Total pelvic exenteration for locally advanced rectal carcinoma

A systematic review and meta-analysis on mortality rate following total pelvic exenteration in cancer patients

BACKGROUND

Total pelvic exenteration (TPE), an en bloc resection is an ultraradical operation for malignancies, and refers to the removal of organs inside the pelvis, including female reproductive organs, lower urological organs and involved parts of the digestive system. The aim of this meta-analysis is to estimate the intra-operative mortality, in-hospital mortality, 30- and 90-day mortality rate and overall mortality rate (MR) following TPE in colorectal, gynecological, urological, and miscellaneous cancers.

METHODS

This is a systematic review and meta-analysis in which three international databases including Medline through PubMed, Scopus and Web of Science on November 2023 were searched. To screen and select relevant studies, retrieved articles were entered into Endnote software. The required information was extracted from the full text of the retrieved articles by the authors. Effect measures in this study was the intra-operative, in-hospital, and 90-day and overall MR following TPE. All analyzes are performed using Stata software version 16 (Stata Corp, College Station, TX).

RESULTS

In this systematic review, 1751 primary studies retrieved, of which 98 articles (5343 cases) entered into this systematic review. The overall mortality rate was 30.57% in colorectal cancers, 25.5% in gynecological cancers and 12.42% in Miscellaneous. The highest rate of mortality is related to the overall mortality rate of colorectal cancers. The MR in open surgeries was higher than in minimally invasive surgeries, and also in primary advanced cancers, it was higher than in recurrent cancers.

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, it can be said that performing TPE in a specialized surgical center with careful patient eligibility evaluation is a viable option for advanced malignancies of the pelvic organs.

Laparoscopic total pelvic exenteration for pelvic malignancies: the technique and short-time outcome of 11 cases

BACKGROUND

Previous reports about laparoscopic total pelvic exenteration (LTPE) are still limited. In the present study, we described our single-center experience of the initial 11 cases.

METHODS

Between April 2011 and September 2015, eight males and three females diagnosed as pelvic malignancies underwent LTPE by the same operation team. We retrospectively collected all cases' parameters about surgical technique. Thirty-seven patients who received open surgery were also retrospectively collected. A comparison between LTPE and open surgery was performed to evaluate the feasibility and safety of LTPE.

RESULTS

Eleven cases successfully underwent the LTPE without any intraoperative complication. No open conversion was required. Eight patients underwent Bricker's procedure. Three patients were performed with the cutaneous ureterostomy. Anus preservation operation was performed in three patients. Compared with open surgery, LTPE had longer mean operative time (565.2 vs 468.2 min, p = 0.004) but less mean blood loss (547.3 vs 1033.0 ml, p < 0.001) and shorter postoperative hospitalization time (15.3 vs 22.4 days, p = 0.004). One patient died of pulmonary embolism in the 7th month of follow-up time. One patient died of recurrence in the 12th month of follow-up time. Nine patients are still alive without recurrence and metastasis. The mean follow-up time was 11.1 months.

CONCLUSIONS

The technique of LTPE seems to be feasible and safe in the treatment of carefully selected patients of pelvic malignancies. LTPE can also decrease the blood loss, the recovery time, and the hospital stay. But the oncological safety and long-term outcome of LTPE still need to be explored.

Partial anterior sacrectomy with nerve preservation to treat locally advanced rectal cancer

AIM

Most studies that have reported outcomes after composite abdomino-sacral resection for locally advanced/recurrent rectal cancer have involved resections below the S2/3 disc space. Involvement of the sacrum above this level is uncommon and, until recently, was considered a contraindication to resection.

METHOD

We report here a surgical technique to deal with high sacral involvement with an anterior approach and maintenance of sacropelvic stability.

RESULTS

The operative findings confirmed a locally perforated rectal cancer with an associated abscess cavity and direct invasion into S2. Given the likelihood that a complete dislocation of the sacrum would cause significant neurological damage and pelvic instability without oncological benefit, we opted for a partial high anterior sacrectomy with nerve preservation. The patient made an uncomplicated recovery without neurological deficit and was able to walk with the aid of crutches from postoperative day 3.

