heart failure

BACKGROUND

Chronic heart failure is a major cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Diuretics are regarded as the first-line treatment for patients with congestive heart failure since they provide symptomatic relief. The effects of diuretics on disease progression and survival remain unclear.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the harms and benefits of diuretics for chronic heart failure

SEARCH METHODS

Updated searches were run in the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials in The Cochrane Library (CENTRAL Issue 1 of 4, 2011), MEDLINE (1966 to 22 February 2011), EMBASE (1980 to 2011 Week 07) and HERDIN database (1990 to February 2011). We hand searched pertinent journals and reference lists of papers were inspected. We also contacted manufacturers and researchers in the field. No language restrictions were applied.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Double-blinded randomised controlled trials of diuretic therapy comparing one diuretic with placebo, or one diuretic with another active agent (e.g. ACE inhibitors, digoxin) in patients with chronic heart failure.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors independently abstracted the data and assessed the eligibility and methodological quality of each trial. Extracted data were analysed by determining the odds ratio for dichotomous data, and difference in means for continuous data, of the treated group compared with controls. The likelihood of heterogeneity of the study population was assessed by the Chi-square test. If there was no evidence of statistical heterogeneity and pooling of results was clinically appropriate, a combined estimate was obtained using the fixed-effects model.

MAIN RESULTS

This update has not identified any new studies for inclusion. The review includes 14 trials (525 participants), 7 were placebo-controlled, and 7 compared diuretics against other agents such as ACE inhibitors or digoxin. We analysed the data for mortality and for worsening heart failure. Mortality data were available in 3 of the placebo-controlled trials (202 participants). Mortality was lower for participants treated with diuretics than for placebo, odds ratio (OR) for death 0.24, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.07 to 0.83; P = 0.02. Admission for worsening heart failure was reduced in those taking diuretics in two trials (169 participants), OR 0.07 (95% CI 0.01 to 0.52; P = 0.01). In four trials comparing diuretics to active control (91 participants), diuretics improved exercise capacity in participants with CHF, difference in means WMD 0.72 , 95% CI 0.40 to 1.04; P < 0.0001.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

The available data from several small trials show that in patients with chronic heart failure, conventional diuretics appear to reduce the risk of death and worsening heart failure compared to placebo. Compared to active control, diuretics appear to improve exercise capacity.

Effects of hydrochlorothiazide on cardiac remodeling in a rat model of myocardial infarction-induced congestive heart failure

Heart failure is a major cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Diuretics are regarded as the first-line treatment for patients with heart failure because they provide symptomatic relief. However, the specific benefits of diuretics and their effects on heart failure survival remain unclear. This study was designed to investigate the potential of hydrochlorothiazide to improve cardiac remodeling compared with spironolactone. Heart failure was produced by ligation of the left anterior descending coronary artery in male Sprague-Dawley rats. Two weeks after coronary artery ligation, 55 rats were randomly divided into four groups: sham-operated group (n=10), control group (n=15), hydrochlorothiazide group (12.5 mg/kg/day, n=15) and spironolactone group (20 mg/kg/day, n=15). Cardiac function was assessed by echocardiography and Millar catheter after treatment with drugs for 8 weeks. Compared with the control group, ejection fraction and left ventricular end-systolic pressure were significantly improved in the hydrochlorothiazide and spironolactone treatment groups (P<0.05). In addition, hydrochlorothiazide and spironolactone reduced collagen volume fraction and proinflammatory cytokine levels. Moreover, gene and protein expression of TGF-β1, Smad2, Smad3 and Smad7 (P<0.05) were also reduced. Nevertheless, no significant differences were observed between the hydrochlorothiazide and spironolactone groups. These results suggest that hydrochlorothiazide improves cardiac remodeling as effectively as spironolactone by reducing proinflammatory cytokine levels and inhibiting the TGF-β signaling pathway in post-myocardial infarction congestive heart failure. Moreover, the effects of the drugs on the TGF-β signaling pathway are likely to result from inhibited TGF-β and R-Smads expression rather than increased Inhibitory-Smad7 expression.

Diuretics for heart failure

BACKGROUND

Chronic heart failure is a major cause of morbidity and mortality world-wide. Diuretics are regarded as the first-line treatment for patients with congestive heart failure since they provide symptomatic relief. The effects of diuretics on disease progression and survival remain unclear.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the harms and benefits of diuretics for chronic heart failure

