Hepatoduodenal bile transit in cholecystectomized subjects. Relationship with sphincter of Oddi function and diagnostic value

Role of 99mTc-Mebrofenin Hepatobiliary Scintigraphy in the Diagnosis of Post Cholecystectomy Syndrome

Background  Huge variation in the prevalence of post cholecystectomy syndrome (PCS) is because PCS can include a wide variety of disorders that can be both related and unrelated to cholecystectomy. Hepatobiliary scintigraphy (HBS) is a noninvasive nuclear medicine scan that can evaluate a delay in the transit of bile from the hepatic hilum to the duodenum using a radiotracer ^99m Tc-Mebrofenin that can be associated with a functional ampullary obstruction. The aim of this study was to assess the role of ^99m Tc-Mebrofenin HBS in the detection of the cause of PCS among the patients undergoing cholecystectomy.

Methods  Twenty-one patients who presented with PCS from September 2018 to February 2020 were included in the study. These patients were characterized based on history, examination, liver function test, and abdominal ultrasound. Sphincter of Oddi dysfunction (SOD) was diagnosed using the Rome 3 criteria and the Milwaukee classification. Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) and upper gastrointestinal endoscopy and biopsy were done when indicated, to establish the diagnosis. These patients were further subjected to ^99m Tc-Mebrofenin HBS, and the findings were analyzed.

Results  The most common symptom in PCS was biliary pain occurring in 85.7% of the patients. The average time of presentation since surgery was 1.9 years. The most common cause of PCS was SOD, occurring in 52.3% of the patients, followed by benign biliary stricture occurring in 23.8% of the patients. The mean bile duct (common bile duct) visualization time in patients with PCS was 25.2 minutes, the mean duodenal visualization time was 38.2 minutes, and the mean jejunal visualization time was 60.5 minutes. The mean bile duct to duodenum transit time was 12.7 minutes, while the mean bile duct to jejunum transit time was 30.1 minutes. HBS showed consistent findings with the final diagnosis made by other diagnostic modalities (clinical criteria/MRCP/intraoperative findings) in 80.9% of the patients.

Conclusion   ^99m Tc-Mebrofenin HBS has a significant role in the evaluation of PCS.

Post-cholecystectomy syndrome and sphincter of Oddi dysfunction: past, present and future

Post-cholecystectomy syndrome and the concept of a causal relationship to sphincter of Oddi dysfunction, despite the controversy, has presented a clinically relevant conflict for decades. Historically surgeons, and now gastroenterologists have expended tremendous efforts towards trying to better understand the dilemma that is confounded by unique patient phenotypes. Areas covered: This review encompasses the literature from a century of experience on the topic of post-cholecystectomy syndrome. Relevant historical and anecdotal experiences are examined in the setting of insights from evaluation of recently available controlled data. Expert commentary: Historical observations and recent data suggest that patients with post-cholecystectomy syndrome can be categorized as follows. Patients with sphincter of Oddi stenosis will most often benefit from treatment with sphincterotomy. Patients with classic biliary pain and some objective evidence of biliary obstruction may have a sphincter of Oddi disorder and should be considered for endoscopic evaluation and therapy. Patients with atypical post-cholecystectomy pain, without any evidence consistent with biliary obstruction, and/or with evidence for another diagnosis or dysfunction should not undergo ERCP.

Can patient and pain characteristics predict manometric sphincter of Oddi dysfunction in patients with clinically suspected sphincter of Oddi dysfunction?

BACKGROUND

Biliopancreatic-type postcholecystectomy pain, without significant abnormalities on imaging and laboratory test results, has been categorized as "suspected" sphincter of Oddi dysfunction (SOD) type III. Clinical predictors of "manometric" SOD are important to avoid unnecessary ERCP, but are unknown.

OBJECTIVE

To assess which clinical factors are associated with abnormal sphincter of Oddi manometry (SOM).

DESIGN

Prospective, cross-sectional.

SETTING

Tertiary.