CONCLUSION

While a high sacral transection is appropriate for some patients with locally advanced/recurrent rectal cancer, operative decisions and options should be tailored to each individual.

Retrospective review of pelvic malignancies undergoing total pelvic exenteration

Background

In patients with locally advanced or recurrent pelvic malignancies, total pelvic exenteration (TPE) may be necessary for curative treatment. Despite improvements in mortality rates since TPE was first described, morbidity rates remain high due to the extensive resection and the aggressiveness of these tumors. We have studied the outcomes of TPE surgery performed at our institution.

Methods

Fifty-three patients with various pelvic pathologies underwent TPE between 2004 and 2010. Patients were divided into two groups based on pathology: colorectal (n = 36) versus non-colorectal (n = 17) malignancies. Demographics, operative reports, pathology reports, periprocedural events, and outcomes were analyzed. Comparison of the two groups was performed using student’s t-test and Fisher’s exact test. Survival curves were constructed using the Kaplan–Meier method and compared using the log rank test.

Results

The colorectal and non-colorectal groups were similar in demographics, operative times, length of stay, estimated blood loss, and rates of preoperative and intraoperative radiation use. Chemotherapy use was increased in the colorectal group compared with the non-colorectal group (55.6% vs. 23.5%, P = 0.04). Complication rates were similar: 86% in the colorectal group and 76% in the non-colorectal group. In the colorectal group, 27.8% of patients developed perineal abscesses, whereas no patients developed these complications in the non-colorectal group (P = 0.02). No survival difference was seen in primary versus recurrent colorectal tumors; however, within the colorectal group there was a survival advantage when comparing R0 resection to R1 and R2 resection combined. Median survival rates were 27.3 months for R0 resection and 10.7 months for R1 and R2 resection combined. The median survival was 21.4 months for the colorectal group and 6.9 months for the non-colorectal group (P = 0.002).

Conclusions

Patients undergoing TPE for colorectal tumors have improved survival when compared with patients undergoing exenteration for pelvic malignancies of other origins. Within the colorectal group, the extent of resection demonstrated a significant survival benefit of an R0 resection compared with R1 and R2 resections. Despite TPE carrying a high morbidity rate, mortality rates have improved and careful patient selection can optimize outcomes.

Bladder-Sparing Extended Resection of Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer Involving the Prostate and Seminal Vesicles

PURPOSE

Total pelvic exenteration (TPE) is the standard procedure for locally advanced rectal cancer involving the prostate and seminal vesicles. We evaluated the feasibility of bladder-sparing surgery as an alternative to TPE.

METHODS

Eleven patients with advanced primary or recurrent rectal cancer involving the prostate or seminal vesicles, or both, underwent bladder-sparing extended colorectal resection with radical prostatectomy. The procedures performed were abdominoperineal resection (APR) with prostatectomy (n = 6), colorectal resection using intersphincteric resection combined with prostatectomy (n = 4), and abdominoperineal tumor resection with prostatectomy (n = 1). Local control and urinary and anal function were evaluated postoperatively.

RESULTS

Cysto-urethral anastomosis (CUA) was performed in seven patients and catheter-cystostomy was performed in four patients. Coloanal or colo-anal canal anastomosis was also performed in four patients. There was no mortality, and the morbidity rate was 38%. All patients underwent complete resection with negative surgical margins. After a median follow-up period of 26 months there was no sign of local recurrence, and ten patients were alive without disease, although distant metastases were found in three patients. Five patients had satisfactory voiding function after CUA, and three had satisfactory evacuation after intersphincteric resection (ISR).

CONCLUSION

These bladder-sparing procedures allow conservative surgery to be performed in selected patients with advanced rectal cancer involving the prostate or seminal vesicles, without compromising local control.

