Endoscopic ultrasonographic abnormalities and lower esophageal sphincter function in reflux esophagitis

Increase in distal esophageal wall thickness with time in adult patients with eosinophilic esophagitis

Background and Aim

Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is a chronic disease which may progress to a fibro-stenotic phenotype due to esophageal sub-epithelial fibrosis. Esophageal wall thickening in patients with EoE has been demonstrated in a few studies using endoscopic ultrasound (EUS). The aim of this study was to longitudinally assess the endoscopic appearance, wall thickness, histology, and dysphagia score of EoE patients.

Methods

Patients with EoE were recruited and studied between February 2012 and April 2021. Patients were evaluated on two separate occasions at least 12 months apart with endoscopy, EUS, and esophageal mucosal biopsies. The dysphagia score and epidemiology data were also assessed.

Results

A total of 16 EoE patients were included with a mean follow-up duration of 2.2 ± 1.2 years. In 14/16 (88%) patients, the total wall thickness of the distal esophagus significantly increased (P = 0.0012) as a result of thickening of the muscularis propria (P = 0.0218). However, only 1/14 (7%) patient had an increase in the dysphagia score, while 8/14 (57%) and 5/14 (36%) had a stable and reduced dysphagia score, respectively. No differences were found in the total thickness of other esophageal regions, dysphagia score, endoscopic appearance, and eosinophil count over time.

Conclusion

Distal esophageal wall thickness increases with time in EoE patients, independent of the dysphagia score and eosinophil count.

Distal esophageal wall thickness correlates with dysphagia in adult patients with eosinophilic esophagitis

BACKGROUND

Thickening of the esophageal wall in patients with eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) and gastro-esophageal reflux disease (GERD) has been shown in studies using endoscopic ultrasound (EUS). We hypothesise that transmural inflammation in EoE results in prominent esophageal wall thickening compared with the mucosal inflammation in GERD. The aim of this study was to compare the relationship among dysphagia, endoscopic appearance, wall thickness, histology, and motility in EoE and GORD.

METHODS

EoE and GERD patients were prospectively studied between February 2012 and April 2021. Patients were studied on 2 separate occasions with endoscopy, EUS and mucosal biopsies, followed by high-resolution manometry. Epidemiology and dysphagia data were obtained.

RESULTS

A total of 45 patients (31 EoE, 14 GERD) were included. There were no significant differences in age, sex, duration of disease and presence of esophageal motility disorders. EoE patients had a higher dysphagia score (P < 0.001), EREFS score (P < 0.001) and peak eosinophil count (P < 0.001) compared with GERD patients. Thickness of the submucosa in the distal esophagus in EoE was significantly higher than GERD (P = 0.003) and positively correlated with duration of disease (P = 0.01, R = 0.67). Positive correlation was also found between dysphagia score and distal total esophageal wall thickness (P = 0.03, R = 0.39) in EoE patients. No correlation was found between these variables in GERD patients.

CONCLUSION

Distal esophageal wall thickness positively correlates with dysphagia score in EoE but not GERD. This appears to be related to the composition of the submucosa which can be identified using EUS.

Distal esophageal wall thickness correlates with dysphagia in adult patients with eosinophilic esophagitis

BACKGROUND

Thickening of the esophageal wall in patients with eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) and gastro-esophageal reflux disease (GERD) has been shown in studies using endoscopic ultrasound (EUS). We hypothesise that transmural inflammation in EoE results in prominent esophageal wall thickening compared with the mucosal inflammation in GERD. The aim of this study was to compare the relationship among dysphagia, endoscopic appearance, wall thickness, histology, and motility in EoE and GORD.

METHODS

EoE and GERD patients were prospectively studied between February 2012 and April 2021. Patients were studied on 2 separate occasions with endoscopy, EUS and mucosal biopsies, followed by high-resolution manometry. Epidemiology and dysphagia data were obtained.

RESULTS

A total of 45 patients (31 EoE, 14 GERD) were included. There were no significant differences in age, sex, duration of disease and presence of esophageal motility disorders. EoE patients had a higher dysphagia score (P < 0.001), EREFS score (P < 0.001) and peak eosinophil count (P < 0.001) compared with GERD patients. Thickness of the submucosa in the distal esophagus in EoE was significantly higher than GERD (P = 0.003) and positively correlated with duration of disease (P = 0.01, R = 0.67). Positive correlation was also found between dysphagia score and distal total esophageal wall thickness (P = 0.03, R = 0.39) in EoE patients. No correlation was found between these variables in GERD patients.