PATIENTS

A total of 214 patients with suspected SOD type III underwent ERCP and pancreatic SOM (pSOM; 85% dual SOM), at 7 U.S. centers (from August 2008 to March 2012) as part of a randomized trial.

INTERVENTIONS

Pain and gallbladder descriptors, psychosocial/functional disorder questionnaires.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

Abnormal SOM findings. Univariate and multivariate analyses assessed associations between clinical characteristics and outcome.

RESULTS

The cohort was 92% female with a mean age of 38 years. Baseline pancreatic enzymes were increased in 5%; 9% had minor liver enzyme abnormalities. Pain was in the right upper quadrant (RUQ) in 90% (48% also epigastric); 51% reported daily abdominal discomfort. Fifty-six took narcotics an average of 33 days (of the past 90 days). Less than 10% experienced depression or anxiety. Functional disorders were common. At ERCP, 64% had abnormal pSOM findings (34% both sphincters, 21% biliary normal), 36% had normal pSOM findings, and 75% had at least abnormal 1 sphincter. Demographic factors, gallbladder pathology, increased pancreatobiliary enzymes, functional disorders, and pain patterns did not predict abnormal SOM findings. Anxiety, depression, and poorer coping were more common in patients with normal SOM findings (not significant on multivariate analysis).

LIMITATIONS

Generalizability.

CONCLUSIONS

Patient and pain factors and psychological comorbidity do not predict SOM results at ERCP in suspected type III SOD. (

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT00688662.).

Endoscopic approach to the patient with motility disorders of the bile duct and sphincter of Oddi

Since its original description by Oddi in 1887, the sphincter of Oddi has been the subject of much study. Furthermore, the clinical syndrome of sphincter of Oddi dysfunction (SOD) and its therapy are controversial areas. Nevertheless, SOD is commonly diagnosed and treated by physicians. This article reviews the epidemiology, clinical manifestations, and current diagnostic and therapeutic modalities of SOD.

Sphincter of Oddi disorder: what is the clinical issue?

Sphincter of Oddi disorder (SOD) is a functional disorder of the sphincter of Oddi (SO) and is pathophysiologically equivalent to functional gastrointestinal disorder (FGID) of the digestive tract. SOD is important as a cause of biliary pain of unknown origin and idiopathic acute recurrent pancreatitis; however, the concept of SOD has not generally spread in the same way as FGID. SOD is diagnosed using ROME III criteria which were revised in 2006 to reduce the number of unnecessary and potentially risky procedures. Many cases of SOD still need SO manometry (SOM) which is performed during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). It is problematic that SOD patients, who already have a high risk of post-ERCP pancreatitis, require SOM for a definitive diagnosis. SOM is an invasive examination that is accompanied by a high risk of post-procedure pancreatitis and can be performed only at a limited number of institutions because of technical difficulties. In the treatment of SOD, the effectiveness of the drugs is uncertain, and the role of drug therapy in the management of SOD has not yet been established. In recent years, endoscopic sphincterotomy (EST) has been recognized as standard treatment for SOD; however, the effect of EST is not yet clear. The development of less invasive diagnostic techniques is desirable in the future. Furthermore, patient eligibility criteria for EST and the long-term prognosis after EST should be clarified.

