Evidence for site selection during synaptogenesis: the surface distribution of synaptic sites in photoreceptor terminals of the files Musca and Drosophila

Two identified looming detectors in the locust: ubiquitous lateral connections among their inputs contribute to selective responses to looming objects

In locusts, two lobula giant movement detector neurons (LGMDs) act as looming object detectors. Their reproducible responses to looming and their ethological significance makes them models for single neuron computation. But there is no comprehensive picture of the neurons that connect directly to each LGMD. We used high-through-put serial block-face scanning-electron-microscopy to reconstruct the network of input-synapses onto the LGMDs over spatial scales ranging from single synapses and small circuits, up to dendritic branches and total excitatory input. Reconstructions reveal that many trans-medullary-afferents (TmAs) connect the eye with each LGMD, one TmA per facet per LGMD. But when a TmA synapses with an LGMD it also connects laterally with another TmA. These inter-TmA synapses are always reciprocal. Total excitatory input to the LGMD 1 and 2 comes from 131,000 and 186,000 synapses reaching densities of 3.1 and 2.6 synapses per μm² respectively. We explored the computational consequences of reciprocal synapses between each TmA and 6 others from neighbouring columns. Since any lateral interactions between LGMD inputs have always been inhibitory we may assume these reciprocal lateral connections are most likely inhibitory. Such reciprocal inhibitory synapses increased the LGMD’s selectivity for looming over passing objects, particularly at the beginning of object approach.

Synaptic connections of first-stage visual neurons in the locust Schistocerca gregaria extend evolution of tetrad synapses back 200 million years

The small size of some insects, and the crystalline regularity of their eyes, have made them ideal for large-scale reconstructions of visual circuits. In phylogenetically recent muscomorph flies, like Drosophila, precisely coordinated output to different motion-processing pathways is delivered by photoreceptors (R cells), targeting four different postsynaptic cells at each synapse (tetrad). Tetrads were linked to the evolution of aerial agility. To reconstruct circuits for vision in the larger brain of a locust, a phylogenetically old, flying insect, we adapted serial block-face scanning electron microscopy (SBEM). Locust lamina monopolar cells, L1 and L2, were the main targets of the R cell pathway, L1 and L2 each fed a different circuit, only L1 providing feedback onto R cells. Unexpectedly, 40% of all locust R cell synapses onto both L1 and L2 were tetrads, revealing the emergence of tetrads in an arthropod group present 200 million years before muscomorph flies appeared, coinciding with the early evolution of flight.

The evolution and development of neural superposition

Visual systems have a rich history as model systems for the discovery and understanding of basic principles underlying neuronal connectivity. The compound eyes of insects consist of up to thousands of small unit eyes that are connected by photoreceptor axons to set up a visual map in the brain. The photoreceptor axon terminals thereby represent neighboring points seen in the environment in neighboring synaptic units in the brain. Neural superposition is a special case of such a wiring principle, where photoreceptors from different unit eyes that receive the same input converge upon the same synaptic units in the brain. This wiring principle is remarkable, because each photoreceptor in a single unit eye receives different input and each individual axon, among thousands others in the brain, must be sorted together with those few axons that have the same input. Key aspects of neural superposition have been described as early as 1907. Since then neuroscientists, evolutionary and developmental biologists have been fascinated by how such a complicated wiring principle could evolve, how it is genetically encoded, and how it is developmentally realized. In this review article, we will discuss current ideas about the evolutionary origin and developmental program of neural superposition. Our goal is to identify in what way the special case of neural superposition can help us answer more general questions about the evolution and development of genetically “hard-wired” synaptic connectivity in the brain.

