A comparison of maximum cystometric bladder capacity with maximum environmental voided volumes

Bladder Capacity in Women With Overactive Bladder Syndrome: A Cross-sectional Study

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate bladder capacity in women with idiopathic overactive bladder syndrome (OAB) through bladder diary, cystomanometry, and uroflowmetry and assess the concordance of the different measures of bladder capacity. A secondary objective is to describe the relationship between bladder capacity and urinary frequency in OAB patients.

METHODS

An observational cross-sectional multicentric study was conducted, including female patients diagnosed with idiopathic OAB. All participants underwent a urodynamic study and completed a 3-day bladder diary (3dBD). Different parameters were used to calculate bladder capacity: maximum cystometric capacity (MCC) assessed at the end of filling cystometry, voided volume (VV) during the uroflowmetry, maximum voided volume (VVmax), and average voided volume (VVmed), both assessed through the 3dBD. Reproducibility analysis was performed to assess the agreement among the different bladder capacity measures. Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and weighted Kappa index were used. Bladder capacity parameters were also assessed in relation to urinary frequency.

RESULTS

Bladder capacity measures were diminished in this population, except for VVmax. Poor correlation was found between the different bladder capacity variables (ICC and weighted Kappa index <0.4). Twenty-four-hour frequency and average VV present a weak negative linear relationship (Pearson coefficient -0.344).

CONCLUSION

MCC and average VV are reduced in OAB patients. MCC does not correlate well with functional bladder volumes determined by voiding diary in the OAB population.

Maximum Voided Volume Is a Better Clinical Parameter for Bladder Capacity Than Maximum Cystometric Capacity in Patients With Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms/Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: A Prospective Cohort Study

PURPOSE

Bladder capacity is an important parameter in the diagnosis of lower urinary tract dysfunction. We aimed to determine whether the maximum bladder capacity (MCC) measured during a urodynamic study was affected by involuntary detrusor contraction (IDC) in patients with Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms (LUTS)/Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia (BPH).

METHODS

Between March 2020 and April 2021, we obtained maximum voided volume (MVV) from a 3-day frequency-volume chart, MCC during filling cystometry, and maximum anesthetic bladder capacity (MABC) during holmium laser enucleation of the prostate under spinal or general anesthesia in 139 men with LUTS/BPH aged >50 years. Patients were divided according to the presence of IDC during filling cystometry. We assumed that the MABC is close to the true value of the MCC, as it is measured under the condition of minimizing neural influence over the bladder.

RESULTS

There was no difference in demographic and clinical characteristics between the non-IDC (n=20) and IDC groups (n=119) (mean age, 71.5±7.4) (P>0.05). The non-IDC group had greater bladder volume to feel the first sensation, first desire, and strong desire than the IDC group (P<0.001). In all patients, MABC and MVV were correlated (r=0.41, P<0.001); however, there was no correlation between MCC and MABC (r=0.19, P=0.02). There was no significant difference in MABC between the non-IDC and IDC groups (P=0.19), but MVV and MCC were significantly greater in the non-IDC group (P<0.001). There was no significant difference between MABC and MVV (MABC-MVV, P=0.54; MVV/MABC, P=0.07), but there was a significant difference between MABC and MCC between the non-IDC and IDC groups (MABC-MCC, P<0.001; MCC/MABC, P<0.001).

CONCLUSION

Maximum bladder capacity from a urodynamic study does not represent true bladder capacity because of involuntary contractions.

Correspondence of uroflowmetry and voiding diary in evaluation of voiding volume in children with lower urinary tract dysfunction

Background

Objective assessment of voided volumes in children with lower urinary tract dysfunction is important. This study aimed to compare and evaluate voided volumes obtained from a 48-h voiding diary and uroflowmetry in children with lower urinary tract dysfunction.

Methods

In this retrospective cohort study, voided volumes obtained by 48-h voiding diary and contemporaneous uroflowmetry were compared in terms of age, sex, and the three most common subtypes of lower urinary tract dysfunction (monosymptomatic nocturnal enuresis, overactive bladder, and dysfunctional voiding) in children. Patients were stratified according to voided volume differences between uroflowmetry and 48-h voiding diary.

Results

A total of 242 children were included in the study. Maximum and average voided volumes in uroflowmetry were higher than those in 48-h voiding diaries in the entire population (P < 0.001). While there was a significant difference between maximum voided volume in the two methods when evaluating patients with overactive bladder and dysfunctional voiding, there was no significant difference in those with monosymptomatic nocturnal enuresis (P = 0.001, P = 0.030, P = 0.206, respectively). A significant difference was observed between the three subtypes of lower urinary tract dysfunction in voided volumes (P < 0.001). When maximum and average voided volumes were compared for age subgroups, there was no significant difference in maximum and mean voided volumes only in voiding diary measurements (P > 0.05). When the two methods were compared, there was a difference in maximum and average voided volumes of more than 30% of the estimated bladder capacity in 94 (38.9%) and 86 (34.3%) children, respectively.