Biliary and gallbladder dyskinesia

Gallbladder and biliary dyskinesia are conditions that are becoming increasingly recognized due to improved technology. They are motility disorders that affect the gallbladder and sphincter of Oddi (SO), respectively. Gallbladder dyskinesia presents with typical biliary pain in the absence of gallstones. Work-up includes laboratory tests and imaging to rule out gallstones. Further investigation leads to a functional radionuclide study to investigate gallbladder ejection fraction. An ejection fraction of less than 40% is considered abnormal, and patients should be referred for cholecystectomy. Symptom relief after the procedure has been seen in 94% to 98% of patients. The term sphincter of Oddi dysfunction (SOD) describes a collection of pain syndromes that are attributed to a motility disorder of the SO. SOD can be further subdivided into biliary and pancreatic SOD. Patients typically have had a prior cholecystectomy and present with episodic biliary pain. The initial work-up includes laboratory tests and imaging to rule out other structural causes of abdominal pain, such as retained gallstones. Imaging and laboratory studies further subdivide patients into types of SOD. SO manometry (SOM) is the gold standard for assessing biliary dyskinesia and can help stratify patients into one of two groups: SO stenosis versus SO dyskinesia. Those with stenosis (type I SOD) are the most likely to respond to treatment with endoscopic biliary sphincterotomy (EBS). As the vast majority of type I patients (>/= 90%) benefit from EBS, SOM is not necessary. Pancreatic SOD patients can be similarly divided into one of three groups. These patients present with recurrent bouts of abdominal pain and/or pancreatitis in the absence of gallstones or other structural abnormalities. Pancreatic sphincter manometry can help distinguish which patients would benefit from endoscopic pancreatic sphincterotomy. Recurrent stenosis of the opening after endoscopic treatment in these patients may necessitate a surgical (open) approach.

Pancreatic sphincterotomy: Technique, indications, and complications

Pancreatic sphincterotomy serves as the cornerstone of endoscopic therapy of the pancreas. Historically, its indications have been less well-defined than those of endoscopic biliary sphincterotomy, yet it plays a definite and useful role in diseases such as chronic pancreatitis and pancreatic-type sphincter of Oddi dysfunction. In the appropriate setting, it may be used as a single therapeutic maneuver, or in conjunction with other endoscopic techniques such as pancreatic stone extraction or stent placement. The current standard of practice utilizes two different methods of performing pancreatic sphincterotomy: a pull-type sphincterotome technique without prior stent placement, and a needle-knife sphincterotome technique over an existing stent. The complications associated with pancreatic sphincterotomy are many, although acute pancreatitis appears to be the most common and the most serious of the early complications. As such, it continues to be reserved for those endoscopists who perform a relatively high-volume of therapeutic pancreaticobiliary endoscopic retrograde cholangio-pancreatography.

Functional hepatobiliary disease: chronic acalculous gallbladder and chronic acalculous biliary disease

Chronic acalculous gallbladder and chronic acalculous biliary disease are considered functional hepatobiliary diseases. Cholescintigraphy provides physiologic imaging of biliary drainage, making it ideally suited for their noninvasive diagnosis. For chronic acalculous gallbladder disease, calculation of a gallbladder ejection fraction during sincalide cholescintigraphy can confirm the clinical diagnosis and has become a common routine procedure in many nuclear medicine clinics. Published data generally confirm a high overall accuracy for predicting relief of symptoms with cholecystectomy. However, data also exist suggesting it is not useful. The discrepant results probably are caused by the various different methodologies that have been used for sincalide infusion. Proper methodology of sincalide infusion is critical for providing accurate reproducible results, minimizing false positive studies, and preventing adverse side effects. The most common causes for the postcholecystectomy pain syndrome are partial biliary obstruction secondary to stones or tumor and sphincter of Oddi dysfunction. The latter is a partial biliary obstruction at the level of the sphincter. This has long been considered a functional hepatobiliary disease because of the lack of anatomical abnormalities. Sphincterotomy is the present treatment; however, diagnosis requires invasive procedures, such as endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography and sphincter of Oddi manometry, which has a high complication rate and is not widely available. The unique ability of cholescintigraphy to image biliary drainage allows noninvasive diagnosis. Different methodologies have been reported, many with good overall accuracy. Various pharmacologic interventions and quantitative methodologies have been used in conjunction with cholescintigraphy to enhance its diagnostic capability. Further investigations are needed determine the optimal methodology; however, cholescintigraphic methods have already a clinical role in the diagnosis of sphincter of Oddi dysfunction and will be used increasingly in the future.

Systematic review: sphincter of Oddi dysfunction--non-invasive diagnostic methods and long-term outcome after endoscopic sphincterotomy

BACKGROUND

Sphincter of Oddi dysfunction is a benign, functional gastrointestinal disorder for which invasive endoscopic therapy with potential complications is often recommended.

