Health-related quality of life of patients with acute erosive reflux esophagitis

Patients' perceptions of antimicrobial photodynamic therapy in the management of chronic periodontitis

The aim of this study is to evaluate patients' perception of antimicrobial photodynamic therapy (aPDT) in the management of chronic periodontitis. 90 patients (51 females and 39 males) with untreated localized chronic periodontitis were randomly assigned to receive SRP with aPDT (test group) or SRP alone (control group) in a single-centered double-blinded randomized and controlled clinical trial. Patients' perception in terms of changes in bleeding gums, pain in gums while chewing, bad breath and sensitive gums along with pain during the procedure and patient acceptance were recorded for 6 months after treatment by a periodontist who was blinded to the procedure. Inter-group and intra-group statistical analyses were performed. Significant difference between the frequencies of two groups with respect to each variable was assessed using non-parametric test. Patients' report of bleeding gums and pain in the gums while chewing showed statistically significant reduction in the test group at 2 weeks and 1 month (p<0.05). Also, a significant difference was detected at 1 month between SRP and SRP+aPDT in terms of halitosis (p<0.05). No statistically significant change was observed between two groups in terms of sensitive gums, pain during procedure and patient acceptance. Patients perceived short-term benefits of single session of aPDT therapy due to the reduction in bleeding gums, halitosis and pain while chewing following treatment. Further studies are required to assess the effectiveness of aPDT for a longer-term and following multiple sessions.

Quantification of the impact of endometriosis symptoms on health-related quality of life and work productivity

OBJECTIVE

To quantify the impact of endometriosis-related symptoms on physical and mental health status, health-related quality of life, and work-related aspects (absenteeism, presenteeism, work productivity, and activity impairment).

DESIGN

Cross-sectional quantitative study.

SETTING

Academic and research institution.

PATIENT(S)

Women (n = 193) with self-reported surgically diagnosed endometriosis from the Endometriosis Patient Registry at Ponce School of Medicine and Health Sciences (PSMHS).

INTERVENTION(S)

Anonymous questionnaire divided into three sections consisting of questions from the Patient Health Survey (SF-12), the Endometriosis Health Profile (EHP-5), and the Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Survey (WPAI).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

Quantification of impact of endometriosis symptoms on physical and mental health status, health-related quality of life, absenteeism, presenteeism, work productivity, and activity impairment.

RESULT(S)

Patients had SF-12 scores denoting statistically significant disability in the physical and mental health components. They also reported an average of 7.41 hours (approximately one working day) of work time lost during the week when the symptoms are worse. In addition, the WPAI scores showed a high impact on work-related domains: 13% of average loss in work time (absenteeism), 65% of work impaired (presenteeism), 64% of loss in efficiency levels (work productivity loss), and 60% of daily activities perturbed (activity impairment).

CONCLUSION(S)

Endometriosis symptoms such as chronic, incapacitating pelvic pain and infertility negatively and substantially impact the physical and mental health status, health-related quality of life, and productivity at work of women.

Questionnaire based gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) assessment scales

Questionnaire based assessment scales for gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) have been utilized for assessment of the patient's symptomatology, assessment of symptom severity and frequency, assessment of health-related quality of life and for assessment of response to treatment. A multitude of unidimensional and multidimensional questionnaires exist for making symptom assessment and monitoring quality of life in GERD. Many of the scales meet some of the parameters of an ideal evaluative GERD specific assessment instrument. Yet, there are certain shortcomings and challenges which are faced in development of GERD questionnaires. This review discusses the features of an ideal symptom assessment instrument, examines the strengths and weaknesses of currently available questionnaires.

