Cancer recurrence following laparoscopic colectomy. Report of two patients treated with heated intraperitoneal chemotherapy

Peritoneal spillage is not an issue in patients undergoing minimally invasive surgery for colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND

Surgery for colorectal cancer (CRC) is increasingly being performed via the minimally invasive route. However, reports of postoperative wound and port site seeding as well as peritoneal spillage have been worrisome. We investigated the risk of peritoneal spillage in patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery for CRC.

METHODS

Cytology specimens were gained from the retrieval bag following intracorporeal resection and specimen retrieval using an endoscopic retrieval bag. Histopathologic examination of the cytology specimens was performed for the presence of malignant cells.

RESULTS

Cytology specimens of 73 (34 female and 39 male) consecutive patients with a median age of 71 years were included for analysis. Advanced CRC in stages III and IV was present in 41% of the study population. Malignant cells were not found in any specimen.

CONCLUSION

Laparoscopic oncologic resection of colorectal cancer is not a risk factor for peritoneal spillage. Minimally invasive oncologic colorectal resection is safe without the increased risk of peritoneal carcinomatosis.

Rectus Abdominis Muscle Resection for Abdominal Wall Recurrence of Mucinous Adenocarcinoma or Peritoneal Mesothelioma

Aims and Background

Diagnostic technologies which penetrate the abdominal wall in an attempt to definitively diagnose an intraabdominal malignancy by biopsy can contaminate the abdominal wall by cancerous cells. With follow-up these entrapped cancer cells may progress as an abdominal wall recurrence of the disease process. Frequently, laparoscopy is the definitive diagnostic study which results in the abdominal wall cancer progression.

Methods

We examined recurrences within the abdominal wall and attempted to establish a surgical approach to this problem which would maximize a functional result and minimize the incidence of disease persistence within the abdominal wall.

Results

Eighteen patients with abdominal wall recurrence were studied. Laparoscopy port sites resulted in the abdominal wall disease in eight patients, in four the recurrence was at a previous ostomy site, in three it was in a Pfannenstiel incision and in three it was in a McBurney incision site. All of these patients were treated by total resection of the rectus abdominis muscle. This resulted in a complete removal of visible disease that was dissecting along the fibers of the rectus abdominis muscle.

Conclusions

No patients required reoperation for abdominal wall hernia and mesh repair was not used in any of these patients. Disease control within the abdominal wall has been excellent.

Cytoreductive surgery plus hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy improves survival for peritoneal carcinomatosis from colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of current evidence

Objectives

The therapeutic efficacy of cytoreductive surgery (CRS) plus hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) for patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC) from colorectal cancer (CRC) is still under debate. This meta-analysis and systematic review of published literature on this comprehensive strategy aims to evaluate its efficacy on CRC patients with PC.

Methods

A systemic review with meta-analysis of published literatures on treatment of CRS plus HIPEC for patients with PC from CRC was performed. In addition, a summary of study results of published literatures concerning CRS plus HIPEC treating patients with PC from CRC was also conducted.

Results

A total of 76 studies were selected, including 1 randomized controlled trial, 14 non-randomized controlled studies, and 61 non-controlled studies. The pooled hazard ratios (HRs) for overall survival (OS) in the 15 researches for meta-analysis was 2.67 (95% CI, 2.21-3.23, I₂= 0%, P < 0.00001), and no significant evidence of publication bias was found. The difference of chemotherapy regimens of HIPEC was not associated with OS and DFS (disease-free survival) after CRS and HIPEC, with no significant difference of heterogeneity (P = 0.27, I2 = 24.1%). In both groups of mitomycin C based HIPEC group and oxaliplatin group, patients received HIPEC had significant better survival (P < 0.00001). The mean mortality and morbidity for HIPEC program were 2.8% and 33.0%, respectively.

Conclusions

This meta-analysis revealed that comprehensive therapeutic strategy of CRS plus HIPEC could bring survival benefit for selected patients with PC from CRC with acceptable safety.