AIMS

To review the available evidence regarding the diagnostic accuracy of non-invasive methods that have been used to establish the diagnosis and to estimate the long-term outcome after endoscopic sphincterotomy.

METHODS

A systematic review of English language articles and abstracts containing relevant terms was performed.

RESULTS

Non-invasive diagnostic methods are limited by their low sensitivity and specificity, especially in patients with Type III sphincter of Oddi dysfunction. Secretin-stimulated magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography appears to be useful in excluding other potential causes of symptoms, and morphine-provocated hepatobiliary scintigraphy also warrants further study. Approximately 85%, 69% and 37%, of patients with biliary Types I, II and III sphincter of Oddi dysfunction, respectively, experience sustained benefit after endoscopic sphincterotomy. In pancreatic sphincter of Oddi dysfunction, approximately 75% of patients report symptomatic improvement after pancreatic sphincterotomy, but the studies have been non-controlled and heterogeneous.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with suspected sphincter of Oddi dysfunction, particularly those with biliary Type III, should be carefully evaluated before considering sphincter of Oddi manometry and endoscopic sphincterotomy. Further controlled trials are needed to justify the invasive management of patients with biliary Type III and pancreatic sphincter of Oddi dysfunction.

Evaluation of the biliary tract in patients with functional biliary symptoms

The aim of this paper was to describe functional biliary syndromes and methods for evaluation of the biliary tract in these patients. Functional biliary symptoms can be defined as biliary symptoms without demonstrable organic substrate. Two main syndromes exist: Gallbladder dysfunction and sphincter of Oddi dysfunction. The most important investigative tools are cholescintigraphy and endoscopic sphincter of Oddi manometry. In gallbladder dysfunction a scintigraphic gallbladder ejection fraction below 35% can select patients who will benefit from cholecystectomy. Endoscopic sphincter of Oddi manometry is considered the gold standard in sphincter of Oddi dysfunction but recent development in scintigraphic methods is about to change this. Thus, calculation of hilum-to-duodenum transit time and duodenal appearance time on cholescintigraphy have proven useful in these patients. In conclusion, ambient methods can diagnose functional biliary syndromes. However, there are still a number of issues where further knowledge is needed. Probably the next step forward will be in the area of sensory testing and impedance planimetric methods.

Sphincter of Oddi dysfunction in children

Sphincter of Oddi dysfunction (SOD) is a clinical entity caused by a primary motility alteration of either the biliary or the pancreatic sphincter. SOD is a rare condition that has been scarcely reported in children. Most of the reported literature has been in children with idiopathic recurrent pancreatitis. These children are treated endoscopically by dual sphincterotomy of the pancreatic and common duct sphincters. However, the safety and efficacy of sphincter of Oddi manometry and sphincterotomy in the pediatric population await further study.

Biliary scintigraphy versus sphincter of Oddi manometry in patients with post-cholecystectomy pain: is it time to disregard the scan?

Sphincter of Oddi (SO) dysfunction is diagnosed using manometry, and patients with an abnormal SO basal pressure respond well to division of the SO. However, manometry is invasive and is associated with a low, yet significant, incidence of complications. Scintigraphy techniques have been developed with the aim of providing a noninvasive means of assessing SO motility. However, when compared with SO manometry these techniques fall short in sensitivity and specificity for diagnosing SO dysfunction. Furthermore, they do not select patients who will respond to treatment. Consequently, the quest for development of a noninvasive investigation for diagnosis of SO dysfunction continues. In the mean time, improved manometric techniques that enhance reproducibility and reduce complications have been developed.

Sphincter of oddi dysfunction

Sphincter of Oddi dysfunction (SOD) is a benign noncalculous obstruction of bile or pancreatic drainage at the level of the sphincter of Oddi. The disorder is clinically associated with either biliary pain or idiopathic pancreatitis, depending on the portion of the sphincter affected. Patients with suspected SOD are subdivided into three categories: these are type I, II, and III, depending on associated clinical evidence for the diagnosis. Multiple noninvasive tests have been utilized to aid in the diagnosis but have been complicated by poor sensitivity and specificity. Sphincter of Oddi manometry is the gold standard for confirming the diagnosis, although questions remain about its sensitivity and specificity. Sphincterotomy of the affected portion of the sphincter is the treatment of choice and has been shown effective for palliation of symptoms in two sham-controlled studies of patients with suspected type II biliary SOD.

