Clinical characteristics and natural history of symptomatic but not excess gastroesophageal reflux

Evidence-based recommendations for GERD treatment

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a common presentation in primary care. New research findings have implications for the diagnosis and management of GERD. The purpose of this article is to synthesize current research related to the diagnosis and management of GERD in adults and to make practice recommendations.

Functional heartburn: definition and management strategies

Functional heartburn (FH) is a functional gastro-intestinal disorder characterized by symptoms of heartburn not related to gastro-esophageal reflux. The absence of evidence of reflux-related symptoms relies on absence of esophagitis at endoscopy (including biopsies to exclude eosinophilic esophagitis), a normal esophageal acid exposure during esophageal pH-monitoring together with a negative symptom-reflux association analysis and an unsatisfactory response to proton pump inhibitor therapy. Addition of impedance measurement to pH-monitoring is likely to increase the number of patients with recognized reflux-related symptoms. The pathophysiology of functional heartburn remains largely unknown but involves disturbed esophageal perception and psychological factors such as depression, anxiety and somatization. The treatment of FH remains largely empirical and an individual approach is therefore recommended. The clinician should provide reassurance and refrain from performing too many invasive tests or therapeutic procedures. The use of pain modulators is recommended by most experts despite the lack of appropriate clinical trials to support it.

Disease progression in non-erosive reflux disease (NERD): impact of initial esophageal acid exposure

We investigated the 5-year clinical course in a cohort of patients with typical reflux symptoms and negative endoscopy. Prospective follow-up was conducted in patients with non-erosive reflux disease (NERD) for at least 5 years after initial evaluation with esophageal pH monitoring and upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. Within the last year of follow-up, reflux symptoms occurred in 27 of the 30 patients (90%). Twenty-five of twenty-seven symptomatic patients (93%) were on acid suppression therapy. The majority of our patients (70%) remained unchanged regarding their endoscopic status over 5 years. Progression to erosive esophagitis occurred in four patients with Los Angeles (LA) A (13%), three patients with LA B (10%), and two patients with LA C (7%). The presence of pathological acid exposure did not alter the presence of reflux symptoms over 5 years. Disease progression to erosive esophagitis occurred more frequently in patients with pathological acid exposure than those without pathological acid exposure (P= 0.025). Most NERD patients have symptoms and require acid suppression therapy 5 years after their initial diagnosis. Initial pathological acid exposure does not influence the use of acid suppression; however, it does influence the progression of NERD within 5 years of follow-up.

The prokinetic effect of mosapride citrate combined with omeprazole therapy improves clinical symptoms and gastric emptying in PPI-resistant NERD patients with delayed gastric emptying

BACKGROUND

Previous studies have shown that non-erosive reflux disease (NERD) patients are less sensitive to proton pump inhibitor (PPI) treatment than patients with erosive reflux disease. The aim of this study was to investigate whether treatment with prokinetics in addition to omeprazole therapy would improve clinical symptoms, gastric emptying and esophageal peristalsis in PPI-resistant NERD patients with or without delayed gastric emptying.

METHODS

Subjects were 64 consecutive patients presenting with typical symptoms of PPl-resistant NERD (n = 44) and 20 healthy volunteers. PPI-resistant NERD patients underwent mosapride citrate (15 mg/day) and omeprazole (20 mg/day) co-therapy for 12 weeks. We evaluated the clinical symptoms as well as gastric emptying and esophageal manometry before and after combined therapy. We measured both acylated- and des-acylated plasma ghrelin levels by the ELISA method. The primary endopoint was to investigate whether co-administration of mosapride citrate and omeprazole would improve clinical symptoms and gastric emptying in PPI-resistant NERD patients with delayed gastric emptying.

RESULTS

T (max) value in PPI-resistant NERD patients was significantly higher than in healthy volunteers. Combination therapy with the prokinetic agent mosapride citrate and omeprazole significantly improved reflux symptoms and T (max) value in T (max) > 65 min NERD patients. Co-therapy also significantly reduced des-acylated-ghrelin levels in NERD patients with delayed gastric emptying.

CONCLUSIONS

Administration of mosapride citrate in addition to omeprazole improved gastro-esophageal reflux and gastric emptying in PPI-resistant NERD patients with delayed gastric emptying.

Reasons for participating in randomised controlled trials: conditional altruism and considerations for self

Background

Randomised controlled trials of healthcare interventions depend on the participation of volunteers who might not derive any personal health benefit from their participation. The idea that altruistic-type motives are important for trial participation is understandably widespread, but recent studies suggest considerations of personal benefit can influence participation decisions in various ways.

Methods

Non-participant observation of recruitment consultations (n = 25) and in-depth interviews with people invited to participate in the UK REFLUX trial (n = 13).

Results

Willingness to help others and to contribute towards furthering medical knowledge featured strongly among the reasons people gave for being interested in participating in the trial. But decisions to attend recruitment appointments and take part were not based solely on consideration of others. Rather, they were presented as conditional on individuals additionally perceiving some benefit (and no significant disadvantage) for themselves. Potential for personal benefit or disadvantage could be seen in both the interventions being evaluated and trial processes.

Conclusions

The term 'conditional altruism' concisely describes the willingness to help others that may initially incline people to participate in a trial, but that is unlikely to lead to trial participation in practice unless people also recognise that participation will benefit them personally. Recognition of conditional altruism has implications for planning trial recruitment communications to promote informed and voluntary trial participation.

Trial registration

ISRCTN15517081

Medical versus surgical management for gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GORD) in adults

BACKGROUND

Gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GORD) is a common condition with up to 20% of patients from Westernised countries experiencing heartburn, reflux or both intermittently. It is unclear whether medical or surgical (laparoscopic fundoplication) management is the most clinically and cost-effective treatment for controlling GORD.

OBJECTIVES

To compare the effects of medical management versus laparoscopic fundoplication surgery on health-related and GORD-specific quality of life (QOL) in adults with GORD.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched CENTRAL (Issue 2, 2009), MEDLINE (1966 to May 2009) and EMBASE (1980 to May 2009). We handsearched conference abstracts and reference lists from published trials to identify further trials. We contacted experts in the field for relevant unpublished material.

SELECTION CRITERIA

All randomised or quasi-randomised controlled trials comparing medical management with laparoscopic fundoplication surgery.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors independently extracted data from articles identified for inclusion and assessed the methodological quality of eligible trials. Primary outcomes were: health-related and GORD-specific QOL, heartburn, regurgitation and dysphagia.

MAIN RESULTS

Four trials were included with a total of 1232 randomised participants. Health-related QOL was reported by four studies although data were combined using fixed-effect models for two studies (Anvari 2006; REFLUX Trial 2008). There were statistically significant improvements in health-related QOL at three months and one year after surgery compared to medical therapy (mean difference (MD) SF36 general health score -5.23, 95% CI -6.83 to -3.62; I(2) = 0%). All four studies reported significant improvements in GORD-specific QOL after surgery compared to medical therapy although data were not combined. There is evidence to suggest that symptoms of heartburn, reflux and bloating are improved after surgery compared to medical therapy, but a small proportion of participants have persistent postoperative dysphagia. Overall rates of postoperative complications were low but surgery is not without risk and postoperative adverse events occurred although they were uncommon. The costs of surgery are considerably higher than the cost of medical management although data are based on the first year of treatment therefore the cost and side effects associated with long-term treatment of chronic GORD need to be considered.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

There is evidence that laparoscopic fundoplication surgery is more effective than medical management for the treatment of GORD at least in the short to medium term. Surgery does carry some risk and whether the benefits of surgery are sustained in the long term remains uncertain. Treatment decisions for GORD should be based on patient and surgeon preference.