Population-based assessment of the surgical management of locally advanced colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND

Evidence-based guidelines recommend multivisceral resection for patients with locally advanced adherent colorectal cancer because it reduces local recurrence and improves survival. However, this procedure can increase morbidity compared with standard resection and may not be practiced uniformly. We performed a population-based study to examine surgical practice and outcomes among patients with locally advanced adherent colorectal cancer in the United States.

METHODS

Patients who were 18 years or older and who had surgical resection for nonmetastatic, locally advanced adherent colorectal cancer from January 1, 1988, through December 31, 2002, were identified from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) registry. Logistic regression was used to examine patient, tumor, and geographic factors associated with multivisceral resection. Cumulative early mortality (i.e., at 1 and 6 months after diagnosis) and 5-year survival were obtained from Kaplan-Meier estimates; adjusted risks of death were calculated using Cox proportional hazards models. All statistical tests were two-sided.

RESULTS

We identified 8380 patients who underwent surgical resection for locally advanced adherent colorectal cancer, of whom 33.3% were managed with multivisceral resection. Among colon cancer patients, younger age at diagnosis, female sex, SEER region, node negativity, and left-sided tumors were independently associated with having had a multivisceral resection. Among rectal cancer patients, younger age at diagnosis and female sex were positively and statistically significantly associated with multivisceral resection, whereas receipt of neoadjuvant radiation was inversely and statistically significantly associated with multivisceral resection. Compared with standard resection, multivisceral resection was associated with improved overall survival for patients with colon (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.89, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.83 to 0.96) and rectal (HR = 0.81, 95% CI = 0.70 to 0.94) cancer, with no associated increase in early mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

The majority of patients with locally advanced colorectal cancer did not receive a multivisceral resection. The geographic variation in the application of this procedure in patients with colon cancer suggests that local organizational structures and processes of care may play an important role in patient treatment and, therefore, prognosis.

Mesorectal lymph node involvement and prognostic implications at total pelvic exenteration for gynecologic malignancies

OBJECTIVES

To determine the incidence and prognostic implications of positive mesorectal lymph nodes in patients undergoing total pelvic exenteration for recurrent gynecologic malignancies.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective chart review of all patients who had undergone total pelvic exenteration for a gynecologic malignancy between July 1992 and December 2003. Patient charts were reviewed for information regarding demographics, site of cancer, histology, pathology report, and time to recurrence.

RESULTS

Fifty-eight women had undergone total pelvic exenteration for recurrent gynecologic malignancies during the study period and 57 were available for analysis. Primary cancer site was as follows: cervix, 37 (65%); vagina, 8 (14%); vulva, 5 (9%); and uterine corpus, 7 (12%). In 30 patients (53%), the mesorectal lymph node status was pathologically evaluated. Of these 30 patients, 3 (10%) had positive mesorectal lymph nodes at the time of total pelvic exenteration. All 3 patients had rectal wall involvement (rectal submucosa, 2; rectal mucosa, 1), and all 3 patients recurred within 4 months of pelvic exenteration. The median time to recurrence after surgery was 2.4 months in those patients with positive mesorectal lymph nodes compared with 7.3 months in those with negative mesorectal lymph nodes (P = 0.005). When individually adjusted for other prognostic variables, such as margin status, tumor grade, lymphovascular space involvement, primary cancer site, and histologic type, a finding of positive mesorectal lymph nodes was associated with a shorter time to recurrence of disease (all P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Mesorectal lymph node involvement is a common finding at total pelvic exenteration, particularly in patients with rectal wall involvement. Patients with positive mesorectal lymph nodes appear to have a worse outcome with a shorter time to recurrence of disease.

Treatment outcomes in locally advanced colorectal carcinoma

BACKGROUND: Locally advanced colorectal cancers form a distinct subgroup where contiguous organs could be involved without distant metastases and so may be amenable to curative surgical resection. It was our objective to report our experience in treating six such patients with operable locally advanced colorectal carcinomas. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the case notes of 47 patients who were diagnosed with colorectal cancers at M S Ramaiah Medical Teaching Hospital between the years 1996 - 2001. Six patients were identified with T4 lesions, adjacent organ involvement and with no nodal involvement. The treatments and outcomes for these patients were then reviewed. RESULTS: Two of three patients with rectal malignancies who underwent pelvic exenteration succumbed to disease recurrence within the first 18 months. One of the three patients with colonic cancers died of non malignant causes. The other two are disease free till date. CONCLUSIONS: Aggressive multivisceral resections for locally advanced colonic cancers might be appropriate. Rectal cancers when locally advanced may be considered for pelvic exenteration, but a more guarded prognosis may apply.