Diagnosing and treating Sphincter of Oddi dysfunction: a critical literature review and reevaluation

Sphincter of Oddi dysfunction is a pathologic syndrome, without considering etiology, physiopathology, or anatomic aspects of the condition. The clinical manifestations of the syndrome may be a consequence of an "organic stenosis" of the tract or a consequence of "abnormal motility" of the sphincter. Until some years ago, the gold standard technique for studying and treating this pathologic condition was endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Two criteria for defining patients in the Milwaukee classification are related to this procedure. The Milwaukee classification was introduced to use clinical and radiologic criteria to define patients with Sphincter of Oddi dysfunction to choose the best treatment. Subsequently, great emphasis has been placed on manometry of the sphincter performed by endoscopic cannulation. The enormous increase of cholecystectomies by means of laparoscopic technique has increased the number of patients who return to their reference-surgeon with a post-cholecystectomy pain and possible Sphincter of Oddi dysfunction. The aim of this paper is to review the literature and to evaluate an up-to-date flow chart for diagnosing and treating the syndrome by using alternative diagnostic procedures that are less invasive than endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography.

Sphincter of Oddi dysfunction

Biliary-like pain alone, or associated with a transient increase in liver or pancreatic enzyme, may be the clinical manifestations of sphincter of Oddi dysfunction. Since it is not always possible to dissociate functional conditions from subtle structural changes, the term sphincter of Oddi dysfunction is used to define motility abnormalities caused by 'sphincter of Oddi stenosis' and 'sphincter of Oddi dyskinesia'. Both sphincter of Oddi stenosis and sphincter of Oddi dyskinesia may account for obstruction to flow through the sphincter of Oddi and may thus induce retention of bile in the biliary tree and pancreatic juice in the pancreatic duct. Most of the clinical information concerning sphincter of Oddi dysfunction refers to post-cholecystectomy patients who have been arbitrarily classified according to clinical presentation, laboratory results and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography findings in: (a) biliary type I, (b) biliary type II, and (c) biliary type III. Prevalence of biliary-type of pain has been reported to vary from 1 to 1.5% in unselected postcholecystectomy people, to 14% in a selected group of patients complaining of postcholecystectomy symptoms. The frequency of sphincter of Oddi dysfunction, as shown by manometry, differs in the different clinical subgroups: 65-95% in biliary group I, mainly due to sphincter of Oddi stenosis; 50-63% in biliary type II, and 12-28% in biliary type III. In patients with idiopathic recurrent pancreatitis, sphincter of Oddi dysfunction varies from 39 to 90%. Diagnostic work-up of postcholecystectomy patients for suspected sphincter of Oddi dysfunction includes liver biochemistry and pancreatic enzymes, plus negative findings of structural abnormalities. Usually, this would include transabdominal ultrasound and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Depending on the available resources, endoscopic ultrasound and magnetic resonance cholangiography may precede endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in specific clinical conditions. Quantitative evaluation of bile transit from the hepatic hilum to the duodenum at choledochoscintigraphy appears valuable in the decision to undertake sphincter of Oddi manometry or to treat. Sphincterotomy is the standard treatment for sphincter of Oddi dysfunction. In biliary type I patients, the indication for endoscopic sphincterotomy is straightforward without the need of any additional investigation. Slow bile transit in biliary type II is an indication to undergo endoscopic sphincterotomy without sphincter of Oddi manometry. Slow bile transit in biliary type III patients is an indication to perform sphincter of Oddi manometry. Diagnostic work-up of patients with gallbladder in situ is part of the same diagnostic algorithm that has initially excluded the presence of a gallbladder dysfunction.

