Chronotropic cardiac effects of histamine in the conscious dog with chronic atrioventricular block: interactions with the autonomic nervous system

Cardiac electrophysiological effects of propafenone and its 5-hydroxylated metabolite in the conscious dog

We studied the cardiac electrophysiological effects of propafenone and its 5-hydroxylated metabolite in conscious dogs. Sinus rate, corrected sinus recovery time and Wenckebach point were measured in 6 intact dogs. Atrial rate, ventricular rate and atrial effective refractory period were measured in 6 atrioventricular-blocked dogs. In both groups, we also determined blood pressure and plasma drug concentrations. Each dog received, with at least an 8-day interval, propafenone (hydrochloride) and 5-hydroxypropafenone (hydrochloride) in 4 successive intravenous injections, 30 min apart, at 0.5, 0.5, 1 and 2 mg kg(-1). Propafenone increased sinus rate and atrial rate more markedly than 5-hydroxypropafenone, and also transiently ventricular rate, whereas 5-hydroxypropafenone decreased it weakly. Propafenone shortened corrected sinus recovery time and increased Wenckebach point at the highest dose only, whereas 5-hydroxypropafenone did not modify corrected sinus recovery time and increased Wenckebach point less markedly than propafenone. Both drugs produced an identical atrial effective refractory period lengthening. Propafenone either increased mean blood pressure (in intact dogs) or decreased it (in atrioventricular-blocked dogs) at the highest dose only, whereas 5-hydroxypropafenone did not produce any effect on this parameter. Overall, these results show that propafenone and 5-hydroxypropafenone exhibit cardiac electrophysiological effects, reflecting (a) direct vagolytic action for both drugs associated with cardiodepressant effects for 5-hydroxypropafenone, and (b) marked atrial antiarrhythmic properties for 5-hydroxypropafenone probably involved in the therapeutic effect of propafenone.

Cardiac electrophysiological effects of falipamil in the conscious dog: comparison with alinidine

We studied the cardiac electrophysiological effects of falipamil, a specific bradycardic agent, in conscious dogs, in comparison with those of alinidine. Sinus rate, corrected sinus recovery time, and Wenckebach point were measured in six intact dogs. Atrial rate, ventricular rate, and atrial effective refractory period were measured in six atrioventricular-blocked dogs. In both groups, blood pressure was also monitored. Each dog received, with at least a three-day interval, falipamil (hydrochloride) and alinidine (hydrobromide) in four successive intravenous injections, 30 min apart, at 0.5, 0.5, 1, and 2 mg kg-1. Falipamil increased sinus rate and atrial rate, but decreased ventricular rate, whereas alinidine decreased sinus rate and ventricular rate, but increased atrial rate. Falipamil shortened corrected sinus recovery time and increased Wenckebach point, whereas alinidine lengthened corrected sinus recovery time and decreased Wenckebach point. Falipamil and alinidine increased atrial effective refractory period. Neither falipamil nor alinidine modified mean blood pressure in either group. Overall, these results show that (a) falipamil exhibits effects on the electrical activity of the heart, reflecting the predominant direct vagolytic effect of this drug, (b) alinidine exhibits effects reflecting the marked antiarrhythmic potential of this agent, and (c) thus indicate that two drugs with almost identical specific bradycardic properties can produce quite different electrophysiological effects in the conscious dog.

Interactions of the cardiac chronotropic effects of rilmenidine with the autonomic nervous system in conscious dogs: comparison with clonidine

