Postoperative prophylaxis with norfloxacin in patients requiring bladder catheters

A Pilot Study on Prevention of Catheter-Related Urinary Tract Infections with Fluoroquinolones

The objective of this multicenter, randomized, controlled, parallel group trial was to evaluate the efficacy of levofloxacin 250 mg oral, once daily (LVFX), placebo one tablet oral once daily (Placebo [P] group) and ciprofloxacin (CPFX) 500 mg oral, twice daily (single blind), prophylaxis in preventing bacteriuria (> or = 10(3) CFU/ml) in post-surgical catheterized patients. In the modified intention-to-treat (M-ITT) population of the 82 enrolled patients, negative bacteriuria was observed in 92% of LVFX group, in 80% of P group and in 100% of CPFX group while in the per-protocol (PP) population figures were: 100%, 86.4% and 100% respectively. Only one symptomatic urinary tract infection and one surgical wound infection were observed in the P group. Both drugs were well tolerated, showing a safety profile comparable to placebo. The high frequency of negative bacteriuria in the placebo group sounds encouraging as it underlines that the adoption of closed urinary drainage system catheters in hospital setting may reduce the frequency of hospital-acquired infections.

Antibiotic prophylaxis for short-term catheter bladder drainage in adults

BACKGROUND

Urinary tract infections account for about 40% of hospital-acquired (nosocomial) infections, and about 80% of urinary tract infections acquired in hospital are associated with urinary catheters.

OBJECTIVES

To determine if certain antibiotic prophylaxes are better than others in terms of prevention of urinary tract infections, complications, quality of life and cost-effectiveness in short-term catheterisation in adults.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Incontinence Group Specialised Register, which contains trials identified from the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE and MEDLINE in Process, and handsearching of journals and conference proceedings (searched 31st October 2012). Additionally, we examined all reference lists of identified trials.

SELECTION CRITERIA

All randomised and quasi-randomised trials comparing antibiotic prophylaxis for short-term (up to and including 14 days) catheterisation in adults.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Data were independently extracted by all review authors and compared. Disagreements were resolved by discussion. Data were processed as described in the Cochrane Handbook for Systemtic Reviews of Interventions. Where data had not been fully reported, clarification was sought directly from the authors of the trial.

MAIN RESULTS

Six parallel-group randomised controlled trials with 789 participants met the inclusion criteria. All six trials compared antibiotic prophylaxis versus no prophylaxis. Studies presented a low to unclear risk of bias with similar interventions and measured outcomes.The primary outcome of bacteriuria was less common in the prophylaxis group amongst surgical patients with asymptomatic bacteriuria (I(2) = 0; risk ratio (RR) 0.20; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.13 to 0.31) . Two non-surgical studies could not be combined in a meta-analysis due to heterogeneity and only one showed significantly fewer cases of bacteriuria (RR 0.19; 95% CI 0.09 to 0.37).Two trials of surgical patients with asymptomatic bacteriuria only (255 participants) compared one type of antibiotic prophylaxis with another and neither study showed a significant difference in cases of bacteriuria.One study (78 participants) compared antibiotic prophylaxis in patients at catheterisation only versus antibiotic prophylaxis throughout catheterisation period with asymptomatic bacteriuria. Antibiotics at catheterisation only, resulted in significantly fewer cases of bacteriuria than giving prophylaxis throughout the catheterisation period (RR 0.29 95% CI 0.09 to 0.91).Secondary data of pyuria were provided by two surgical studies (255 participants). When studies were pooled, pyuria occurred in significantly fewer cases in the prophylactic antibiotic group (RR 0.23, 95% CI 0.13 to 0.42). The number of gram-negative isolates in patients' urine just before catheter removal in one study (RR 0.05, 95% CI 0.00 to 0.79) and six weeks after hospital discharge (RR 0.36, 95% CI 0.23 to 0.56) were significantly lower. There were no events in the treatment group before catheter removal. When pooled data from two studies showed significantly reduced febrile morbidity in those receiving antibiotic prophylaxis (RR 0.53 95% CI 0.31 to 0.89).Although all studies assessed micro-organisms isolated from the urine specimens the data were too heterogenous to pool in a meta-analysis and have been provided in a narrative form. Further secondary data such as economic analysis, length of stay and quality of life were not covered in detail.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

The limited evidence indicated that receiving prophylactic antibiotics reduced the rate of bacteriuria and other signs of infection, such as pyuria, febrile morbidity and gram-negative isolates in patients' urine, in surgical patients who undergo bladder drainage for at least 24 hours postoperatively. There was also limited evidence that prophylactic antibiotics reduced bacteriuria in non-surgical patients.

