Clinical significance of diminutive polyps of the rectum and sigmoid colon

Prevalence of proximal neoplasms among asymptomatic patients according to distal colorectal findings

Colorectal cancer has been described in association with hyperplastic polyposis. Only half of proximal colon cancers are associated with distal adenomas. To compare the prevalence of proximal and advanced neoplasia between patients with distal hyperplastic polyps only; with distal adenomas with or without hyperplastic polyps; and with no distal polyps, we retrospectively analyzed data of 1,064 adults who underwent colonoscopy. Of these patients, 3% had neoplasia. Proximal neoplasia occurred in 0.8% of 945 patients with no distal polyps, compared to none of 19 with distal hyperplastic polyps (P > 0.05) and 6% with distal adenomas (P > 0.05). Proximal advanced neoplasia occurred in 0.6% patients with no distal polyps, compared with none with distal hyperplastic polyps (P > 0.05) and 6% with distal adenomas (P > 0.05). In conclusion, patients with distal hyperplastic polyps, unlike those with distal adenomas, do not exhibit an increased risk for proximal neoplasia or proximal advanced neoplasia compared to those with no distal polyps.

Polyp enhancing level set evolution of colon wall: method and pilot study

Computer aided detection (CAD) in computed tomography colonography (CTC) aims at detecting colonic polyps that are the precursors of colon cancer. In this work, we propose a colon wall evolution algorithm polyp enhancing level sets (PELS) based on the level-set formulation that regularizes and enhances polyps as a preprocessing step to CTC CAD algorithms. The underlying idea is to evolve the polyps towards spherical protrusions on the colon wall while keeping other structures, such as haustral folds, relatively unchanged and, thereby, potentially improve the performance of CTC CAD algorithms, especially for smaller polyps. To evaluate our methods, we conducted a pilot study using an arbitrarily chosen CTC CAD method, the surface normal overlap (SNO) CAD algorithm, on a nine patient CTC data set with 47 polyps of sizes ranging from 2.0 to 17.0 mm in diameter. PELS increased the maximum sensitivity by 8.1% (from 21/37 to 24/37) for small polyps of sizes ranging from 5.0 to 9.0 mm in diameter. This is accompanied by a statistically significant separation between small polyps and false positives. PELS did not change the CTC CAD performance significantly for larger polyps.

Risk of proximal colorectal neoplasia among asymptomatic patients with distal hyperplastic polyps

PURPOSE

Many guidelines on colorectal cancer screening do not consider distal hyperplastic polyps to be a marker for proximal neoplasia. However, 11 of 17 published studies have shown an increased risk of proximal neoplasia in patients with distal hyperplastic polyps. Our goal is to assess the risk of proximal neoplasia in asymptomatic patients with distal hyperplastic polyps, compared to those with distal tubular adenomas or no distal polyps.

METHODS

We assessed proximal (cecum, ascending, transverse colon and splenic flexure) and distal polyps in patients undergoing screening colonoscopy, classifying them into 3 groups: distal hyperplastic polyps only; distal adenomas with or without hyperplastic polyps; no distal polyps. The prevalence of proximal neoplasia and advanced neoplasia (polyps > or =1 cm, villous adenomas, or cancer) was compared among these groups.

RESULTS

Of 2357 patients, 427 (18%) had neoplasia, including 103 (4%) with advanced neoplasia. Proximal neoplasia occurred in 175 (9%) of 1896 patients with no distal polyps, compared with 28 (12%) of 237 with distal hyperplastic polyps (P = 0.20) and 64 (29%) of 224 with distal adenomas (P <0.0001). Proximal advanced neoplasia occurred in 39 (2%) patients with no distal polyps, compared with 4 (2%) with distal hyperplastic polyps (P = 0.70) and 9 (4%) with distal adenomas (P = 0.13).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with distal hyperplastic polyps, unlike those with distal adenomas, do not exhibit an increased risk for proximal neoplasia or proximal advanced neoplasia compared to those with no distal polyps. The discovery of hyperplastic polyps on screening sigmoidoscopy should not prompt colonoscopy.

Diagnostic value of distal colonic polyps for prediction of advanced proximal neoplasia in an average-risk population undergoing screening colonoscopy

BACKGROUND

For colorectal cancer screening, the predictive value of distal findings in the ascertainment of proximal lesions is not fully established. The aims of this study were to assess distal findings as predictors of advanced proximal neoplasia and to compare the predictive value of endoscopy alone vs. combined endoscopic and histopathologic data.

