Blood transfusion and survival in colorectal cancer

Perioperative blood transfusion is associated with post-operative infectious complications in patients with Crohn's disease

Background

We have previously demonstrated that blood transfusion (BT) was associated with post-operative complications in patients undergoing surgery for Crohn’s disease (CD), based on our institutional data registry. The aim of this study was to verify the association between perioperative BT and infectious complications in CD patients enrolled in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS NSQIP) database.

Methods

All CD patients undergoing surgery between 2005 and 2013 were identified from NSQIP. Variables were defined according to the ACS NSQIP guidelines. The primary outcome was infectious complications, including superficial, deep and organ/space surgical site infection, wound dehiscence, urinary tract infection, pneumonia, systemic sepsis and septic shock. Multivariate analyses were performed to assess the risk factors for post-operative infections.

Results

All 10 100 eligible patients were included and 611 (6.0%) received perioperative BT. BT patients were older, lighter in weight and more likely to be functionally dependent. BT patients were more likely to have post-operative infectious complications than those without BT, including superficial surgical site infection (SSI) (10.8% vs 7.4%, p=0.002), deep SSI (3.3% vs 1.6%, p=0.003), organ/space SSI (14.2% vs 5.4%, p<0.001), pneumonia (3.8% vs 1.3%, p<0.001), urinary tract infection (3.9% vs 2.2%, p=0.006), sepsis (11.5% vs 4.5%, p<0.001) and sepsis shock (3.1% vs 0.8%, p<0.001). Multivariate analysis showed that intra- and/or post-operative BT was an independent risk factor for post-operative infectious complications (odds ratio [OR] = 2.2; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.8–2.7; p<0.001) and the risk increased with each administered unit of red blood cell (OR = 1.3, 95% CI: 1.2–1.5). Other independent factors were history of smoking, chronic heart disease, diabetes, hypertension and the use of corticosteroids. Pre-operative BT, however, was not found to be a risk factor to post-operative infections.

Conclusions

Intra- and/or post-operative, not pre-operative, BT was found to be associated with an increased risk for post-operative infectious complications in this CD cohort. Therefore, the timing and risks and benefits of BT should be carefully balanced.

Perioperative Blood Transfusion and Postoperative Outcome in Patients with Crohn's Disease Undergoing Primary Ileocolonic Resection in the "Biological Era"

BACKGROUND

Perioperative blood transfusion has been shown to be associated with inflammatory response and immunosuppression. Patients receiving blood transfusion may have an increased risk for developing postoperative morbidities. The impact of blood transfusion on the postoperative recurrence of Crohn's disease (CD) has been controversial. The aim of this study was to assess the effect of blood transfusion on postoperative outcomes in CD in the current biological era.

METHODS

This historical cohort study involved data collection and analysis of CD patients who underwent the index ileocolonic resection in our institution between 2000 and 2012. Postoperative complications were compared between the transfused and nontransfused patients. The effects of perioperative blood transfusion on postoperative complications and disease recurrence were analyzed with both univariate and multivariate analyses.

RESULTS

A total of 318 patients were included in the study, and 52 of them (16.5 %) received perioperative blood transfusion. Blood transfusion was found to be associated with an increased risk of postoperative infectious and noninfectious complications both in univariate (P < 0.001 for each) and multivariable analyses (infectious complications: odds ratio [OR] = 8.73, 95 % confidence interval [CI] 2.85-26.78, P < 0.001; noninfectious complications: OR = 3.64, 95 % CI 1.30-10.18; P = 0.014). In addition, the Cox regression model indicated that blood transfusion was associated with both surgical (hazard ratio [HR] = 3.43, 95 % CI 1.92-6.13; P < 0.001) and endoscopic (HR = 2.08, 95 % CI 1.38-3.14; P < 0.001) CD recurrence following the index surgery.

CONCLUSION

Adverse outcomes after perioperative blood transfusion for the primary ileocolonic resection for CD resemble findings in surgery for other diseases. The presumed immunosuppressive effect of blood transfusion did not confer any protective effect on disease recurrence.

Effect of blood transfusion on outcome after pancreaticoduodenectomy for exocrine tumour of the pancreas

BACKGROUND

Blood transfusion is thought to have an immunosuppressive effect. The aims of this study were to examine survival in patients with pancreatic cancer receiving blood transfusion in association with pancreaticoduodenectomy, and to define preoperative risk factors for subsequent transfusion.

