[Red cell enzyme polymorphisms in forensic serology]

Stain analysis using oligonucleotide probes specific for simple repetitive DNA sequences

The use of oligonucleotide fingerprinting is evaluated in practical forensic work, using both artificially and systematically produced stains as well as actual case work material. The probes (CAC5/(GTG)5 are superior because of their individualizing potential in comparatively fresh specimens with little DNA degradation, whereas (GACA)4, still produces substantial information when high molecular weight DNA is lacking. The overall limitations and the advantages of this technology are discussed in detail and compared to the classical minisatellite probes.

[The detection of inherited enzyme polymorphism in semen (author's transl)]

Our investigation of the occurrence of the enzymes phosphoglucomutase (PGM), glutamate-pyruvate-transaminase (GPT), adenylatkinase (AK), adenosine-desaminase (ADA), and 6-phophogluconate-dehydrogenase (6-PGD) produced the following results: The phosphoglucomutase type was demonstrated in the most sperm samples and seminal stains in accordance with the corresponding blood type. This enzyme is rather stable and could still be demonstrated well in 1-month old stains. The glutamate-pyruvate-transaminase can only seldom be determined in semen and seminal stains. We only found the GPT 1 type, which is known to have usually the strongest activity. The adenylatekinase was demonstrable in the most fresh ejaculates (not older than 24 h) and in about half the seminal stains (not older than 7 days)--The AK--2-band gets weak with increasing lay days, which may lead to incorrect determinations. The adenosine-desaminase could not be determined in sperm. On the contrary, 6-phosphogluconate-dehydrogenase could be demonstrated in fresh semen samples and also partly in seminal stains up to 7 days. The demonstration of the enzymes did not depend in any system on the secretor type.

[Differentation and timeinterval for detection of tissue cells on a weapon used in a crime (author's transl)]

There are numerous methods of examining the weapon used in a crime to detect evidence of blood or of blood-group properties. Forensic literature also contains references to the tracing of organic tissue. In the case against Jaccoud the two medical experts called upon, UNDRITZ and HEGG, found evidence of cells from internal organs on a knife which had possibly been used to commit the crime and which had been stored away for some considerable time. Practical experience has shown that the likelihood of finding cells on the weapon used is small; however, it is greater in the case of abdominal injuries than in the case of stab wounds in the chest. Tests carried out on corpses have revealed evidence that cells from the liver can adhere to a blade plunged into the organ. This happens mostly when a knife with a serrated or wavy edge is used. The abdominal wall has a greater cleaning effect on a blade than clothing does. It is of crucial importance to clarify the environmental conditions to which an object bearing certain traces has been exposed. Over a long period of time it is much easier to detect parts of organs if they have been subjected to swift dehydration (by the wind, for example). A location which is either warm or damp and humid makes identification, even after a few hours, no longer possible. The presence of a single tissue cell, especially if it should have managed to retain its structure after several months' dessication, can never suffice for an organic diagnosis. How many determining characteristics then must be traceable? And how great is the certainty of identification with regard to cells from other organs or to nun-human cell structures - all of which are also subject to environmental and time factors? How many single tissue cells must be identified to determine conclusively that the cells in question came, for example from the liver?