From competency to dormancy: a 3D model to study cancer cells and drug responsiveness

Background

The heterogeneous and dynamic tumor microenvironment has significant impact on cancer cell proliferation, invasion, drug response, and is probably associated with entering dormancy and recurrence. However, these complex settings are hard to recapitulate in vitro.

Methods

In this study, we mimic different restriction forces that tumor cells are exposed to using a physiologically relevant 3D model with tunable mechanical stiffness.

Results

Breast cancer MDA-MB-231, colon cancer HCT-116 and pancreatic cancer CFPAC cells embedded in the stiffer gels exhibit a changed morphology and cluster formation, prolonged doubling time, and a slower metabolism rate, recapitulating the pathway from competency to dormancy. Altering environmental restriction allows them to re-enter and exit dormant conditions and change their sensitivities to drugs such as paclitaxol and gemcitabine. Cells surviving drug treatments can still regain competent growth and form tumors in vivo.

Conclusion

We have successfully developed an in vitro 3D model to mimic the effects of matrix restriction on tumor cells and this high throughput model can be used to study tumor cellular functions and their drug responses in their different states. This all in one platform may aid effective drug development.

Could sentinel node mapping of the groin cause extranodal metastasis in vulva cancer?

Groin node lymphadenectomy in vulva cancer carries a substantial risk of morbid sequelae. Sentinel lymph node (SLN) mapping is a valid alternative in patients with squamous cancer of diameter <4 cm and nonsuspicious lymph nodes. SLN are mapped according to the combined technique of radioscintigraphy using technetium-labelled colloid and blue dye. We describe early extranodal recurrence in 2 patients undergoing SLN mapping. They had lymph node metastases at their original dissection. We question whether rapid lymph flow promoted by injection of colloid and dye could cause retrograde flow of cancer cells along the lymphatics draining from the pubis to the groin and extravasation of cancer cells into the dermis since these metastases arose anterior to the pubis and medial to the groin. These recurrence sites were more medial and cephalad than would be expected for skin bridge metastasis. CT imaging shows the metastases are within the dermis. No lymphatic tissue was identified around these subcuticular cancer deposits at repeat resection. Body wall extension occurs in recurrent vulva cancer, but we never saw such an early recurrence when full inguinofemoral lymphadenectomy without SLN was the standard approach. These 2 cases raise a caveat in the application of SLN mapping in vulva cancer, especially when metastasis is detected on SLN as the afferent channels to the lymph nodes may be already blocked or flow impaired by the tumour.

Technical innovation, standardization, and skill qualification for pediatric minimally invasive surgery in Japan

This is a presentation of sharing endeavors at modifying and standardizing surgical procedures as well as establishing endoscopic surgical skill qualification in the field of pediatric surgery in Japan.

Clinical study of laparoscopic versus open hepatectomy for malignant liver tumors

BACKGROUND

The number of reported laparoscopic hepatectomies for liver malignancy is increasing, but comparative data on the survival outcomes between the patients who have undergone laparoscopic hepatectomy versus open surgery are still lacking.

METHODS

We compared 31 laparoscopic liver resections with 31 open liver resections in a pair-matched retrospective analysis with the aim of evaluating the intraoperative hazards, recovery, and survival outcomes of these procedures for liver cancer. The laparoscopic group and the open group were matched for age, sex, the size and location of the tumor, and the presence or absence of cirrhosis.

RESULTS

Thirty cases in the laparoscopic group were performed successfully while one case was converted to open surgery due to intraoperative hemorrhage. The length of hospital stay was 7.5 (5-15) days, which was significantly shorter than those in open group (p < 0.01). The mean operative time and blood loss in the laparoscopic group were 140.1 (60-380) min and 502.9 (50-2000) ml, respectively, which were lower than those in open group but without significant difference. There were no operative complications and no deaths in the laparoscopic group. The mean and median survival times of laparoscopic group were 59.3 and 70 months, compared with 49.4 and 60 months in the open group, respectively. The 1-, 3-, 5-year survival rates in the laparoscopic group were, respectively, 96.55%, 60.47%, and 50.40%, and 96.77%, 68.36%, and 50.64% in the open group. By log-rank test, these two survival curves were not significantly different (p = 0.8535).

