Use of Toradol in anorectal surgery

PREEMPTIVE ANALGESIA IN ANORECTAL SURGERY: RESULTS OF THE PROSPECTIVE, RANDOMIZED, DOUBLE-BLIND, PLACEBO-CONTROLLED TRIAL

Aim: To assess the efficiency of preemptive analgesia with Ketoprofen 100 mg 2 hours before procedure per os to decrease postoperative pain. Methods: This prospective, randomized, double-blind study was conducted in the surgical department of the Lomonosov MSU Medical Center. Patients who were diagnosed with anorectal disease without contraindication to perform subarachnoid anesthesia or other somatic diseases and underwent anorectal procedure were included. After signing the consent all participants were randomly divided: the first group got a 100 mg Ketoprofen tablet, the second one got a starch tablet 2 hours before surgery. Following the procedure the primary and secondary outcomes were evaluated: opioid administration intake, the pain at rest and during defecation, duration and frequency of other analgesics intake, readmission rate, life quality, time to return to previous lifestyle, the complications rate. Results: 134 participants were included in the study: 68 in the main group, 66 in the control one. Postoperative pain syndrome was statistically less in the main group on the 4,5,7 days (p=0,035; p=0,023; p=0,046, respectively). Opioid intake after surgery was significantly lower in the main group (p=0.174). The side effects frequency, live quality, time to return to previous lifestyle also didn’t differ in both groups. Conclusion: Preoperative analgesia is safe and effective in reducing postoperative pain in anorectal surgery, reduces the opioid usе, doesn’t increase the ketoprophen side effects frequency. It should be a part of the routine patients’ multimodal management in anorectal surgery.

Preemptive analgesia for hemorrhoidectomy: study protocol for a prospective, randomized, double-blind trial

BACKGROUND

Hemorrhoidectomy is associated with intense postoperative pain that requires multimodal analgesia. It includes nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), acetaminophen, and local anesthetics to reach adequate pain control. There are data in literature preemptive analgesia could decrease postoperative pain after hemorrhoidectomy. The aim of this study is to assess the efficacy of preemptive analgesia with ketoprofen 100 mg 2 h before procedure per os with spinal anesthesia to decrease postoperative pain according to visual analog scale and to reduce the opioids and other analgesics consumption.

METHODS

Patients of our clinic who meet the following inclusion criteria are included: hemorrhoids grade III-IV and the planned Milligan-Morgan hemorrhoidectomy. After signing the consent all participants are randomly divided into 2 groups: the first one gets a tablet with 100 mg ketoprofen, the second one gets a tablet containing starch per os 2 h before surgery (72 participants per arm). Patients of both arms receive spinal anesthesia and undergo open hemorrhoidectomy. Following the procedure the primary and secondary outcomes are evaluated: opioid administration intake, the pain at rest and during defecation, duration, and frequency of other analgesics intake, readmission rate, overall quality of life, time from the procedure to returning to work, and the complications rate.

DISCUSSION

Multimodality pain management has been shown to improve pain control and decrease opioid intake in patients after hemorrhoidectomy in several studies. Gabapentin can be considered as an alternative approach to pain control as NSAIDs have limitative adverse effects. Systemic admission of ketorolac with local anesthetics also showed significant efficacy in patients undergoing anorectal surgery. We hope to prove the efficacy of multimodal analgesia including preemptive one for patients undergoing excisional hemorrhoidectomy that will help to hold postoperative pain levels no more than 3-4 points on VAS with minimal consumption of opioid analgesics.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrial.gov NCT04361695 . Registered on April 24, 2020, version 1.0.

PREEMPTIVE ANALGESIA IN ANORECTAL SURGERY: STUDY PROTOCOL FOR A PROSPECTIVE, RANDOMIZED, DOUBLE-BLIND TRIAL

Aim: To assess the efficiency of preemptive analgesia with Ketoprofen 10 mg 2 hours before procedure per os with spinal anesthesia to decrease postoperative pain and the amount of used analgesics.Methods: Patients of our clinic who meet the following inclusion criteria are included: they must be diagnosed with anorectal disease and planned anorectal procedure. After signing the consent all participants are randomly divided into 2 groups: the first one gets a tablet with 10 mg Ketoprofen, the second one gets a tablet containing starch per os 2 hours before surgery (72 participants per arm). Patients of both arms receive spinal anesthesia and undergo open hemorrhoidectomy. Following the procedure the primary and secondary outcomes are evaluated: opioid administration intake, the pain at rest and during defecation, duration and frequency of other analgesics intake, readmission rate, overall quality of life, time from the procedure to returning to work and the complications rate.Discussion: Multimodality pain management has been shown to improve pain control and decrease opioid intake in patients after anorectal surgery in several studies. Gabapentin can be considered as an alternative approach to pain control as NSAIDs have limitative adverse effects. Systemic admission of ketorolac with local anesthetics also showed significant efficacy in patients undergoing anorectal surgery. We hope to prove the efficacy of multimodal analgesia including preemptive one for patients undergoing anorectal procedure that will help to hold postoperative pain level no more than 3-4 points on VAS with minimal consumption of opioid analgesics.