METHODS

A retrospective review was performed of a prospective database of patients with exocrine tumours of the head of the pancreas who had undergone pancreaticoduodenectomy between 1998 and 2003. Clinical data, transfusion records and preoperative laboratory values were recorded.

RESULTS

A total of 294 patients underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy for exocrine tumours in the pancreatic head. Of these, 140 (47.6 per cent) received a blood transfusion. Their median survival was 18 months, compared with 24 months for those who did not have a transfusion (P = 0.036). Postoperative transfusion, margin status and node stage were independent predictors of survival. Age and preoperative total bilirubin and haemoglobin levels were the only preoperative factors that correlated with transfusion.

CONCLUSION

In patients with exocrine tumours of the pancreas, blood transfusion should be avoided when possible. Preoperative risk factors can identify patients who are likely to require transfusion and would therefore benefit most from blood conservation methods.

Impact of blood transfusions on recurrence and survival after rectal cancer surgery

PURPOSE

This study was designed to determine whether type or number of blood units transfused affected short-term and long-term outcome in patients undergoing surgery for rectal cancer. The number of perioperative blood units is associated with postoperative mortality and overall survival by some authors. In addition, allogenic perioperative blood transfusion has been postulated to produce host immunosuppression and has been reported to result in adverse outcome in patients with colorectal cancer. Autologous blood transfusion might improve results compared with allogenic transfusion.

METHODS

Clinical outcome for 597 patients undergoing surgery for rectal cancer was analyzed according to their transfusion status. Results for type (autologous or allogenic) and number of blood units transfused were recorded.

RESULTS

Blood transfusion was associated with increased postoperative mortality at 60 days. Patients who received > 3 units had a postoperative mortality of 6 percent compared with 1 percent for patients who received 1 to 3 units and 0 percent for patients who did not require transfusions. No difference was found between patients who received autologous or allogenic blood. Blood transfusions were also associated with impaired overall survival in a univariate analysis, but this finding was not confirmed in the multivariate analysis. The number or type of blood units transfused did not influence oncologic results. Local recurrence rates, distant metastases rates, and disease-free survival were not influenced by transfusion in our patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Increased numbers of blood units were associated with postoperative mortality. However, there is no reason, with respect to cancer recurrence or disease-free survival, to use a program of transfusion with autologous blood in patients undergoing surgery for rectal cancer.

Perioperative blood transfusions for the recurrence of colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND

The improvement of renal allograft survival by pre-transplantation transfusions alerted the medical community to the potential detrimental effect of transfusions in patients being treated for cancer.

OBJECTIVES

The present meta-analysis aims to evaluate the role of perioperative blood transfusions (PBT) on colorectal cancer recurrence. This is accomplished by validating the results of a previously published meta-analysis (Amato 1998); and by updating it to December 2004.

SEARCH STRATEGY

Published papers were retrieved using Medline, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, controlled trials web-based registries, or the CCG Trial Database. The search strategy used was: {colon OR rectal OR colorectal} WITH {cancer OR tumor OR neoplasm} AND transfusion. The tendency not to publish negative trials was balanced by inspecting the proceedings of international congresses.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Patients undergoing curative resection of colorectal cancer (classified either as Dukes stages A-C, Astler-Coller stages A-C2, or TNM stages T1-3a/N0-1/M0) were included if they had received any amount of blood products within one month of surgery. Excluded were patients with distant metastases at surgery, and studies with short follow-up or with no data.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

A specific form was developed for data collection. Data extraction was cross-checked, using the most recent publication in case of repetitive ones. Papers' quality was ranked using the method by Evans and Pollock. Odds ratios (OR, with 95% confidence intervals) were computed for each study, and pooled estimates were generated by RevMan (version 4.2). When available, data were stratified for risk factors of cancer recurrence.

MAIN RESULTS

The findings of the 1998 meta-analysis were confirmed, with small variations in some estimates. Updating it through December 2004 led to the identification of 237 references. Two-hundred and one of them were excluded because they analyzed survival (n=22), were repetitive (n=26), letters/reviews (n=66) or had no data (n=87). Thirty-six studies on 12,127 patients were included: 23 showed a detrimental effect of PBT; 22 used also multivariable analyses, and 14 found PBT to be an independent prognostic factor. Pooled estimates of PBT effect on colorectal cancer recurrence yielded overall OR of 1.42 (95% CI, 1.20 to 1.67) against transfused patients in randomized controlled studies. Stratified meta-analyses confirmed these findings, also when stratifying patients by site and stage of disease. The PBT effect was observed regardless of timing, type, and in a dose-related fashion, although heterogeneity was detected. Data on surgical techniques was not available for further analysis.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

This updated meta-analysis confirms the previous findings. All analyses support the hypothesis that PBT have a detrimental effect on the recurrence of curable colorectal cancers. However, since heterogeneity was detected and conclusions on the effect of surgical technique could not be drawn, a causal relationship cannot still be claimed. Carefully restricted indications for PBT seems necessary.