Acalculous biliary pain: new concepts for an old entity

Biliary pain is commonly reported in household surveys with the presumed cause being gallstones. When gallstones are absent or other abnormalities as a potential cause of similar pain do not exist, a different approach is necessary. Although trans-abdominal ultrasound can detect stones down to 3-5 mm, the advent of endoscopic ultrasound provides an even better definition for microlithiasis of < 3 mm. Duodenal aspiration of bile can further detect cholesterol microlithiasis or bilirubin granules, another potential source of biliary-type pain and perhaps even pancreatitis. Only in this way can acalculous gallbladder disease be clearly defined. The percentage of cholecystokinin-stimulated gallbladder emptying has been reputed to be the most sensitive diagnostic test for 'biliary dyskinesia', but abnormality of gallbladder emptying can be due to a smooth muscle defect of the gallbladder itself or heightened tone in the sphincter of Oddi. The value of surgical intervention has not been clearly established. The advent of laparoscopic cholecystectomy, however, has increased the number of patients with acalculous biliary disease who undergo surgery. Surgery is best done using impaired gallbladder emptying as the criterion for operation with improved outcome. Often, following cholecystectomy, biliary pain does not resolve the so-called 'post cholecystectomy syndrome'. Absence of the gallbladder as a pressure reservoir leaves the sphincter of Oddi as the prime determinant of bile duct pressure. Sphincter of Oddi dysfunction also exists in patients with an intact biliary tract and may become evident following cholecystectomy. Biliary manometry has clarified who might benefit from sphincterotomy. Choledochoscintigraphy is a non-invasive preliminary test. Advent of visceral hypersensitivity and better definition of this entity has shown, that in some of these patients with type III sphincter of Oddi, dysfunction appears to reside in duodenal hyperalgesia. It is clear that improved criteria are required to perform gallbladder emptying and better techniques to detect visceral hypersensitivity. Nonetheless, functional biliary pain in the absence of gallstone disease is a definite entity and a challenge for clinicians.

Biliary Dyskinesia

Biliary dyskinesia is a motility disorder that affects the gallbladder and sphincter of Oddi. The motility disorder of the gallbladder is called gallbladder dyskinesia. Patients with this condition present with biliary-type pain, and investigations show no evidence of gallstones in the gallbladder. The diagnosis is made by performing a gallbladder ejection fraction, which is a radionuclide investigation. An abnormal gallbladder ejection fraction has a value less than 40%. Patients with an abnormal gallbladder ejection fraction should undergo cholecystectomy. This procedure has been shown to be effective in curing the symptoms in over 90% of patients. Motility disorder of the sphincter of Oddi is called sphincter of Oddi dysfunction. This disorder is categorized as two distinct types--biliary sphincter of Oddi dysfunction and pancreatic sphincter of Oddi dysfunction. Typically, patients with biliary sphincter of Oddi dysfunction present with biliary-type pain on average 4 to 5 years after having undergone cholecystectomy. Sphincter of Oddi manometry is essential in making a diagnosis of abnormal motility of the sphincter. On manometry, diagnosis of a sphincter of Oddi stenosis should lead to division of the sphincter. Sphincterotomy results in long-term relief of symptoms in more than 80% of patients. Pancreatic sphincter of Oddi dysfunction clinically presents with recurrent episodes of pancreatitis of unknown cause. Having ruled out all of the common causes of pancreatitis, sphincter of Oddi manometry of the pancreatic duct sphincter should be performed. When manometric stenosis is diagnosed, these patients should undergo division of both the biliary and pancreatic duct sphincter. This treatment results in relief of symptoms in more than 80% of patients.

Comparison of sphincter of Oddi manometry, fatty meal sonography, and hepatobiliary scintigraphy in the diagnosis of sphincter of Oddi dysfunction

BACKGROUND

Sphincter of Oddi dysfunction (SOD) afflicts approximately 1% to 5% of patients after cholecystectomy. The diagnostic standard for SOD is sphincter of Oddi manometry (SOM), a technically difficult, invasive test that is frequently complicated by pancreatitis. A sensitive and accurate noninvasive imaging modality is thus needed for the diagnosis of SOD. Quantitative hepatobiliary scintigraphy (HBS) and fatty meal sonography (EMS) are frequently used for this purpose, but results vary. This study compared SOM, HBS, and EMS in the diagnosis of SOD in a large group of patients.