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (Issue 2 2004), MEDLINE 1966-2004, EMBASE 1980-2004 and HERDIN database. We hand searched pertinent journals and reference lists of papers were inspected. We also contacted manufacturers and researchers in the field.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Only double-blinded randomised controlled trials of diuretic therapy comparing one diuretic with placebo, or one diuretic with another active agent (e.g. ACE inhibitors, digoxin) in patients with chronic heart failure were eligible for inclusion.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two reviewers independently abstracted the data and assessed the eligibility and methodological quality of each trial. Extracted data were entered into the Review Manager 4.2 computer software, and analysed by determining the odds ratio for dichotomous data, and difference in means for continuous data, of the treated group compared with controls. The likelihood of heterogeneity of the study population was assessed by the Chi-square test. If there was no evidence of statistical heterogeneity and pooling of results was clinically appropriate, a combined estimate was obtained using the fixed-effects model.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 14 trials (525 participants), 7 were placebo-controlled, and 7 compared diuretics against other agents such as ACE inhibitors or digoxin. We analysed the data for mortality and for worsening heart failure. Mortality data were available in 3 of the placebo-controlled trials (202 participants). Mortality was lower for participants treated with diuretics than for placebo, odds ratio (OR) for death 0.24, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.07 to 0.83; P = 0.02. Admission for worsening heart failure was reduced in those taking diuretics in two trials (169 participants), OR 0.07 (95% CI 0.01 to 0.52; P = 0.01). In four trials comparing diuretics to active control (91 participants), diuretics improved exercise capacity in participants with CHF, difference in means WMD 0.72 , 95% CI 0.40 to 1.04; P < 0.0001.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

The available data from several small trials show that in patients with chronic heart failure, conventional diuretics appear to reduce the risk of death and worsening heart failure compared to placebo. Compared to active control, diuretics appear to improve exercise capacity.

The increase in serum uric acid concentration caused by diuretics might be beneficial in heart failure

Patients with mild-moderate chronic heart failure (CHF) often have raised levels of serum uric acid (UA). This is due, amongst other factors, to reduced UA excretion by the kidneys, which is partly explained by restriction of sodium intake and treatment with diuretics. The decline in renal function that parallels worsening cardiac function also contributes to elevated serum UA in patients with advanced CHF. However, UA production also appears to be augmented in CHF. Because UA scavenges various reactive oxygen species, diuretic-induced elevations in serum UA could be beneficial in patients with CHF. This concept is supported by the superior performance of antihypertensive therapy with diuretics in preventing heart failure. The present hypothesis may be tested by examining the effects of add-on treatment with a thiazide-type diuretic on morbidity and mortality, or surrogate variables, in asymptomatic patients with left ventricular dysfunction but without fluid retention.

Diuretic usage in heart failure: a continuing conundrum in 2005

Several large well-designed clinical trials have shown that the use of diuretics is beneficial in patients with hypertension. However, similarly robust data regarding their role in chronic heart failure are lacking. Historically, diuretics were developed for treatment of sodium and water retention in oedematous disorders and clinically, they remain the most potent drugs available to relieve symptoms and eliminate oedema in the congested patient with heart failure. In the non-congested patient, however, diuretics continue to be used on a purely clinical basis without sufficient characterization of benefits, adverse effects, and potential influence on mortality. There are also concerns that chronic diuretic usage can cause adverse vascular effects, unfavourable neuroendocrine activation, electrolyte imbalances, and life-threatening arrhythmias. In this article, we review the limited evidence available regarding the benefits and perils of using diuretics in heart failure.

Diuretics in the treatment of patients who present congestive heart failure and hypertension

The main operational objective of diuretic therapy in patients who present congestive heart failure and hypertension is to reduce or to suppress excess bodily fluid. Effective diuretic therapy decreases cardiac size when the heart is dilated, and it reduces lung congestion and excess water. Consequently, external respiratory work diminishes and cardiac output would be redistributed in favour of systemic vascular beds other than that of the respiratory muscles; dyspnoea decreases markedly and there is a slight reduction in fatigue. This clinical improvement and the fall in body weight caused by diuretics entail an increase in effort capacity. Subsequent exercise training ameliorates the abnormal ventilatory response to physical effort and the skeletal muscle myopathy that occur in heart failure, and thereby it attenuates dyspnoea and decreases fatigue further. Loop and/or thiazide-type diuretics may be used to augment natriuresis in patients with congestive heart failure and hypertension. The state of renal function, the existence of certain co-morbid conditions, potential untoward drug actions, and possible interactions of diuretics with nutrients and with other drugs are some of the factors that must be considered at the time of deciding on the diuretic drug(s) and dose(s) to be prescribed. Spironolactone has been found to increase life expectancy and to reduce hospitalisation frequency when added to the conventional therapeutic regimen of patients with advanced congestive heart failure and systolic dysfunction. Therefore, spironolactone should be the drug of choice to oppose the kaliuretic effect of a loop or of a thiazide-type diuretic.

Current evidence supporting the role of diuretics in heart failure: a meta analysis of randomised controlled trials

OBJECTIVE

To summarise the current evidence from randomised controlled trials for diuretics in patients with congestive heart failure (CHF).

DATA SOURCES

English-language randomised controlled trials and review papers referenced in Medline, Embase between 1966 and 1999. General literature review of pertinent journals was carried out and reference lists of papers were inspected.

REVIEW METHOD

STUDY DESIGN

Meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials of diuretic therapy in patients with CHF.

STUDY SELECTION

Studies were included if they were randomised comparisons of loop or thiazide diuretics and control, or one diuretic and another active agent (e.g. ACE inhibitors, ibopamine and digoxin).

DATA ABSTRACTION

Using a standardised protocol, two reviewers independently abstracted the data and assessed the methodological quality of each paper.