Regular mosaic of synaptic contacts among three retinal neurons

Retinal bipolar, amacrine, and ganglion cells contact each other within precisely defined synaptic laminae, but the spatial distribution of contacts between the cells is generally treated as random. Here we show that not to be the case. Excitatory inputs to inner retinal neurons were visualized by introduction of a plasmid coding for the postsynaptic protein PSD95-GFP. Our initial finding was that synapses on the dendrites of retinal ganglion cells are regularly spaced, at 2-3-μm intervals, along the dendrites. Thus, the presence of a PSD95 punctum creates a nearby zone from which other inputs appear to be excluded. Despite their great variation in size and different morphologies, the spacing is similar for the arbors of different retinal ganglion cell types. Regular spacing was also observed for the starburst amacrine cells. This regularity is mirrored in the spacing of axonal varicosities of the stratified bipolar cells, which have a regular, nonrandom interval consistent with that of the PSD95 puncta on ganglion cells. Thus, for each level of the inner plexiform layer all three cell types participate in a single 2D mosaic of synaptic contacts. These findings raise a new set of questions: How does the self-avoidance of synaptic sites along an individual dendrite arise and how is it physically maintained? Why is a regular spacing of inputs important for the computational function of the cells? Finally, which of the three players, if any, is developmentally responsible for the initial establishment of the pattern?

Optic lobe development

The optic lobes comprise approximately half of the fly's brain. In four major synaptic ganglia, or neuropils, the visual input from the compound eyes is received and processed for higher order visual functions like motion detection and color vision. A common characteristic of vertebrate and invertebrate visual systems is the point-to-point mapping of the visual world to synaptic layers in the brain, referred to as visuotopy. Vision requires the parallel extraction of numerous parameters in a visuotopic manner. Consequently, the optic neuropils are arranged in columns and perpendicularly oriented synaptic layers that allow for the selective establishment of synapses between columnar neurons. How this exquisite synaptic specificity is established during approximately 100 hours of brain development is still poorly understood. However, the optic lobe contains one of the best characterized brain structures in any organism-both anatomically and developmentally. Moreover, numerous molecules and their function illuminate some of the basic mechanisms involved in brain wiring. The emerging picture is that the development of the visual system of Drosophila is (epi-)genetically hard-wired; it supplies the emerging fly with vision without requiring neuronal activity for fine tuning of neuronal connectivity. Elucidating the genetic and cellular principles by which gene activity directs the assembly of the optic lobe is therefore a fascinating task and the focus of this chapter.

Basigin/EMMPRIN/CD147 mediates neuron-glia interactions in the optic lamina of Drosophila

Basigin, an IgG family glycoprotein found on the surface of human metastatic tumors, stimulates fibroblasts to secrete matrix metalloproteases (MMPs) that remodel the extracellular matrix, and is thus also known as Extracellular Matrix MetalloPRotease Inducer (EMMPRIN). Using Drosophila we previously identified novel roles for basigin. Specifically, photoreceptors of flies with basigin eyes show misplaced nuclei, rough ER and mitochondria, and swollen axon terminals, suggesting cytoskeletal disruptions. Here we demonstrate that basigin is required for normal neuron-glia interactions in the Drosophila visual system. Flies with basigin mutant photoreceptors have misplaced epithelial glial cells within the first optic neuropile, or lamina. In addition, epithelial glia insert finger-like projections--capitate projections (CPs)--sites of vesicle endocytosis and possibly neurotransmitter recycling. When basigin is missing from photoreceptors terminals, CP formation between glia and photoreceptor terminals is disrupted. Visual system function is also altered in flies with basigin mutant eyes. While photoreceptors depolarize normally to light, synaptic transmission is greatly diminished, consistent with a defect in neurotransmitter release. Basigin expression in photoreceptor neurons is required for normal structure and placement of glia cells.

Activity-independent prespecification of synaptic partners in the visual map of Drosophila

Specifying synaptic partners and regulating synaptic numbers are at least partly activity-dependent processes during visual map formation in all systems investigated to date . In Drosophila, six photoreceptors that view the same point in visual space have to be sorted into synaptic modules called cartridges in order to form a visuotopically correct map . Synapse numbers per photoreceptor terminal and cartridge are both precisely regulated . However, it is unknown whether an activity-dependent mechanism or a genetically encoded developmental program regulates synapse numbers. We performed a large-scale quantitative ultrastructural analysis of photoreceptor synapses in mutants affecting the generation of electrical potentials (norpA, trp;trpl), neurotransmitter release (hdc, syt), vesicle endocytosis (synj), the trafficking of specific guidance molecules during photoreceptor targeting (sec15), a specific guidance receptor required for visual map formation (Dlar), and 57 other novel synaptic mutants affecting 43 genes. Remarkably, in all these mutants, individual photoreceptors form the correct number of synapses per presynaptic terminal independently of cartridge composition. Hence, our data show that each photoreceptor forms a precise and constant number of afferent synapses independently of neuronal activity and partner accuracy. Our data suggest cell-autonomous control of synapse numbers as part of a developmental program of activity-independent steps that lead to a "hard-wired" visual map in the fly brain.