METHODS

Three hundred four consecutive patients after cholecystectomy (38 men, 266 women, age 17-72 years) suspected to have SOD were evaluated by SOM, FMS, and HBS. SOM was considered abnormal if any of the following were observed: (1) increased basal pressure (greater than 40 mm Hg), (2) increased phasic activity with amplitude greater than 350 mm Hg, (3) frequency of contractions greater than 8 per minute, (4) greater than 50% of propagation sequences retrograde, and (5) paradoxical response to cholecystokinin. FMS was considered abnormal if ductal dilation was greater than 2 mm at 45 minutes after fatty meal ingestion. Quantitative HBS was performed with sequential images obtained every 5 minutes for 90 minutes to monitor excretion of the radionuclide. Time-to-peak, halftime, and downslope were calculated according to predetermined ranges.

RESULTS

A diagnosis of SOD was made in 73 patients (24%) by using SOM as the reference standard. HBS was abnormal in 86 whereas EMS was abnormal in 22 patients. A true-positive result was obtained in 15 patients by EMS and 36 patients with HBS. EMS and HBS gave false-positive results, respectively, in 7 and 50 patients. Sensitivity of EMS was 21% and for HBS 49%, whereas specificities were 97% and 78%, respectively. EMS, HBS, or both were abnormal in 90% of patients with Geenen-Hogan Type I SOD, 50% with Type II, and 44% of Type III. Of the 73 patients who underwent sphincterotomy, 40 had a long-term response. Of those with SOD, 11 of 13 patients (85%) with an abnormal HBS and EMS had a good long-term response.

CONCLUSIONS

In this series, the largest reported to date, correlation of FMS and HBS with SOM in the diagnosis of SOD was poor. When HBS and EMS are used together, a slight increase in sensitivity can be expected. The accuracy of EMS and HBS in the diagnosis of SOD decreases across the spectrum from Type I to Type III SOD. EMS and HBS, nonetheless, may by of assistance in predicting long-term response to endoscopic sphincterotomy in patients with elevated sphincter of Oddi basal pressure.

Cholecystokinin cholescintigraphy: clinical indications and proper methodology

Cholecystokinin is a useful diagnostic adjunct to cholescintigraphy. Clinical indications include contracting the gallbladder before cholescintigraphy in patients fasting greater than 24 hours, during cholescintigraphy to diagnose sphincter of Oddi dysfunction, and after cholescintigraphy to exclude acute acalculous cholecystitis, differentiate common duct obstruction from normal variation, and to confirm the diagnosis of chronic acalculous cholecystitis. Proper methodology is mandatory for a diagnostically useful test. Data presented shows that a 3-minute infusion of 0.01 or 0.02 microg/kg is nonphysiologic and often results in ineffective contraction similar to that seen with a bolus infusion. Normal gallbladder ejection (GBEF) values cannot be established using a 3-minute infusion because of the wide variability in response. Instead, infusions of 30 or 60 minutes are required. Normal GBEF values have been established for these methods and are 30% and 40%, respectively.

Efficacy of biliary scintigraphy in suspected sphincter of Oddi dysfunction

Sphincter of Oddi dysfunction (SOD) can pose diagnostic challenges for the physician. SOD is classified into types I, II, and III, but clinical outcome after sphincterotomy for suspected types II and III SOD has been unpredictable. Therefore, accurate diagnosis of types II and III SOD is important because of the increased risk of sphincterotomy in patients with SOD. Endoscopic sphincter of Oddi manometry (ESOM) is the gold standard for diagnosis of SOD; however, it is associated with significant morbidity and is not an appropriate screening test. Quantitative hepatobiliary scintigraphy (QHBS) has demonstrated good sensitivity as a screening test for SOD in patients following cholecystectomy; however, studies using this methodology are criticized for poor design and patient selection. Recent publications address these criticisms and provide evidence that QHBS and ESOM are comparable diagnostic tools after exclusion of organic biliary obstruction. QHBS can effectively replace invasive ESOM in the diagnostic algorithm of SOD.

