Internal anal sphincter activity after restorative proctocolectomy for ulcerative colitis: a study using continuous ambulatory manometry

Abnormal gut motility in inflammatory bowel disease: an update

BACKGROUND

There is substantial evidence linking disturbed gastrointestinal motility to inflammation. Thus, it is not surprising that abnormalities of gastrointestinal motility play a role in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), affecting patient outcomes. We performed a review of the literature to investigate the relationship between abnormal gut motility and IBD.

METHODS

With an extensive literature search, we retrieved the pertinent articles linking disturbed gut motility to IBD in various anatomical districts.

RESULTS

The evidence in the literature suggests that abnormal gastrointestinal motility plays a role in the clinical setting of IBD and may confuse the clinical picture.

CONCLUSIONS

Abnormal gut motility may be important in the clinical setting of IBD. However, additional data obtained with modern techniques (e.g., magnetic resonance imaging) are needed to individuate in a more precise manner gastrointestinal motor dysfunctions, to understand the nature of clinical manifestations and properly tailor the treatment of patients.

Evaluation of long-term function, complications, quality of life and health status after restorative proctocolectomy with ileo neo rectal and with ileal pouch anal anastomosis for ulcerative colitis

AIM

Restorative surgery after (procto)colectomy with ileo-neorectal anastomosis (INRA) or restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch anal anastomosis (RPC) combines cure of ulcerative colitis (UC) with restoration of intestinal continuity. This study aimed to evaluate these two operations.

METHOD

Patients having INRA and RPC were matched according to sex, age at onset of UC, age at restorative surgery and duration of follow-up. Patients were included if they were over 18 years of age, had UC confirmed histopathologically and had undergone either operation. Long-term function, anal and neorectal physiology, complications, quality of life (QoL) and health status (HS) were determined.

RESULTS

Seventy-one consecutive patients underwent surgery with the intention of having an INRA procedure. This was successfully carried out in 50, and 21 underwent intra-operative conversion to RPC. Median defaecation frequency was 6/24 h. In 11/71 patients reservoir failure occurred and 13/71 developed pouchitis. QoL and HS were comparable to the healthy population. Median follow-up was 6.2 years. These patients were matched with 71 patients who underwent RPC. RPC was successful in all patients. Median defaecation frequency was 8/24 h. Failure occurred in 7/71 patients and 13/71 developed pouchitis. QoL and HS were comparable with the healthy population. Median follow-up was 6.9 years.

CONCLUSION

Comparison of INRA and RPC on an intention to treat basis was not considered to be realistic due to the high intra-operative conversion rate and the failures in the INRA group. RPC remains the procedure of choice for restoring intestinal continuity after proctocolectomy for UC.

The role of pouch compliance measurement in the management of pouch dysfunction

PURPOSE

Ileal pouch anal anastomosis is an established option for patients who require total proctocolectomy and restoration of bowel continuity. However, the functional results are not always good and low pouch compliance has been suggested as one possible cause. We aimed to review the results of pouch compliance tests over 11 years to assess whether measuring pouch compliance is a useful diagnostic tool to guide management of pouch dysfunction.

METHODS

The results of pouch compliance tests performed between 1996 and 2007 together with the details of symptoms, treatments and outcome were reviewed.

RESULTS

One hundred and forty-one pouch compliance tests were performed. There was no difference in pouch compliance between those with overt pathology (pouchitis, pelvic sepsis or anastomotic stricture) and those with idiopathic pouch dysfunction. In this second group, there was no difference in pouch compliance between patients with and without each of the symptoms of increased defaecatory frequency, incontinence and evacuation difficulties. The results of the compliance testing did not influence the clinical decision making on idiopathic pouch dysfunction (p=0.77) nor diverted pouches (p=0.07).

CONCLUSIONS

Measuring pouch compliance does not offer new information accounting for idiopathic pouch dysfunction and has little influence on the clinical management.

Anterior Perineal PlanE for Ultra-low Anterior Resection of the Rectum (the APPEAR technique): a prospective clinical trial of a new procedure

OBJECTIVE

The APPEAR procedure was developed to allow sphincter-preserving rectal resection for both benign and malignant pathology, which would traditionally require abdominoperineal excision or completion proctectomy, if treated by conventional means. This clinical trial (clinicaltrials.gov: NCT00534131) evaluated the short-term clinical and physiological results of this procedure.

METHODS

Fourteen patients were enrolled, 7 with neoplasia, 5 with ulcerative colitis, and 2 with traumatic rectal damage. Patients were evaluated preoperatively, and at a median of 2 years after surgery.