Oesophageal acid hypersensitivity is not a contraindication to Nissen fundoplication

BACKGROUND

The Rome III criteria classify patients with a positive relationship between symptoms and reflux episodes but a physiological oesophageal acid exposure time as having gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GORD) with an acid hypersensitive oesophagus. The long-term outcome of antireflux surgery in these patients was investigated.

METHODS

Outcomes of Nissen fundoplication in 28 patients with GORD refractory to proton-pump inhibitors (PPIs) and oesophageal acid hypersensitivity (group 1) were compared with those of 126 patients with pathological acid exposure (group 2).

RESULTS

Fundoplication had a similar effect in both groups. Three months after surgery, total acid exposure time and the prevalence of oesophagitis had decreased, whereas mean lower oesophageal pressure had increased. The percentage of patients using PPIs was reduced from 83 to 4 per cent in group 1 and from 86.1 to 7.4 per cent in group 2 (both P < 0.001). Quality of life measured on a scale from 0 to 100 improved from 52 to 69 (P = 0.009) and 64 (P < 0.001) respectively. The percentage of patients with resolved or improved symptoms at 5 years was similar.

CONCLUSION

Patients with oesophageal acid hypersensitivity benefit from Nissen fundoplication as much as those with pathological acid exposure.

Hiatal hernia, lower esophageal sphincter incompetence, and effectiveness of Nissen fundoplication in the spectrum of gastroesophageal reflux disease

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a spectrum of disease that includes nonerosive reflux disease (NERD), erosive reflux disease (ERD), and Barrett's esophagus (BE). Treatment outcomes for patients with different stages have differed in many studies. In particular, acid suppressant medication therapy is reported to be less effective for treating patients with NERD and Barrett's esophagus. The aims of this study were to investigate (1) the role of mechanical factors including hiatal hernia and lower esophageal sphincter (LES) competence in the spectrum of GERD and (2) outcomes of Nissen fundoplication.

METHODS

From the records of patients who had undergone laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication after an abnormal pH study, we identified 50 symptomatic consecutive patients with each of the GERD stages: (1) NERD, (2) mild ERD, defined as esophagitis that was healed with acid suppression therapy, (3) severe ERD, defined as esophagitis that persisted despite medical therapy, and (4) BE. Exclusion criteria were normal distal esophageal acid exposure, esophageal pH monitoring performed elsewhere, antireflux surgery less than 1 year previously or previous fundoplication, and a named esophageal motility disorder or distal esophageal low amplitude hypomotility. Patients who could not be contacted for the study were also excluded. All patients completed a detailed preoperative questionnaire; underwent preoperative upper gastrointestinal endoscopy, stationary manometry, and distal esophageal pH monitoring; and were interviewed at least 1 year after operation.

RESULTS

One hundred sixty patients meeting the entry criteria were studied. The mean follow-up period was 36.7 months. The only significant preoperative symptom difference was that patients with BE had more moderately severe or severe dysphagia compared to patients with NERD. Patients with severe ERD or BE had a significantly higher prevalence of hiatal hernia, lower LES pressures, and more esophageal acid exposure. Hiatal hernia and hypotensive LES were present in most patients with severe ERD or BE but in only a minority of patients with NERD or mild ERD. Surgical therapy resulted in similarly excellent symptom outcomes for patients in all GERD categories.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared to mild ERD and NERD, severe ERD and BE are associated with significantly greater loss of the mechanical antireflux barrier as reflected in the presence of hiatal hernia and LES measurements. Restoration of the antireflux barrier and hernia reduction by laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication provides similarly excellent symptom control in all patients.

The Italian validation of the Montreal Global definition and classification of gastroesophageal reflux disease

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Recently, a Global definition and a classification of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) were developed by Montreal Consensus Group, composed of international expert gastroenterologists. Guidelines and consensus documents are, however, infrequently accepted and adopted at a local level. The aim of this study was to measure the acceptance of Montreal Global definition of GERD consensus document by specialists in a single country (Italy) and to measure the linguistic, scientific, and practical differences between the international consensus document and the Italian version.

METHODS

A 2-day meeting was held in June 2007 in Rome, Italy, attended by 147 Italian physicians who were experts in gastroenterology. They reviewed the individual original statements in their Italian translation and then voted on the statement using the scoring system used by the Montreal Consensus Group (6-point Likert scale). Voting was performed at baseline and after an analytical discussion on each statement, led by six internationally renowned experts. Consensus was defined as an agreement with a statement by at least two-thirds of the group. Results were compared with the Montreal statements.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

The level of consensus was already extremely high at the first vote (>90% with the two-thirds threshold). The level of agreement at the second vote increased slightly. The maximum variation between two votes was 33% (of increase from first to second round, 59-92%). The high level of agreement could be because of both the general acceptance of Montreal Consensus by scientific community, and the new scientific evidences published after the Montreal report, which fit with the original statements.

CONCLUSION

This study is the first national linguistic validation of the Montreal Global definition of GERD and is also proof of its scientific validity, based on the same methodology used to create the Montreal statements. It also suggests that evidence-based International disease classification systems can be applied to local settings after validation by local experts.

GLP-1 suppresses gastrointestinal motility and inhibits the migrating motor complex in healthy subjects and patients with irritable bowel syndrome

Glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) is released after food intake to act as an incretin. GLP-1 also inhibits gastric emptying and increases satiety. In rats, GLP-1 inhibits small bowel motility. Our aim was to study the effects of GLP-1 on gastrointestinal motility in healthy subjects and patients with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). Antro-duodeno-jejunal manometry was carried out during a 4-h control period with saline, followed by a 4-h period with intravenous GLP-1 (healthy: 0.7 and 1.2 pmol kg(-1) min(-1) (n = 16); IBS, 1.2 and 2.5 pmol kg(-1) min(-1) (n = 14). Plasma was analysed for GLP-1 and gut hormones, and gut tissue expression of GLP-1 receptor was studied. In healthy subjects, GLP-1 0.7 pmol kg(-1) min(-1) reduced the migrating motor complexes (MMCs) from a median of 2 (range 2-3) to 0.5 (0-2), and motility index from 4.9 +/- 0.1 to 4.3 +/- 0.3 ln Sigma(mmHg*s min(-1)) in jejunum, while GLP-1 1.2 pmol kg(-1) min(-1) diminished MMCs from 2 (2-3) to 1.5 (1-2.5), and motility index from 5.2 +/- 0.2 to 4.4 +/- 0.2. In IBS patients, GLP-1 1.2 pmol kg(-1) min(-1) reduced the MMCs from 2.5 (2-3.5) to 1 (0-1.5) without affecting motility index. At 2.5 pmol kg(-1) min(-1) GLP-1 decreased MMCs from 2 (1.5-3) to 1 (0.5-1.5), and motility index from 5.2 +/- 0.2 to 4.0 +/- 0.5. Motility responses to GLP-1 were similar in antrum and duodenum. Presence of the GLP-1 receptor in the gut was verified by reverse transcriptase PCR. In conclusion, the gut peptide GLP-1 decreases motility in the antro-duodeno-jejunal region and inhibits the MMC in healthy subjects and IBS patients.