CONCLUSION

This study shows that laparoscopic hepatectomy for liver malignancy in selected patients is a safe, effective, and oncologically efficient procedure with better short-term results and similar survival outcomes to open hepatectomy for liver malignancy after midterm follow-up.

Cytoreductive surgery and perioperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy: a new standard of care for appendiceal mucinous tumors with peritoneal dissemination

In the past, mucinous appendiceal tumors and the pseudomyxoma peritonei syndrome were treated with serial debulking procedures. Some benefit was achieved, but no long-term survivals were seen. A new standard of care that involves the complete removal of all visible disease using peritonectomy procedures combined with intraperitoneal chemotherapy washing has developed. This new approach is jeopardized when extensive prior surgical procedures have violated the peritoneum as a first line of defense of the host against carcinomatosis. In patients who have a complete cytoreduction, a 5-year survival of 80% is expected. In patients who have an incomplete cytoreduction, no 10-year survivors are seen. These studies suggest a new standard of care for appendiceal mucinous tumors with peritoneal dissemination.

Laparoscopic resection of colon Cancer: Consensus of the European Association of Endoscopic Surgery (EAES)

BACKGROUND

The European Association of Endoscopic Surgery (EAES) initiated a consensus development conference on the laparoscopic resection of colon cancer during the annual congress in Lisbon, Portugal, in June 2002.

METHODS

A systematic review of the current literature was combined with the opinions, of experts in the field of colon cancer surgery to formulate evidence-based statements and recommendations on the laparoscopic resection of colon cancer.

RESULTS

Advanced age, obesity, and previous abdominal operations are not considered absolute contraindications for laparoscopic colon cancer surgery. The most common cause for conversion is the presence of bulky or invasive tumors. Laparoscopic operation takes longer to perform than the open counterpart, but the outcome is similar in terms of specimen size and pathological examination. Immediate postoperative morbidity and mortality are comparable for laparoscopic and open colonic cancer surgery. The laparoscopically operated patients had less postoperative pain, better-preserved pulmonary function, earlier restoration of gastrointestinal function, and an earlier discharge from the hospital. The postoperative stress response is lower after laparoscopic colectomy. The incidence of port site metastases is <1%. Survival after laparoscopic resection of colon cancer appears to be at least equal to survival after open resection. The costs of laparoscopic surgery for colon cancer are higher than those for open surgery.

CONCLUSION

Laparoscopic resection of colon cancer is a safe and feasible procedure that improves short-term outcome. Results regarding the long-term survival of patients enrolled in large multicenter trials will determine its role in general surgery.

Trocar site recurrence in laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic colorectal surgery has been associated with less postoperative pain, an early return of bowel function, a shorter period of hospitalization and disability, and better cosmetic results. However, the application of laparoscopic techniques to the curative resection of colorectal cancer is still controversial, owing to reports of cancer recurrence at the port site wounds. The accumulation of numerous such reports in a relatively short period raised concern that there might be an extraordinary high rate of port site metastases after laparoscopic colorectal surgery. This concern has led to intense clinical and basic research aimed at determining the incidence and causes of wound recurrence and developing preventative measures to address this problem. Despite these efforts, it is still not clear whether port site metastasis is really an inherent drawback to laparoscopic cancer surgery.

METHODS

In this review of the literature on port site metastasis, we gathered data from clinical series of laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer. We eliminated series of <50 patients, since they may be flawed by the learning curve required for this technically demanding procedure.

RESULTS

The rate of port site recurrences in the 1737 patients who participated in these series was 1%. Although the methods and criteria for patient selection in these studies varied, this figure appears to be comparable to the incidence reported for other malignancies and for laparotomies performed to treat colorectal cancer.