Palliative care for colorectal cancer

Most patients with stage IV colorectal cancer have a poor prognosis,but numerous palliative modalities are available today. When a cure is no longer possible, treatment is directed toward providing symptomatic relief. The data leave little doubt that surgical resection may provide good palliation. Although resection has been the mainstay of palliative care, an individualized multidisciplinary approach, which may involve both surgical and nonsurgical modalities, is probably the best current option.

Urinary tract involvement by colorectal cancer

PURPOSE

Involvement of the urinary tract by colorectal cancer is sufficiently rare to be encountered by an individual surgeon on an infrequent basis. The aim of this review is to highlight technical and oncologic issues that should be considered when dealing with complex colorectal cancer that involves the urinary tract.

METHODS

The relevant literature from 1975 to 2001 was identified using the MEDLINE database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine and reviewed. Because of the diversity of forms of presentation of urologic involvement, few randomized, controlled trials are available, with most evidence derived from retrospective studies.

RESULTS

Three distinct clinical situations in which the urinary tract may be affected by colorectal cancer were identified: involvement by primary colorectal cancer, involvement by recurrent cancer, and unexpected intraoperative findings of urinary tract involvement. Management strategies to identify and treat locally advanced primary or recurrent colorectal cancer involving the urinary tract improve survival with acceptable morbidity and mortality. Careful preoperative assessment of all patients with colorectal cancer will reduce unexpected identification of urinary tract invasion at the time of surgery. In patients in whom cure is not possible, endourologic techniques combined with judicious surgical resection can provide high-quality palliation. Optimal care of many of these conditions is facilitated by specialist urologic advice.

CONCLUSIONS

The wide spectrum of possible urinary tract involvement by colorectal cancer requires individual patient-specific and disease-specific consideration. The literature offers important guidelines that aid decision making and improve management of these challenging problems.

Radical surgery for extensive rectal cancer: is it worthwhile?

In a small proportion of patients with extensive primary or locally recurrent rectal cancer, disease remains confined to the pelvis for a prolonged period. Symptoms are highly prejudicial to quality of life and often refractory to treatment short of extirpative surgery. Cure requires en bloc excision of all involved pelvic viscera with tumor-free margins. The pelvic exenterations (PE) are the most radical operations for rectal cancer. PE carries a high risk of perioperative morbidity and mortality, and has profound functional, psychological, and psychosexual implications for patients. Careful preoperative counseling regarding surgical risks and the impact of PE on body function and image is indispensable; the patient's consent must be truly informed. Patients with major medical or psychiatric/emotional comorbidity and those who are mentally incompetent are not candidates. Tenesmus and central pelvic/perineal pain are amenable to PE whereas radicular pain is not; sciatica and lower extremity lymphedema portend unresectability. Extrapelvic disease should be excluded preoperatively. While invaded sacrum can be resected en bloc with involved viscera (sacropelvic exenteration), fixity of tumor to the pelvic sidewall(s) in nonirradiated patients almost invariably implies unresectability. Other contraindications to PE include invasion of the proximal (S1 or higher) lumbosacral spine or lumbosacral plexus/sciatic nerves, ureteric obstruction proximal to the ureterovesical junctions, and encasement of the external or common iliac vessels by tumor. PE for advanced primary rectal carcinoma yields 5-year survival of over 40%; when performed for recurrent disease, long-term salvage rates are not as high. While radical surgery is rarely indicated for palliation, PE in carefully selected (good performance status and life expectancy, complete excision of all gross disease) incurable patients results in abrogation of disabling symptoms and reasonable intervals of high-quality survival.