Esophageal dilated intercellular spaces (DIS) and nonerosive reflux disease

Esophageal mucosal dilated intercellular spaces (DIS) are frequently observed in patients with nonerosive reflux disease (NERD) and patients with esophagitis. The specificity of DIS is questionable, as it is present in up to 30% of asymptomatic healthy subjects and in patients with other esophageal disorders. DIS occurs in parallel with a drop in potential difference, diminished transepithelial resistance, and increased esophageal mucosal permeability. These alterations arise with exposure to acid and pepsin during gastroesophageal reflux, but the exact pathway of damage to the intercellular junctions remains unclear and seems to be multifactorial. Other noxious contents of the refluxate, such as bile acids, are harmful and DIS can also be induced by acute psychological stress. DIS can be assessed quantitatively with electron microscopy (EM), but it is also recognizable with light microscopy (LM). DIS can disappear after treatment with proton pump inhibitors (PPI); however, this is not the case in all NERD patients. A recent study showed that patients with NERD who are refractory to PPI might still have DIS; and animal experiments showed that persistence of DIS might be due to esophageal mucosal exposure to bile acids and/or psychological stress. In conclusion, DIS is a frequent but nonspecific histological feature of NERD. It can be caused by acid reflux, but bile acids in the refluxate and/or psychological stress can modulate the development or persistence of DIS. Although a causal relationship between DIS and heartburn has been proposed, it still needs to be proven and the underlying mechanisms investigated before considering DIS as a target for treatment of NERD.

Medium-term outcome of endoluminal gastroplication with the EndoCinch device in children

OBJECTIVE

Endoluminal gastroplication (EG) is emerging as a minimally invasive procedure for the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). The aim of this study is to evaluate the medium-term outcomes after EG in a pediatric patient population.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Seventeen children with a median age of 12.4 years (range 6.1-15.9 years) with GERD underwent EG using a flexible endoscopic sewing device (EndoCinch) over a period of 3 years. Three plications were placed in the gastric tissue below the lower esophageal sphincter. Drug dose requirement, pH measurements, symptom severity and frequency, and validated Quality of Life in Reflux and Dyspepsia (QOLRAD) scores were compared before EG and 1 and 3 years after EG. Statistical analysis was performed using a Wilcoxon rank-sum test and P < 0.05 was the threshold for significance.

RESULTS

All patients showed an immediate posttreatment improvement in symptom severity, symptom frequency, and quality of life scores. Completed 1- and 3-year data were obtained from 16 patients. Four cases (25%) required a repeat procedure as a result of recurrence of symptoms after 2 to 24 months. Fourteen patients (88%) at 1 year and 9 patients (56%) at 3 years remained without a need for any antireflux medication. A sustained improvement in heartburn (P = 0.004), regurgitation (P = 0.017), and vomiting (P = 0.018) was seen at 3 years. The total QOLRAD score (maximum of 175) improved from a median of 87 (range 69-142) to 156 (range 111-175) at 1 year (P < 0.0001) and 153.5 (range 55-174) at 3 years (P = 0.002).

CONCLUSIONS

EG is an effective and safe procedure in children. It is a viable option for the treatment of GERD refractory to or dependent on antireflux medications.

Importance of 5-hydroxytryptamine receptors on intestinal afferents in the regulation of visceral sensitivity

Serotonin (5-HT) plays an important role as a signalling molecule in the gastrointestinal (GI) tract. The regulation of GI sensitivity via 5-HT is mediated by specific 5-HT receptor subytypes on intrinsic and extrinsic afferents. This review discusses visceral afferent hypersensitivity in irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) and the importance of 5HT(3), 5HT(4), and 5HT(2B) receptor-mediated mechanisms in the regulation of visceral sensitivity.

The patient with GORD and chronically recurrent problems

Treatment of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GORD) by means of gastric acid secretion inhibition usually is successful. When symptoms persist despite adequate treatment, correctness of the diagnosis of GORD should be questioned. Quite often dyspeptic symptoms are erroneously interpreted as GORD symptoms. Other causes of treatment failure are insufficient acid suppression and oesophageal hypersensitivity. In the management of patients with persistent symptoms oesophageal pH and impedance monitoring are useful techniques. These may provide answers to the question whether the symptoms are reflux-related and whether acid secretion is adequately suppressed.

Sensory and biomechanical properties of the esophagus in non-erosive reflux disease

OBJECTIVES

To investigate possible differences between patients with non-erosive gastroesophageal reflux disease (NERD) and controls in a) sensitivity of the distal esophagus after mechanical and thermal stimuli and b) the referred pain areas.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Fifteen healthy subjects (mean age 39+/-19.4 years) and 13 NERD patients (mean age 44.4+/-21 years) were enrolled in the study. Pain evoked by mechanical and thermal stimuli was assessed using a newly designed multimodal stimulation probe.

RESULTS

The patients were less sensitive to mechanical stimulation as assessed by the cross-sectional area (p<0.001) and volume (p=0.007). After thermal stimulation, the patients were hypersensitive to heat stimuli (p=0.04), whereas no significant difference was seen to cold stimuli. The referred pain areas were larger in patients compared with the pain areas in controls after mechanical (p=0.03) and heat stimuli (p=0.01), but not after cold stimuli. Balloon distension resulted in a significant higher number of reactive esophageal contractions in patients as compared with controls (p=0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The present study showed that NERD patients were hypersensitive to heat stimuli of the esophagus, with an increase in referred pain to the evoked visceral pain. The data indicate that peripheral sensitization of heat-sensitive pathways together with facilitation of central pain mechanisms are important in the pathogenesis of NERD.

A comparison of the cost effectiveness of pharmacotherapy or surgery (laparoscopic fundoplication) in the treatment of GORD

BACKGROUND

Gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GORD) causes some of the most frequently seen symptoms in both primary and secondary care. An estimated 4-5 patients (age range 18-60 years) per 10,000 (0.045% of the general population) are receiving maintenance proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) for oesophagitis and reflux. The treatment of reflux disease represents significant prescription drug costs to the UK NHS. An alternative to lifelong pharmacotherapy is surgical treatment of reflux using the laparoscopic fundoplication technique to effect a cure. A multicentre study (REFLUX trial) comparing laparoscopic fundoplication with medical management (PPIs) among patients with GORD is currently underway in the UK. This study includes data collection to contribute to a cost-effectiveness analysis.

OBJECTIVE

To generate some preliminary estimates of the cost effectiveness of surgical and medical management of GORD to guide UK NHS decision making before the REFLUX trial reports.

METHODS

A Markov model was developed in Excel. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis was employed to assess the uncertainty associated with the point estimates. Two strategies were compared: long-term medical management or immediate laparoscopic surgery for GORD. Health outcomes were expressed in terms of QALYs with a lifetime time horizon (30 years) for a patient aged 45 years at commencement of treatment. Costs (pound, 2004 values) of drugs and costs associated with surgery were obtained from five of the REFLUX study centres. Costs and outcomes were discounted by 3.5% per anum. Value of information analysis was used to quantify the cost of uncertainty associated with the decision about which therapy to adopt, indicating the maximum value of future research.

RESULTS

Treatment with laparoscopic fundoplication is the most costly strategy but is also associated with more QALYs. The incremental cost per additional QALY for surgery versus medical management was 180 pounds. However, the cost effectiveness of surgery was uncertain, and the probability that it is cost effective at the threshold of 30,000 pounds per QALY was 0.639. Value of information analysis suggests that further research in this area could be potentially worthwhile. Specifically, this research should focus on the health-related quality of life of patients on medical management or post-surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of the model suggest that, on the basis of current evidence, laparoscopic fundoplication represents a cost effective means of treating GORD rather than lifelong medical management.