CONCLUSION

This review suggests that wound recurrence may actually be the result of an unfortunate learning curve, rather than an inherent concern. However, we must await the final results of large randomized studies before drawing any definitive conclusions.

Guidelines 2000 for colon and rectal cancer surgery

BACKGROUND

Oncologic resection techniques affect outcome for colon cancer and rectal cancer, but standardized guidelines have not been adopted. The National Cancer Institute sponsored a panel of experts to systematically review current literature and to draft guidelines that provide uniform definitions, principles, and practices.

METHODS

Methods were similar to those described by the American Society of Clinical Oncology in developing practice guidelines. Experts representing oncology and surgery met to review current literature on oncologic resection techniques for level of evidence (I-V, where I is the best evidence and V is the least compelling) and grade of recommendation (A-D, where A is based on the best evidence and D is based on the weakest evidence). Initial guidelines were drafted, reviewed, and accepted by consensus.

RESULTS

For the following seven factors, the level of evidence was II, III, or IV, and the findings were generally consistent (grade B): anatomic definition of colon versus rectum, tumor-node-metastasis staging, radial margins, adjuvant R0 stage, inadvertent rectal perforation, distal and proximal rectal margins, and en bloc resection of adherent tumors. For another seven factors, the level of evidence was II, III, or IV, but findings were inconsistent (grade C): laparoscopic colectomy; colon lymphadenectomy; level of proximal vessel ligation, mesorectal excision, and extended lateral pelvic lymph node dissection (all three for rectal cancer); no-touch technique; and bowel washout. For the other four factors, there was little or no systematic empirical evidence (grade D): abdominal exploration, oophorectomy, extent of colon resection, and total length of rectum resected.

CONCLUSIONS

The panel reports surgical guidelines and definitions based on the best available evidence. The availability of more standardized information in the future should allow for more grade A recommendations.

Laparoscopic liver resections: a feasibility study in 30 patients

OBJECTIVE

To assess the feasibility and safety of laparoscopic liver resections.

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA

The use of the laparoscopic approach for liver resections has remained limited for technical reasons. Progress in laparoscopic procedures and the development of dedicated technology have made it possible to consider laparoscopic resection in selected patients.

METHODS

A prospective study of laparoscopic liver resections was undertaken in patients with preoperative diagnoses including benign lesion, hepatocellular carcinoma with compensated cirrhosis, and metastasis of noncolorectal origin. Hepatic involvement had to be limited and located in the left or peripheral right segments (segments 2-6), and the tumor had to be 5 cm or smaller. Surgical technique included CO2 pneumoperitoneum and liver transection with a harmonic scalpel, with or without portal triad clamping or hepatic vein control. Portal pedicles and large hepatic veins were stapled. Resected specimens were placed in a bag and removed through a separate incision, without fragmentation.

RESULTS

From May 1996 to December 1999, 30 of 159 (19%) liver resections were included. There were 18 benign lesions and 12 malignant tumors, including 8 hepatocellular carcinomas in cirrhotic patients. Mean tumor size was 4.25 cm. There were two conversions to laparotomy (6.6%). The resections included 1 left hepatectomy, 8 bisegmentectomies (2 and 3), 9 segmentectomies, and 11 atypical resections. Mean blood loss was 300 mL. Mean surgical time was 214 minutes. There were no deaths. Complications occurred in six patients (20%). Only one cirrhotic patient developed postoperative ascites. No port-site metastases were observed in patients with malignant disease.

CONCLUSION

Laparoscopic resections are feasible and safe in selected patients with left-sided and right-peripheral lesions requiring limited resection. Young patients with benign disease clearly benefit from avoiding a major abdominal incision, and cirrhotic patients may have a reduced complication rate.