Update on health-related quality of life in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease

Gastroesophageal reflux disease is highly prevalent in westernized countries. It damages quality of life but its effect is frequently underestimated, often leading to inadequate management of the disease and its symptoms. Health-related quality of life questionnaires are now becoming more widely recognized as an effective means of demonstrating the true impact of gastroesophageal reflux disease, both on individuals and on society at large. Health-related quality of life questionnaires can also help to underscore the importance of effective acid suppression therapy, with proton pump inhibitors, such as omeprazole and esomeprazole, for this common and highly debilitating condition. This review summarizes recent information on the impact of gastroesophageal reflux disease on a range of aspects of health-related quality of life, including patient well-being.

Long-term quality of life improvement in subjects with healed erosive esophagitis: treatment with lansoprazole

BACKGROUND

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a chronic symptomatic condition and may be associated with erosive esophagitis (EE). Considerable data on the long-term maintenance of healing of EE are available, but data on long-term GERD symptom prevention and patient quality of life (QOL) are limited.

AIMS

To investigate QOL in subjects with healed EE who received 12 months of double-blind maintenance treatment with lansoprazole or ranitidine, followed by long-term open-label lansoprazole therapy to prevent recurrence of EE.

METHODS

Subjects with healed EE received 12 months of double-blind maintenance treatment with lansoprazole 15 mg once daily or ranitidine 150 mg twice daily, followed by dose-titrated, open-label lansoprazole therapy for up to 82 months.

RESULTS

During double-blind treatment (n = 206), lansoprazole-treated patients showed significantly (P <or= 0.05) greater improvements than ranitidine-treated patients in the frequency, severity, and 'bothersomeness' of heartburn, the symptom index, problems of activity limitation, eating and drinking problems, symptom problems, health distress, and social functioning. During dose-titrated, open-label treatment (n = 195), all disease-specific QOL scales except sleep improved significantly (P < 0.001) from open-label baseline at each time-point.

CONCLUSIONS

Maintenance treatment with lansoprazole for 12 months in healed EE subjects produced significantly greater improvements in QOL indicators than ranitidine. These improvements were sustained during dose-titrated, open-label lansoprazole treatment.

Long-term efficacy of lansoprazole in preventing relapse of erosive reflux esophagitis

In a phase III study of lansoprazole treatment, patients with healed or unhealed erosive esophagitis entered a titrated open-label treatment period and received lansoprazole for <or=6 years to assess long-term maintenance therapy. Doses were adjusted depending on symptom response. Endoscopy was performed yearly. One hundred ninety-five subjects received lansoprazole for <1 to 72 months; most received daily doses of <or=30 mg. Lansoprazole maintained erosive esophagitis remission in 75% of subjects receiving treatment for <or=72 months, with 39 subjects experiencing 50 recurrences. Most subjects (94-95%) had no or mild symptoms of day or night heartburn at study end, and 77% were asymptomatic at first erosive esophagitis recurrence. The most common treatment-related adverse events included diarrhea (10%), headache (8%), and abdominal pain (6%), and were mild or moderate in severity. Long-term lansoprazole is effective and well tolerated when used to maintain erosive esophagitis remission for <or=6 years.

Systematic review: health-related quality of life (HRQOL) questionnaires in gastro-oesophageal reflux disease

BACKGROUND

Although gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GERD) has a well-established pathophysiology, the impact of GERD symptoms on the patients' quality of life can be profound. Therefore, health-related quality of life (HRQOL) questionnaires have become standard instruments to evaluate the effect of treatment in clinical trials.

AIM

To evaluate the reliability, validity and responsiveness of available GERD-specific HRQOL.

METHODS

A systematic literature search using the Medical Subject Headings terms: 'Gastro-oesophageal reflux', 'Heartburn' and 'Oesophagitis' with 'quality of life' and 'questionnaires' was preformed to identify the available HRQOL questionnaires. To analyse the psychometric properties of the respective tools, the actual guidelines for the use of patient-reported outcomes in clinical trials were applied.

RESULTS

We identified five GERD-specific HRQOL questionnaires but none of them fulfilled all quality criteria; either they did not meet the actual standards for psychometric properties (HBQOL, GERD-HRQL, Jasani et al.Aust Fam Physician 1999; 28: 515), or were impracticable to use in clinical trials. The generic and hybrid instruments lack specificity and sensitivity and were not designed for treatment evaluation in GERD patients.