RESULTS

Nine of 14 patients underwent ileostomy reversal and were followed up for a minimum of 1 year, with 1 patient awaiting closure. Four patients have not yet been considered for ileostomy reversal due to anastomotic perineal fistulae. Transient sexual dysfunction was noted in 3 of 14 patients, but no urological problems occurred. When the APPEAR procedure was performed for neoplasia or trauma, postoperative median Wexner continence score was 5 (range 0-8, n = 6), with a median defecation frequency of 3 (range 1-8/day). All cancers were completely excised with no local recurrence. Following APPEAR with restorative proctocolectomy for ulcerative colitis, median Wexner continence score was 2 (range 0-6, n = 3), with a median daily defecatory frequency of 3 (range 1-5). Preoperative SF-36 scores did not change significantly following ileostomy closure, and anorectal physiological testing was unaltered following perineal dissection.

CONCLUSIONS

The APPEAR procedure provides an alternative technique to effect an ultra-low sphincter-saving anastomosis, when this is not possible by conventional surgery. Morbidity was encountered and greater experience will be required to fully assess this approach. Nevertheless, this is a promising new procedure with the potential to reduce the need for a permanent stoma even further than is currently the case.

Reconstructive surgery for failed ileal pouch-anal anastomosis: a viable surgical option with acceptable results

PURPOSE

Salvage procedures for failed ileal pouch-anal anastomoses frequently require total reconstruction with a combined abdominal and perineal approach. The aim of this study was to determine the indications for surgery and the outcomes in this group of patients.

METHODS

All patients who underwent combined abdominal and perineal ileal pouch-anal anastomosis reconstruction at the Mount Sinai Hospital between 1982 and 2000 were reviewed. Data were collected prospectively in the inflammatory bowel disease database.

RESULTS

Sixty-three reconstructive procedures were performed in 57 patients, with a mean age of 33.9 (+/-10.4) years at the time of reconstruction. There were 14 males. The mean follow-up was 69.1 months. The initial indication for ileal pouch-anal anastomosis was ulcerative colitis in 98 percent. The primary indication for reconstruction was pouch-vaginal fistula in 21 patients, long outlet in 14, pelvic sepsis in 14, ileoanal anastomotic stricture in 5, pouch-perineal fistula in 2, and chronic pouchitis in 1. The mean operative time was four hours (+/-1.1), the average blood loss was 500 mL (+/-400), and the average length of stay was 10.3 days (+/-4.6). All patients had a diverting ileostomy. Forty-two (73.6 percent) of the patients have a functioning pouch. Seven (12.3 percent) patients have had their pouch excised. The ileostomy has not yet been closed in 8 (14 percent) patients; 3 of these patients are awaiting closure, whereas the remaining 5 have a permanently defunctioning ileostomy. Eighty-nine percent have ten or fewer bowel movements per day. No patients are incontinent of stool during the day, whereas two patients are incontinent at night. Seventeen percent complain of frequent urgency. Despite this, more than 80 percent rate their physical and psychological health as good to excellent.

CONCLUSION

Reconstructive pouch surgery has a high success rate in experienced hands. The functional results in those whose pouch is in use are good.

Functional results and visceral perception after ileo neo-rectal anastomosis in patients: a pilot study

INTRODUCTION

To reduce pouch related complications after restorative proctocolectomy, an alternative procedure was developed, the ileo neo-rectal anastomosis (INRA). This technique consists of rectal mucosa replacement by ileal mucosa and straight ileorectal anastomosis. Our study provides a detailed description of the functional results after INRA.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Eleven patients underwent an INRA procedure with a temporary ileostomy. Anorectal function tests were performed two months prior to and six and 12 months after closure of the ileostomy and comprised: anal manometry, ultrasound examination, rectal balloon distension, and transmucosal electrical nerve stimulation (TENS). Function was subsequently related to the histopathology of rectal biopsy samples.

RESULTS

Median stool frequency decreased from 15/24 hours (10-25) to 6/24 hours (4-11) at one year. All patients reported full continence. Anal sensibility, and resting and squeeze pressures did not change after INRA. Rectal compliance decreased (2.1 (0.7-2.8) v 1.5 (0.4-2.2) and 1.4 (0.8-3.7) ml/mm Hg (p=0.03)) but the maximum tolerated volume increased (70 (50-118) v 96 (39-176) (NS) and 122 (56-185) ml (p=0.03)). Decreasing rectal sensitivity was found: the maximum tolerated pressure increased (14 (8-24) v 22 (8-34) (NS) and 26 (14-40) (p=0.02)) and the rectal threshold for TENS displayed a similar tendency. All patients displayed a low grade chronic inflammatory infiltrate in neorectal biopsy samples before closure of the ileostomy, with no change during follow up.