Conclusions

Uroflowmetry and a 48-h voiding diary should not be used interchangeably when evaluating children with lower urinary tract dysfunction. The results of uroflowmetry measurements should be used to support the diagnosis of underlying lower urinary tract dysfunction.

Artifacts and abnormal findings may limit the use of asymptomatic volunteers as controls for studies of multichannel urodynamics

BACKGROUND

Multichannel urodynamics is the gold standard for the evaluation of lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS). When performing studies to validate new adjuncts to urodynamic testing with control patients undergoing urodynamic investigation, there is difficulty in the interpretation of urodynamic results in the asymptomatic patient due to artifacts and the invasive nature of the procedure. The purpose of this investigation was to examine urodynamics in asymptomatic volunteers in order to better understand the role of control participants in urodynamic research studies.

METHODS

Asymptomatic volunteers with no LUTS were recruited to undergo standard urodynamic testing as a comparison group in a study evaluating novel urodynamic techniques. To be eligible, participants had to report no LUTS, score ≤1 on all symptom questions of the International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire Overactive Bladder Module (ICIq-OAB) survey, have no medical conditions or to undergo any medications that affect bladder function. The urodynamics was done according to ICS standards. All tracings were evaluated by an expert neuro-urologist. Data were analyzed categorically for the presence or absence of low compliance (<30 mL/cmH20), detrusor overactivity, bladder outlet obstruction (Bladder Outlet Obstruction Index [BOOI]>40), weak contractility (bladder contractility index [BCI]<100), straining to void, poorly sustained detrusor contraction, uncoordinated EMG activity, and intermittent flow.

RESULTS

A total of 24 participants completed the study including 10 men and 14 women. All participants had at least 1 urodynamic abnormality/artifact with an average of 4.43±1.28 abnormalities/participant. The most common abnormalities included uncoordinated electromyography (EMG) activity (87.50%), straining to void (79.17%), and intermittent flow (70.83%). There were no significant differences for sex, age, Body Mass Index.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrated that healthy, asymptomatic volunteers have high rates of abnormal urodynamic findings, suggesting that asymptomatic participants are not the ideal controls in research studies that involve urodynamic testing.

Bladder sensations in male and female overactive bladder patients compared to healthy volunteers: a sensation-related bladder diary evaluation

Objectives: To investigate the differences in bladder sensations of overactive bladder (OAB) patients compared to healthy volunteers. In addition, to see if bladder sensations are different in men and women.Methods: In a prospective, longitudinal study (METC 09-2-095), 66 volunteers and 68 OAB patients were included. Anticholinergic medication was stopped. Subjects filled out a sensation-related bladder diary (SR-BD), for two periods of 3 days, including a 4-points urgency scale and visual analogue scale for perception of bladder fullness.Results: In total, 6160 voids were assessed. Patients voided more often with higher degrees of urge at a lower mean voided volume (193 vs 270 ml/void; p < 0.001) than healthy volunteers. The mean urinary frequency per litre diuresis was also higher (5.8 vs 4.1/l; p < 0.001) in patients. At the same voided volume: patients perceived a higher mean bladder fullness, independent of the degree of urge, and higher urgency (1.4 vs 0.5/100 ml; p < 0.001) than healthy volunteers. There were no gender differences in the above-mentioned voiding parameters, except for the mean voided volume at urge 3 in volunteers (340 ml in men vs 362 ml in women; p = 0.03) and urge 1 in patients (171 ml in men vs 135 ml in women; p = 0.027).Conclusions: Bladder sensations were significantly increased in everyday life for both male and female OAB patients compared to healthy volunteers. OAB patients experienced a higher mean bladder fullness sensation, independent of the degree of urge, and higher mean urge/urgency at the same voided volume than volunteers. Bladder sensations are crucial in the assessment of treatment response.

Evaluation of bladder diary parameters based on correlation with the volume at strong desire to void in filling cystometry

Accurate assessment of patient bladder capacity is important in determining the proper initial treatment for lower urinary tract dysfunctions and as well as for monitoring therapeutic outcomes. However, urodynamic study is an invasive procedure. Thus, it is important to find a surrogate for invasive urodynamic study, and the aim of this study is to identify the parameter from patient-recorded bladder diary that is best correlated to the volume at strong desire to void (VSD) derived from urodynamic studies. A total of 900 women who underwent urodynamic studies at a university hospital between January 2009 and December 2011. Correlation between bladder diary parameters and VSD was investigated by Spearman rank-correlation coefficient. Days 1 to 3 average maximum daytime voided volumes excluding the first morning void (DVVmaxavg) (mean 263 ml) had the highest correlation with VSD (mean 261 ml; ρ = 0.51, p<0.001). The predictive value of VSD was 146+0.44 × DVVmaxavg. The days 1, 2, and 3 daytime maximum voided volumes excluding the first morning void (DVVmax) were all significantly associated with VSD and had similar mean volumes (ρ = 0.43–0.46, all p<0.001). DVVmaxavg had the highest area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (0.75; 95% confidence interval = 0.72–0.78) for predicting bladder oversensitivity. The threshold of DVVmaxavg <250 ml had good predictive value for detecting bladder oversensitivity (sensitivity 70.9%; specificity 65.8%), and day 1 DVVmax <250 ml had similar sensitivity (70.6%) and specificity (59.1%). Besides, the correlation coefficients (ρ) between day 1, day 2 and day 3 DVVmax and DVVmaxavg were good with a range of 0.70–0.89. In conclusion, DVVmaxavg was the bladder diary parameter best correlated with VSD. DVVmaxavg and day 1 DVVmax may be useful in screening for bladder oversensitivity.