CONCLUSION

Distal esophageal wall thickness positively correlates with dysphagia score in EoE but not GERD. This appears to be related to the composition of the submucosa which can be identified using EUS.

Lansoprazole-induced improvement of esophageal submucosal injury

The proton pumpvinhibitor, lansoprazole, is reported to have acid secretion inhibiting effect as well as anti-inflammatory effects such as inhibition of cytokine secretion from inflammatory cells. Clinically, excellent efficacy of lansoprazole is reported for not only gastric ulcer but also gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Since GERD is categorized endoscopically into erosive esophagitis and non-erosive reflux disease, it is important to make accurate assessment of any improvement in the inflammatory process when using endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) capable of visualizing the submucosal structure. We report here our experience in assessing the effect of treatment with lansoprazole on esophageal wall structure using EUS in patients with GERD. At baseline (before treatment), EUS showed abnormalities in the mucosa, submucosa and muscularis propria caused by inflammation, thickening of the entire esophageal wall and changes in the contractile properties of esophageal smooth muscles reflecting the effects of inflammation on the entire wall of the lower esophagus in reflux esophagitis regardless of whether it is erosive or endoscopically-negative. Treatment with lansoprazole resulted in normalization of esophageal wall structure and improvement of motility, suggesting that lansoprazole improves not only mucosal inflammation but also submucosal inflammation in GERD.

Comparison of investigation modalities for evaluation of esophageal peristaltic function

We reviewed the recent literature concerning investigations of esophageal peristaltic function. The gold standard for the assessment of esophageal peristaltic function is manometry with pH monitoring. Even with this investigation modality, however, we are in fact doing no more than estimating esophageal peristaltic function from the manometry and pH results. With esophageal fluoroscopy and scintigraphy, where we observe esophageal motility, there are problems with radiation exposure and handling of radioactive agents that make widespread use difficult. In recent years, the development of multichannel intraluminal impedance (MII) manometry has allowed simultaneous measurement of intraesophageal pressure and assessment of esophageal peristalsis. Using MII it is also possible to distinguish whether gas or liquid is passing down the esophagus. When manometry is performed in conjunction with transnasal esophagogastroduodenoscopy, with this unique combination it is possible to measure the intraesophageal pressure while actually observing the swallowing motion at the same time. Assessment of esophageal peristaltic function is now moving from simple measurement of intraesophageal pressure to simultaneous impedance manometry and endoscopic observation of esophageal peristalsis itself.

Abdominal ultrasonography as a new modality for the diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux disease

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Thickening and abnormal architecture of the esophageal wall in gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) have been reported using endoscopic ultrasonography (US), but whether extracorporeal abdominal US is a useful diagnostic modality has not been investigated.

METHODS

Subjects were 37 GERD, 24 non-erosive reflux disease (NERD) patients and 32 controls who visited our hospital from 2006-2009 and underwent upper gastrointestinal endoscopy and extracorporeal abdominal US. The US operator was unaware of any clinical information and examined the following: (i) thickness (>or=5 mm) and (ii) architecture of the esophageal wall; and (iii) presence of reflux. GERD was diagnosed when two or more of these items were positive.

RESULTS

Thickening of the lower esophageal wall in erosive GERD, NERD and controls was 5.7 +/- 0.6, 4.4 +/- 0.8 and 4.7 +/- 0.9 mm, respectively. The thickness in erosive GERD was significantly greater (P < 0.05) than that in NERD patients and controls. Sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of abdominal US diagnosis for erosive GERD and NERD (vs control) was 84.6% (11/13), 25% (6/24), 91.1% (31/34) and 91.1% (31/34), 89.4% (42/47) and 63.8% (37/58), respectively.

CONCLUSION

Extracorporeal abdominal US could be a new useful modality for diagnosing GERD.

Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of gastroesophageal reflux disease: an evidence-based consensus

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is one of the most common disorders in medical practice. A number of guidelines and recommendations for the diagnosis and management of GERD have been published in different countries, but a Brazilian accepted directive by the standards of evidence-based medicine is still lacking. As such, the aim of the Brazilian GERD Consensus Group was to develop guidelines for the diagnosis and management of GERD, strictly using evidence-based medicine methodology that could be clinically used by primary care physicians and specialists and would encompass the needs of physicians, investigators, insurance and regulatory bodies. A total of 30 questions were proposed. Systematic literature reviews, which defined inclusion and/or exclusion criteria, were conducted to identify and grade the available evidence to support each statement. A total of 11,069 papers on GERD were selected, of which 6,474 addressed the diagnosis and 4,595, therapeutics. Regarding diagnosis, 51 met the requirements for the analysis of evidence-based medicine: 19 of them were classified as grade A and 32 as grade B. As for therapeutics, 158 met the evidence-based medicine criteria; 89 were classified as grade A and 69 as grade B. In the topic Diagnosis, answers supported by publications grade A and B were accepted. In the topic Treatment only publications grade A were accepted: answers supported by publications grade B were submitted to the voting by the Consensus Group. The present publication presents the most representative studies that responded to the proposed questions, followed by pertinent comments. Follow examples. In patients with atypical manifestations, the conventional esophageal pH-metry contributes little to the diagnosis of GERD. The sensitivity, however, increases with the use of double-channel pH-metry. In patients with atypical manifestations, the impedance-pHmetry substantially contributes to the diagnosis of GERD. The examination, however, is costly and scarcely available in our country. The evaluation of the histological signs of esophagitis increases the diagnostic probability of GERD; hence, the observation of the dimensions of the intercellular space of the esophageal mucosa increases the probability of diagnostic certainty and also allows the analysis of the therapeutic response. There is no difference in the clinical response to the treatment with PPI in two separate daily doses when compared to a single daily dose. In the long term (>1 year), the eradication of H. pylori in patients with GERD does not decrease the presence of symptoms or the high recurrence rates of the disease, although it decreases the histological signs of gastric inflammation. It seems very likely that there is no association between the eradication of the H. pylori and the manifestations of GERD. The presence of a hiatal hernia requires larger doses of proton-pump inhibitor for the clinical treatment. The presence of permanent migration from the esophagogastric junction and the hernia dimensions (>2 cm) are factors of worse prognosis in GERD. In this case, hiatal hernias associated to GERD, especially the fixed ones and larger than 2 cm, must be considered for surgical treatment. The outcomes of the laparoscopic fundoplication are adequate.

Increased esophageal mucosal/submucosal blood flow in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease: normalization by treatment with a proton pump inhibitor

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Mucosal injury caused by gastroesophageal reflux may result in changes in esophageal mucosal blood flow. Little is known about esophageal mucosal blood flow in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Here we examined esophageal mucosal blood flow and the effects of treatment in patients with GERD.

METHODS

The subjects included 41 cases (21 males and 20 females, mean age 64.2 years) in whom endoscopy was warranted in patients complaining of heartburn and/or regurgitation. We also studied six normal control subjects. Patients underwent endoscopy, laser Doppler flow meter measurements, and endoscopic ultrasonography before and after treatment.

RESULTS

Esophageal mucosal/submucosal blood flow was increased in patients with GERD compared with the control patients. The thickness of the whole esophageal wall and that of the mucosal and submucosal layers of the esophagus correlated significantly with esophageal mucosal/submucosal blood flow. The increased esophageal mucosal/submucosal blood flow significantly decreased after 4 weeks' treatment with lansoprazole, a proton pump inhibitor.

CONCLUSION

Our results indicated that the pathophysiology or underlying mechanisms of GERD includes increased esophageal mucosal/submucosal blood flow, which correlates with the thickness of the esophageal wall, but is reversible and responds to treatment with lansoprazole. This suggests that proton pump inhibitors can effectively treat GERD and promote histological normalization of the mucosa and submucosa in the lower esophagus.

The effect of traction on esophageal structure in children with long-gap esophageal atresia

We examined the esophageal structure in children who underwent traction to achieve primary repair of long-gap esophageal atresia. High-resolution ultrasound was used to compare thickness of the proximal and distal esophagus in children who had traction to achieve primary repair (n=15) to cases of esophageal atresia with shorter gaps that did not require traction (n=8). The muscularis propria of the upper esophagus was thicker in the traction compared to the non-traction group, though not statistically significant (respectively, 0.79 (0.18) mm vs. 0.71 (0.16) mm; p=0.29), measurements were similar for the lower esophagus (respectively, 0.79 (0.21) mm vs. 0.75 (0.13) mm; p=0.64). Combined mucosa and submucosa was very similar in both groups for the upper (respectively, 1.03 (0.15) mm vs. 1.04 (0.16) mm; p=0.95) and lower esophagus (respectively, 1.09 (0.23) mm vs. 1.01 (0.13) mm; p=0.37). The thickness of individual mural layers is maintained after increasing esophageal length with traction.