CONCLUSIONS

The technique of INRA provides a safe alternative for restorative surgery. Stool frequency after INRA improves with time and seems to be related to decreasing sensitivity and not to histopathological changes in the neorectum. Furthermore, after the INRA procedure, all patients reported full continence.

Ambulatory manometric recording of anorectal activity

PURPOSE

Ambulatory anorectal manometry is usually analyzed by computer analysis only. An in-depth analysis with visual assessment of the recordings combined with computer analysis is presented.

METHODS

Recordings of 20 to 24 hours in length were performed on ten healthy subjects. Spontaneous anal canal relaxations were analyzed and related to changes in rectal pressure and any reported rectal sensation. Pressure variations in the anorectum, including the rectal motor complex, were studied.

RESULTS

In the awake subject the frequency of anal canal relaxations was 14.5 to 18.7/hour, and the frequency was 4.3/hour while asleep. They can be divided into two different subtypes. The amplitude of the pressure fall was 26 to 29 mm Hg, but diminished during sleep to 19 mm Hg. The duration of each relaxation was 16 to 19 seconds. Passage of flatus and the sensation of flatus in the rectum occurs 1.5 and 1.2 times per hour, respectively, usually with simultaneous anal canal relaxation. The frequency of rectal motor complexes in the midrectum was 0.4/hour and in the lower rectum was 0.7/hour; the duration was 10.3 and 5.8 minutes, respectively, with no nocturnal variation. The complexes could not be related to anorectal events.

CONCLUSIONS

The study provides supplementary knowledge of anorectal physiology, particularly of anal canal relaxation, and proposes a more detailed method for evaluation of data obtained by ambulatory anorectal manometry.

Internal anal sphincter: advances and insights

The internal anal sphincter, the smooth muscle component of the anal sphincter complex, has an ambiguous role in maintaining anal continence. Despite its significant contribution to resting anal canal pressures, even total division of the internal anal sphincter in surgery for anal fistulas may fail to compromise continence in otherwise healthy subjects. However, recently reported abnormalities of the innervation and reflex response of the internal anal sphincter in patients with fecal incontinence indicate its significance in maintaining continence. The advent of sphincter-saving surgery and restorative proctocolectomy has re-emphasized the major contribution of the internal anal sphincter to resting pressure and its significance in preventing fecal leakage. The variable effect of rectal excision on rectoanal inhibitory reflex has led to a reappraisal of the significance of this reflex in discrimination of rectal contents and its impact on anal continence. Electromyographic, manometric, and ultrasonographic evaluation of the internal anal sphincter has provided new insights into its pathophysiology. This article reviews advances in our understanding of internal anal sphincter physiology in health and disease.

Extent of smooth muscle resection during mucosectomy and ileal pouch-anal anastomosis affects anorectal physiology and functional outcome

PURPOSE

In patients undergoing colectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis, controversy exists regarding the necessity for and appropriate extent of rectal mucosal resection. Our aim was to assess histologically the extent of anorectal smooth muscle resected at the time of mucosal proctectomy and to correlate this with postoperative bowel and anal sphincter function.

METHODS

Surgical specimens of 79 patients undergoing colectomy, mucosal proctectomy, and ileal pouch-anal anastomosis were examined histologically in a blinded fashion, and the content of smooth muscle in the mucosal proctectomy specimens was scored. Degree of smooth muscle resection was correlated with postoperative anorectal manometry and with functional outcomes, including stool frequency and nocturnal leakage of stool after 3 and 12 months of follow-up.

RESULTS

Degree of smooth muscle loss correlated with decreased resting pressure of the internal anal sphincter as early as three months after surgery (r = -0.26; P = 0.03), and the correlation was even stronger after 12 months (r = -0.37; P = 0.005). Decreases in resting pressure were related, in turn, to increased stool frequency at 12 months (r = 0.32; P = 0.02), but stool frequency was also inversely related to volume of the ileal pouch (r = -0.27; P = 0.05). Multivariate analysis confirmed that resting pressure and pouch volume were both significant determinants of stool frequency. The likelihood of nocturnal stool leakage at 12 months was primarily a function of stool frequency (P < 0.01) but also increased with patient age (P < 0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

These findings indicate that loss of resting pressure of the internal anal sphincter can be correlated with the extent of smooth muscle resection during rectal mucosectomy and that these factors, in turn, correlate with increased stool frequency and a greater likelihood of nocturnal stool leakage. Consequently, an optimum functional result requires care in identifying and preserving maximum anorectal smooth muscle during mucosectomy.