Mechanisms of hypersensitivity in IBS and functional disorders

General introduction The concept of visceral hypersensitivity is accepted as being germane to several functional gastrointestinal disorders (FGIDs). The causes or risk factors associated with this hypersensitivity are unclear. This article addresses the proposed mechanisms leading to hypersensitivity: from genetic to inflammatory disorders, from central to peripheral alterations of function. However, in order to place visceral hypersensitivity in a more global perspective as an aetiological factor for FGIDs, it also provides a review of recent evidence regarding the role of other peripheral mechanisms (the intraluminal milieu), as also genetic factors in the pathophysiology of these disorders. The article has been divided into five independent sections. The first three sections summarize the evidence of visceral hypersensitivity as a biological marker of functional gut disorders, the peripheral and central mechanisms involved, and the role of inflammation on hypersensitivity. In opposition to visceral hypersensitivity as an isolated phenomenon in functional gut disorders, the last two sections focus on the importance of peripheral mechanisms, like motor disturbances, specifically those resulting on altered transport of intestinal gas, and alterations of the intraluminal milieu and genetics.

Comparison between the combined analysis and the DeMeester Score to predict response to PPI therapy

BACKGROUND

Distal esophageal acid exposure can be quantified using the DeMeester score (DS) or percentage time pH<4. In addition to these parameters, symptom index (SI) is used to evaluate the association of symptoms and acid reflux. Combined analysis (CA) including the SI and percentage time pH<4 provides a more comprehensive interpretation of pH monitoring results.

AIM

To assess whether using CA compared with DS is more accurate for interpretation of pH monitoring.

METHOD

pH studies from 450 patients (303 female; mean age 53; range 11 to 88) off therapy between July 2002 and October 2004 were analyzed. DS (normal<14.7), percentage time pH<4 (normal; upright<6.3%, recumbent<1.2%), and the SI (positive symptom if >/=50%) were calculated for each patient. Symptom responses to proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) were assessed in patients with discordant DS and CA.

RESULTS

Sixty-six patients were identified as having a normal DS and an abnormal CA. Forty-one (62%) patients had abnormal reflux according to the CA and 25 (38%) had normal reflux but a positive SI. Ten patients were lost to follow-up, 43 (84%) improved on and were currently taking a PPI and 8 (16%) found no benefit from taking a PPI. Five (9%) patients were never tried on a PPI and 3 were still symptomatic. Twenty-two (88%) patients with a positive SI and normal reflux were followed-up (3 never prescribed PPI) and 17 (90%) improved with a PPI.

CONCLUSIONS

Interpreting the results of pH monitoring based solely on the composition DS misses patients with an acid "sensitive esophagus," a group of patients who benefit from PPI therapy.

Disturbed bowel habits in patients with non-ulcer dyspepsia

BACKGROUND; Emerging medications for non-ulcer-dyspepsia, such as the serotonin-receptor modulators, also affect bowel habits by altering colonic transit. If drugs that alter colonic function were to prove useful in non-ulcer dyspepsia, knowledge of baseline bowel habit disturbances would be potentially critical.

AIM

To estimate the rate of non-ulcer dyspepsia patients with clinically relevant constipation or diarrhoea potentially precluding use of motility agents.

METHODS

Consecutive patients with non-ulcer dyspepsia (n = 79), gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (n = 135) and organic upper gastrointestinal disease (upper gastrointestinal disease; n = 36) completed a validated symptom questionnaire evaluating predominant bowel habits in the last year.

RESULTS

Prevalence of constipation was higher in non-ulcer dyspepsia (34%) than in gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (P = 0.01) and organic upper gastrointestinal disease (P = 0.01), prevalence of alternating diarrhoea/constipation (24%) and diarrhoea (22%) was similar, while prevalence of normal bowel habits was significantly less in non-ulcer dyspepsia (20%; P = 0.01 vs. gastro-oesophageal reflux disease and P < 0.01 vs. organic upper gastrointestinal disease). Constipation was particularly frequent in ulcer-like and dysmotility-like non-ulcer dyspepsia, while prevalence of diarrhoea was lowest in dysmotility-like non-ulcer dyspepsia. A normal bowel habit was equally uncommon in male (21%) and female non-ulcer dyspepsia patients (20%).

CONCLUSIONS

Only one of five non-ulcer dyspepsia patients had normal bowel habits based on clinical symptoms; constipation is particularly prevalent. Patients with functional dyspepsia who are prescribed motility altering drugs should be evaluated by taking a thorough bowel habit history.

Review article: uncomplicated diverticular disease of the colon

Diverticular disease of the colon is the fifth most important gastrointestinal disease in terms of direct and indirect health care costs in western countries. Uncomplicated diverticular disease is defined as the presence of diverticula in the absence of complications such as perforation, fistula, obstruction and/or bleeding. The distribution of diverticula along the colon varies worldwide being almost always left-sided and directly related to age in western countries and right-sided where diet is rich in fibre. The pathophysiology of diverticular disease is complex and relates to abnormal colonic motility, changes in the colonic wall, chronic mucosal low-grade inflammation, imbalance in colonic microflora and visceral hypersensitivity. Moreover, there can be genetic factors involved in the development of colonic diverticula. The use of non-absorbable antibiotics is the mainstay of therapy in patients with mild to moderate symptoms, and the effect of fibre-supplementation alone does not appear to be significantly different from placebo, although no definite data are available. More recently, alternative treatments have been reported. Mesalazine acts as a local mucosal immunomodulator and has been shown to improve symptoms and prevent recurrence of diverticulitis. In addition, probiotics have also been shown to be beneficial by re-establishing a normal gut microflora. In this study, the current literature on uncomplicated diverticular disease of the colon is reviewed.

Distension technique influences the relationship between colonic and rectal hypersensitivity in irritable bowel syndrome

In irritable bowel syndrome (IBS), it remains unclear whether rectal hypersensitivity is a 'marker' of colonic hypersensitivity. Our aim was to examine the relation between colonic and rectal sensitivity in IBS patients, comprising phasic and ramp distension techniques. Twenty IBS patients and 12 healthy subjects (N) underwent stepwise ramp and random phasic barostat distensions in the colon and rectum in random order. The sensory threshold pressure (ramp distension) and the visual analogue scale score (VAS, phasic distension), for pain and non-pain, were recorded. Colonic thresholds were lower, and VAS scores were generally higher, for pain and non-pain sensitivities in IBS compared to N. Rectal thresholds were lower, and VAS scores were higher, for pain but not for non-pain, in IBS compared to N. In IBS, for phasic distension, there was good correlation between the colon and rectum for non-pain (e.g. at 16 mmHg, r=0.59, P=0.006) and pain (r=0.60, P=0.006) sensitivities. In contrast, there was no significant correlation between the colon and rectum for ramp distension. In conclusion, colonic and rectal sensitivity in IBS are correlated in response to phasic but not ramp barostat distensions. The rectum serves as a legitimate 'window' for evaluating colonic hypersensitivity in IBS, provided that phasic distensions are employed.