DATA SYNTHESIS

The odds ratio (OR) of treated group compared with control was estimated for each end-point outcome and plotted against each other using the fixed-effects model. THE MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcomes of our analysis were effects of diuretics on mortality and morbidity.

RESULTS

Eighteen trials met our criteria and were eligible for analysis, involving 928 patients. Eight trials were placebo-controlled. We analysed the data for mortality and for worsening heart failure. A further ten trials compared diuretics against other agents such as ACE inhibitors, ibopamine, and digoxin. Mortality data were available in three of the placebo-controlled trials (n=221); the mortality rate was lower for patients treated with diuretics than for control [the odds ratio for death, 0.25; 95% confidence intervals (CI), 0.07-0.84; P=0.03]. Admissions for worsening heart failure in the four small trials (n=448) showed an odds ratio of 0.31 (95% CI 0.15-0.62; P=0.001). In six studies of diuretics compared to active control, diuretics significantly improved exercise capacity in patients with CHF [OR: 0.37; CI: 0.10-0.64, P=0.007].

CONCLUSION

Compared to active control, diuretics appear to reduce the risk of worsening disease and improve exercise capacity. The available data from small studies show that in CHF conventional diuretics reduce the risk of death and worsening heart failure compared to placebo.

Effects of spironolactone on exercise capacity and neurohormonal factors in patients with heart failure treated with loop diuretics and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor

1. Treatment with spironolactone is reported to be useful when combined with loop diuretics and an angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor in severe congestive heart failure (CHF). However, the effects of the addition of spironolactone on exercise capacity and neurohormonal variables have not been demonstrated. This study determined the effects of additive spironolactone on exercise capacity and neurohormonal factors in patients with mild CHF. 2. Oxygen uptake (VO2), plasma norepinephrine (NE), renin activity (PRA), angiotensin II (AII), aldosterone (ALD), and atrial natriuretic peptide (ANP) were measured at rest and after peak exercise in nine patients with CHF (six idiopathic and three ischemic cardiomyopathy; New York Heart Association (NYHA) classes II and III) who were already taking furosemide (mean 29 +/- 5 mg/day) and enalapril (mean 4.7 +/- 0.8 mg/day). Studies were repeated after 16 weeks of treatment with additive single daily dose of 25 mg of spironolactone. In four of nine patients, the exercise test was repeated after a 4-weeks washout of spironolactone. 3. Treatment with spironolactone caused natriuresis, decreased cardiothoracic ratio in chest X-ray (before vs. after treatment: 53.7 +/- 1.2 vs. 50.7 +/- 1.4%, P < 0.01), and improved NYHA functional class. Peak VO2 (17.1 +/- 1.6 vs. 17.5 +/- 2.2 ml/min/kg, NS) and heart rate and blood pressure responses to exercise were not altered. Resting NE (215 +/- 41 vs. 492 +/- 85 pg/ml, P < 0.01) and resting PRA (8.2 +/- 2.3 vs. 16.2 +/- 4.1 ng/ml/hr, P < 0.01) as well as peak NE (1618 +/- 313 vs. 2712 +/- 374 pg/ml, P < 0.01) and peak PRA (12.8 +/- 3.2 vs. 28.1 +/- 11.8 ng/ml/hr, P = 0.17) were augmented after additive spironolactone. ALD and AII were insignificantly increased, and ANP was insignificantly decreased at peak exercise after spironolactone treatment. Spironolactone washout was associated with a trend of the neurohormones to return toward pretreatment values. 4. In conclusion, chronic additive treatment with spironolactone was associated with neurohormonal activation both at rest and during exercise without changing the exercise capacity of patients with mild CHF who were already on loop diuretics and ACE inhibitor therapy.

Central hemodynamic effects of diuretic therapy in chronic heart failure

In chronic heart failure diuretic drugs improve central hemodynamic variables and cardiac pumping secondary to altered plasma and extracellular volumes; humoral markers of these changes include increased plasma renin and aldosterone levels. The latter increases are maximal over the first week but decline with chronic therapy. The plasma alpha-ANP levels show a reciprocal effect; these data are compatible with a rapid contraction of the plasma volume which is sustained during chronic therapy. The acute hemodynamic actions of diuretic agents reflect both immediate and direct vascular actions and also effects secondary to diuresis (volume redistribution). At rest substantial reductions in pulmonary "wedge" pressure (-29%), with a consequent fall in cardiac output (-10%), are described. Total systemic vascular resistance initially increases but "reverse autoregulation" over subsequent weeks returns this elevation gradually towards control values. Tolerance to these initial hemodynamic effects does not occur with maintained therapy; moreover, echocardiographic markers of contractility and exercise capacity may increase. The early venodilator effects of diuretic drugs can be attributed to prostaglandin release and the initial pressor actions to activation of the renin angiotensin system; these vascular actions may have limited relevance to long-term beneficial effects on hemodynamics. Direct pulmonary vasodilation and improved pulmonary compliance remain an interesting finding. Although most patients are both symptomatically and hemodynamically improved at rest, the actions during exercise are more varied. Some individuals with severely impaired left ventricular function show little hemodynamic improvement, whereas those with milder dysfunction usually benefit; in the main this is probably related to the latter being on a steeper cardiac function curve.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)