Abnormalities in the sequence of filling and emptying of mesenteric arteries and veins: a guide to ischemic disease of the bowel

Radiology in intestinal ischemia. Angiographic diagnosis and management

Angiography is an essential component of the diagnosis and treatment of patients with acute and chronic intestinal ischemia. Aortography and selective angiography permit identification of the cause and precise anatomy of intestinal ischemic syndromes, and also help plan their potential correction. Direct intra-arterial infusion of pharmacologic agents into splanchnic vessels has now become part of the therapy of these conditions. This article reviews angiographic techniques and their applications in the management of intestinal ischemic syndromes.

Venous mesenteric infarction: a particular entity

Ninety-eight patients with documented mesenteric infarction during a 19-year period were reviewed. In 13 patients infarction was due to a mesenteric venous thrombosis (MVT). Patients with MVT distinguished themselves from those having another aetiology by: (1) longer history of pain before admission (median 8 days, P less than 0.0001); (2) typical appearance of the bowel at laparotomy (10/13); (3) a localized segment of ischaemic jejunum or ileum of less than 120 cm in length (12/13) allowing better operability at the first laparotomy (P = 0.006). In hospital the mortality was lower for venous mesenteric infarction (5/13, 38 per cent) than for mesenteric infarction of other aetiologies (70/85, 82 per cent) (P = 0.002). Patients with primary venous mesenteric infarction showed a better survival rate (one death in eight patients) than patients with associated diseases such as liver cirrhosis, sepsis or previous operation who had a poor prognosis with a mortality comparable to other aetiologies of acute bowel ischaemia (four deaths in five patients). Since the high recurrence rate of this disease in the early postoperative period was due to residual venous thrombosis and to a hypercoagulable state, a wide bowel resection is recommended followed by early and long-term anticoagulation. Thrombectomy is probably inefficient since it removes only centrally located thrombi and leaves peripheral occlusion, which is responsible for the recurrence.

Abdominal pain, atherosclerosis, and atrial fibrillation. The case for mesenteric ischemia

DT, a 63-year-old white male with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus and severe peripheral vascular disease, was admitted with a five-day history of vague abdominal pain and diarrhea. On the day of admission he vomited three times, was noted to have a bloody stool, and came to the emergency room. DT denied hematemesis, fever, or chills. He had bilateral leg amputations and had sustained three myocardial infarctions, the last one 15 months before this admission. He had never experienced symptoms of abdominal angina. Of significance was his history of congestive heart failure, mitral regurgitation, and atrial fibrillation. His medications on admission included digoxin 0.25mg per day, furosemide 40mg per day, and NPH insulin 15 units per day. On admission to the hospital his oral temperature was 38 degrees C, pulse was 90/min, respiratory rate was 24/min, and blood pressure was 134/80mmHg. Abdominal examination revealed a distended abdomen with hypoactive bowel sounds and mild tenderness. Chest x ray revealed cardiomegaly. The electrocardiogram demonstrated atrial fibrillation. A plain film of the abdomen was positive for gallstones and edema of the bowel wall (thumb-printing). Laboratory results included blood urea nitrogen 48mg%, creatinine 1.2mg%, hemoglobin 18g/dl, and hematocrit 52.9%. White blood cell count was 11,900 cells/cc with 33% polymorphonuclear leukocytes, 47% bands, 8% lymphocytes, 11% monocytes, and 1% atypical lymphocytes. The prime considerations for differential diagnosis were mesenteric ischemia and infectious gastroenteritis. While it was appreciated that mesenteric ischemia, if present, might warrant surgical intervention, the risk of anesthesia itself in this patient was felt by his attending physicians to exceed 30%. Furthermore, the clinical findings were only "suggestive" of mesenteric eschemia. They were certainly not "diagnostic." In view of this dilemma, a consultation with the Division of Clinical Decision Making was requested.