CONCLUSION

There is need for a new evaluative tool in the assessment of HRQOL during GERD therapy.

GERD evaluation: time for a new paradigm?

In the past there has been reliance on heartburn and acid regurgitation as the cardinal symptoms of gastro-esophageal reflux. Now it is recognized that diverse additional symptoms including extraesophageal manifestations are essential components of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Furthermore, previous reliance in mucosal damage at endoscopy as evidence of therapeutic success in the management of GERD has proven of only limited value in the diverse world of GERD symptoms. Indeed is now apparent that the relationship between symptoms and lesions is modest at best. Most patients with GERD have no overt erosions or ulceration at endoscopy and they frequently suffer from a wide array of complaints other than heartburn that contribute to their diminished perception of life's quality. To address these problems, multidimensional questionnaires designed to encompass the diverse symptomatology of GERD have been investigated, principally, to provide a reproducible metric of change in the subjective response to pharmacologic therapy during trials for patients with nonerosive reflux disease. The most promising of these instruments is The ReQuest questionnaire, because it has been extensively validated in multiple patient groups and cultures, appears highly promising in this regard and for erosive disease too and may ultimately prove to be of value for the initial evaluation of patients with GERD. We propose that accurate symptom delineation complemented with endoscopy performed in selected groups of patients will become the mainstay in diagnosis of GERD and the assessment of therapy efficacy.

Symptom-based outcome measures for dyspepsia and GERD trials: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Symptom assessment using questionnaires has been recommended as the primary outcome measure in clinical gastroesophageal reflux and dyspepsia trials. Questionnaires should have proven reliability, validity, and responsiveness, and may assess the frequency and/or severity of dyspepsia symptoms. Although a number of measures have been developed, it remains unclear which of these should be used in new trials.

OBJECTIVE

To describe existing questionnaire outcome measures that assess symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux dyspepsia for use in clinical trials.

METHODS

Studies were identified from Medline, Embase, the Cochrane library, and reference lists. The inclusion criterion was that the study assessed a questionnaire, which measured the frequency or severity of dyspepsia or gastroesophageal reflux symptoms, in a sample of patients.

RESULTS

No direct comparison between questionnaires was possible due to methodological heterogeneity. Thirty-seven studies describing 26 questionnaires met the inclusion criteria. Twelve were unidimensional (assessed symptoms only) and 14 were multidimensional (also assessed quality of life). Eleven questionnaires assessed both frequency and severity of dyspepsia, and 10 had proven reliability, validity, and responsiveness. No studies compared different questionnaires.

CONCLUSIONS

Future gastroesophageal reflux and dyspepsia clinical trials should use unidimensional or multidimensional outcome measures that assess both the frequency and severity of symptoms, and have proven reliability, validity, and responsiveness. Further research is necessary to compare existing outcome measures to determine which are the most reliable, valid, and responsive instruments.

Systematic review: do we need a new gastro-oesophageal reflux disease questionnaire?

BACKGROUND

Gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is highly prevalent in Western countries. Because the majority of patients do not present with endoscopic abnormalities, the assessment of the symptom severity and quality of life, and their response to treatment, has become increasingly important. Self-assessed symptom questionnaires are now key instruments in clinical trials.

AIM

To evaluate the validity of available GERD measurement tools.

METHODS

An ideal GERD symptom assessment instrument, suitable as a primary end-point for clinical trials, should possess the following characteristics: (i) be sensitive in patients with GERD; (ii) cover the frequency and intensity of typical and atypical GERD symptoms; (iii) be multidimensional (cover all symptom dimensions); (iv) have proven psychometric properties (validity, reliability and responsiveness); (v) be practical and economical; (vi) be self-assessed; (vii) use 'word pictures' which are easy to understand for patients; (viii) respond rapidly to changes (responsiveness over short time intervals); (ix) be used daily to assess changes during and after therapy; and (x) be valid in different languages for international use.