Colorectal cancer presenting as surgical emergencies

Colorectal Cancer (CRC) is a major cause of cancer morbidity and mortality. Surgery is considered the first line therapy for CRC, and is generally encountered by many surgeons under elective conditions. Unfortunately, colorectal cancer may present acutely as a surgical emergency. These conditions include, but are not limited to perforation, hemorrhage, and obstruction. The presentation of a patient with these conditions can lead to higher morbidity and mortality. The choice of operation depends mainly on the site of the disease (left-sided versus right-sided), the patient's physical condition, nutritional status, and age. The treatment for right-sided lesions is a right hemicolectomy. However, treatment of left-sided lesions is still undecided. There are many therapeutic options such as primary or staged resections, Hartman's procedure, subtotal colectomy, or colostomy. Other therapies involve non-operative techniques such as laser therapy, colonic stenting, emergency endoscopy, and comfort measures.

[Perioperative transfusion in colorectal surgery]

Several studies have evaluated the role and effect of blood transfusion in colorectal surgery. To date, no recommendation concerning its use in colorectal surgery has been yet published. However, blood transfusion is often required in colorectal surgery, especially in anaemic patients who suffer from malignant disease. The aim of this review is to define the effect of blood transfusion on oncologic and operative results, and to evaluate the clinical potential of alternative to allogeneic blood transfusion in order to promote the development of transfusion policy in colorectal surgery.

Rectal cancer recurrence: factors and mechanisms

OBJECTIVE

There have been significant developments in treatment for rectal carcinoma, both in surgical and adjuvant therapy. They may however have associated morbidity and hence individualized therapy for rectal cancer is desirable, to optimize treatment but avoid over-treatment for cases where the risk of recurrence is low.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A literature review was undertaken of the reported incidence of recurrence of rectal carcinoma following curative surgery, factors which predispose to recurrence and proposed mechanisms for recurrence, and the evidence for each critically evaluated.

RESULTS

The incidence of local recurrence of rectal carcinoma following curative resection ranges from 2.6% to 32%, with an average of 15%. Tumour stage is the strongest predictor of tumour recurrence. Upstaging using molecular biology may predict increased risk of recurrence but is not yet proven. Histological factors including differentiation and vascular invasion increase recurrence but are imprecise. Tumour microvascular density and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) levels may be predictive but need refinement. Adequate resection margins are important but recurrence may occur despite this. Tumour cell spillage and distant dissemination may be a mechanism for tumour recurrence following curative resection, but further research is required before this could be applied clinically.

CONCLUSION

Recurrence of rectal cancer remains a significant problem following 'curative' surgery. Multiple factors may influence recurrence risk, though currently however only tumour stage and histological resection margins have demonstrated sufficient importance for management decisions to be made upon them.

Perioperative blood transfusions reduce long-term survival following surgery for colorectal cancer

PURPOSE

The aim of the study contained herein was to investigate the association between blood transfusion and long-term outcome for patients treated for colorectal cancer, controlling for the effect of other prognostic factors. We also wanted to study whether blood storage time influenced the prognosis.

METHODS

Cox's proportional hazards regression analysis was used to analyze data from 336 patients who survived resection with curative intent. Median follow-up was 5.8 (2-16.8) years or until death.

RESULTS

Local recurrences and distant metastases were significantly more frequent when more than two units of blood had been transfused. In the multivariate Cox's analysis, with backward elimination of nonsignificant factors at the 10 percent level, the following risk factors were significantly related to death by colorectal cancer: tumor stage (T stage and N stage), perforation of tumor, age, and the need for a blood transfusion. Transfusions of more than two units of blood were independently and significantly associated with death from colorectal cancer (relative hazard, 2.7; 95 percent confidence intervals, 1.4-5.2). Time of blood storage had no effect on the prognoses. In patients dying from diseases unrelated to colorectal cancer, age and American Society of Anesthesiologists group were significantly related to death, whereas blood transfusion was not.