Preemptive Analgesia Decreases Pain Following Anorectal Surgery: A Prospective, Randomized, Double-Blinded, Placebo-Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND

Postoperative pain is a frequent cause for delayed discharge following outpatient procedures, including anorectal surgery. Both central and peripheral pain receptor sensitization are thought to contribute to postoperative pain. Blocking these receptors and preempting sensitization prevents hyperalgesia leading to lower pain medication requirements. Studies in the orthopedic, urologic, and gynecologic literature support this practice, but the use of preemptive analgesia in anorectal surgery is understudied.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of preemptive analgesia in decreasing postoperative pain.

DESIGN

This is a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial.

SETTING

This study was conducted at the University of Vermont Medical Center, a tertiary care referral center in Burlington, Vermont.

PATIENTS

Patients who were over 18 years of age, ASA Physical Status Classes I, II, or III, and undergoing surgery for anal fissure, fistula or condyloma or hemorrhoids were selected.

INTERVENTIONS

Preoperative oral acetaminophen and gabapentin followed by intravenous ketamine and dexamethasone were given before incision compared with oral placebos.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary outcomes measured were postoperative pain scores, percentage of patients utilizing breakthrough narcotics, and rates of side effects.

RESULTS

Ninety patients were enrolled. Because of patient withdrawal, screen failures, and loss to follow-up, 61 patients were analyzed (30 in the preemptive analgesia group and 31 in the control group). Patients in the active group had significantly less pain in the postanesthesia care unit and at 8 hours postoperatively. Significantly fewer participants in the active group used narcotics in the postanesthesia care unit and at 8 hours postoperatively. Average pain scores were excellent for both groups. There was no difference in the number of medication-related side effects between the 2 groups.

LIMITATIONS

This study was limited by the small sample size and excellent pain control in both groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Preemptive analgesia is safe and results in decreased pain in the early postoperative period following anorectal surgery. It should be implemented by surgeons performing these procedures. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/A588.

Prospective randomized multicentre trial comparing stapled with open haemorrhoidectomy

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to compare the results of conventional open haemorrhoidectomy as currently practised in Italy (group 1) with stapled haemorrhoidectomy using a 33-mm circular stapling device (group 2).

METHODS

One hundred patients with symptomatic third- and fourth-degree haemorrhoids were enrolled by five hospitals. Patients were allocated to the two groups according to a centralized randomization scheme featuring five permutated blocks of 20. Preoperative clinical examination and anorectal manometry demonstrated no features of anal incontinence. Patients had a clinical and manometric re-evaluation after operation and were asked to complete a clinical diary. After a median of 16 (range 8-19) months patients were administered a standardized questionnaire by telephone.

RESULTS

Postoperative bleeding requiring haemostatic procedures occurred in three patients in each group. Patients in group 1 complained of moderate pain for a median of 5.3 (range 0-19) days compared with 3.1 (range 0-10) days in group 2 (P = 0.01), while severe pain was present for 2.3 (range 0-24) days in group 1 but only for 1 (range 0-14) day in group 2 (P = 0.03). The median hospital stay was 2 days in group 1 compared with 1 day in group 2 (P = 0.01). In the early days after operation, patients in group 2 had greater difficulty in maintaining normal continence to liquid stools (P = 0.01), but after 30 days the continence score was better in group 2 (P = 0.04).

CONCLUSION

Stapled haemorrhoidectomy is as effective as conventional haemorrhoidectomy. Reduced postoperative pain, shorter hospital stay and a trend toward earlier return to work suggest short-term advantages for the stapled technique.

Ketorolac improves recovery after outpatient anorectal surgery

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of ketorolac combined with local anesthetics for anorectal surgery.

METHODS

From June 1998 through March 1999, 123 outpatients undergoing anorectal surgery were entered into a prospective, randomized, double-blinded study involving three treatment groups. All patients received intravenous sedation consisting of fentanyl and a propofol infusion, with a local anesthesia mixture of lidocaine, bupivacaine, and bicarbonate. Group A (41 patients) received placebo (saline) injections. Group B (41 patients) received 60 mg of intravenous ketorolac at the onset of the procedure, and Group C (41 patients) received 60 mg of ketorolac mixed with the local anesthetic. Data were analyzed using analysis of variance and chi-squared tests.

RESULTS

All groups had similar demographic characteristics and operative procedures. Twenty-nine of the 123 patients were human immunodeficiency virus-positive. There was no difference in operative or anesthesia time. Anesthesia and fluids given were similar in across groups. A significantly higher percentage of Group A patients had pain (34 percent) and required additional oral analgesia (20 percent) in the Day Surgery Unit. Only 5 percent of Group B and Group C patients complained of pain, with oral analgesics given to 2 percent of Group B and none in Group C. Voiding difficulties were more common in Group A patients, one patient requiring catheterization.