RESULTS

A literature review revealed five scales that met some of the above characteristics, but did not fulfil all criteria.

CONCLUSION

There is a need for a new evaluative tool for the assessment of GERD symptoms and their response to therapy.

Improving health-related quality of life in gastro-oesophageal reflux disease

Gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GORD) is a common, chronic disorder that can progress to erosive or ulcerative oesophagitis and other complications. Uncomplicated GORD can be defined using criteria that combine symptom assessment and the impact of symptoms on well being or quality of life. The extent of impairment of health-related quality of life (HRQL) in GORD patients has been evaluated using generic HRQL questionnaires, GORD-specific quality of life questionnaires or a combination of the two types of instruments. The impact of GORD on HRQL in affected individuals is proportional to the frequency and severity of heartburn, and is greater than that associated with many other chronic diseases. In the treatment of GORD, the goal should be complete symptom resolution as this has been shown to be associated with a clinically significant improvement in HRQL. Both drug treatment and surgical intervention have been successful in improving HRQL of patients with GORD when complete symptom resolution can be attained.

Natural history of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease without oesophagitis (NERD)--a reappraisal 10 years on

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Ten years ago we published a study describing the 6-month outcome of 33 outpatients with typical gastro-oesophageal reflux disease symptoms and pH-metry proven excess gastro-oesophageal reflux but without endoscopical evidence of oesophagitis, currently referred to as patients with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease without oesophagitis. We now present an update of that report concerning morbidity, drug consumption and quality of life of the original patients 10 years after the initial diagnosis.

METHODS

The study consisted of the retrieval and revision of all clinical and instrumental records concerning the cohort of 33 above-mentioned patients. Data are available regarding annual intervals within the first 5 years from original diagnosis and, subsequently, with a follow-up ranging from 7 to 14 years (median 10 years). The records of these 33 patients were reviewed, including the results of clinical visits at the outpatients department, of oesophagogastroduodenoscopies and pH- metries. Finally, a telephonic interview was conducted by means of a structured questionnaire, aiming at evaluating present symptoms, actual therapy if any, health-related quality of life and other information regarding any gastro-oesophageal reflux disease symptoms.

RESULTS

Of the original 33 patients, 31 are still alive and 2 were lost to follow-up. Of the 29 remaining, only 1 is definitively not complaining of any gastro-oesophageal reflux disease-related symptoms. Within 5 years of the first diagnosis, oesophagitis was found in all but one of the 18 subjects who underwent repeated endoscopy. At the latest follow-up check, after a median of 10 years, out of the 28 still complaining of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease symptoms, 21 (75%) were presently taking antisecretory drugs (proton pump inhibitors and H-2 receptor antagonists) because of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease symptoms/lesions, 12 of whom intermittently or on demand and the remaining 9 continuously. Two patients (2/28) underwent antireflux surgery, but despite this were still taking antisecretory drugs (in one case H2-RA; in the other proton pump inhibitor). The health-related quality of life, self-evaluated by the patient by means of a VAS scoring from 0 (worst possible) to 10 (best possible) increased significantly from 3.2 to 6.5 from baseline (before therapy) to present time, possibly due to the positive effect of present therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study conducted on a cohort of endoscopy-negative patients with pH-metry-confirmed reflux disease has shown that after a median time of 10 years following the original diagnosis, the majority of patients have, in fact, developed reflux oesophagitis and are on prolonged antisecretory therapy because of recurrent gastro-oesophageal reflux disease symptoms/lesions. The study confirms that gastro-oesophageal reflux disease without oesophagitis, as well as gastro-oesophageal reflux disease at large, is a chronic disease characterised by increasing severity with time, which requires protracted medical therapy in a vast proportion of patients. Absence of endoscopic oesophagitis at presentation does not represent a positive prognostic factor.

