Methods of assessing the synovial fluid cell count

Reliability of Total Nucleated Cell Counts in the Setting of Hip Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Total nucleated cell (TNC) count and differential are used to classify joint effusions as inflammatory or noninflammatory. Further diagnostic evaluation and management is contingent on this classification. TNC count can be measured by automated analyzers or by manual assessment using a hemocytometer. Studies have raised concerns regarding the accuracy of TNC counts measured by automated instruments, particularly in the setting of joint arthroplasty. The objective of this study was to determine whether metallosis, a complication of total hip arthroplasty in which metal debris accumulates in periprosthetic tissues and synovial fluid, is associated with inaccurate TNC counts in synovial fluid.

METHODS

We compared the accuracy of cell counts measured by the Sysmex XN-1000 and Beckman Coulter Iris iQ200 with the gold standard of manual assessment using a hemocytometer in synovial fluid from patients with suspected metallosis and in fluid obtained from controls from patients with native joints and a history of arthroplasty for other indications.

RESULTS

TNC counts produced by automated analyzers were associated with increased levels of discordance (relative to manual counts) in patients with metallosis. Metallosis was not associated with increased levels of discordance for RBC counts or WBC differentials. The Sysmex XN flagged all but 1 metallosis sample for manual verification of the results.

CONCLUSIONS

Automated methods are generally reliable for analysis of synovial fluid. TNC counts can be inaccurate in the context of metallosis following total hip arthroplasty. Laboratories should correlate automated cell counts with a microscopic assessment of the specimen, as recommended by instrument manufacturers.

Optimization of Cellular analysis of Synovial Fluids by optical microscopy and automated count using the Sysmex XN Body Fluid Mode

BACKGROUND

This study was planned to assess the impact of pre-treating synovial fluid (SF) samples with hyaluronidase (HY), defining the best procedure for optical microscopy (OM) analysis and evaluating the performance of Sysmex XN-9000 Body Fluid module (XN-BF).

METHODS

The cell count by OM was carried out both with and without HY pre-treatment, and using 3 different types of staining reagents. The evaluation of XN-BF included data comparison with OM (100 SFs), carryover, Limit of Blank (LoB), Limit of Detection (LoD), Limit of Quantitation (LoQ) and linearity.

RESULTS

Unlike cell count in Burker's chamber and staining with Stromatol, pre-treatment with HY and staining with Methylene Blue and Turk's promoted cell clustering. The SF samples pre-treated with HY displayed excellent morphological quality, contrary to samples without HY pre-treatment. Excellent correlation was found between total cells counting with both OM and XN-BF. Satisfactory agreement was also observed between polymorphonuclear neutrophils compared to XN-BF parameter, whereas mononuclear cell count on XN-BF had suboptimal agreement with OM. The carryover was negligible. The LoB, LoD, LoQ and linearity were excellent.

CONCLUSION

XN-BF displays excellent performance, which makes it a reliable and practical alternative to OM for SF samples analysis in clinical laboratories.