Reliability of signal transfer at a tonically transmitting, graded potential synapse of the locust ocellar pathway

We assessed the performance of a synapse that transmits small, sustained, graded potentials between two classes of second-order ocellar "L-neurons" of the locust. We characterized the transmission of both fixed levels of membrane potential and fluctuating signals by recording postsynaptic responses to changes in presynaptic potential. To ensure repeatability between stimuli, we controlled presynaptic signals with a voltage clamp. We found that the synapse introduces noise above the level of background activity in the postsynaptic neuron. By driving the presynaptic neuron with slow-ramp changes in potential, we found that the number of discrete signal levels the synapse transmits is approximately 20. It can also transmit approximately 20 discrete levels when the presynaptic signal is a graded rebound spike. Synaptic noise level is constant over the operating range of the synapse, which would not be expected if presynaptic potential set the probability for the release of individual quanta of neurotransmitter according to Poisson statistics. Responses to individual quanta of neurotransmission could not be resolved, which is consistent with a synapse that operates with large numbers of vesicles evoking small responses. When challenged with white noise stimuli, the synapse can transmit information at rates up to 450 bits/s, a performance that is sufficient to transmit natural signals about changes in illumination.

Development and structure of synaptic contacts in Drosophila

Structural synapses are key regulators of information flow in neuronal networks. To understand the function and formation of neuronal circuits, the development and function of synapses have therefore been intensely studied in both vertebrate and invertebrate species. Precise descriptions of synapses and their amenability to genetic analysis in the model organism Drosophila provide an efficient platform from which to explore mechanisms and principles of synapse formation, which find many counterparts in other animals. Here we summarise our knowledge of the structure of Drosophila synapses. Focussing on neuromuscular junctions and photoreceptor synapses, we provide an overview of mechanisms underlying the development of synaptic structure in Drosophila.

Structural daily rhythms in GFP-labelled neurons in the visual system of Drosophila melanogaster

In the visual system of Drosophila melanogaster, two classes of interneurons in the first optic neuropil, or lamina, the monopolar cells L1 and L2, show rhythmic circadian changes in the shape and size of their axons. In the present study we have used the GAL4-UAS system to target the GFP expression to the L2 cells in D. melanogaster and to examine morphological changes in the cell body, nucleus, axon and dendritic spines. Our results showed that in addition to changes in the caliber of its axon, L2 also shows daily changes in the morphology of its dendritic spines, differences which are most pronounced at the beginning of the night. There are also changes in the sizes of the cells' nuclei in the lamina cortex, which are largest at the beginning and in the middle of day, in females and males, respectively. In contrast to the axon and dendrites, L2's soma does not change size significantly during the day or night. The observed changes clearly indicate the cyclical modulation of the structure of the L2 interneurons. These changes seem to be regulated by a circadian clock, which exhibits certain differences between the sexes.

The organization of synaptic vesicles at tonically transmitting connections of locust visual interneurons

Large, second-order neurons of locust ocelli, or L-neurons, make some output connections that transmit small changes in membrane potential and can sustain transmission tonically. The synaptic connections are made from the axons of L-neurons in the lateral ocellar tracts, and are characterized by bar-shaped presynaptic densities and densely packed clouds of vesicles near to the cell membrane. A cloud of vesicles can extend much of the length of this synaptic zone, and there is no border between the vesicles that are associated with neighboring presynaptic densities. In some axons, presynaptic densities are associated with discrete small clusters of vesicles. Up to 6% of the volume of a length of axon in a synaptic zone can be occupied with a vesicle cloud, packed with 4.5 to 5.5 thousand vesicles per microm(3). Presynaptic densities vary in length, from less than 70 nm to 1.5 microm, with shorter presynaptic densities being most frequent. The distribution of vesicles around short presynaptic densities was indistinguishable from that around long presynaptic densities, and vesicles were distributed in a similar way right along the length of a presynaptic density. Within the cytoplasm, vesicles are homogeneously distributed within a cloud. We found no differences in the distribution of vesicles in clouds between locusts that had been dark-adapted and locusts that had been light-adapted before fixation.