Quality of life and cost-effectiveness of combined therapy for reflux esophagitis

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate clinical, Quality of Life (QoL) and medical cost outcomes in patients with symptomatic reflux esophagitis (RE) receiving different "triple combination therapy".

METHODS

A multicenter medical effectiveness trial conducted in 10 hospitals of 5 regions in Zhejiang Province. 248 patient-volunteers were assigned to 8 weeks of "triple combination therapy" with Lansoprazole plus Cisapride and Sucralfate or Ranitidine plus Cisapride and Sucralfate. Main outcomes assessment included symptoms scale scores, RE severity, QoL at baseline and 8 weeks. Medical cost data were collected with cost analysis questionnaire.

RESULTS

(1) More Lansoprazole group patients noted RE symptoms resolution than Ranitidine group (92.3% vs 78.4%, P<0.01). There was no striking difference between two groups in RE healing rate (90.8% vs 82.9%, P>0.05). (2) RE significantly impaired QoL of patients (P<0.001). Compared with Ranitidine group, QoL in Lansoprazole group had significant improvement (rate of "good" QoL 64.5% vs 45.6%, P<0.01). (3) There was close correlation between symptomic effectiveness and QoL rating scale in both the Lansoprazole and Ranitidine group (P<0.01, r=0.235 and 0.353 respectively). There were no statistical difference of medical cost between the two groups (P>0.05).

CONCLUSION

RE significantly impaired QoL of patients. "Triple combination therapies" can significantly improve RE symptoms and QoL. Lansoprazole combination therapy was more cost-effective than Ranitidine combination group.

Pantoprazole rapidly improves health-related quality of life in patients with heartburn: a prospective, randomized, double blind comparative study with nizatidine

BACKGROUND

Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) is impaired in untreated patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). In the absence of an objective marker such as erosions, assessment of treatment efficacy can be based on symptoms and HRQoL.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate changes in HRQoL during treatment with pantoprazole or nizatidine in patients with GERD.

METHODS

This was a prospective, randomized, double blind Canadian multicenter study. Patients with GERD, characterized by heartburn that had occurred 4 or more times per week for at least 6 months, were treated for 28 days with either pantoprazole 40 mg once daily or nizatidine 150 mg twice daily. HRQoL assessment was performed before endoscopy (baseline) and on days 7 and 28 after treatment. HRQoL was assessed using 4 domains of the SF-36, the SF-12 summary scales and the gastrointestinal system rating scale (GSRS).

RESULTS

A total of 208 patients (n = 106 pantoprazole treatment group, n = 102 nizatidine treatment group) was available for intention-to-treat analysis. Baseline HRQoL scores were comparable between the 2 treatment groups. After 7 days, treatment with pantoprazole led to a statistically significant greater improvement in HRQoL in 2 SF-36 domains: bodily pain (pantoprazole versus nizatidine, P = 0.0088) and vitality (pantoprazole versus nizatidine, P = 0.0137), and in the GSRS reflux score (pantoprazole versus nizatidine, P = 0.0078). After 28 days of treatment, the changes in scores relative to baseline were still greater with pantoprazole than with nizatidine. The improvement in the 4 SF-36 domains and the GSRS reflux score achieved by pantoprazole after 7 days were also significantly greater than those achieved by nizatidine after 28 days.

CONCLUSIONS

HRQoL improves more rapidly and to a greater degree following treatment with pantoprazole than nizatidine. Control of heartburn strongly predicts HRQoL improvement during the acute treatment of GERD. Our data support the approach to use pantoprazole instead of nizatidine as the initial therapy for patients with heartburn in a primary care practice setting.

The impact of gastroesophageal reflux disease on quality of life

BACKGROUND

Quality of life as a medical endpoint has become an important measure in clinical research.

METHODS

In this article, we review the recent literature that has examined the impact of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and its treatment of quality of life.