Urinary Tract Infections in Extended Care Facilities: Preventive Management Strategies

OBJECTIVE

To provide health care professionals with an overview of interventions that may be done to reduce the incidence of urinary tract infections (UTIs) in elderly patients, especially those residing in extended care facilities.

DATA SOURCES

A Medline search of the English literature was performed from 1980 to January 2006 to find literature relevant to urinary tract prophylaxis. Further references were hand-searched from relevant sources.

STUDY SELECTION

When assessing the effectiveness of various clinical interventions for reducing the incidence of UTIs in the elderly, preference was given to more recent, double-blind, placebo-controlled randomized studies, but studies of less robust design also were included in the discussions when the former were lacking.

DATA EXTRACTION

Where possible, recent publications were favored over older studies. References were all reviewed by the authors and chosen to present key citations.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Data selection was prioritized to address specific subtopics.

CONCLUSION

Though still frequent in occurrence and quite costly in terms of morbidity, mortality, and cost to the health care system, numerous measures may be taken to ameliorate the incidence of UTIs in elderly, institutionalized residents. First and foremost, establishing and adhering to good infection-control practices by health care givers and minimizing the use of indwelling catheters are essential. Adequate staffing and training are germane to this effort. Reasonably well-designed clinical studies also give credence to the use of topical estrogens and lactobacillus "probiotics" for female subgroups and cranberry juice for a wider array of patients. Vitamin C is of no proven benefit. With regard to antibiotics, with the relative paucity of data available for this patient population, concerns for resistance proliferation must be balanced against perceived gains in UTI reduction.

Health-Care–Associated Infections and Prevention

Health-care-associated infections (HAIs) are an important cause of perioperative morbidity and mortality. Currently, one out of every 10 surgical patients develops an HAI. Causes of HAIs vary, but include the transient immunodeficiency associated with surgery,immobility, and the presence of indwelling devices. With rates of antimicrobial resistance increasing, prevention remains the best solution. The investigators review the most frequently encountered health-care-associated infections with an emphasis on preventative strategies. The article addresses issues related to the diagnosis,treatment, and prevention of health-care-related pneumonia,health-care-associated urinary tract infections, and intravascular-catheter-related infections. The article also discusses the utility of hand hygiene policies.

Antibiotic policies for short-term catheter bladder drainage in adults

BACKGROUND

Urinary tract infections account for about 40% of hospital-acquired (nosocomial) infections, and about 80% of urinary tract infections acquired in hospital are associated with urinary catheters.

OBJECTIVES

To determine if certain antibiotic policies are better than others in terms of prevention of urinary tract infections, complications, quality of life and cost-effectiveness in short-term catheterised adults.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Incontinence Group Specialised Register (searched 20 December 2004). Additionally, we examined all reference lists of identified trials.

SELECTION CRITERIA

All randomised and quasi-randomised trials comparing antibiotic policies for short-term (up to and including 14 days) catheterization in adults.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Data were extracted by both reviewers independently and compared. Disagreements were resolved by discussion. Data were processed as described in the Cochrane Handbook. If data had not been fully reported, clarification was sought directly from the authors of the trial.

MAIN RESULTS

Six parallel-group randomised controlled trials met the inclusion criteria. In one trial comparing antibiotic prophylaxis with giving antibiotics when clinically indicated amongst female surgical patients who had a urethral catheter for more than 24 hours, symptomatic urinary tract infection was less common in the prophylaxis group (RR 0.20, 95% CI 0.06 to 0.66). Five trials compared antibiotic prophylaxis with giving antibiotics when microbiologically indicated, bacteriuria, pyuria and gram-negative isolates in patients' urine were less common in the prophylaxis group amongst surgical patients with bladder drainage for at least 24 hours postoperatively. Bacteriuria rates were also about five-fold lower in the prophylaxis group in trials involving urological surgery patients and non-surgical patients. No trial compared giving antibiotics when microbiologically indicated with giving antibiotics when clinically indicated.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

There was weak evidence that antibiotic prophylaxis compared to giving antibiotics when clinically indicated reduced the rate of symptomatic urinary tract infection in female patients with abdominal surgery and a urethral catheter for 24 hours. The limited evidence indicated that receiving antibiotics during the first three postoperative days or from postoperative day two until catheter removal reduced the rate of bacteriuria and other signs of infection such as pyuria and gram-negative isolates in patients urine in surgical patients with bladder drainage for at least 24 hours postoperatively. There was also limited evidence that prophylactic antibiotics reduced bacteriuria in non-surgical patients.