METHODS

Primary colonoscopy screening was performed in 2210 consecutive, average-risk adults. Age, gender, endoscopic (size, number of polyps), and histopathologic distal findings were used as potential predictors of advanced proximal neoplasms (i.e., any adenoma > or =1 cm in size, and/or with villous histology, and/or with severe dysplasia or invasive cancer). Polyps were defined as distal if located in the descending colon, the sigmoid colon, or the rectum. Those in other locations were designated proximal.

RESULTS

Neoplastic lesions, including 11 invasive cancers, were found in 617 (27.9%) patients. Advanced proximal neoplasms without any distal adenoma were present in 1.3% of patients. Of the advanced proximal lesions, 39% were not associated with any distal polyp. Older age, male gender, and distal adenoma were independent predictors of advanced proximal neoplasms. The predictive ability of a model with endoscopic data alone did not improve after inclusion of histopathologic data. In multivariate logistic regression analysis, the predictive ability of models that use age, gender, and any combination of distal findings was relatively low. The proportion of advanced proximal neoplasms identified if any distal polyp was an indication for colonoscopy was only 62%.

CONCLUSIONS

A strategy in which colonoscopy is performed solely in patients with distal colonic findings is not effective screening for the detection of advanced proximal neoplasms in an average-risk population.

Prevalence of proximal adenomas after an adenoma is found on flexible sigmoidoscopy

BACKGROUND

Adenomatous polyps are a precursor of colorectal cancer and a frequent finding on screening flexible sigmoidoscopy (FS). Performance of colonoscopy when a diminutive (<6mm) adenoma is found on FS has been the subject of considerable debate.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the data from our colorectal cancer screening program for patients with adenoma(s) found on FS. Patients were divided into three groups based on FS findings: (1) an adenoma <6mm in size, (2) multiple non-advanced adenomas or an adenoma 6-10mm in size, or (3) advanced adenoma defined as an adenoma >10mm or with villous histology or high-grade dysplasia or cancer. A comparison of the proximal findings was then made.

RESULTS

5291 FS reports were reviewed with 606 (12%) patients having at least one adenoma. Colonoscopy reports were available in 550 patients. Of the 258 patients with a diminutive distal adenoma, 69 (27%) had a proximal adenoma and 13 (5%) had an advanced proximal adenoma on colonoscopy. Of the 164 patients with an adenoma 6-10mm or multiple non-advanced adenomas, 59 (36%) had a proximal adenoma and 13 (8%) had an advanced proximal adenoma. Of the 128 patients with a distal advanced adenoma, 58 (45%) had a proximal adenoma and 15 (12%) had an advanced proximal adenoma. The increase in proximal adenomas across the three groups was significant (P=0.001), and there was a trend for increased prevalence of advanced adenomas (P=0.061).

CONCLUSIONS

The prevalence of proximal adenomas increased significantly with more advanced lesions found distally at FS, and there was a trend towards a higher prevalence of advanced proximal adenomas. Based on current guidelines, flexible sigmoidoscopy is a screening option that can be used to identify average-risk patients at increased risk of proximal neoplasia.

Is the distal hyperplastic polyp a marker for proximal neoplasia?

CONTEXT

The current literature is unclear about the association between distal hyperplastic polyps and synchronous neoplasia (adenomatous polyps and cancer) in the proximal colon.

OBJECTIVE

To estimate the prevalence of proximal neoplasia associated with distal hyperplastic polyps.

DATA SOURCES

Database searches (medline and embase from 1966 to 2001) and manual search of the bibliographies of included and excluded studies, case reports, editorials, review articles, and textbooks of Gastroenterology.

STUDY SELECTION

Studies describing the prevalence of proximal neoplasia in persons with distal hyperplastic polyps.

DATA EXTRACTION

Demographics, clinical variables, study design, and prevalence of proximal neoplasia associated with various distal colorectal findings.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Of 18 included studies, 12 involved asymptomatic individuals in which the pooled absolute risk of any proximal neoplasia associated with distal hyperplastic polyps was 25% (95% confidence interval [95% CI], 21% to 29%). In 4 studies where colonoscopy was performed irrespective of distal findings, the absolute risk was 21% (95% CI, 14% to 28%). The relative risk of finding any proximal neoplasia in persons with distal hyperplastic polyps was 1.3 (95% CI, 0.9 to 1.8) compared to those with no distal polyps. Among 6 studies of patients with symptoms or risk factors for neoplasia, the absolute risk of proximal neoplasia was 35% (95% CI, 32% to 39%) in persons with distal hyperplastic polyps. In 2 studies of screening colonoscopy, advanced proximal neoplasia (cancer, or a polyp with villous histology or severe dysplasia, or a tubular adenoma >/=1 cm) was present in 4% to 5% of persons with distal hyperplastic polyps, which was 1.5 to 2.6 times greater than in those with no distal polyps.