Activation of peripheral 5-HT receptors attenuates colonic sensitivity to intraluminal distension

Tegaserod is a 5-HT(4) receptor partial agonist approved for the treatment of irritable bowel syndrome in women with constipation and in both men and women with chronic constipation. The efficacy of tegaserod is based on the importance of 5-HT(4) receptors regulating intestinal peristalsis and secretion, and possibly visceral sensory pathways. Our aim was to investigate the effect of tegaserod on colorectal sensitivity using models of normal and exaggerated responsiveness to colorectal distension (CRD). The visceromotor responses (VMR) to CRD at graded pressures (0-60 mmHg) were measured by the number of reflex abdominal contractions. Acute colorectal hypersensitivity was induced by intracolonic infusion of dilute acetic acid. Chronic hypersensitivity was observed in rats following spontaneous resolution of trinitrobenzenesulfonic acid-induced colitis. Rats with normosensitive colons served as controls. Tegaserod (0.1-10 mg kg(-1)) caused dose-dependent reduction of the VMR to CRD in control rats and in those with colonic hypersensitivity. 5-HT(4) antagonists reversed the effects of tegaserod in rats with normosensitive colons, and partially inhibited effects in rats with colonic hypersensitivity. Central administration of tegaserod had no inhibitory effect. These results support the assumption that colonic hypersensitivity could be normalized by tegaserod acting, at least in part, through peripheral 5-HT(4) receptors.

Treatment of patients with persistent heartburn symptoms: a double-blind, randomized trial

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Common treatment practices in patients who continue to be symptomatic on proton pump inhibitor once-daily treatment include either increasing the dosage or the use of supplemental medication. This trial's purpose was to compare 2 therapeutic strategies, increasing the proton pump inhibitor dosage to twice daily versus switching to another proton pump inhibitor, in patients with persistent heartburn while receiving standard-dose proton pump inhibitor therapy.

METHODS

This multicenter, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy trial included patients with persistent heartburn symptoms while receiving therapy with lansoprazole 30 mg once daily. Patients were randomly assigned to treatment for 8 weeks with either single-dose esomeprazole (40 mg once daily) (n = 138) or lansoprazole 30 mg twice daily (n = 144). The primary efficacy variable was the percentage of heartburn-free days from day 8 to the end of treatment.

RESULTS

Single-dose esomeprazole was at least as effective as twice-daily lansoprazole for the primary end point of percentage of heartburn-free days during the study period (54.4% and 57.5%, respectively). Symptom scores improved from baseline in similar numbers of patients for heartburn (83.3% of patients in each group), acid regurgitation (76.8% vs 72.9%, P = .58), and epigastric pain (67.4% vs 61.1%, P = .32), and rescue antacid use was also similar (0.4 tablets/day vs 0.5 tablets/day, P = .50).

CONCLUSIONS

Switching patients with persistent heartburn on a standard-dose proton pump inhibitor to a different proton pump inhibitor was as effective as increasing the proton pump inhibitor dosage to twice daily for controlling heartburn symptoms.

Guidelines for the management of dyspepsia

Dyspepsia is a chronic or recurrent pain or discomfort centered in the upper abdomen; patients with predominant or frequent (more than once a week) heartburn or acid regurgitation, should be considered to have gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) until proven otherwise. Dyspeptic patients over 55 yr of age, or those with alarm features should undergo prompt esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD). In all other patients, there are two approximately equivalent options: (i) test and treat for Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) using a validated noninvasive test and a trial of acid suppression if eradication is successful but symptoms do not resolve or (ii) an empiric trial of acid suppression with a proton pump inhibitor (PPI) for 4-8 wk. The test-and-treat option is preferable in populations with a moderate to high prevalence of H. pylori infection (> or =10%); empirical PPI is an initial option in low prevalence situations. If initial acid suppression fails after 2-4 wk, it is reasonable to consider changing drug class or dosing. If the patient fails to respond or relapses rapidly on stopping antisecretory therapy, then the test-and-treat strategy is best applied before consideration of referral for EGD. Prokinetics are not currently recommended as first-line therapy for uninvestigated dyspepsia. EGD is not mandatory in those who remain symptomatic as the yield is low; the decision to endoscope or not must be based on clinical judgement. In patients who do respond to initial therapy, stop treatment after 4-8 wk; if symptoms recur, another course of the same treatment is justified. The management of functional dyspepsia is challenging when initial antisecretory therapy and H. pylori eradication fails. There are very limited data to support the use of low-dose tricyclic antidepressants or psychological treatments in functional dyspepsia.

Acid perfusion test: a useful test for evaluating esophageal acid sensitivity

The acid perfusion test (APT) is a test of esophageal acid sensitivity. In gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), the APT has largely been superseded by indexes derived from 24-hr esophageal pH monitoring: symptom index (SI), symptom sensitivity index (SSI), and symptom association probability (SAP). To evaluate the role of APT in patients with GERD we compared values of SI, SSI, and SAP in 126 APT+ and 146 APT- patients. Median values for SI, SSI, and SAP were higher in the APT+ compared with the APT- group (P < 0.001). More patients had a positive SI, SSI, and SAP in the APT+ compared with the APT- group (SI, P < 0.0001; SSI and SAP, P < 0.001). Patients with a negative APT were unlikely to have symptoms caused by acid reflux (negative predictive value, 86%). APT may be useful in detecting acid sensitivity in patients who do not report symptoms on 24-hr esophageal pH monitoring.

Review: what do we mean by GERD?--definition and diagnosis

Gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a condition in which the gastro-oesophageal reflux provokes symptoms or complications. Since the majority of patients with heartburn do not have mucosal breaks, expressions such as 'endoscopy-negative reflux disease' (ENRD), 'non-erosive reflux disease' (NERD), or even 'reflux-like dyspepsia' and 'functional heartburn' are frequently employed despite the lack of consensus concerning their exact meaning. Moreover, definition of a disease does not mean that precise diagnostic criteria exist. Diagnostic approaches to GERD differ considerably between primary and secondary care. The primary care physician's role is to decide, on the basis of symptoms and clinical examination, if it is likely that the patient has some serious problem which requires urgent investigation and intervention. In practice, a symptom-based diagnosis can often be made reliably because heartburn and regurgitation are very specific for GERD. The secondary care physician has to make a full evaluation of an already highly-selected patient and, as far as possible, to make a comprehensive, accurate diagnosis, using whatever investigative tools are required. However, there is no 'gold standard' for the diagnosis of GERD and 24-hour pH monitoring lacks sensitivity in NERD. Recently, impedance-pH monitoring has been introduced and promising results have been reported. However, this new technology needs further validation and technical improvement before being employed in routine clinical investigation.

Gastroesophageal reflux disease in children: association between symptoms and pH monitoring

OBJECTIVE

The prevalence of symptoms associated with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) in patients with abnormal results of pH monitoring has been investigated in adults and infants. A questionnaire suitable for children between 7 and 16 years of age has been proposed, but this tool has so far not been validated. In the present study the items of the questionnaire are validated against results from an esophageal 24-h study of pH.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Ninety-nine children aged from 7 to 16 years referred from two outpatient clinics for suspected GERD completed the 7-point questionnaire regarding symptoms during the week prior to a pH study. The frequency of symptoms was investigated in patients with abnormal versus normal pH (reflux index >/< 5.0). A group of healthy children (n = 284) served as controls to estimate the frequency of symptoms in the normal population.