RESULTS

The increasing interest in measuring patients' quality of life as an outcome reflects an increasing awareness that traditional physiological endpoints often do not correlate well with patients' functional status, general well-being, and satisfaction with therapy. It has been shown that GERD has a significant impact on patients' quality of life; therefore, improvement of quality of life is one of the major goals of GERD treatment. This can be achieved by medical as well as surgical treatment.

CONCLUSION

In addition to the patients' perspective, quality of life is one of the major endpoints in medical research that will help provide more selective treatment regimens for our patients.

Rabeprazole improves health-related quality of life in patients with erosive gastroesophageal reflux disease

The purpose of this study was to assess the effect of rabeprazole 20 mg once a day on patient-reported health-related quality of life in routine clinical practice. Patients with erosive gastroesophageal reflux disease participating in an open-label, 8-week study completed the SF-36 Health Survey before and after treatment with rabeprazole. For all SF-36 scales, there was a statistically significant (p < or = 0.007) improvement in mean scores from baseline to week 8. Improvements in each of the subscales, except for physical functioning, general health, and mental health, were at least 5% in magnitude, a level considered clinically meaningful. Furthermore, while baseline scores were significantly poorer than general United States population scores, follow-up scores for four of the subscales (role limitations due to physical problems, social functioning, role limitations due to emotional problems, and mental health) were comparable to general population scores. In conclusion, rabeprazole significantly improved health-related quality of life in erosive gastroesophageal reflux disease patients and restored social functioning and emotional well-being to levels comparable to those observed in the United States general population.

Lansoprazole for maintenance of remission of erosive oesophagitis

Gastro-oesophageal reflux disease, which is experienced daily by a significant proportion of individuals, may result in serious sequelae such as erosive oesophagitis. Short-term treatment with acid antisecretory therapy (a proton pump inhibitor or a histamine H(2) receptor antagonist) is highly effective in healing the erosive oesophagitis lesion. However, numerous studies confirm that unless maintenance therapy is initiated virtually all patients will experience oesophagitis relapse within 1 year, as well as an increasing severity of oesophagitis and risk for complications such as Barrett's oesophagus and adenocarcinoma. Studies evaluating the efficacy of proton pump inhibitor and H(2) antagonist maintenance therapy have found that only the proton pump inhibitors significantly reduce the incidence of oesophagitis relapse. Pharmacoeconomic studies have also confirmed that proton pump inhibitor maintenance therapy is cost effective, by virtue of the ability of these agents to reduce the incidence of relapse as well as prolong the time to relapse and increase the number of weeks per year that patients are without symptoms. Lansoprazole, a member of the proton pump inhibitor class of agents, has been extensively studied in the treatment of patients with a variety of acid-related disorders. Among those with erosive oesophagitis, maintenance therapy with lansoprazole 15 or 30mg once daily is highly effective in preventing relapse. Studies have documented that lansoprazole 15 and 30mg once daily for six months prevents oesophagitis relapse in up to 81 and 93% of patients, respectively, with comparable percentages of patients remaining in remission after 1 year of treatment. These high rates of remission have also been observed in studies of patients with lesions that were difficult to heal at baseline (resistant to healing with at least 3 months of H(2) antagonist therapy). Moreover, lansoprazole produces high remission rates regardless of the grade of erosive oesophagitis before acute healing. Among symptomatic patients with heartburn, lansoprazole provides rapid and effective relief of daytime and night-time heartburn and prevents relapse of symptoms. Lansoprazole has a wide margin of safety and is well tolerated when administered as monotherapy in short- and long-term clinical trials. Taken together these data suggest that proton pump inhibitor therapy represents the preferred and ideal long-term management strategy for the patient with erosive oesophagitis. Lansoprazole is a well-established member of this class of agents and, as such, has an extensive body of literature that supports its safety, tolerability and clinical efficacy in preventing relapse in these patients.