Paclitaxel loaded poly(L-lactic acid) microspheres for the prevention of intraperitoneal carcinomatosis after a surgical repair and tumor cell spill

A controlled release delivery system for paclitaxel was developed using poly(L-lactic acid) to provide local delivery to the peritoneal cavity. Microspheres were made in 1-40 and 30-120 microm size ranges. In an in vitro release study, 30-120 microm microspheres loaded with 10, 20 and 30% paclitaxel exhibited a burst phase of release for 3 days followed by an apparently zero-order phase of release. At all loadings, 20-25% of the original load of paclitaxel was released after 30 days. The effect of microsphere size on retention in the peritoneal cavity was assessed. Control 1-40 microm microspheres were injected intraperitoneally in rats. The rats received either insufflation of the peritoneal cavity using 11 mmHg CO2 or no further treatment. After sacrifice, microspheres with diameters less than 24 microm were observed in the lymphatic system after being cleared from the peritoneal cavity through fenestrations in the diaphragm. Insufflation of the peritoneal cavity had no effect on the size of microspheres that were cleared. Efficacy studies were carried out using 30-120 microm microspheres that were of sufficient size to be retained in the peritoneal cavity. In a model of a tumor cell spill after a cecotomy repair, 100 mg of 30-120 microm microspheres containing 30% paclitaxel were effective in preventing growth of tumors in the peritoneal cavity at both 2 and 6 weeks post-surgery. No gross or histologically evident tumor growth was observed on any peritoneal surfaces or in the surgical wound site. Rats receiving control microspheres all showed tumor cell implantation and growth after 2 weeks.

Risk factors contributing to early occurrence of port site metastases of laparoscopic surgery for malignancy

In this article, the authors present an up-to-date review of our experience and that of the medical literature encompassing all important aspects of port site metastases after laparoscopic surgery for malignancy and to search for potential risks with contribution to early occurrence of port site metastases after laparoscopic surgery. We used a Medline computer database search to conduct for pertinent articles through September 1996. Cross-referencing identified additional publications. We found that the majority of recurrences were in patients with adenocarcinoma cell type, advanced stage (far-advanced disease), and often with diffuse peritoneal carcinomatosis, suggesting that port site metastases may contribute to the highly aggressive nature of the disease. Risk factors that contributed to early occurrence of port site metastases were ovarian cancers, presence of ascites, and diagnostic or palliative procedures for malignancy (P < 0.0001, P = 0.008, and P < 0.001, respectively). Practitioners should exercise extreme caution when using laparoscopic techniques to manage the care of these patients.

Does laparoscopic vs. conventional surgery increase exfoliated cancer cells in the peritoneal cavity during resection of colorectal cancer?

PURPOSE

Traumatic manipulation of cancer specimens during laparoscopic colectomy may increase exfoliation of malignant cells into the peritoneal cavity, causing an early occurrence of peritoneal carcinomatosis or port-sites recurrence. Because of this concern, the routine use of intraperitoneal chemotherapy after laparoscopic colectomy for cancer was suggested recently. We assessed if laparoscopic vs. conventional surgery increases exfoliated malignant cells in the peritoneal cavity during resection of colorectal cancer.

METHODS

In a prospective, randomized fashion, 38 colorectal cancer patients undergoing an elective, curative operation were assigned to either a conventional or laparoscopic procedure between June 1996 and May 1997. In either group (n = 19), after the abdominal cavity was entered, saline was instilled into the peritoneal cavity, and the fluid was collected (Specimen 1). During surgery, all irrigating fluids were collected (Specimen 2). Both specimens were assessed for malignancy using four techniques: filtration process (ThinPrep), smear, cell block, and immunochemistry using Ber-EP4. The change in the amount of tumor cells in both specimens was compared between surgical groups. A pilot study was performed to validate the proposed cytologic method.

RESULTS

In the pilot study of 20 consecutive patients with colorectal cancer, postresectional peritoneal cytology was positive in six patients, including two Stage II (T3, N0, M0) patients. The pilot study also validated that our semiquantitative scoring system can be reliably used to assess the amount of free peritoneal cancer cells. In the main study, 16 right colectomies, 3 extended right colectomies, 17 proctosigmoidectomies, and 1 left colectomy were performed. The T and N stages were T1 (n = 13, T2 (n = 5), T3 (n = 8), T4 (n = 11); N0 (n =22), N1 (n = 8), N2 (n = 7). Malignant cells were not detected in any Specimens 1 or, more importantly, in Specimens 2 in either surgical group.