Ambulatory manometric examination in patients with a colonic J pouch and in normal controls

Anorectal function after anterior resection may be impaired as a result of reduced luminal capacity in the pelvis. The aim of this study was to evaluate the colonic J pouch neorectum by means of ambulatory manometry. Twelve patients with a colonic pouch following anterior resection and seven healthy controls were studied for a median of 6 (range 6-24) h using a probe with two pouch-rectal and two anal canal transducers. Records were interpreted by visual inspection. Pressure values and wave frequencies were determined by software analysis. Pouches had been functioning for a median of 32 (range 11-55) months. All patients with a pouch had an acceptable stool frequency. Seven of 12 patients complained of incomplete evacuation. Resting anal canal pressure (73 versus 100 cmH2O), pouch-rectal pressure (29 versus 15 cmH2O) and anal canal pouch-rectal pressure gradients (60 versus 85 cmH2O) were similar in patients and controls. The frequency of slow-wave activity in patients with a pouch was significantly lower than that in controls (7 versus 16 cycles per min, P = 0.001). Coordination between the colonic J pouch and the anal canal, in the form of sampling episodes, was observed in more than half of the patients with a functioning pouch. Large isolated contractions (pressure greater than 30 cmH2O and lasting longer than 20 s) and rhythmic contractions were the most frequent pattern of pouch motility.

Anal transitional zone and columnar cuff in restorative proctocolectomy

The popularity of double stapling the ileal pouch-anal anastomosis probably owes more to the technical ease it brings than to histological considerations or functional results. It is preservation of a 'columnar cuff' of mucosa, rather than the restricted site of the anal transitional zone, that should be the focus of research with respect to long-term risk of malignancy and inflammatory complications. If cancer is present in colon that has been removed for ulcerative colitis, there is a 25 per cent incidence of dysplasia in the columnar cuff in the short term. In other circumstances, those who are spared from carcinoma by colectomy are likely to have a similar risk of developing dysplastic change in the columnar cuff with longer follow-up. Double stapling the pouch-anal anastomosis and preserving the anal canal mucosa improves function, but long-term surveillance of the columnar cuff is then required, including biopsies.

Physiology of ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. Current concepts

PURPOSE

Increasing experience with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) associated with increasing knowledge about anorectal physiology has lead to a large number of publications. The purpose of this review is to evaluate the current understanding of fecal continence as revealed by the evolution of the ileoanal procedure.

METHODS

Review of the literature covering the most important physiologic parameters involved in fecal continence was undertaken.

RESULTS

Rectoanal inhibitory reflex is probably absent after IPAA but is preserved when distal anorectal mucosa is spared. Anal resting pressure decreases but is less affected when the internal anal sphincter is less traumatized. Squeeze pressure is not importantly affected, and the importance of reservoir function as a determinant of stool frequency is emphasized. IPAA does not affect the coordination between pouch and anal canal motility in the majority of cases. Normal continence is preserved, even during the night, by preserving a gradient of pressure between the pouch and anal canal.

CONCLUSIONS

Physiologic concepts are well established, but controversies about the continence mechanism related to IPAA remain. The IPAA procedure has allowed discrimination of details about the function of multiple structures involved in fecal continence.

Stapled ileal pouch-anal anastomosis with resection of the anal transition zone

We assessed the outcome of stapled ileal J-pouch-anal anastomosis with intersphincteric resection of the anal transition zone in 83 consecutive patients with ulcerative colitis (n = 71) or familial adenomatous polyposis (n = 12). There was no postoperative mortality. Two patients (2.4%) required permanent ileostomy for manifestation of unsuspected Crohn's disease. Major postoperative complications consisted of pelvic sepsis, anastomotic leakage, and pancreatitis with 3.6% each. Both, frequency of bowel movements and degree of continence improved with time. Two years after takedown of the diverting ileostomy 45 patients with ulcerative colitis and 12 with familial adenomatous polyposis were assessed with a frequency of bowel movements of 5.6 +/- 2 and 3.2 +/- 1 per 24 h, respectively (P < 0.05). At this time none of them had major daytime or nighttime incontinence. Minor incontinence was reported by 9% and 14% of the patients with ulcerative colitis during day-time and night-time, respectively. The patients with familial adenomatous polyposis demonstrated better results, without day-time seepage and intermittent nocturnal seepage in only 9%. It is concluded that direct ileal J-pouch-anal anastomosis is a safe procedure with excellent functional results for patients with ulcerative colitis and familial adenomatous polyposis.