Degree of urge, perception of bladder fullness and bladder volume--how are they related?

PURPOSE

We evaluated the reliability of the degree of urge and perception of bladder fullness scales, the relationship between the scales and bladder volume, and possible differences between bladder sensations experienced in a controlled or an uncontrolled setting.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Volunteers and patients with overactive bladder symptoms participated in the protocols. They were asked to grade bladder sensation on a 4-point urge scale of no sensation to need to void now and assess the perception of fullness on a visual analog scale of empty to full bladder. This was assessed in a 3-day bladder diary and during controlled, noninvasive bladder filling.

RESULTS

Each scale was reliable and significantly related to bladder volume (p <0.001). Agreement between the scales and voided volume was poor. Patients and volunteers grade bladder fullness and degree of urge higher in an uncontrolled than in a controlled setting.

CONCLUSIONS

The perception of bladder fullness and the degree of urge have a significant relation to bladder volume in controlled and uncontrolled settings. Due to poor agreement between the scales and actual voided volume these scales cannot replace measuring voided volume. The perception of bladder sensation depends on the setting. Bladder sensation at the hospital might underestimate the bother of symptoms experienced by a patient in daily life.

Which method is the most reliable in determination of bladder capacity in children with idiopathic overactive bladder? A comparison of maximum voided volume, uroflowmetry and maximum cystometric capacity

OBJECTIVE

To compare uroflowmetry, maximum cystometric capacity and maximum voided volume in terms of bladder capacity (BC) estimation in children with idiopathic overactive bladder.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 84 children with idiopathic overactive bladder were enrolled. Bladder diaries were kept by parents to measure maximum voided volume. The sum of voided volume and post-void residual urine represented uroflowmetric BC. Maximum cystometric capacity was recorded for each patient. Patients with and without urge incontinence and both sexes were compared, and correlations were tested between estimated capacities, patient age and continence status.

RESULTS

Mean age was 10.88 (range 6-16) years. There were 52 females and 32 males. A total of 48 patients had urge incontinence (group 1), and the remaining 36 (group 2) did not. Mean bladder capacities were 165.44ml for uroflowmetry, 204.37ml for cystometry and 260.07ml for bladder diary. Maximum cystometric capacity and capacity in terms of maximum voided volume by diary were significantly higher in patients without urge incontinence. There were significant correlations between age and all other variables, and between the presence of urge incontinence and all variables except maximum cystometric capacity. There were significant differences between bladder capacities estimated by the three methods; however, on age-adjusted re-analysis this significance was lost.

CONCLUSION

There is no significant difference between BCs estimated by uroflowmetry, maximum cystometric capacity and maximum voided volume in children with idiopathic overactive bladder. Bladder diary is a reliable and non-invasive way of estimating BC in this patient population.

Are conventional pressure-flow measurements dependent upon filled volume?

OBJECTIVE

To determine, in a prospective study, whether detrusor pressure (p(det.Qmax)) and maximum urinary flow rate (Q(max)) measurements obtained after filling to maximum cystometric capacity (MCC) differ from those obtained with filling restricted to average voided volume (V(void)), as standard protocols for pressure flow studies (PFS) mandate bladder filling until the subject has a strong desire to void, which aids standardization but further divorces the test from real-life experience.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

After calculating the appropriate sample size, 84 patients attending for PFS with an adequately completed 3-day frequency-volume chart were recruited. Each underwent two consecutive PFS with filling to MCC and average V(void) in a random order, and measurements of p(det.Qmax) and Q(max) were compared. For men, the agreement for a diagnosis of obstruction between the tests was also assessed.

RESULTS

Complete data were obtained from 76 (90%) of the patients, with a mean (range) age of 64 (20-94) years. The mean (sd) difference between MCC and average V(void) was 134 (113) mL (P < 0.01). There were no significant differences between estimates of Q(max), at - 0.1 (3) mL/s (P = 0.75), and of p(det.Qmax), at - 1 (13) cmH(2)O (P = 0.91), obtained within each patient. For men there was 91% agreement (32 of 35) in the classification of obstruction.

CONCLUSIONS

Restriction of filling to the average V(void) during PFS allows a closer approximation to normal voiding and results in no clinically relevant change to the value of standard pressure-flow measurements or alters individual classification of obstruction.