A pilot randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial on the use of antibiotics on urinary catheter removal to reduce the rate of urinary tract infection: the pitfalls of ciprofloxacin

OBJECTIVE

To assess if a short course of antibiotics starting at the time of the removing a short-term urethral catheter decreases the incidence of subsequent urinary tract infection (UTI).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients across specialities with a urethral catheter in situ for >/= 48 h and </= 7 days were recruited at the time of catheter removal. Patients were excluded if they had had recent genitourinary surgery or were on antibiotics. Eligible patients were randomly assigned to a 48-h course of either ciprofloxacin or placebo tablets starting 2 h before catheter removal. A catheter specimen of urine was obtained before the start of the trial medication. The follow-up was at 7 and 14 days after catheter removal, with a questionnaire for UTI symptoms, and a mid-stream urine sample was taken.

RESULTS

Forty-eight patients were recruited and had a complete follow-up (25 received ciprofloxacin and 23 placebo). Of the ciprofloxacin group, four patients (16%) had a UTI at the follow-up after catheter removal, and two were symptomatic. The UTI in two patients (including one of those symptomatic) was newly developed after catheter removal; the other two UTIs were a result of failure to resolve a catheter-associated UTI. All these UTIs in the ciprofloxacin group were resistant to ciprofloxacin. Of the placebo group, three patients (13%) had a UTI at the follow-up after removal, and one patient was symptomatic. The UTI, newly developed after catheter removal, was resistant to ciprofloxacin. The other two patients were asymptomatic; their UTIs were a result of failure to resolve a catheter-associated UTI, and one was resistant to ciprofloxacin.

CONCLUSIONS

The risk of UTI (both symptomatic and asymptomatic) after removing a urethral catheter is real, even in absence of catheter-associated UTI before removal. UTIs occurring after removing a short-term urinary catheter had a high rate of resistance to ciprofloxacin. There was no detectable significant benefit in using prophylactic ciprofloxacin to reduce the UTI rate after catheter removal.

Biofilms and catheter-associated urinary tract infections

Urinary catheter-related infections are commonly seen in several different patient populations and lead to substantial morbidity. The overall health care costs caused by these infections are sizable given how often urinary catheters are used in acute care settings, extended care facilities, and in persons with injured spinal cords. Recent attention has appropriately focused on biofilm development on the catheter surface because biofilm has important implications for the pathogenesis, treatment, and prevention of catheter-related infection. Because the most important risk factor for infection is duration of catheterization, indwelling urethral catheterization should be avoided or at least limited whenever possible. Additional methods to prevent this infection include aseptic insertion and maintenance use of a closed drainage system, anti-infective catheters in patients at high-risk for infection, and systemic antibiotics in select patients. Alternative urinary collection strategies may be appropriate in certain patient groups. Specifically, condom catheters should be considered in men likely to be adherent with this urinary collection method, suprapubic catheters should be considered in patients requiring long-term indwelling drainage, and intermittent catheterization seems appropriate in patients with injured spinal cords. Future research should focus on additional methods for preventing this common infection.

Impact of hospital-wide surveillance on hospital-acquired infections in an acute-care hospital in the Netherlands

The goal of surveillance is to identify hospital-acquired infections (HAI) and risk factors, to apply targeted interventions and to evaluate their effect in an ongoing system. Continuing active surveillance in a 270-bed acute-care hospital is being performed on clinical patients, excluding day-care. The period 1984-1997 is described here. Specific surveillance-based interventions included the introduction of antimicrobial prophylaxis in gynaecology patients with postoperative urinary tract catheters and inpatients scheduled for appendicectomy and hysterectomy. General measures included education, implementation of protocols, feedback of surgeon-specific infection rates. In total, 3545 HAI were found in 13 years of surveillance. The incidence was 4.7/100 admissions and 4. 5/1000 patient days. Age-specific incidences ranged from 1.3 in the age-category 1-14 years, to 10.2 in patients aged 75 years and above. If age-specific incidences had remained at their 1984 level, over 3000 additional infections would have occurred, affecting all age groups except those up to 14 years. The distribution of types of infections differed between services. Following the targeted interventions, the rate of infections in gynaecology decreased from 19.4 per 1000 patient days in 1984 to 2.4 per 1000 patient days in 1996. The rates of wound infection following appendicectomy and hysterectomy decreased by 69% and 82%, respectively, in the period following the institution of antimicrobial prophylaxis. Over 4000 micro-organisms were isolated from the HAI; multi-resistant strains were isolated sporadically. We conclude that hospital-wide surveillance of hospital-acquired infections provides appropriate targets for interventions tailored to the specific needs of the hospital. The impact of such interventions can readily be documented from the surveillance data.