CONCLUSIONS

In asymptomatic persons, a distal hyperplastic polyp is associated with a 21% to 25% risk for any proximal neoplasia and a 4% to 5% risk of advanced proximal neoplasia, and may justify examination of the proximal colon. Further study is needed to determine the risk of advanced proximal neoplasia associated with size and number of distal hyperplastic polyps.

The yield of colonoscopy in average-risk patients with non-specific colonic symptoms

OBJECTIVES

The need for full colonoscopies in average-risk patients with non-specific colonic symptoms is controversial. We aimed to evaluate: (1) the yield of full colonoscopy; (2) the prevalence of proximal neoplasia in these patients; (3) the yield if any of doing full colonoscopies to diagnose proximal lesions in patients in whom the distal colon was clear; (4) the significance of this yield with respect to age.

DESIGN

This is a retrospective analysis to assess the value of open access colonoscopy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

All patients who underwent a colonoscopy in our Endoscopy Unit during January 1996 to December 1999 were assessed (n = 3357).

RESULTS

We analysed 945 patients with average risk and non-specific colonic symptoms (significant risk factors excluded). The overall yield of adenomas was 5.8%. The yield of distal adenomas in patients > or= 50 years of age was 8.2% (37 out of 450) versus 0.2% in the 50 years group (one out of 495; = 0.0001). The proximal adenoma yield in > or= 50 year olds was 3.8% (17 out of 495) versus 0.2% in < 50 year olds (one out of 495) (P = 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

In a cohort of average-risk patients with non-specific colonic symptoms attending an "open access" colonoscopy clinic, the yield for proximal adenomas is small in the < 50 years group. In patients aged < 50 years, distal colonic examination is all that is required, whereas a full colonoscopy may be justified in patients > or = 50 years old.

Diminutive polyps of large bowel should be an early target for endoscopic treatment

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Aim of the present study is to ascertain the importance of diminutive colorectal polyps and define the need for removal according to their characteristics and malignant potential.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 4,723 patients who underwent colonoscopy were evaluated and 624 patients with 826 polyps were recorded. There were 352 patients with 443 diminutive polyps, studied according to their distribution. Of these, 371 were removed, histologically examined and correlated to patient characteristics and occurrence of synchronous neoplasms.

RESULTS

Of the right colon polyps, 81/115 were diminutive, versus 362/711 of the left colon (p<0.0001). Adenomas were more common in patients over 50 years of age, (p<0.0001). In all colonic segments, diminutive adenomas prevailed over hyperplastic polyps, whereas the proportion of diminutive adenomas predominated in the right colon (p=0.0015). Adenomas were classified as tubular 39%, tubulovillous 55.7% and villous 5.3%. The degree of dysplasia was mild in 45.5%, moderate in 51% and severe in 3.5%. The prevalence of synchronous neoplasms was 37.4%. They were more frequently found in males over 50 years of age and in patients with diminutive adenomas compared to those with diminutive hyperplastic polyps (p=0.0078).

CONCLUSIONS

The majority of right colon polyps are diminutive. The proportion of diminutive adenomas is higher in patients over 50 years and in the right vs left colon. Diminutive polyps should be removed taking into account the high prevalence of adenomas with a villous component and their significant degree of dysplasia.

The effect of electrothermal cautery-assisted resection of diminutive colonic polyps on histopathologic diagnosis

We examined diminutive colonic polyps to identify relationships between thermal electrocoagulation or resection trauma cytologic artifacts, type of thermal electrocoagulation, polyp size, and the interobserver variation among 3 pathologists. The 3 pathologists independently evaluated 119 colonic polyps 5 mm or less in maximum dimension for diagnosis and degree of thermal electrocoagulation or resection trauma cytologic artifacts. The maximum dimension of the polyps and type of thermal electrocoagulation were recorded. The average percentage of polyps in which a definitive diagnosis could not be made because of cytologic artifacts was 16.5% (range, 11.8%-19.3%). Decreasing polyp size was associated linearly with the inability to make a definitive diagnosis owing to cytologic artifacts. Polyps smaller than 2 mm significantly more often could not be definitively diagnosed by at least 1 pathologist owing to cytologic artifacts, including some polyps that were excised without thermal electrocautery. Interobserver variation increased with decreasing polyp dimension. Two millimeters seems to represent a cut point, below which the likelihood that a definitive diagnosis can be made can be increased if thermal electrocoagulation is used. This small size seems to make them especially susceptible to cytologically injurious forces.