Synaptic structure, distribution, and circuitry in the central nervous system of the locust and related insects

The Orthopteran central nervous system has proved a fertile substrate for combined morphological and physiological studies of identified neurons. Electron microscopy reveals two major types of synaptic contacts between nerve fibres: chemical synapses (which predominate) and electrotonic (gap) junctions. The chemical synapses are characterized by a structural asymmetry between the pre- and postsynaptic electron dense paramembranous structures. The postsynaptic paramembranous density defines the extent of a synaptic contact that varies according to synaptic type and location in single identified neurons. Synaptic bars are the most prominent presynaptic element at both monadic and dyadic (divergent) synapses. These are associated with small electron lucent synaptic vesicles in neurons that are cholinergic or glutamatergic (round vesicles) or GABAergic (pleomorphic vesicles). Dense core vesicles of different sizes are indicative of the presence of peptide or amine transmitters. Synapses are mostly found on small-diameter neuropilar branches and the number of synaptic contacts constituting a single physiological synapse ranges from a few tens to several thousand depending on the neurones involved. Some principles of synaptic circuitry can be deduced from the analysis of highly ordered brain neuropiles. With the light microscope, synaptic location can be inferred from the distribution of the presynaptic protein synapsin I. In the ventral nerve cord, identified neurons that are components of circuits subserving known behaviours, have been studied using electrophysiology in combination with light and electron microscopy and immunocytochemistry of neuroactive compounds. This has allowed the synaptic distribution of the major classes of neurone in the ventral nerve cord to be analysed within a functional context.

Visualization of synaptic markers in the optic neuropils of Drosophila using a new constrained deconvolution method

The fruitfly Drosophila melanogaster offers compelling genetic advantages for the analysis of its nervous system, but cell size precludes immunocytochemical analysis of wild-type structure and mutant phenotypes beyond the level of neuronal arborizations. For many antibodies, especially when immunoelectron microscopy is not feasible, it would therefore be desirable to extend the resolution limit of confocal microscopy as far as possible. Because high-resolution confocal microscopy suffers from considerable blurring, so-called deconvolution algorithms are needed to remove, at least partially, the blur introduced by the microscope and by the specimen itself. Here, we present the establishment and application of a new deconvolution method to visualize synaptic markers in Drosophila optic neuropils at the resolution limit of light. We ascertained all necessary parameters experimentally and verified them by deconvolving injected fluorescent microspheres in immunostained optic lobe tissue. The resulting deconvolution method was used to analyze colocalization between the synaptic vesicle marker neuronal synaptobrevin and synaptic and putative synaptic markers in photoreceptor terminals. We report differential localization of these near the resolution limit of light, which could not be distinguished without deconvolution.

Neurite morphogenesis of identified visual interneurons and its relationship to photoreceptor synaptogenesis in the flies, Musca domestica and Drosophila melanogaster

The first neuropile, or lamina, of the fly's optic lobe comprises a model set of identified neurons that are arrayed in cylindrical modules, called cartridges. The cartridge acquires adult form only in the second half of the fly's pupal life. All cells are by then correctly located within each of the lamina's cartridges (Drosophila, Musca), becoming invested by glial cells after 75% of pupal development (P + 75%). In adult cartridges, two lamina cells, L1 and L2, receive input from photoreceptor terminals R1-R6, at so-called tetrad synapses that form in the pupa when these cells' dendrites contact R1-R6. Single-section electron microscopy (EM, Drosophila) and serial-EM reconstructions of L1 and L2 (Musca) reveal relationships between the morphogenesis of L1/L2 dendrites and the formation of tetrads. Neurite outgrowth is initially (P + 55%) random and neurites are unbranched; many neurites invaginate surrounding terminals of R1-R6 but, later, embrace the outer surfaces of these. The maximum profusion of neurites at P + 74% coincides with peak numbers of nascent tetrads; neurites then branch vertically, in the lamina's depth. Later, neurites failing to reach R1-R6's outer surfaces regress. Down the length of their axons, L1 and L2's neurites initially form a random sequence, L1 partnering L1 as often as L2, etc., but beginning at P + 74%, L1 partners L2, and L2 partners L1, with progressive strictness. L1 has more neurites overall than L2. These observations are consistent with the following hypotheses: a neurite only survives if it contacts a presynaptic site; a synapse only survives if it progressively acquires the appropriate number and combination of postsynaptic neurites, culminating in a tetrad; an interaction exists between the neurites of L1 and L2, so that the growth of one respects the pattern of growth of the other.