CONCLUSION

When performed according to strict oncologic surgical principles, laparoscopic techniques in curative colorectal cancer surgery did not have an increased risk of intraperitoneal cancer cell spillage, compared with conventional techniques. We hope that these results can decrease some of the concerns about tumor cell spillage and seeding during laparoscopy.

Mechanism and prevention of port-site tumor recurrence after laparoscopy in a murine model

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE

Although minimally invasive surgery (MIS) has been broadly applied in patients with cancer of the gastrointestinal tract, the etiology of port-site tumor recurrence (PSR) after laparoscopic cancer surgery remains unclear. The authors report here an analysis of PSR in a model of murine neuroblastoma after laparoscopic tumor biopsy and propose a mechanism for this complication as well as a potential treatment.

METHODS

Immature 5- to 7-week old male A/J mice (18-23 g) were subcutaneously inoculated with the minimally immunogenic TBJ-neuroblastoma (TBJ-NB) in the left flank and divided into three treatment groups. The following operations were performed 14 days after tumor inoculation: group 1, additional intraperitoneal or intravenous injection of TBJ-NB during CO2 pneumoperitoneum; group 2, simulated transperitoneal tumor biopsy using MIS techniques during either CO2 pneumoperitoneum or gasless suspension; Group 3, intraperitoneal (IP) or intravenous (IV) administration of cyclophosphamide on postoperative days 0 and 3 to prevent PSR after simulated tumor biopsy during CO2 pneumoperitoneum.

RESULTS

In group 1, the incidence of PSR was 0% in the intravenously injected mice versus 63% in mice injected intraperitoneally with TBJ-NB. In group 2, no significant difference in the incidence of PSR was seen between simulated tumor biopsy (89%) animals with CO2 pneumoperitoneum versus animals with gasless suspension (81%). In group 3, mice that did not receive any chemotherapy had an 89% incidence of PSR. Administration of cyclophosphamide via either the IP or IV route effectively prevented PSR, although there was no difference in the incidence of PSR between the two routes (IP 12% versus IV 13%).

CONCLUSIONS

The data suggest that PSR in tumor-bearing hosts may be caused by direct seeding of exfoliated tumor cell, and not by hematogenous metastases. Contrary to the other reports, CO2 pneumoperitoneum was not found to be essential for the development of PSR. Furthermore, the authors conclude that postoperative chemotherapy may be useful in preventing PSR after MIS in patients bearing chemotherapy-sensitive tumors such as neuroblastoma.

Port-site recurrences following laparoscopic operations for gynaecological malignancies

OBJECTIVE

To determine the frequency of port-site recurrences following laparoscopic surgical treatment of gynaecological malignancies metastatic at the time of surgery.

DESIGN

Retrospective review of metastatic primary and recurrent gynaecological malignancies.

RESULTS

Twenty-five women were studied. Twenty-four had metastatic disease at the time of laparoscopic surgery, 22 in association with a primary malignancy (cervix: n = 12, ovary: n = 7, endometrium: n = 3), and two in association with recurrent ovarian cancer; all received pelvic or extended field radiation or chemotherapy after surgery. One woman with Stage IIIC ovarian cancer, disease-free at the completion of neoadjuvant chemotherapy following laparotomy by a general surgeon, was included; she developed scalene node metastases 18 months after definitive laparoscopic surgery. Seventy-one 5 mm trocars and fifty 10 mm trocars (total n = 121) were used for surgery; thirty-one 10 mm trocar sites and forty-four 5 mm sites (total n = 75) received post-operative treatment with chemotherapy (n = 49) or radiation (n = 26). Four women (16%) developed recurrences in association with endometrial (n = 2) and cervical (n = 2) cancer at six trocar sites. All recurrences were associated with abdominopelvic and/or distant metastases, and all occurred at untreated 5 mm trocar sites. The difference in recurrence rates between 5 mm and 10 mm trocar sites (chi(2) = 6; P < 0.025), and between treated and untreated trocars (chi(2) = 5; P < 0.05) were both statistically significant (McNemar's test), but the effects of treatment and trocar size on the port-site recurrence rate were confounded.