Measuring symptom distress and health-related quality of life in clinical trials of gastroesophageal reflux disease treatment: further validation of the Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease Symptom Assessment Scale (GSAS)

This study reports the reliability and validity of the distress subscale of the GERD Symptom Assessment Scale (GSAS) and the acute SF-36 Health Survey in a clinical trial setting. Patients with moderately severe GERD completed the GSAS and SF-36 at baseline and four weeks following treatment. The age (mean +/- SD) of the 187 patients was 45.5 +/- 11.1 years and most were female (63%) and Caucasian (78%). All scales met the 0.70 reliability criterion except for the SF-36 bodily pain scale. Mean baseline GSAS scores were significantly (P < 0.001) poorer by 10-17% among patients reporting more severe levels of all symptoms. Mean baseline SF-36 physical component summary scores were significantly (P < 0.02) poorer among patients reporting more severe levels of regurgitation, early satiety, bloating, and nausea. Patients reporting complete and satisfactory heartburn relief reported improvements in GSAS scores that were 13% and 10% greater, respectively, than patients who did not experience these levels of relief (P < 0.001). In conclusion, the GSAS and SF-36 scales were reliable and valid measures in this clinical trial. Differences of 10% in GSAS distress scores correspond to differences in symptom severity at a point in time and to changes in symptom severity over time. The SF-36 was not as useful in detecting differences in symptom severity over time.

Health-Related quality-of-life and quality-days incrementally gained in symptomatic nonerosive GERD patients treated with lansoprazole or ranitidine

Eight-hundred forty-nine patients with symptomatic nonerosive GERD from two clinical trials of lansoprazole 15 mg daily (LAN 15) and lansoprazole 30 mg daily (LAN 30) vs ranitidine 150 mg twice a day (RAN 150) completed a health-related quality-of-life (HRQoL) questionnaire at baseline and four and eight weeks after treatment. The questionnaire included the Short-Form 12, GERD symptoms, eating symptoms, social restrictions, problems with sleep, work disability, treatment satisfaction, and associated importance weights items. Both LAN groups reported greater, although not significant, improvement from baseline to week 8 versus RAN 150 in the majority of HRQoL scales. Treatment satisfaction was significantly higher at week 8 in both LAN groups. Quality-days incrementally gained analysis showed that both LAN groups gained significantly more quality days than RAN 150. Patients taking lansoprazole 15 or 30 mg daily reported better outcomes than those receiving ranitidine 150 twice a day over the eight-week study.

Symptom and health-related quality-of-life measures for use in selected gastrointestinal disease studies: a review and synthesis of the literature

Patient-rated symptom and health-related quality-of-life (HR-QOL) outcomes are important end-points for clinical trials of medical treatments for gastrointestinal (GI) disorders. Based on this review, patient outcomes research is focused on gastroesophageal reflux disease and dyspepsia, with a growing interest in irritable bowel syndrome but little research in gastroparesis. State-of-the-art for patient-rated symptom scales is rudimentary with an abundance of scales and little attention to systematic instrument development or comprehensive psychometric evaluation. Generally, disease-specific HR-QOL measures have been more systematically developed and evaluated psychometrically, but few have been incorporated into clinical trials. More comprehensive outcome assessments are needed to determine the effectiveness of new medical treatments for functional GI disorders. Future clinical trials of GI disorders should combine clinician assessments of outcomes and symptoms with patient-rated symptom and HR-QOL end-points.

Initial validation of a diagnostic questionnaire for gastroesophageal reflux disease

OBJECTIVES

Brief, reliable, and valid self-administered questionnaires could facilitate the diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux disease in primary care. We report the development and validation of such an instrument.

METHODS

Content validity was informed by literature review, expert opinion, and cognitive interviewing of 50 patients resulting in a 22-item survey. For psychometric analyses, primary care patients completed the new questionnaire at enrollment and at intervals ranging from 3 days to 3 wk. Multitrait scaling, test-retest reliability, and responsiveness were assessed. Predictive validity analyses of all scales and items used specialty physician diagnosis as the "gold standard."