Use of norfloxacin for prevention of symptomatic urinary tract infection in chronically catheterized patients

Thirty-four elderly inpatients with long-term urethral catheters were randomly assigned to receive either norfloxacin (200 mg/day) or placebo in a double-blind study with cross-over after three months. Twenty-three patients completed the entire study. Norfloxacin treatment was associated with a persistent decrease in gram-negative isolates (p < 0.005) and the acquisition of gram-positive norfloxacin-resistant flora. It also resulted in a highly statistically significant reduction of symptomatic urinary tract infections (1 vs. 12, p < 0.02), a decrease in catheter-associated local complications, obstructions and leakage (p < 0.05) and an improvement in the patients' general condition (p < 0.001). In conclusion, within the conditions of the present study, long-term suppression of gram-negative bacteriuria by norfloxacin reduced the incidence of catheter-related urinary tract infection and associated morbidity.

Nosocomial catheter-associated bacteriuria: a clinical trial comparing two closed urinary drainage systems

We compared the time of onset and incidence of nosocomial bacteriuria between two different closed urinary drainage systems: a simple closed drainage system containing an antireflux valve ('Urias A-4') and a complex closed drainage system ('Curity Infection Control System') incorporating: (1) a preconnected, coated catheter, (2) a tamper discouraging seal at the catheter-drainage tubing junction, (3) a drip chamber, (4) an antireflux valve, (5) a hydrophobic drainage bag vent and (6) a povidone-iodine releasing cartridge in line with the outlet tube of the urine collection bag. 181 non-bacteriuric patients, requiring catheter drainage for more than 48 h, were assigned by chance to either of the two systems. Bacteriological monitoring of bladder urines of the enrolled patients was performed every 24 h by establishing viable counts and identification of all microorganisms. No differences in the onset and incidence of nosocomial bacteriuria between the two urine drainage system groups were noted. We conclude that additional complex features aimed at preventing intraluminal spread of bacteria did not reduce the risk of urinary tract infection, compared to a simple closed urinary drainage system.

Prophylactic ciprofloxacin for catheter-associated urinary-tract infection

Patients receiving antibiotics during bladder drainage have a lower incidence of urinary-tract infections compared with similar patients not on antibiotics. However, antibiotic prophylaxis in patients with a urinary catheter is opposed because of the fear of inducing resistant bacterial strains. We have done a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of prophylactic ciprofloxacin in selected groups of surgical patients who had postoperative bladder drainage scheduled to last for 3 to 14 days. Patients were randomly assigned to receive placebo (n = 61), 250 mg ciprofloxacin per day (n = 59), or 500 mg ciprofloxacin twice daily (n = 64) from postoperative day 2 until catheter removal. 75% of placebo patients were bacteriuric at catheter removal compared with 16% of ciprofloxacin-treated patients (relative risk [RR] [95% CI] 4.7 [3.0-7.4]). The prevalence of pyuria among placebo patients increased from 11% to 42% while the catheter was in place; by contrast, the rate of pyuria was 11% or less in patients receiving ciprofloxacin (RR 4.0 [2.1-7.3]). 20% of placebo patients had symptomatic urinary-tract infections, including 3 with septicaemia, compared with 5% of the ciprofloxacin groups (RR 4.0 [1.6-10.2]). Bacteria isolated from urines of placebo patients at catheter removal were mostly species of enterobacteriaceae (37%), staphylococci (26%), and Enterococcus faecalis (20%), whereas species isolated from urines of ciprofloxacin patients were virtually all gram-positive. Ciprofloxacin-resistant mutants of normally sensitive gram-negative bacteria were not observed. Ciprofloxacin prophylaxis is effective and safe in the prevention of catheter-associated urinary tract infection and related morbidity in selected groups of patients requiring 3 to 14 days of bladder drainage.

Impact of concurrent antimicrobial therapy on catheter-associated urinary tract infection

Results of a survey in two Dutch district hospitals which investigated the impact of concurrent administration of antibiotics on the incidence of catheter-associated urinary tract infection (UTI), showed that 61% of catheterized patients received antibiotics at some stage during bladder drainage. The use of antibiotics within 48 hours prior to catheter removal reduced the risk of bacteriuria fivefold. Multivariate analysis of patients who were catheterized for 3-14 days indicated that, apart from the duration of catheter employment, the use of antibiotics was the only variable significantly and independently associated with the development of bacteriuria. The power of this association varied inversely with increasing duration of catheterization but remained significant throughout the 3-14-day interval. Patients with bacteriuria at the time of catheter removal were more likely to have a febrile illness compared to those who remained free of catheter-associated UTI.