CONCLUSIONS

Port-site recurrences are local manifestations of disseminated disease that result from the enhancement of tumour growth characteristic of healing tissues and can be prevented by appropriate post-operative therapy.

Early postoperative results of a prospective series of laparoscopic vs. Open anterior resections for rectosigmoid cancers

PURPOSE

This study was undertaken to compare postoperatively laparoscopic (LAR) with open (OAR) anterior resection in patients with rectosigmoid cancers.

METHODS

Forty consecutive patients were divided into two groups: 20 patients (9 males) were allocated to LAR and 20 patients (6 males) to OAR.

RESULTS

Median age in the LAR group was 62 (range, 39-77) years, and in the OAR group, it was 61 (range, 43-84) years (P = 0.9). Median lengths of the distal margin of clearance beyond the tumor were 4 (range, 2-8) cm and 4.5 (range, 3-7.5) cm in the LAR and OAR groups, respectively (P = 0.35). Median numbers of lymph nodes harvested were 20 (range, 7-49) and 19 (range, 7-97) for the LAR and OAR groups, respectively (P = 0.44). Median operating times were 90 (range, 55-185) minutes and 73 (range, 40-140) minutes in the LAR and OAR groups, respectively (P = 0.08). Blood losses were 50 (range, 50-800) ml and 50 (range, 50-1,500) ml in the LAR and OAR groups, respectively. There was no intraoperative complication in either group, and no laparoscopic patient was converted to an open procedure. Median length of extraction site incision in the LAR group was 5.5 (4-13) cm, and length of incision in the OAR group was 18 (8-25) cm (P < 0.002).

CONCLUSION

There were no significant differences between the two groups with regard to duration of parenteral analgesia, starting of fluid and solid diet after surgery, or time to first bowel movement and time to discharge from the hospital.

Early results of laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer. Retrospective analysis of 372 patients treated by Clinical Outcomes of Surgical Therapy (COST) Study Group

This study was undertaken to determine the early experience of the embers of the COST Study Group with colorectal cancer treated by laparoscopic approaches.

METHOD

A retrospective review was performed of all patients with colorectal cancer treated with laparoscopy by the COST Study Group before August 1994. Tumor site, stage, differentiation, procedure completion, presence of recurrence (local, distant, trocar site), and cause of death were analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 372 patients with adenocarcinoma of the colon and rectum were treated by laparoscopic approach between October 1991 and August 1994 (170 men and 192 women): right colectomy, 170; sigmoid colectomy, 55; low anterior resection, 56; abdominoperineal resection, 44; left colectomy, 22; colostomy, 8; total colectomy, 6; transverse colectomy, 7; exploration, 2. Conversion to an open procedure was required in 15.6 percent of cases. Operative mortality was 2 percent. Tumor characteristics were as follows: TNM state: I, 40 percent; II, 25 percent; III, 18 percent; IV, 17 percent; Differentiation: well-moderate, 88 percent; poor, 12 percent; carcinomatosis, 5 percent. Local (3.6 percent) and distant implantation occurred in four patients (1.1 percent). Only one of these patients died a cancer-related death (Stage III at 36 months). Cancer-related death rates increased with increasing stage of tumor: I, -4 percent; II, 17 percent; III, 31 percent; IV, 70 percent.

CONCLUSION

A laparoscopic approach to colorectal cancer results in early outcome after treatment that is comparable with conventional therapy for colorectal cancer. A randomized trial is needed to compare long-term outcomes of open and laparoscopic approaches with colorectal cancer.

Minimally invasive surgery for colorectal cancer. Initial follow-up

OBJECTIVE

An analysis was performed to evaluate early patterns of recurrence and survival in patients undergoing laparoscopic-assisted colectomies for primary colorectal cancer. Thirty-nine patients are available with a minimum of 24 months postoperative follow-up.