RESULTS

Iterative factor analyses yielded three scales of four items each including heartburn, acid regurgitation, and dyspepsia. Multitrait scaling criteria including internal consistency, item interval consistency, and item discrimination were 100% satisfied. Test-retest reliability was high in those reporting stable symptoms. Scale scores significantly changed in those reporting a global change. Regressing specialty physician diagnosis on the three scales revealed significant effects for two scales (heartburn and regurgitation). Combining the two significant scales enhanced the strength of the model. Symptom response to self-directed treatment with nonprescription antisecretory medications was highly predictive of the diagnosis also, although the item demonstrated poor validity and reliability.

CONCLUSIONS

A brief, simple 12-item questionnaire demonstrated validity and reliability and seemed to be responsive to change for reflux and dyspeptic symptoms.

Epidemiology and natural history of reflux disease

Gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GORD) is a highly prevalent condition in Western countries; at least 20% of the population have weekly symptoms. The incidence appears to be rising in the West and in some developing countries. Heartburn, based on a carefully elicited history, is reasonably specific for identifying GORD if it is a predominant complaint. Symptoms, however, appear to correlate poorly with oesophagitis; hence, severe symptoms do not indicate there is greater oesophageal damage. Only one-third to one-half of patients with GORD undergoing endoscopy have oesophagitis. GORD is usually a chronic disease but one-third may lose their symptoms over time. An ill-defined subset of patients over time may progress to develop abnormal acid exposure or oesophagitis, or both, when none existed at baseline. GORD has a significant negative impact on quality of life to the same degree as other chronic medical conditions, but impairment in quality of life is independent of oesophagitis.

Evaluation of omeprazole, lansoprazole, pantoprazole, and rabeprazole in the treatment of acid-related diseases

OBJECTIVE

To review the comparative efficacy and safety of the proton pump inhibitors (PPIs)--omeprazole, lansoprazole, pantoprazole, and rabeprazole--in the management of acid-related diseases.

DATA SOURCES

English-language journal articles retrieved from a MEDLINE search from 1990 to the present using these index terms: proton pump inhibitors, omeprazole, lansoprazole, pantoprazole, rebeprazole, and each of the acid-related diseases.

STUDY SELECTION

Clinical trials and pertinent review articles that discussed the pharmacology, pharmacokinetics, efficacy, and safety of PPIs in the management of acid-related disease.

DATA EXTRACTION

By the authors.

DATA SYNTHESIS

PPIs are substituted benzimidazoles that inhibit gastric acid secretion by covalently binding to the proton pump (H+/K+ ATPase). All undergo extensive hepatic metabolism and conjugation. The four agents differ in their metabolism by and effects on specific hepatic enzymes and thus in their ability to interact with other medications. PPIs are important agents used for eradicating Helicobacter pylori, in treating peptic ulcer disease, gastroesophageal reflux disease, Zollinger-Ellison syndrome, and upper gastrointestinal bleeding, and for preventing acid aspiration. Short-term side effects of the four agents are similar. The long-term safety of pantoprazole and rabeprazole appears similar to that of omeprazole and lansoprazole. Pantoprazole, which is in the final stages of approval for marketing in the United States, will be available in both an oral and injectable formulation.

CONCLUSION

Based on superior efficacy profiles, PPIs are the drugs of choice in managing patients with peptic ulcer disease, gastroesophageal reflux disease, and Zollinger-Ellison syndrome. The decision to select one PPI versus another is most likely to be based on the agents' acquisition costs, formulations, FDA-labeled indications, and overall safety profiles. Intravenous or parenteral pantoprazole may become the preferred antisecretory agent for patients unable to take oral medications (e.g., critically ill patients and those with Zollinger-Ellison syndrome).

A practical approach to heartburn

Heartburn and other symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux disease can be a lifelong problem, affecting millions of Americans each year. Fortunately, treatment has improved dramatically over the past decade. Medications currently available are remarkably safe and, with proper selection, almost universally effective. When indicated, surgical treatment is also highly effective.