Significance of small distal adenoma for detection of proximal neoplasms in the colorectum

BACKGROUND

The significance of the small distal tubular adenoma detected by sigmoidoscopy as a predictor of proximal neoplasm remains controversial. The aim of this study was to examine the prevalence of proximal neoplasms in patients with and without distal neoplasms.

METHODS

This is a retrospective study of 3131 asymptomatic middle-aged men who underwent total colonoscopy. For 812 men with colorectal neoplasms characteristics of the identified neoplasms were determined.

RESULTS

The prevalence of proximal neoplasms in patients with small distal tubular adenoma was 20% (92 of 461), whereas the prevalence of proximal neoplasms in patients without distal neoplasms was 11.5% (301 of 2620). The prevalence of advanced proximal neoplasms in patients with small distal tubular adenoma and without distal neoplasm was 1.3% and 0.8%, respectively. In the 29 patients with advanced proximal neoplasms, only 6 (21%) had a small distal tubular adenoma.

CONCLUSIONS

The presence of small distal tubular adenomas may provide a clue to the presence of small proximal tubular adenomas. However, the majority of advanced proximal neoplasms (79%) do not have a synchronous small distal tubular adenoma. (Gastrointest Endosc 2000;52:358-61).

Advanced distal colonic lesions as predictors of advanced lesions in the proximal colon

The characteristics of adenomas found during sigmoidoscopy have been suggested to predict synchronous adenomas in the proximal colon. Our aim was to examine whether the presence and characteristics of distal colonic lesions are associated with the presence and characteristics of lesions in the proximal colon. We performed a university hospital based case-control study with 3,268 consecutive subjects who received colonoscopy between January 1992 and December 1995. Subjects who had a history of colonic polyps, inflammatory bowel disease, intestinal resection, or had a contraindication against biopsies were excluded. Number size, and histologic characteristics of polyps in the distal and proximal colon were recorded. Advanced lesions were defined as neoplastic lesions with 1 or more of the following features: 1) > or = 1 cm diameter, and/or 2) villous histology, and/or 3) severe dysplasia or carcinoma, and/or 4) > or = 3 lesions. We found that 439 patients had neoplastic lesions in the distal colon only (61.3% with advanced lesions), 198 patients had lesions in the proximal colon only (55.1% advanced), and 197 had lesions in both the distal colon (74.6% advanced) and the proximal colon (55.8% advanced). Distal lesions were significantly more often advanced in patients with synchronous proximal lesions compared with patients with lesions in the distal colon only (odds ratio: 1.9; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.3-2.8; p < 0.001). The odds ratios for finding any neoplastic lesion in the proximal colon and an advanced proximal lesion, respectively, were 3.7 (2.6-5.3) (p < 0.001) and 2.2 (1.3-3.7) (p < 0.01) when a nonadvanced lesion was found in the distal colon, and 6.8 (5.3-8.7) (p < 0.001) and 6.7 (4.9-9.0) (p < 0.001) when an advanced lesion was found in the distal colon. Logistic regression analysis revealed number of distal polyps and villous histology as independent predictors of advanced lesions in the proximal colon; size and severe dysplasia were not independent predictors. In conclusion, characteristics of neoplastic lesions in the distal colon predict the presence and characteristics of lesions in the proximal colon.

Do patients with rectosigmoid adenomas 5 mm or less in diameter need total colonoscopy?

BACKGROUND

The need for colonoscopy in the care of patients with rectosigmoid adenoma 5 mm or less in diameter is still debatable.

METHODS

We estimated the prevalence of proximal adenomas among 3052 consecutive subjects undergoing total colonoscopy. Rectosigmoid adenoma was classified as diminutive (5 mm), small (6 to 10 mm), or large (>/=11 mm). Advanced proximal adenoma was 10 mm in diameter or larger, or with a villous component, severe dysplasia, or infiltrating adenocarcinoma.