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA

The techniques and expected surgical outcomes for patients undergoing laparoscopically assisted colectomies are slowly being defined as these procedures become more common and more widely available. One of the areas of greatest concern is the use of laparoscopic-assisted colectomy for the surgical treatment of patients with primary colorectal cancer. There are anecdotal reports in the literature describing both port site recurrence and wound recurrence in patients undergoing laparoscopic-assisted colectomies for colorectal cancer. This raises concerns about whether these recurrences are more common in patients undergoing laparoscopic procedures and whether overall survival is compromised. Wound recurrences and laparoscopic port site recurrences have been described with numerous other intra-abdominal tumors, but the precise incidence remains unknown. The authors reviewed data from 39 patients to determine early patterns of recurrence and overall survival.

METHODS

Two-hundred thirty-eight laparoscopic-assisted colectomies were performed by the Norfolk Surgical Group between June 1992 and September 1995. Thirty-nine of the patients who underwent resection for colorectal cancer between June 1992 and September 1993 currently are available for at least a 2-year follow-up. Preoperative evaluation included physical examination, liver function studies, carcinoembryonic antigen, chest x-ray, computed tomography scans, and endoscopies with biopsy. Postoperative follow-up data consisted of physical examination, liver function tests, CEA, chest X-ray, computed tomography scan of the abdomen, and endoscopy of the colon. No patients have been lost to follow-up. Survival rates and patterns of recurrence were compared between node-negative and node-positive patients and compared with conventional data after open surgery.

RESULTS

There were 22 men and 17 women ranging in age from 33 to 89 years. Mean follow-up was 30 months, with a range of 24 to 40 months. There were three patients with recurrence and nine deaths. Recurrence and tumor-related death rates, respectively, for each Dukes' stage were 0/1 and 0/1 for stage A, 0/7 and 0/7 for stage B-1, 1/16 and 2/16 for stage B-2, 0/1 and 0/1 for stage C-1, and 2/8 and 1/8 for Stage C-2. All six patients with Dukes' stage D disease died of metastatic colorectal cancer within 4 to 14 months of surgery. There were two patients with anastomotic recurrence. No unusual patterns of recurrent disease were noted, and there were no wound or port site recurrences.

CONCLUSIONS

In this group of patients undergoing laparoscopic-assisted colectomies for primary colorectal malignancy, no adverse patterns of recurrence or decreased survival has been noted at 2-year follow-up when compared with standard open colorectal cancer surgery statistics. Prospective randomized studies with long-term follow-up will be required to better define the potential benefits and adverse effects of laparoscopic surgery for colorectal malignancy.

Recovery of gastrointestinal motility following open versus laparoscopic colon resection in dogs

The recovery of gastrointestinal motility was compared in dogs undergoing either laparoscopic or open sigmoidectomy. During surgery, bipolar recording electrodes were placed on the proximal and distal antrum, mid- and distal colon, and the rectum. Fasting myoelectric data were recorded postoperatively. Scintigraphic gastric emptying studies employing a solid test meal were performed before and after [postoperative day (POD) 2] operation. Ten radiopaque markers were given just before operation and retained markers were counted daily by abdominal x-ray. Gastric emptying on POD 2 was significantly delayed in the open group at 120 min compared with preoperative studies for the open group and compared with the laparoscopic group on POD 2 (P < 0.05 and P < 0.01, respectively). A significant difference in the number of retained markers was observed between the groups on POD 4 (P < 0.05). There were no significant differences in slow-wave frequency, presence of dysrhythmias in the proximal and distal antrum, or presence of either discrete or continuous electrical response activity in the colon and rectum between groups on any days. We conclude that using a laparoscopic approach results in more rapid recovery of fed-state gastrointestinal motility following colon resection. These data also suggest that myoelectric activity alone is not a sensitive enough parameter to detect these differences in recovery in this animal model.