Daily rhythmic changes of cell size and shape in the first optic neuropil in Drosophila melanogaster

Daily rhythms of changes in axon size and shape are seen in two types of monopolar cell-L1 and L2-that are unique cells within each of the modules or cartridges of the first optic neuropil or lamina in the fly's optic lobe. In the fruit fly Drosophila, L1 and L2's axons swell at the beginning of both day and night, with larger size increases occurring at the beginning of night. Later, they shrink during the day and night, respectively. Simultaneously, they change shape from an inverted conical form during the day to a cylindrical one at night. This is because the axonal cross section of L1 increases during the night, especially at proximal depths of the lamina, closest to the brain, whereas the axon of L2 increases in size at distal lamina depths. The cross-sectional areas of the L1 cell and of an individual cartridge both change under constant darkness (DD), indicating the circadian origin of changes observed under day/night (LD) conditions. We sought to see whether such changes impart a net change to the entire lamina's volume or shape that is visible by light microscopy, but oscillations in the volume or the curvature of the whole lamina neuropil are found neither in LD nor in DD. These size changes are discussed in relation to previous findings in the housefly Musca, with respect to differences in L1 and L2 between the two species, and to differences in the time course of their circadian changes.

Peripheral synapses at identified mechanosensory neurons in spiders: three-dimensional reconstruction and GABA immunocytochemistry

The mechanosensory organs of arachnids receive diverse peripheral inputs. Little is known about the origin, distribution, and function of these chemical synapses, which we examined in lyriform slit sense organ VS-3 of the spider Cupiennius salei. The cuticular slits of this organ are each associated with two large bipolar mechanosensory neurons with different adaptation rates. With intracellular recording, we have now been able to correlate directly the staining intensity of a neuron for acetylcholinesterase with its adaptation rate, thus allowing us simply to stain a neuron to identify its functional type. All rapidly adapting neurons stain more heavily than slowly adapting neurons. Immunostaining of whole-mount preparations reveals GABA-like immunoreactive fibers forming numerous varicosities at the surface of all sensory neurons in VS-3; peripheral GABA-like immunoreactive somata are lacking. Sectioning the leg nerve procures rapid degeneration of most fiber profiles, confirming that the fibers are efferent. Punctate synapsin-like immunoreactivity colocalizes to these varicosities, although some synapsin-like immunoreactive puncta are GABA-immunonegative. Fibers with similar immunoreactivities are also associated with trichobothria, tactile hairs, internal joint receptors, i.e. other types of spider mechanosensory organs. In organ VS-3, immunoreactivity is most dense across the initial axon segment. The exact distribution of peripheral synapses was reconstructed from a 10-microm-long electron micrograph series of the dendritic, somatic, and initial axon regions of acetylcholinesterase-stained VS-3 neurons. These reveal a pattern similar to that of the synapsin-like immunoreactivity. Two different types of synapse were distinguished on the basis of their presynaptic vesicle populations. Many peripheral synapses thus appear to derive from efferent GABA-like immunoreactive fibers and probably provide centrifugal inhibitory control of primary mechanosensory activities.