RESULTS

It was found that 37/99 (37%) of patients had an abnormal pH study result. Regurgitation/vomiting yielded the best symptom discrimination, and was reported by 46% with abnormal versus 24% with normal pH-study results (p = 0.029). A weighted score including the five best discriminating symptoms was positive in 75% versus 44% (OR 3.78, CI 1.52-9.37, p = 0.006). In a comparison of children with abnormal pH studies and healthy controls, a correct diagnosis based on five symptoms could be obtained in 75% and 94%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

A relatively weak association was found between reflux symptoms and a positive pH study in 7-16-year-old children referred for pH monitoring. Thus, the questionnaire is not a diagnostic tool, and its potential use is limited to epidemiological studies.

Catheter-based pH monitoring: use in evaluation of gastroesophageal reflux disease symptoms (on and off therapy)

Tube-based ambulatory pH testing has rapidly evolved in the past 3 decades to become the standard by which other diagnostic approaches to gastroesophageal reflux disease are judged. Acid exposure 5 cm above the manometrically determined lower esophageal sphincter is the standard for documentation of pathologic acid exposure of the distal esophagus. Proximal esophageal or hypopharyngeal monitoring is an evolving technique that may shed light on patients with supraesophageal symptoms. The ability to simultaneously monitor esophageal and gastric acidity (usually in patients with persistent symptoms despite therapy) is another advantage of this technique. Whether the new system that allows simultaneous pH and impedance monitoring and the system that uses an implantable tubeless monitoring capsule will supplant this older but well-established technology remains to be determined.

Long-term outcome of surgically and medically treated patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease: a matched-pair follow-up study

OBJECTIVE

A recent randomized study has shown that the long-term effects of continuous medical treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) with a proton-pump inhibitor are comparable to those of open fundoplication. We compared the long-term effects of anti-reflux surgery with those of medical care according to clinical practice.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This is a questionnaire-based 3-10 years follow-up study of 373 patients with GERD operated on in two hospitals with either open or laparoscopic fundoplication, and pair-matched non-operated controls treated medically according to clinical practice. The controls were matched for hospital, age, sex, follow-up time, degree of esophagitis, presence of hiatus hernia and Barrett's esophagus. The questionnaires used for symptoms and health-related quality of life (QoL) were the Gastrointestinal Symptoms Rating Scale and the Psychological General Well-Being Index, respectively.

RESULTS

Response rates were about 80%, and 179 pairs of operated patients and controls remained for analysis (102 based on laparoscopic and 77 on open fundoplication). Independently of the surgical technique, the operated patients suffered at the follow-up from significantly (p <0.001) fewer reflux symptoms than the non-operated controls, the mean scores being 1.34 and 2.51, respectively. The operated patients suffered from slightly more symptoms of indigestion (p <0.05). No consistent significant differences between the groups were found for QoL. Significant differences in QoL in favor of the operated patients were found when dealing only with the 43 pairs with no concurrent disease.

CONCLUSION

The study shows that in our area anti-reflux surgery is more effective in relieving reflux symptoms than medical care according to clinical practice.

Updated guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease

Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) were published in 1995 and updated in 1999. These and other guidelines undergo periodic review. Advances continue to be made in the area of GERD, leading us to review and revise previous guideline statements. GERD is defined as symptoms or mucosal damage produced by the abnormal reflux of gastric contents into the esophagus. These guidelines were developed under the auspices of the American College of Gastroenterology and its Practice Parameters Committee, and approved by the Board of Trustees. Diagnostic guidelines address empiric therapy and the use of endoscopy, ambulatory reflux monitoring, and esophageal manometry in GERD. Treatment guidelines address the role of lifestyle changes, patient directed (OTC) therapy, acid suppression, promotility therapy, maintenance therapy, antireflux surgery, and endoscopic therapy in GERD. Finally, there is a discussion of the rare patient with refractory GERD and a list of areas in need of additional study.

Review article: diagnosis and clinical investigation of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease: a European view

In Western populations, many individuals with symptoms of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GERD) do not bother to seek medical attention because their symptoms are mild and acceptably controlled by self-medication. Among those who do consult physicians, only a minority present with the classical clinical symptoms of heartburn and regurgitation: more often the pattern is a nonspecific combination of upper gastrointestinal complaints that do not permit confident clinical diagnosis. Oesophagitis is now found in less than 50% of GERD patients and those without oesophagitis are sometimes said to have 'non-erosive reflux disease'. If a patient's clinical history is inadequate for diagnosis and the oesophageal endoscopic appearances are normal, ambulatory pH monitoring may be required if the diagnostic uncertainty is to be resolved. Despite initial enthusiasm, the 'Proton Pump test' for GERD has proved unreliable and has fallen from favour. Intraluminal impedence measurement is currently considered a research tool only. Most European gastroenterologists acknowledge the occurrence of 'atypical' presentations of GERD, including noncardiac chest pain, asthma and hoarseness (laryngitis), though confirmation of GERD as the cause of such symptoms in individual patients is often difficult.

Review article: gastro-oesophageal reflux disease as a functional gastrointestinal disorder

Gastro-oesophageal reflux disease encompasses a family of disorders united by a common pathogenesis: the excessive reflux of gastric contents. The best defined disorder is oesophagitis, but it is now evident that proton pump inhibitor therapy can resolve oesophagitis in virtually every case. The same cannot be said for gastro-oesophageal reflux disease symptoms, however, thus moving the frontier to symptom control. Endoscopy-negative reflux disease is a heterogeneous group, no longer bound by the common denominator of endoscopic findings. In fact, three distinct patient subgroups emerge: (i) individuals who in essence have oesophagitis, but are either in remission or simply fail to meet the endoscopic criteria; (ii) patients with hypersensitivity to oesophageal stimuli; and (iii) patients with 'functional heartburn' whose symptoms are not related to reflux. Given this heterogeneity, it is not surprising that the efficacy of antisecretory drugs is less impressive. This has led to new therapeutic approaches beyond acid control: mucosal protective agents, either central nervous system or peripherally acting compounds aimed at normalizing hyperalgesia, and reflux inhibitors and serotonergic agents, such as tegaserod.

Effectiveness of proton pump inhibitors in nonerosive reflux disease

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Little information is available about the efficacy of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) in patients with nonerosive reflux disease (NERD). We aimed to synthesize available data and determine the effectiveness of PPIs on symptom resolution in patients with NERD.

METHODS

A systematic review of the literature identified studies reporting the effects of PPIs in patients with NERD. Heartburn resolution data were pooled across studies. The effectiveness of PPI therapy in inducing complete heartburn resolution was compared in patients with NERD vs. erosive esophagitis (EE).

RESULTS

Seven trials evaluating heartburn resolution in NERD were identified. Higher proportions of patients reported achieving sufficient heartburn resolution compared with complete heartburn resolution. The effect of PPIs on sufficient heartburn resolution was observed sooner than was complete heartburn resolution. Therapeutic gain of PPI therapy over placebo ranged from 30% to 35% for sufficient heartburn control and from 25% to 30% for complete heartburn control. Pooled response rates at 4 weeks were significantly higher for patients with EE compared with NERD (56% vs. 37%, P < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

PPIs provide a more modest therapeutic gain in patients with NERD as compared with those with EE. A trend in increased therapeutic gain for NERD patients was shown throughout the 4 weeks, suggesting that 4 weeks of follow-up evaluation may be insufficient to show full therapeutic gain in this patient population.

Oesophageal hypersensitivity in Japanese patients with non-erosive gastro-oesophageal reflux diseases

BACKGROUND

Visceral hypersensitivity plays a major role in the pathogenesis of non-erosive oesophageal reflux disease (NERD). Prevalence of NERD differs according to the population and geographical region. Oesophageal hypersensitivity in NERD has not been well studied, especially in Japanese patients.