CONCLUSION

We found an independent and significant association between perioperative blood transfusion and poor prognosis in colorectal cancer patients. Blood storage time was not a prognostic factor.

Perioperative allogeneic blood transfusion does not cause adverse sequelae in patients with cancer: a meta-analysis of unconfounded studies

BACKGROUND

There is controversy over whether perioperative allogeneic red blood cell transfusions are associated with an increased risk of cancer recurrence, postoperative infection or death in patients with cancer undergoing surgery.

METHODS

A systematic meta-analysis was performed to answer this question. Studies were identified from electronic databases (Medline 1966-1997, Cancerlit 1983-1997, Current Contents, Cinahl 1982-1996, Healthstar 1990-1997, Bioabstracts 1990-1996 and Embase), by hand search of the bibliographies of identified studies and relevant journals, and by contact with experts in the field. All randomized controlled trials or prospective cohort studies with active comparator controls (autologous or leucocyte-depleted allogeneic blood) were eligible for inclusion if they reported on mortality, infection or recurrence rate in patients with cancer undergoing potentially curative surgical resection. The validity of the identified studies was assessed by means of a standardized scale, and data abstraction was carried out by two investigators independently. A random effects model was used for data synthesis.

RESULTS

Of the 2172 references identified, only 17 studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria. After exclusion of duplicate publications, six randomized controlled trials and two prospective cohort studies with appropriate concurrent controls were included in the analysis. The summary risk ratios were 0.95 (95 per cent confidence interval (c.i.) 0.79-1.15) for all-cause mortality and 1.06 (95 per cent c.i. 0.88-1.28) for cancer recurrence, the two endpoints that were appropriate to combine statistically. There was significant heterogeneity (explainable by differences in study design and patient characteristics) in the postoperative infection data and the summary risk ratio was 1.00 (95 per cent c.i. 0.76-1.32) for the four studies that were appropriate to subject to meta-analysis. Given the sample sizes of these eight studies, this meta-analysis had insufficient power to detect a relative difference of less than 20 per cent in the frequency of death, cancer recurrence or infection between the allogeneic and control transfusion arms.

CONCLUSION

Although more studies are required before a definitive statement can be made, at this time there is no evidence that allogeneic blood transfusion increases the risk of clinically important adverse sequelae in patients with cancer undergoing surgery.

The influence of peri-operative blood transfusion during radical hysterectomy on the prognosis of uterine cervical cancer

To evaluate the clinical implications of peri-operative transfusion in the surgical treatment of uterine cervical cancer, a detailed analysis of the cumulative survival rate was performed using clinical data from 145 patients with FIGO stage Ib cervical cancer of the squamous cell type acquired between 1982 and 1989 at the Center for Adult Diseases. The cumulative survival rate was statistically analyzed using the Kaplan Meier method. Of the 145 patients with stage Ib cancer, 103 were considered to have undergone complete excision and received no further treatment post-operatively, and 42 were considered to have undergone incomplete excision because of the involvement of lymph nodes or the lymphovascular space. Of the 79 patients in the former group who received peri-operative transfusion, 69 received less than seven units (1400 mL) and 10 received more than eight units (1600 mL). The cumulative 5-year survival rate was 100% in the 24 patients who received no transfusions, 91.7% in those who received less than 1400 mL, and 90.0% in those who received more than 1600 mL. Similarly, of the 42 patients in the incomplete excision group, nine did not receive any peri-operative transfusion, 27 received less than 1400 mL, and six received more than 1600 mL. The 5-year survival rate in these groups was 88.9, 77.8 and 50.0%, respectively. The survival rate of our patients with stage Ib cervical cancer without peri-operative transfusion was significantly higher than that of those with transfusion, regardless of post-operative irradiation therapy status, indicating that peri-operative transfusion has an adverse influence on the prognosis in cervical cancer.

Surgical management of locally recurrent rectal cancer

The surgical management of locally recurrent rectal cancer may involve major procedures and is not for the faint-hearted. Nevertheless, such treatment is preferable to chemotherapy and radiotherapy; the latter will fail over a period of months during which the patient is likely to experience intractable pain. Radical surgery offers good palliation and a better quality of life. Survival is prolonged by such operations which may be curative in up to one-third of patients. Nevertheless, surgeons must be realistic in their assessment of and discussions with patients.