Review article: diagnosis and investigation of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease in Japanese patients

Gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GERD) encompasses a wide range of disorders defined by either reflux-related symptoms or by complications of gastro-oesophageal reflux. The most characteristic GERD symptoms are heartburn and acid regurgitation. Patients with these symptoms are in most cases easily identifiable and diagnosis is made on the basis of symptoms alone. For patients with a decreased frequency of heartburn, diagnosis is more difficult, and endoscopy is the single best test for diagnosis of GERD. A major difference between the West and Asia is the frequency of endoscopic investigation. In Japan, the earlier high prevalence of stomach cancers resulted in the increased use of endoscopy as an investigational tool for dyspeptic symptoms and today endoscopy continues to be widely available as a diagnostic tool. However, the overall sensitivity of endoscopy for the diagnosis of GERD is less than 50% since not all patients will have oesophagitis at the time of endoscopy. Ambulatory pH monitoring is therefore a frequently used diagnostic tool as it allows correlation between reflux events and symptoms, and is especially useful in patients with atypical or extraoesophageal symptoms. Oesophageal manometry is also an excellent test to evaluate oesophageal function and to measure sphincter pressure and while it may not provide an unequivocal diagnosis of GERD it is a useful tool with which to evaluate oesophageal function.

High-resolution EUS in children with eosinophilic "allergic" esophagitis

BACKGROUND

The pathophysiology of dysphagia associated with eosinophilic esophagitis is unknown. This study investigated possible anatomic alterations in children with eosinophilic esophagitis in comparison with healthy children by using high-resolution EUS to precisely measure individual tissue layers of the esophagus.

METHODS

Children with eosinophilic esophagitis (n = 11) and control children (n = 8) without esophagitis were prospectively evaluated by high-resolution EUS with a 20-MHz catheter US probe during an endoscopic examination. Real-time measurements of the distal esophagus were obtained including the thickness of the total wall, combined mucosa and submucosa, muscularis propria, and circular muscle.

RESULTS

Statistically significant differences were found between patients with eosinophilic esophagitis and control patients for mean values for thickness of the total wall (respectively, 2.8 vs. 2.1 mm; p = 0.004), combined mucosa and submucosa (respectively, 1.6 vs. 1.1 mm; p = 0.001), and muscularis propria (respectively, 1.2 vs. 1.0 mm; p = 0.043). Mean values for circular muscle did not differ between patient groups.

CONCLUSION

High-resolution EUS reveals significant expansion of the esophageal wall and individual tissue layers including the combined mucosa and submucosa, and muscularis propria in children with eosinophilic esophagitis compared with healthy control patients.

Ultrasonographic evaluation of lansoprazole-induced improvement of submucosal injury in patients with gastroesophageal reflux

OBJECTIVE

Endoscopic ultrasonographic (EUS) changes in gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) after treatment with proton pump inhibitor have been poorly evaluated. We conducted a randomized, double-blind 12-wk clinical trial to compare the EUS effects of lansoprazole to histamine H2-receptor antagonist therapy in GERD.

METHODS

Seventeen patients with reflux-related symptoms received 40 mg of famotidine for 6 wk or 30 mg of lansoprazole for 6 wk followed by 40 mg of famotidine or 30 mg of lansoprazole for another 6 wk, respectively. Patients underwent EUS before and at 6 and 12 wk after treatment.

RESULTS

Before treatment, a variable degree of wall thickening was noted on EUS in the lower esophagus, compared with 20 normal subjects. After 6 wk of therapy, esophageal wall was significantly thicker in the famotidine group compared with the lansoprazole group (p<0.01). Surprisingly, thickening of esophageal wall and abnormal architecture were also detected in endoscopically negative reflux disease. Lansoprazole was superior to famotidine in reducing the thickness of esophageal wall.

CONCLUSIONS

EUS was very useful for evaluation of submucosal injury in patients with GERD. EUS showed that a 6-wk course of lansoprazole therapy reduced thickening of esophageal wall, which was resistant to histamine H2-receptor antagonist therapy. Our results also suggest that inflammatory damage to the submucosal and muscle layers of the lower esophagus is the underlying mechanism of heartburn and associated symptoms in patients with endoscopically negative reflux disease.