AIM

To investigate oesophageal hypersensitivity in Japanese NERD patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We performed upper GI endoscopy and the modified acid perfusion test on 14 control subjects and 68 GERD patients, including 26 with NERD, 34 with erosive GERD, and six with Barrett's oesophagus. The stimulus-response function to acid was quantified by three parameters (lag time, intensity rating and the acid perfusion sensory score) and compared among four groups.

RESULTS

The mean value of the lag time, intensity rating, and acid perfusion scores in NERD patients (4.6 +/- 3.4, 4.4 +/- 3.4, 27.8 +/- 26.7, respectively) were higher than in erosive GERD (3.2 +/- 3.3, 3.0 +/- 3.2, 18.2 +/- 24.8) and Barrett patients (2.5 +/- 4.0, 1.8 +/- 3.3, 15.0 +/- 28.8), and significantly higher than in the control group (1.7 +/- 2.7, 1.1 +/- 2.0, 5.4 +/- 11.8). The ratio of patients with higher sensory scores was also greater in the NERD group (57.7%) than in erosive GERD (32.3%) and Barrett group (16.7%), and significantly greater than in control group (6.7%).

CONCLUSION

Our findings suggest that oesophageal sensitivity is likely to be enhanced especially in NERD patients also in Japanese population in comparison with erosive GERD, Barrett's oesophagus and controls.

Natural history of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease without oesophagitis (NERD)--a reappraisal 10 years on

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Ten years ago we published a study describing the 6-month outcome of 33 outpatients with typical gastro-oesophageal reflux disease symptoms and pH-metry proven excess gastro-oesophageal reflux but without endoscopical evidence of oesophagitis, currently referred to as patients with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease without oesophagitis. We now present an update of that report concerning morbidity, drug consumption and quality of life of the original patients 10 years after the initial diagnosis.

METHODS

The study consisted of the retrieval and revision of all clinical and instrumental records concerning the cohort of 33 above-mentioned patients. Data are available regarding annual intervals within the first 5 years from original diagnosis and, subsequently, with a follow-up ranging from 7 to 14 years (median 10 years). The records of these 33 patients were reviewed, including the results of clinical visits at the outpatients department, of oesophagogastroduodenoscopies and pH- metries. Finally, a telephonic interview was conducted by means of a structured questionnaire, aiming at evaluating present symptoms, actual therapy if any, health-related quality of life and other information regarding any gastro-oesophageal reflux disease symptoms.

RESULTS

Of the original 33 patients, 31 are still alive and 2 were lost to follow-up. Of the 29 remaining, only 1 is definitively not complaining of any gastro-oesophageal reflux disease-related symptoms. Within 5 years of the first diagnosis, oesophagitis was found in all but one of the 18 subjects who underwent repeated endoscopy. At the latest follow-up check, after a median of 10 years, out of the 28 still complaining of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease symptoms, 21 (75%) were presently taking antisecretory drugs (proton pump inhibitors and H-2 receptor antagonists) because of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease symptoms/lesions, 12 of whom intermittently or on demand and the remaining 9 continuously. Two patients (2/28) underwent antireflux surgery, but despite this were still taking antisecretory drugs (in one case H2-RA; in the other proton pump inhibitor). The health-related quality of life, self-evaluated by the patient by means of a VAS scoring from 0 (worst possible) to 10 (best possible) increased significantly from 3.2 to 6.5 from baseline (before therapy) to present time, possibly due to the positive effect of present therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study conducted on a cohort of endoscopy-negative patients with pH-metry-confirmed reflux disease has shown that after a median time of 10 years following the original diagnosis, the majority of patients have, in fact, developed reflux oesophagitis and are on prolonged antisecretory therapy because of recurrent gastro-oesophageal reflux disease symptoms/lesions. The study confirms that gastro-oesophageal reflux disease without oesophagitis, as well as gastro-oesophageal reflux disease at large, is a chronic disease characterised by increasing severity with time, which requires protracted medical therapy in a vast proportion of patients. Absence of endoscopic oesophagitis at presentation does not represent a positive prognostic factor.

The epidemiology of gastroesophageal reflux disease

Symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) are among the most common encountered in primary practice. Reported symptoms certainly under-represent the true prevalence of this disease in the population, because many patients do not seek care for symptoms of GERD and many physicians do not specifically ask about such symptoms when performing the review of systems. We describe the epidemiology of GERD. We begin by considering the prevalence of GERD as a function of the disease definition used. We then discuss the epidemiology of nonerosive reflux disease. After that, we consider the population risk factors for GERD. Next, we briefly touch on the epidemiology of GERD complications, including erosive esophagitis, strictures, and Barrett esophagus. We will end with a brief discussion of population screening of those with GERD for Barrett esophagus.

Barrett's oesophagus: optimal strategies for prevention and treatment

Barrett's oesophagus is a change in the lining of the distal oesophagus recognised at endoscopy and documented to have intestinal metaplasia by biopsy. It is thought that it is an acquired condition resulting from chronic gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GORD). Barrett's oesophagus has the potential to progress to adenocarcinoma of the oesophagus. Evidence to support the association between Barrett's oesophagus and GORD appears to be strong but circumstantial. The intermediate steps that lead from GORD to Barrett's oesophagus are speculative and the timeline for the development of this condition remains obscure. It has yet to be demonstrated that erosive oesophagitis is a necessary intermediate step for the development of Barrett's oesophagus. In spite of effective therapy, documentation that medical or surgical therapy prevents Barrett's oesophagus is lacking. The goal of screening for Barrett's oesophagus is ultimately to improve the survival of patients with adenocarcinoma of the oesophagus. This goal has not been achieved and the evidence-based criteria for screening remain to be defined. Medical and surgical therapy of Barrett's oesophagus is effective in controlling reflux, although not proven to prevent neoplastic progression of the at risk mucosa. Endoscopic techniques of mucosal injury have been applied as alternatives to oesophagectomy in efforts to prevent progression to cancer. Surveillance endoscopy and biopsy is the currently accepted method aimed at early intervention and improved survival for oesophageal adenocarcinoma. A working surveillance protocol to accomplish this is proposed based on dysplasia grade. If no dysplasia is found and confirmed with subsequent endoscopy and biopsy, a 3-year interval is recommended. If only low grade dysplasia is confirmed, then annual endoscopy until no dysplasia is recognised is recommended. On the basis of defined risk factors, high grade dysplasia can lead to intense surveillance every 3 months or an intervention. Future developments in understanding the biology of Barrett's oesophagus and in therapeutic interventions will provide an opportunity for more effective screening, surveillance and prevention of neoplastic progression.

New developments in the pathophysiology of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GERD): implications for patient management

The spectrum of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GERD) has expanded; indeed the majority of individuals with symptomatic GERD do not have erosive reflux disease (ERD); this group has been referred to as nonerosive or negative-endoscopy reflux disease (NERD). There may be important differences between NERD and ERD in terms of pathophysiology and management. Thus, NERD patients appear relatively resistant to proton pump inhibitors and may not be good surgical candidates. The clinician caring for patients with GERD must therefore be aware of the full spectrum of GERD and of the pathophysiological and therapeutic implications of NERD. Recent twin studies have revealed that genetic factors play a role in GERD and form the basis for future studies on the role of inheritance in the various manifestations of GERD. Several recent investigations have reaffirmed the primacy of acid reflux in the pathogenesis of GERD and have also provided insights into the pathophysiology of postprandial heartburn. Transient lower oesophageal sphincter relaxations and hiatal hernias have emerged as major and interacting factors in the genesis of reflux events and in the potentiation of acid exposure; the former are attracting considerable attention as a potential therapeutic target. Nocturnal acid breakthrough, which has been implicated in the failure of some patients to respond to high doses of proton pump inhibitors, appears, on further examination, to be a gastric rather than an oesophageal phenomenon, and may not be of clinical or therapeutic importance.