CONCLUSION

The addition of ketorolac (60 mg), either intravenous or injected with local anesthetics, reduces voiding problems and significantly decreases postoperative analgesic requirements in outpatients undergoing anorectal surgery.

Ischiorectal fossa block decreases posthemorrhoidectomy pain: randomized, prospective, double-blind clinical trial

PURPOSE

Hemorrhoidectomy can be associated with severe pain in the immediate postoperative period. The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy of a preemptive local anesthetic, ischiorectal fossa block, in the reduction of pain and analgesic requirements after hemorrhoidectomy.

METHODS

All patients were suitable for an established day surgery hemorrhoidectomy protocol. Immediately before surgery patients were randomly assigned either to receive (Group 1) or not receive (Group 2) the local anesthetic block. All other aspects of surgery and anesthesia were standardized. Nursing staff assessed pain at 30 minutes and 2, 4, and 24 hours postoperatively using a visual analog scale (1-10, where 1 represented no pain and 10 represented the worst pain imaginable). Analgesic requirements also were recorded at these times. Both the patients and the nursing staff were blinded to which local anesthetic protocol had been used.

RESULTS

Twenty patients were enrolled in the trial. Ten patients were randomly assigned to Group I and ten to Group 2. Mean pain scores for Group 1 (anal block) at 0.5, 2, 4, and 24 hours were 1.5, 1.8, 2.1, and 2.5, respectively, compared with Group 2, with mean pain scores of 3.4, 3.4, 3.9, and 5.1. These differences were statistically significant. Patients in Group 1 used less analgesia in the first 24 hours postoperatively than those in Group 2.

CONCLUSION

The use of a preemptive local anesthetic, ischiorectal fossa block, is associated with a significant decrease in pain and analgesia requirements after hemorrhoidectomy.

Day-case haemorrhoidectomy

BACKGROUND

Ligation excision haemorrhoidectomy is usually performed on an inpatient basis. This study was designed to assess the feasibility of day-case haemorrhoidectomy.

METHODS

Patients fulfilling criteria for day surgery underwent ligation excision haemorrhoidectomy with the intention of a same-day discharge from hospital. A standardized protocol for anaesthesia, perioperative analgesia and antiemesis was followed. Patients received daily home nursing visits until they felt both comfortable and confident. Staff recorded pain and nausea scores on a visual analogue scale (range 1-10) until the first bowel action. Patient satisfaction was assessed independently after operation.

RESULTS

Fifty-one patients underwent planned day-case haemorrhoidectomy. Forty-two (82 per cent) were discharged on the day of surgery. All patients were discharged within 26 h of surgery. Four patients required readmission, two with reactive bleeding, one with urinary retention and one for pain control. Pain and nausea were well controlled. Forty-four patients (86 per cent) were totally or very satisfied with their overall care.

CONCLUSION

Ligation excision haemorrhoidectomy can be performed successfully as a day-case procedure.

Intraoperative use of Toradol facilitates outpatient hemorrhoidectomy

Pain after hemorrhoidectomy is widely feared by many patients who are mostly still treated with oral/intramuscular narcotics to control their pain postoperatively.

PURPOSE

In an effort to decrease posthemorrhoidectomy pain by applying newer methods of analgesia, a prospective trial was conducted to investigate the postoperative analgesic effect of Toradol (ketorolac tromethamine; Syntex Labs, Palo Alto, CA) injected into the sphincter muscle at the time of hemorrhoidectomy and taken orally during a five-day postoperative period in a group of 24 patients (Toradol group). Results were compared with two other groups of matching patients: one group (narcotics, n = 18) treated with standard postoperative narcotic intramuscular/oral analgesics after overnight hospital stay, and a group (SQMP, n = 21) previously treated by one of us with outpatient, subcutaneous infusion of morphine sulfate (Roxane Laboratories, Columbus, OH) via a home infusion pump.

METHOD

The length of hospitalization, severity of postoperative pain and complications, costs, and side effects were analyzed by patient questionnaire at the time of the first postoperative visit and hospital and clinic records were reviewed. Differences between groups were analyzed using Student's t-test with P < 0.05 being significant.

RESULTS

Subjective pain response and hospitalization cost were significantly less in the SQMP group; however, this was at the expense of increased postoperative complications (urinary retention) and side effects (day until first bowel movement, nausea) although without a decrease in satisfaction rating. The Toradol group had pain control equivalent to that of the narcotics group, a higher satisfaction rating, and suffered no increase in complications relative to either group. Significantly, there was no urinary retention in the Toradol group.

CONCLUSION

Postoperative pain after hemorrhoidectomy can be safely controlled as an outpatient using newer methods of pain control. These include both constant-infusion pain pump or supplemental use of the nonsteroidal analgesic ketorolac, both of which allow early release of the patient the day of surgery by diminishing postoperative pain. An important advantage of local injection of ketorolac is the elimination of urinary retention in our study group, probably by blunting the pain reflex response facilitated by prostaglandins, thus allowing safe same-day discharge.