Sphincterotomy for biliary sphincter of Oddi dysfunction

BACKGROUND

The sphincter of Oddi regulates both bile and pancreatic juice flow into the duodenum. When dysfunction occurs it leads to problems relating to either the bile or pancreatic ducts. On the biliary side, the most common problem is recurrent biliary type pain following cholecystectomy.

OBJECTIVES

Is sphincterotomy effective treatment for biliary sphincter of Oddi dysfunction patients?

SEARCH STRATEGY

Electronic data bases, including the Collaborative Review Group trial registers, MEDLINE, and EMBASE, as well as checking reference lists in as many languages as possible that had the titles: sphincter of Oddi dysfunction, biliary dyskinesia, papillary stenosis, biliary dyssynergia, odditis, papillitis, post-cholecystectomy pain, right upper quadrant pain, or unexplained right upper quadrant pain were included. These titles were matched with sphincterotomy.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised placebo-controlled trials performing sphincterotomy in patients with suspected biliary sphincter of Oddi dysfunction using manometry as part of the patient evaluation. A basal pressure > 40 mmHg was defined as abnormal. The primary outcome measure were symptomatic response (defined either as cure/improvement or not improved) to sphincterotomy.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Electronic data bases were used to search for the studies. Studies were attempted to be stratified as randomised clinical trials, controlled clinical trials (i.e., quasi-randomised clinical trials), well designed observational studies using a well matched control group, or other. These groupings were then entered into a meta-analysis.

MAIN RESULTS

Only two randomised clinical trials met the inclusion criteria. In 49 patients studied, sphincterotomy was more effective than placebo in treating patients with an elevated basal pressure (Peto odds ratio 9.08, 95% confidence interval 2.97-277.77). In 77 patients studied, sphincterotomy was no better than placebo in treating patients with a normal normal basal pressure (Peto odds ratio 1.28, 95% confidence interval 0.52-3.13). There was no data on quality of life or health economics.

REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS

These results suggest that sphincterotomy for biliary sphincter of Oddi dysfunction appears effective in those patients with an elevated sphincter of Oddi basal pressure (>40 mmHg), but is no better than placebo in those patients with a normal basal pressure. The results reported in this review must be interpreted with caution as there are only two studies and one of the reviewers (Toouli) has been an author in both studies. Further trials by independent groups are recommended.

Biliary tract imaging

In addition to the detection of gallstones, common bile duct stones, and narrowed and dilated bile ducts, recent advancements in imaging techniques now make it possible to diagnose microlithiasis, pathology of normal-size ducts, and dysfunction of the gallbladder and the sphincter of Oddi (SO). More and more frequently, noninvasive imaging techniques obviate the risk of invasive investigation. These techniques can also take the place of unsuccessful or contraindicated direct cholangiography, and they play an essential role in treatment planning and diagnosis of postoperative complications. Transabdominal ultrasonography (TUS) remains fundamental for initial assessment of the biliary tract. Technical developments make magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography the most promising diagnostic technique of the biliary tract. Endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) is most helpful for detection of microlithiasis and evaluation of the ampullary region, the periductal structures, and the regional lymph nodes in neoplastic diseases. Cholescintigraphy is most valuable to assess bile dynamics in the diagnosis of gallbladder and SO dysfunction and in postoperative bile leakage.

Clinical aspects of sphincter of Oddi function and dysfunction

The sphincter of Oddi (SO) functions to regulate the flow of bile and pancreatic juices as well as to prevent the reflux of duodenal contents into the pancreatobiliary system. When dysfunction of the sphincter occurs, symptoms develop relating to either the biliary or pancreatic portions of the sphincter. The mechanism of this dysfunction remains speculative. SO manometry remains the "gold standard" to correctly diagnose the disorder and stratify therapy. Division of the sphincter is effective for SO stenosis, but there is no proven therapy for SO dyskinesia.