Elevation of serum xanthine oxidase activity following halothane anesthesia in man

The Use of Biomarkers as Alternatives to Current Animal Tests on Food Chemicals

Recent developments in biomarkers relating to the interrelationship of diet, disease and health were surveyed. Most emphasis was placed on biomarkers of deleterious effects, since these are of greatest relevance to the subject of this review. The area of greatest activity was found to be that relating to biomarkers of mutagenic, genotoxic and carcinogenic effects. This is also one of the major areas of concern in considerations of the beneficial and deleterious effects of dietary components, and also the area in which regulatory testing requires studies of the longest duration. A degree of progress has also been made in the identification and development of biomarkers relating to certain classes of target organ toxicity. Biomarkers for other types of toxicity, such as immunotoxicity, neurotoxicity, reproductive toxicity and developmental toxicity, are less developed, and further investigation in these areas is required before a comprehensive biomarker strategy can be established. A criticism that recurs constantly in the biomarker literature is the lack of standardisation in the methods used, and the lack of reference standards for the purposes of validation and quality control. It is encouraging to note the growing acknowledgement of the need for validation of biomarkers and biomarker assays. Some validation studies have already been initiated. This review puts forward proposals for criteria to be used in biomarker validation. More discussion on this subject is required. It is concluded that the use of biomarkers can, in some cases, facilitate the implementation of the Three Rs with respect to the testing of food chemicals and studies on the effects of diet on health. The greatest potential is seen to be in the refinement of animal testing, in which biomarkers could serve as early and sensitive endpoints, in order to reduce the duration of the studies and also reduce the number of animals required. Biomarkers could also contribute to establishing a mechanistic basis for in vitro test systems and to facilitating their validation and acceptance. Finally, the increased information that could result from the incorporation of biomarker determinations into population studies could reduce the need for supplementary animal studies. This review makes a number of recommendations concerning the prioritisation of future activities on dietary biomarkers in relation to the Three Rs. It is emphasised, however, that further discussions will be required among toxicologists, epidemiologists and others researching the relationship between diet and health.

Therapeutic effects of xanthine oxidase inhibitors: renaissance half a century after the discovery of allopurinol

The prototypical xanthine oxidase (XO) inhibitor allopurinol, has been the cornerstone of the clinical management of gout and conditions associated with hyperuricemia for several decades. More recent data indicate that XO also plays an important role in various forms of ischemic and other types of tissue and vascular injuries, inflammatory diseases, and chronic heart failure. Allopurinol and its active metabolite oxypurinol showed considerable promise in the treatment of these conditions both in experimental animals and in small-scale human clinical trials. Although some of the beneficial effects of these compounds may be unrelated to the inhibition of the XO, the encouraging findings rekindled significant interest in the development of additional, novel series of XO inhibitors for various therapeutic indications. Here we present a critical overview of the effects of XO inhibitors in various pathophysiological conditions and also review the various emerging therapeutic strategies offered by this approach.

Serum xanthine oxidase in human liver disease

OBJECTIVES

High concentrations of serum xanthine oxidase (XO) have been reported during human liver disease and hepatocyte injury in experimental settings. However, it is unclear whether this elevation reflects hepatocyte necrosis or has a different meaning.

METHODS

The serum level of XO in 64 patients with chronic liver disease (17 patients with cirrhosis, 30 with chronic hepatitis, and 17 with cholestatic disorders) and in 12 control subjects was determined by a competitive ELISA. Conventional serum markers of liver damage were assessed in all patients, and grading and staging were scored in the chronic hepatitis group according to Knodell.

RESULTS

The XO serum levels were significantly higher in the patients than in the controls. The differences were also significant when controls were compared to patients with chronic hepatitis and cholestatic disorders separately, but not when compared to the cirrhosis group. Patients with cholestatic disorders had XO values higher than those of patients with cirrhosis or chronic hepatitis. XO levels did not correlate with stage and grade in chronic hepatitis group. We found a weak but significant positive correlation in patients between XO serum level and gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase (r = 0.37). This correlation was stronger when chronic hepatitis (r = 0.42) and, especially cholestatic disorders (r = 0.71), were separately tested, but was absent in the cirrhosis group. The XO values positively correlated with alkaline phosphatase in patients with cholestatic disorders. A level of serum XO >32 microg/ml specifically identified cholestatic disorders in our study population.

CONCLUSIONS

A marked elevation of serum XO in patients with chronic liver disease seems to reflect the presence of cholestasis. No correlation between XO levels and histological or serum evidence of hepatocyte necrosis was found in these patients.

Determination of xanthine oxidase in human serum by a competitive enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)

Xanthine oxidase was purified from human milk and used to immunise rabbits. A competitive immunoenzymatic assay with purified enzyme and rabbit antiserum was optimised to measure xanthine oxidase in human serum, the lowest detectable amount being 0.03 pmol of enzymatic protein. Thus, the test (i) is sensitive enough to determine xanthine oxidase in human serum, being more sensitive than the spectrophotometric method, (ii) it is more convenient for clinical laboratories than other sensitive tests and (iii) it has the advantage over the enzyme activity-based assays of also detecting inactive enzyme molecules. A competitive enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) was used to measure the serum xanthine oxidase level in healthy donors and in patients with liver diseases, and it was found that any concentration below 1 mg/L is in the normal range.

Determination of human plasma xanthine oxidase activity by high-performance liquid chromatography

An assay for human plasma xanthine oxidase activity was developed with pterin as the substrate and the separation of product (isoxanthopterin) by high-performance liquid chromatography with a fluorescence detector. The reaction mixture consists of 60 microliters of plasma and 240 microliters of 0.2 M Tris-HCl buffer (pH 9.0) containing 113 microM pterin. With this assay, the activity of plasma xanthine oxidase could be easily determined despite its low activity. As a result, it could be demonstrated that the intravenous administration of heparin or the oral administration of ethanol did not increase plasma xanthine oxidase activity in normal subjects, and also that plasma xanthine oxidase activity was higher in patients with hepatitis C virus infection than in healthy subjects or patients with gout. In addition, a single patient with von Gierke's disease showed a marked increase in the plasma activity of this enzyme, relative to that apparent in normal subjects.