1. The cardiac chronotropic effects of rilmenidine (10-100 micrograms kg-1) and clonidine (1-10 micrograms kg-1) were studied in conscious dogs with chronic atrioventricular block. 2. Rilmenidine and clonidine initially (< 3 min) decreased atrial rate, although the effect was not related to dose. More lastingly, ventricular rate was decreased in a dose-related manner (ratio, 1:21). Rilmenidine lowered mean blood pressure only at 100 micrograms kg-1, while clonidine had the same effect at doses of 5 micrograms kg-1 upward (ratio, 1:15). 3. When administered after atropine and pindolol, rilmenidine (50 micrograms kg-1) produced a decrease in atrial rate, with an identical intensity but longer duration than under basal conditions. When clonidine (2.5 micrograms kg-1) was given after atropine, no chronotropic atrial effect was observed. However, when clonidine (2.5 micrograms kg-1) was given after pindolol, it produced a decrease in atrial rate that was more marked, both in intensity and duration, than under basal conditions. After phenoxybenzamine, rilmenidine decreased atrial rate with a more marked and lasting effect than observed under basal conditions. Clonidine produced a bradycardic atrial effect identical to the basal effect. After yohimbine, rilmenidine and clonidine decreased atrial rate with an intensity similar to that under basal conditions, although the time course was totally different. 4. When given after atropine, rilmenidine (50 micrograms kg-1) and clonidine (2.5 micrograms kg-1) decreased ventricular rate as under basal conditions, whereas after pindolol and phenoxybenzamine, both drugs decreased ventricular rate less markedly than under basal conditions, both in intensity and duration. After yohimbine, rilmenidine and clonidine produced no chronotropic ventricular effect. 5. These results show that (a) the initial atrial bradycardia caused by rilmenidine results from both a decrease in sympathetic tone and an increase in cholinergic activity; while the effect of clonidine is caused mainly by the enhancement of cholinergic activity. For both drugs, alpha 2-adrenoceptors are involved at least in the initiation of the effect; (b) the very short duration of atrial bradycardia may result from reflex buffering in response to ventricular bradycardia. This buffering is less effective when heart rate was high; and (c) the ventricular bradycardia caused by both drugs is mainly the result of a decrease in sympathetic tone in response to the stimulation of alpha 2-adrenoceptors. The results also suggest that negative chronotropic postsynaptic alpha 2-adrenoceptors could be involved in the ventricular bradycardia.

Chronotropic cardiac effects of NPY in conscious dogs: interactions with the autonomic nervous system and putative NPY receptors

The chronotropic cardiac effects of neuropeptide Y (NPY) were studied in the conscious dog with chronic atrioventricular block. NPY (0.2-5 micrograms/kg i.v.) produced no effect on atrial cycle length (ACL), and increased ventricular cycle length (VCL) and mean arterial blood pressure (MBP). After atropine, NPY produced no effect on ACL and increased MBP. At 0.2 microgram/kg, it shortened VCL, whereas at 1 and 5 micrograms/kg, it lengthened this parameter. After pindolol, NPY produced no effect on ACL, shortened VCL and increased MBP. These results indicate that in the conscious dog, NPY (0.2-5 microgram/kg i.v.) does not exert any chronotropic effect on the sinoatrial node, most likely because of competition between opposite chronotropic effects and/or absence of specific NPY receptors in the sinoatrial node. They also suggest that the ventricular bradycardic effects produced by NPY result mainly from a reflex withdrawal of beta-adrenergic tone and that its ventricular tachycardic effects result from a direct action of NPY on specific receptors located in the His bundle.

Effects of bepridil, diltiazem and verapamil on atrial refractoriness and heart rate in the conscious dog: comparison with quinidine

1. Bepridil at cumulative doses between 1.25 and 8.75 mg/kg and quinidine between 2.5 and 17.5 mg/kg given in conscious dogs with chronic atrioventricular block and implanted atrial pacing electrodes, dose-relatedly lengthened atrial effective refractory period (AERP), as reflected by the decrease in maximal atrial frequency determined by pacing. 2. Diltiazem shortened AERP at 0.25 mg/kg and lengthened it at 1.75 mg/kg, but both effects were very slight. 3. Verapamil between 0.06 and 0.435 mg/kg did not alter AERP at all. 4. Except for diltiazem at 0.75 and 1.75 mg/kg and bepridil at 8.75 mg/kg, each dose of each drug increased atrial rate. Each drug produced an increase in ventricular rate and a short-lasting lowering in mean blood pressure. 5. Thus, these results indicate that bepridil exhibits more marked antiarrhythmic potentialities than quinidine and that the atrial and ventricular tachycardic effects observed are mainly baroreceptor reflex effects.