Management of locally advanced rectal cancer

The treatment of rectal cancer typically involves a multidisciplinary approach. A minority of patients will have tumors that are full thickness, involve adjacent structures, or have metastatic disease to regional lymph nodes. The combination of adjuvant therapy and surgical resection is the mainstay of treatment for locally advanced carcinoma of the rectum. This article will review the role of adjuvant chemotherapy and radiotherapy in patients with high risk tumors. The operative considerations in advanced rectal cancers will be reviewed. In particular, the role of mesorectal excision and exenterative surgery will be discussed.

Total pelvic exenteration for locally advanced rectal cancer

BACKGROUND

Since its first description in 1948, total pelvic exenteration has been a surgical option for the treatment of locally advanced rectal cancer in selected patients. During these 50 years, it has remained a formidable procedure with high mortality and substantial morbidity. This report describes the results of total pelvic exenteration for rectal cancer in terms of post-operative mortality, morbidity, and longterm survival in patients with locally advanced primary and recurrent rectal cancer.

STUDY DESIGN

A study of the patient records revealed that 24 patients underwent total pelvic exenteration as the treatment for locally advanced primary or recurrent cancer of the rectum from 1983 to 1998. The charts of the patients were reviewed, and morbidity and mortality were documented. The survival of the patients was also analyzed.

RESULTS

Fifteen patients had primary tumor and 9 had locally recurrent cancer. The mean age was 62 years old. There were no postoperative deaths, and the complication rate was 54%. In the treatment of primary tumor, bowel continuity was possible in 60% of the patients. Previous radiation or operation for recurrent disease was not associated with increased morbidity. The overall 5-year survival was 44%. The 5-year survival of patients with primary cancer was 64% and was significantly better than the rate for those with recurrent disease. Only one patient with recurrent disease survived more than 24 months.

CONCLUSIONS

Total pelvic exenteration now can be performed with low mortality rates, but the morbidity remains high. In the treatment of primary rectal cancer, good survival (64%) can be achieved, but results are dismal for the treatment of recurrent disease. We suggest better selection of patients for this procedure, especially as a treatment for recurrent rectal cancer.

Rationale for bladder-sparing surgery in patients with locally advanced colorectal carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Total pelvic exenteration (TPE) with urinary diversion is a standard surgical approach for patients with locally advanced rectal carcinoma. Because only approximately 50% of patients undergoing TPE have tumor involving the bladder, the authors evaluated the feasibility of bladder salvage in this setting. The current study presents the results of a retrospective study of patients with advanced colorectal carcinoma (classification of >/= T3) to formulate criteria for selecting patients for bladder-sparing procedures.

METHODS

The charts of 81 patients with rectal carcinoma classified as >/= T3 were reviewed for age, gender, computed tomography (CT) findings, results of intraoperative examination under anesthesia, final pathologic evaluation, urologic complications, local recurrence, and patient survival.

RESULTS

Among the 46 patients who underwent TPE, final pathologic evaluation demonstrated tumor involvement of the bladder in 58% of patients. Preoperative identification of a bladder mucosal abnormality accurately predicted bladder involvement in only 57% of the 30 patients who underwent cystoscopy. CT and intraoperative palpation of the bladder individually predicted the final pathologic findings in 69% and 70% of patients, respectively; of the 21 patients in whom both were positive, 90% had bladder involvement. Of the 35 patients (26 females and 9 males) who underwent bladder-sparing procedures, 22 had complete sparing of the bladder, 9 underwent partial cystectomy (5 with ureteroneocystostomy), 4 underwent ureteroneocystostomy alone, and 2 underwent prostatectomy alone. Ninety-four percent of these 35 patients had negative histologic margins. There was no difference in the incidence rate of urinary complications between patients who underwent TPE and those who underwent a bladder-sparing surgery (17% each). The incidence rates of local recurrence (14% vs. 17%) and the 3-year survival rates (49% vs. 39%) did not differ significantly between the 2 groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Bladder-sparing surgery to treat patients with locally invasive colorectal carcinoma provides good local control without sacrificing survival. Women, whose reproductive organs act as a natural barrier, and selected men in whom CT and intraoperative evaluation identify only localized involvement of the prostate or bladder appear to be reasonable candidates for bladder-sparing procedures.