RESULTS

Proximal adenoma was found in 212 of 2483 patients (8.5%, 95% CI [7.5, 9.7]) without distal neoplastic polyps, 49 of 214 (22.9%, 95% CI [17.6, 29.2]) with diminutive, 44 of 174 (25.3%, 95% CI [19.1, 32.5] with small, and 70 of 181 (38.7%, 95% CI [31.6, 46.2]) with large distal adenoma. Advanced proximal adenoma was found in 49 (2.0%, 95% CI [1.5, 2.6]), 8 (3.7%, 95% CI [1.7, 7.5]), 17 (9.8%, 95% CI [6.0, 15.4]), and 29 patients (16.0%, 95% [11.2, 22.4]), respectively. In patients with distal adenoma risk for proximal lesions increased with increasing age, size, and number of distal adenomas (p = 0.01). Size of distal adenoma was the strongest predictor of the presence of proximal advanced adenoma (multivariate analyses).

CONCLUSIONS

In a clinical setting, the decision to perform colonoscopy should take into account proximal lesions of clinical interest, life expectancy, costs, and risks associated with the procedure. When detection of advanced proximal adenoma is the goal, presence of distal diminutive adenoma alone might not be an indication for total colonoscopy.

Frequency of advanced neoplasia in the proximal colon without an index polyp in the rectosigmoid

PURPOSE

Screening endoscopy has the potential to reduce colorectal cancer mortality. However, the efficacy of screening flexible sigmoidoscopy compared with colonoscopy strongly depends on the frequency of advanced proximal neoplasms without an index polyp in the rectosigmoid. We have therefore determined this frequency in our endoscopy population.

METHODS

Endoscopic and histologic data were analyzed from all patients on whom integral colonoscopy was performed between 1980 and 1995. Advanced neoplasia was defined as cancer or adenomas >10 mm in diameter, adenomas with a villous component, or severe dysplasia. Patients with polyposis syndrome or inflammatory bowel disease were excluded.

RESULTS

Colonoscopy was performed on 11,760 patients. 2,272 (19.3 percent) had at least one colorectal neoplasm, of which 39 percent had the neoplasm above the rectosigmoid. Twenty-two percent of all patients with neoplasia had no index polyp in the rectosigmoid and 16 percent of these had no index polyp, but at least one advanced proximal neoplasm.

CONCLUSIONS

Although 39 percent of patients had neoplasms above the rectosigmoid, only 16 percent had an advanced proximal neoplasm without an index polyp in the rectosigmoid. This gives a figure on which to base the evaluation of screening sigmoidoscopy programs against those of screening colonoscopy.

Is colonoscopy needed for the nonadvanced adenoma found on sigmoidoscopy? The Polyp Prevention Trial

BACKGROUND & AIMS

The need for colonoscopy when small tubular adenomas with low-grade dysplasia are found on sigmoidoscopy is uncertain. The aim of this study was to examine the prevalence and characteristics of proximal adenomas in patients with distal adenomas.

METHODS

We studied 981 subjects with distal adenomas found on the index colonoscopy before randomization in the Polyp Prevention Trial.

RESULTS

Four hundred sixty patients (46.9%) had >/=1 distal adenoma that was pathologically advanced (villous component, high-grade dysplasia, or >/=1 cm); 21.5% (211 of 981) had any proximal adenoma; and 4.3% (42 of 981) (95% confidence interval [CI], 3.0-5.5) had an advanced proximal adenoma. A greater percentage of patients with an advanced distal adenoma (5.9%) (95% CI, 3.7-8.0) had an advanced proximal adenoma compared with those with a nonadvanced distal adenoma (2.9%) (95% CI, 1.4-4.3) (OR, 2.1; 95% CI, 1.1-4.3; P = 0.03). Not performing a colonoscopy in patients with a nonadvanced distal adenoma would have missed 36% (15 of 42) of the advanced proximal adenomas.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with an advanced distal adenoma are twice as likely to have an advanced proximal adenoma as patients with a nonadvanced distal adenoma. However, eschewing a colonoscopy in patients with a nonadvanced distal adenoma would result in not detecting a sizeable percentage of the prevalent advanced proximal adenomas. These data support performance of a colonoscopy in patients with a nonadvanced distal adenoma. Confirmation of these results in asymptomatic subjects undergoing screening sigmoidoscopy is advisable.

Distal hyperplastic polyps do not predict proximal adenomas: results from a multicentric study of colorectal adenomas

BACKGROUND

The association between distal hyperplastic polyps and proximal adenomas is still a matter of debate. We investigated this association while taking into account patient characteristics.