Diagnosis of symptomatic gastroesophageal reflux disease

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) encompasses a heterogeneous group of patients with differences in sensitivity to esophageal acid exposure, perception of pain, and physiological tissue involvement. The most difficult patients to understand are those who have a great symptom burden but no endoscopic evidence of esophageal mucosal involvement. These patients with symptomatic GERD (also called nonerosive reflux disease and endoscopy-negative reflux disease) present a diagnostic challenge. Diagnostic tests, like ambulatory pH monitoring, the acid perfusion test, and intraesophageal balloon distension, have limited reliability in patients with this form of GERD whose symptoms may exhibit poor correlation with acid exposure or mechanostimulation. The recent interest in a proton pump inhibitor therapeutic trial to identify the group of symptomatic GERD patients (having ruled out risk factors for more morbid conditions) who will respond to these agents has considerable appeal. It has been shown effective in about 75% of patients, and offers a simple approach to managing the difficult-to-diagnose patient even while further diagnostic procedures are carried out.

Factors that influence therapeutic outcomes in symptomatic gastroesophageal reflux disease

The term "symptomatic gastroesophageal reflux disease" (GERD) refers to those patients who present with the typical GERD symptoms of heartburn and regurgitation, yet do not have endoscopic evidence of esophagitis. The primary goals of managing symptomatic GERD are to control symptoms and improve quality of life. A clinical assessment of the GERD patient can identify important clinical features, such as atypical and extraesophageal symptoms for which acid-suppressive agents tend to be less effective. Performing an endoscopy can further identify the patient as having nonerosive reflux disease, erosive esophagitis, or Barrett's esophagus-diagnoses which can help determine treatment but may not prove predictive of therapeutic response. Determining acid exposure through pH testing can predict therapeutic response, with those revealing an abnormal acid exposure time being more responsive to acid-suppressive therapy. However, the performance of an endoscopy and pH testing on each patient is clearly not practical. Whereas the natural history of symptomatic GERD is still largely undefined, acid-suppressive therapy appears to be the best approach available for both the short-term and long-term management of this disease.

Natural history of nonerosive reflux disease. Is all gastroesophageal reflux disease the same? What is the evidence?

Currently not much can be said about the natural history of NERD. The existing data show that GERD symptoms are common, affecting one out of five adults on a weekly basis, but they fluctuate dramatically and are associated with other forms of gastrointestinal symptoms. Clinic-based studies suggest that the natural history of NERD and GERD is the same in regard to symptom duration and ratings of symptom severity. These studies show some transition between NERD and erosive reflux disease. At present, there is a need to establish more accurately the clinical condition to be labeled as NERD. This condition should be defined by noninvasive tests. A true natural history study could be performed and address the question in more detail.

Initial validation of a questionnaire for detecting gastroesophageal reflux disease in epidemiological settings

There is a high prevalence of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) in the general population. Prevalence studies are scarce, and there is a lack of valid instruments for measuring them. The aim of this paper is to validate a questionnaire for detecting GERD. A validity study design with pathologic GERD patients and controls was used. A sample of 240 subjects age and sex paired was selected in the ratio of 3:1 (patients to controls). The initial structured questionnaire contained a variety of GERD symptoms. Internal consistency, interobserver reliability, criteria validity using 24-h esophageal pH monitoring, construct validity, and extreme group validation were assessed. Sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values were also obtained in different cutoff points of the definitive scale. A total of 180 confirmed GERD patients and 60 controls were included in the study. Mean age in years was 45 +/- 13, with no statistical difference by gender (67% were female). Internal consistency of 0.75 and interobserver reliability of 0.87 was achieved in building the scale. Extreme group validation was highly significant by assessing the scale score with 24-h esophageal pH monitoring (P <.0001). At cutoff point 3 of the scale and with a correct classification of subjects of 92.4%, sensitivity, specificity, positive, and negative predictive values were 92, 95, 98, and 79%, respectively. The conclusion of this article is that a reliable and valid instrument was built to detect GERD.

Outcome of laparoscopic antireflux surgery in patients with nonerosive reflux disease

As many as 50% of patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) have no endoscopic evidence of esophagitis (EGD negative). Laparoscopic antireflux surgery (LARS) provides effective symptomatic and endoscopic healing in patients with erosive GERD (EGD positive). The surgical outcome of patients undergoing LARS for EGD-negative GERD has not received wide attention. The objective of this study was to compare surgical outcomes between EGD-negative and EGD-positive patients. During the period from June 1996 to September 1998, all patients undergoing LARS for persistent GERD symptoms despite medical therapy, who were EGD-negative, were invited to respond to a questionnaire regarding their clinical status before and after LARS. To perform a comparative analysis, the same questions were posed to a randomly selected equal number of EGD-positive patients who underwent surgery during the same study period. LARS was performed in 255 patients during the study period; 59 patients (23%) had EGD-negative GERD, and 148 (58%) were EGD-positive. Forty-eight patients (19%) did not meet the entry criteria and were excluded from analysis. LARS provided effective symptomatic relief in patients with EGD-negative and EGD-positive GERD. There were no significant differences in patient satisfaction or symptom improvement between the two groups (P = 0.82). The surgical outcome of EGD-negative patients is similar to the outcome for patients with erosive esophagitis. LARS is a valuable treatment option for patients with persistent GERD symptoms regardless of the endoscopic appearance of the esophageal mucosa.

Functional Heartburn

Functional heartburn is defined as the presence of a retrosternal burning sensation in the absence of pathologic gastroesophageal reflux. The underlying pathophysiology seems to be heterogeneous. In a subset of patients, esophageal hypersensitivity to physiologic esophageal acid exposure is involved, and this is likely to respond to intensive antireflux treatment. Antireflux surgery was not studied systematically in these patients and should be considered only in exceptional cases. In the remaining patients, non-acid reflux, esophageal mechanosensitivity, and psychological factors may be involved. Treatment options in these patients are limited owing to a lack of studies. Emerging therapies include selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors and relaxation therapy.

Gastroesophageal reflux disease--should we adopt a new conceptual framework?

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) has traditionally been approached as a spectrum of diseases. Over the years, this important concept affected our current understanding of the pathophysiologic mechanisms resulting in GERD. Additionally, it had a profound impact on our therapeutic approach and treatment algorithms. However, literature review reveals that there is scant data to support the spectrum paradigm. Consequently, we propose categorizing GERD into three unique groups of patients: nonerosive reflux disease, erosive esophagitis, and Barrett's esophagus. Thus far, studies have demonstrated very little movement between these groups. Although the spectrum concept focused our attention on esophageal mucosal injury, the new proposed conceptual model shifts our attention to esophageal symptoms. Furthermore, dividing GERD into three unique groups of patients will allow us to concentrate on the different mechanisms that lead to the development of each of these GERD-related disorders and thus help us to focus on the specific therapeutic modalities that will benefit each individual group of patients.