Pelvic exenteration for carcinoma of the colon and rectum

Carcinoma of the colon and rectum is one of the most common causes of cancer deaths in the United States. The mortality of patients treated by surgery alone is 55% within 5 years of surgery. Despite efforts to decrease local recurrence and their concomitant problems of pain and disability, a significant number of patients will still have pelvic recurrences that carry a significant morbidity. In selected cases, pelvic exenteration may cure or provide palliation of the symptoms of colorectal carcinoma. Pre-operative evaluation is performed to detect signs of unresectability. During surgery, exploration is performed for evidence of metastases to the liver, omentum, and peritoneum, followed by an assessment of the local extent of the tumor. The margins of resection must be clear even if resection of contiguous organs or bony structures is necessary. The urinary tract is resected with an ileal loop, sigmoid or transverse colon conduits, or continent urinary diversion. Depending upon the involvement of neighboring structures, exenterative pelvic surgery can be modified for organ preservation.

Phase II trial of radical surgery for locally advanced pelvic neoplasia

BACKGROUND

Reported operative mortality and survival rates following total pelvic exenteration (TPE) for recurrent pelvic neoplasia are now as good as those for many primary treatments. The currently accepted primary treatments for these tumours are, however, still either radiotherapy alone or radiotherapy and chemotherapy. The primary aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and tolerability of TPE and secondarily to ascertain survival after TPE.

METHODS

This was a phase II study of 50 patients with locally advanced pelvic tumours who underwent TPE.

RESULTS

Thirty-two patients (64 per cent) underwent TPE for recurrent carcinoma of the cervix, seven (14 per cent) for rectal cancer, three (6 per cent) for vulval carcinoma, three (6 per cent) for vaginal carcinoma, two (4 per cent) for prostate cancer and three (6 per cent) for other tumours. The 30-day mortality rate was 8 per cent with an in-hospital mortality rate of 16 per cent. The crude morbidity rate was 62 per cent, with 23 patients (46 per cent) having grade III or IV toxicity. A complete response was achieved in 63 per cent and a partial response in 37 per cent of patients. The overall median survival time was 86 weeks; it was 111 weeks in patients in whom a complete response was achieved.

CONCLUSION

The survival and operative mortality rates that are now attainable with TPE are comparable to those achieved with chemoradiotherapy in advanced pelvic neoplasia. TPE should no longer be reserved for salvage therapy and should perhaps be compared with chemoradiotherapy as first-line treatment in a phase III randomized trial in patients with these tumours.

[Total pelvic exenteration and rectal cancer. Apropos of 20 cases]

STUDY AIM

The report of a series of 20 patients with the aim of trying to specify the implications of pelvic exenteration for rectal cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

From 1986 to 1996, 20 total pelvic exenterations were performed for rectal adenocarcinoma. This retrospective study included locally extended carcinomas (n = 10), and recurrences (n = 10) after anterior resection (n = 7), and after abdominoperineal resection (n = 3). The subjects included 13 men and seven women with a mean age of 54 years (34-74 years). Complaints were major and serious: pain (n = 20), rectal syndrome (n = 17), recto-vesical fistula (n = 5) recto-vaginal fistula (n = 5), urinary infection (n = 13), and hematuria (n = 6). Preoperative radiotherapy was performed in 11 patients and preoperative radio chemotherapy in six. The surgical procedure included a total pelvic exenteration with perinectomy in 12 patients, and a total pelvic exenteration with preservation of levator ani and perineum in eight, associated in two cases with a partial resection of the sacrum, and in two other cases with partial hepatectomy for a single liver metastasis. Urinary diversion was a trans ileal ureterostomy in 17 patients and a direct double ureterostomy in three.