METHODS

After exclusion of patients with inflammatory bowel diseases, familial adenomatous polyposis, or any cancer, 3088 eligible consecutive subjects aged 18 to 69 years underwent total colonoscopy in four gastroenterology units. The odds ratios (OR) of having proximal adenomas according to patient characteristics (age, sex, medical center, year of endoscopy, reasons for referral, and distal findings) were estimated in univariate and multivariate analyses.

RESULTS

Patients with distal polyps of any type showed an adjusted OR of 2.5 (95% CI [1.9, 3.1] p < .001) of having proximal adenomas as compared with those without distal polyps. When distal adenomas and distal hyperplastic polyps were included in the multivariate model as independent factors, the presence of adenomas significantly increased the risk of proximal adenomas (OR = 2.8: 95% CI [2.2, 3.6] p < .001), whereas the presence of hyperplastic polyps did not (OR = 1.1: 95% CI [0.8, 1.5] p = .64). No association with number, size, or location of distal hyperplastic polyps was seen.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data show that the presence of hyperplastic polyps should not be the sole indication for total colonoscopy because they are not associated with proximal adenomas when adjusting for patient characteristics and presence of distal adenomas.

Importance of adenomas 5 mm or less in diameter that are detected by sigmoidoscopy

BACKGROUND

The need for colonoscopy in patients with adenomas 5 mm or less in diameter that are detected by sigmoidoscopy is controversial.

METHODS

We prospectively determined the prevalence of proximal colonic neoplasms in asymptomatic patients at average risk for colorectal cancer, each of whose index lesion on screening fiberoptic sigmoidoscopy was a benign adenoma. Polyps found on sigmoidoscopy underwent biopsy, and colonoscopy was recommended to all patients with neoplastic polyps. Rectosigmoid adenomas were classified as diminutive (< or = 5 mm in diameter), small (6 to 10 mm in diameter), or large (> or = 11 mm in diameter).

RESULTS

Of 3496 consecutive patients referred for sigmoidoscopy, 311 had neoplastic rectosigmoid polyps; 108 of these patients were excluded from the analysis because of a history of colonic neoplasia, symptoms, prior colonic evaluation, or incomplete follow-up data. The remaining 203 patients made up the study group, and all underwent colonoscopy. Neoplasms were found in the proximal colon in 40 of 137 patients (29 percent) with diminutive index polyps, 15 of 52 patients (29 percent) with small index polyps, and 8 of 14 patients (57 percent) with large index polyps. Advanced neoplasms (adenomas > or = 10 mm in diameter, adenomas with a villous component or moderate-to-severe dysplasia, carcinoma in situ, or frank carcinoma) were found in 8 patients (6 percent), 5 patients (10 percent), and 4 patients (29 percent), respectively. Two patients with diminutive index polyps had proximal carcinoma in situ, and two had proximal stage I carcinomas; one patient with a large index polyp had proximal stage III carcinoma.

CONCLUSIONS

The substantial prevalence of proximal colonic neoplasms, including advanced lesions, in asymptomatic average-risk patients with rectosigmoid adenomas < or = 5 mm in diameter warrants colonoscopy in these patients.

The acute effect of straining on pelvic floor neurological function

Integrity of sensory and motor function is essential in the maintenance of continence. The pudendal nerve assumes a central role being a mixed sensory and motor nerve. Neuropathic changes may therefore lead to incontinence and stretch injury to the pudendal nerve has been implicated as an aetiological factor. However pudendal neuropathy, altered anal sensation and perineal descent do not always correlate in the same patient. To investigate this further we evaluated the effect of a simulated defaecation strain on pelvic floor neurological function in a group of patients with constipation and incontinence. Pudendal nerve terminal motor latency (PNTML) and anal electrosensitivity (AS) were measured at rest and after a simulated defaecation strain of 1 minute. At rest PNTML correlated with AS (r = 0.461, P = 0.003). Twenty-five patients had perineal descent of more than 1 cm on straining, and 13 had descent below the ischial tuberosities. After 1 minute of straining AS was significantly (P < 0.001) blunted and PNTML was significantly (P < 0.001) prolonged both changes returning to normal after 3 minutes. AS was significantly (P = 0.01) more blunted in patients with perineal descent of more than 1 cm. PNTML was significantly (P = 0.01) more prolonged in patients with perineal descent of more than 2 cm. Age was significantly correlated with AS (r = 0.45, P = 0.004) and PNTML (r = 0.49, P = 0.002). Anal sensation and PNTML are acutely affected by defaecation straining, and changes may occur in patients without perineal descent. Functional changes occur equally in constipated and incontinent patients.