Schüssler B. [Clinical, urodynamic and radiologic parameters for determining success following surgery of incontinence].
Arch Gynecol Obstet 1989;
245:792-4. [PMID:
2802768 DOI:
10.1007/bf02417570]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/02/2023]
Abstract
The basis of any quality control after surgery for SUI is objective control by pre- and postoperative quantification of urinary loss. Whereas a clinical stress test or the ICS pad-weigh-test allows to quantify, history as well as urodynamic data do not. For analysis of failures the whole diagnostic range (history, urodynamic, radiology/sonography, gynecologic examination) is needed, which enables to decide about second line therapy. Voiding difficulties and urge-incontinence after surgery for SUI are major complications and have to be critically analysed.
Collapse