RESULTS

The mean duration of surgery was 6 h. The mean preoperative blood loss was 1,200 L. Nine patients received blood transfusion. There was no postoperative mortality but in contrast, the morbidity rate was high with mainly urinary and digestive complications, pelvic sepsis and thromboembolic complications. After pathological examination, tumoral resections were classified R0 in 19 cases, and R1 in one. All tumors were T4 with tumoral invasion of the bladder (n = 15), prostate (n = 6), seminal vesicles (n = 4), ureter (n = 3), vagina (n = 7), urethra (n = 1), and sacrum (n = 1). Lymph node involvement was present in four patients. The 3 and 5 year actuarial survival rate was respectively 47 and 18%. Thirteen patients died of their cancer, nine from metastases, and four from local recurrence with a mean survival of 29 and 32 months respectively. Seven patients were alive at the time of this study, six without actual recurrence.

CONCLUSIONS

In spite of its aggressive aspect, total pelvic exenteration seems justified in rectal carcinoma when extended to the urinary tract, when it causes major functional disorders, when there are no detectable metastases, and when the tumor has no posterior or lateral fixation. Local tumoral evolution can usually be controlled by pelvic exenteration but prolongation of survival is not demonstrated.

Results from pelvic exenteration for locally advanced colorectal cancer with lymph node metastases

PURPOSE

We examined the survival benefit of pelvic exenteration for locally advanced colorectal cancer with lymph node metastases, because this issue remains controversial.

METHODS

Medical records of 50 patients who underwent curative pelvic exenteration for colorectal cancer were reviewed retrospectively. Nodal metastases were examined by the clearing method in 29 patients and by the conventional manual method in 21 patients.

RESULTS

Invasion to contiguous pelvic organs was present in 40 patients (80 percent) and absent in 10 patients (20 percent). Node metastases were present in 33 patients (66 percent). Operative morbidity and mortality rates were 22 percent (11 patients) and 6 percent (3 patients), respectively. Respective five-year survival rates were 60 and 80 percent in the groups with and without organ invasion (no significant difference). Five-year survival rates in patients with nodal metastases was 54.6 percent but was significantly higher, 82.4 percent, in patients without nodal metastases. Five-year survival in 28 patients with both organ invasion and nodal metastases was 53.6 percent.

CONCLUSIONS

Long-term survival was afforded by pelvic exenteration for locally advanced colorectal cancer with nodal metastases.

The need for a multidisciplinary approach in the treatment of advanced colorectal cancer: a critical review from a medical oncologist and surgeon

Over the last 10 years important advances have been made in the treatment of patients with advanced colorectal cancer, particularly with surgery either alone or in combination with radiotherapy. Furthermore, despite early scepticism, several chemotherapy studies have now reported significant clinical benefits with 5-FU-based regimens and promising results have also been reported with newer agents such as raltitrexed and irinotecan. Taken together these advances now enable a significant proportion of patients to undergo treatment which will improve their quality of life, prolong survival and even result in cure in certain cases. Patients with advanced colorectal cancer can only benefit from these important advances, however, if a truly multidisciplinary approach to patient care is adopted which requires integration of the roles of the surgeon, medical oncologist and radiotherapist.

Total pelvic exenteration for locally advanced colorectal carcinoma

Twenty-six patients who underwent total pelvic exenteration for locally advanced colorectal cancer were studied retrospectively. The operative mortality rate was 8 per cent (two deaths). In patients with stage II primary disease the recurrence rate after curative surgery was three of seven, although the mean survival time was 58 months and the 5-year survival rate 71 per cent. Patients with stage III primary disease had a shorter mean survival time regardless of supposed curability (curative 14 months versus non-curative 9 months). Patients with stage IV disease had a mean survival time of 5 months. In patients who underwent curative surgery for recurrent disease the mean survival time was 33 months and 5-year survival rate 25 per cent, although in those receiving non-curative surgery the survival time was significantly shorter at 10 months (P < 0.05). Total pelvic exenteration is warranted for patients with stage II locally advanced colorectal carcinoma and is an option for those with recurrent carcinoma when performed with curvative intent.