Regulated spacing of synapses and presynaptic active zones at larval neuromuscular junctions in different genotypes of the flies Drosophila and Sarcophaga

Synapses at larval neuromuscular junctions of the flies Drosophila melanogaster and Sarcophaga bullata are not distributed randomly. They have been studied in serial electron micrographs of two identified axons (axons 1 and 2) that innervate ventral longitudinal muscles 6 and 7 of the larval body wall. The following fly larvae were examined: axon 1--wild-type Sarcophaga and Drosophila and Drosophila mutants dunce(m14) and fasII(e76), a hypomorphic allele of the fasciclin II gene; and axon 2--drosophila wild-type, dunce(m14), and fasII(e76). These lines were selected to provide a wide range of nerve terminal phenotypes in which to study the distribution and spacing of synapses. Each terminal varicosity is applied closely to the underlying subsynaptic reticulum of the muscle fiber and has 15-40 synapses. Each synapse usually bears one or more active zones, characterized by dense bodies that are T-shaped in cross section; they are located at the presumed sites of transmitter release. The distribution of synapses was characterized from the center-to-center distance of each synapse to its nearest neighbor. The mean spacing between nearest-neighbor pairs ranged from 0.84 microm to 1.05 microm for axon 1, showing no significant difference regardless of genotype. The corresponding values for axon 2, 0.58 microm to 0.75 microm, were also statistically indistinguishable from one another in terminals of different genotype but differed significantly from the values for axon 1. Thus, the functional class of the axon provides a clear prediction of the spacing of its synapses, suggesting that spacing may be determined by the functional properties of transmission at the two types of terminals. Individual dense bodies were situated mostly at least 0.4 microm away from one another, suggesting that an interaction between neighboring active zones could prevent their final positions from being located more closely.

The shaking B gene in Drosophila regulates the number of gap junctions between photoreceptor terminals in the lamina

The molecular structure of insect gap junctions differs from that in vertebrates, and in Drosophila is possibly encoded by the shaking B (= Passover) locus. shaking B2 is a null allele that acts in the nervous system. In the shakB2 mutant, one site of action are gap junctions between photoreceptor terminals in the cartridges of the lamina, beneath the compound eye, which we assayed from the number of close-apposition profiles in thin-section EM. The number of profiles in the Canton-S (C-S) wild type is about 0.5 per cartridge per section in distal and mid-lamina depths, and significantly less, about one quarter this value, closer to the brain, in the proximal lamina. In shakB2, there are fewer profiles, approximately one quarter the number of appositions in distal and mid-lamina depths as in C-S, and their number does not differ significantly from those at the proximal depth in either the mutant or wild type. Thus mutant action is associated with a reduced number of appositions at distal and mid-lamina depths. We propose that R1-R6 gap junctions are partitioned into at least two strata, proximal and distal, and that two populations of gap junctions exist, one extending throughout the lamina that does not require shakB, and a second at distal and mid-depth levels, which does. The number of gap junctions is reduced in mutant shakB2, and surviving appositions at distal and middle lamina depths possibly have wider clefts than in C-S. Gap junctions are reduced equally between all R1-R6 terminals, so the two different types of junction proposed, shakB2- and non-shakB2-dependent, can apparently express in a single receptor terminal.

Ultrastructure and quantification of synapses in the insect nervous system

Standard EM methods can be successfully used to reveal the various organelles of synaptic junctions in different insect species. The individual junctions of a synaptic class exhibit a high level of morphological stereotypy, but the study of serial sections is generally necessary to understand the different appearances of a junction's profiles when it is cut in different planes. Most synaptic profiles seen in single sections may then be attributed to one or a few morphological classes, not to many. Probably most central synapses are of the multiple-contact type, containing a number of postsynaptic elements, with the diversity of the combinations of these providing the major difference between particular synaptic junctions. The different profiles of a synapse when cut serially in oblique, non-canonical section planes provide the investigator with search images, prior knowledge of which is needed for a comprehensive identification of synaptic sites in single sections. The latter can be used to describe the synaptic organization of an unknown neuropile from the variety of synaptic contacts that form between different neurons. This requires that continuity be established between a postsynaptic dendrite and its parent axon, and that the position of the axon can then be used to identify the neuron of origin. Tracing between dendrite and axon can be undertaken either systematically in serial sections of a restricted region or by protracted searches of single sections. The number of synaptic profiles in a single section can be used to estimate the number of synaptic contacts, either in relative terms, as the number of profiles per section in different cells, or as the absolute number of synapses per cell. The latter requires use of correction formulae, taking into account the influence of section thickness and of the mean size of the synaptic junction on the number of synaptic profiles recorded in a particular section.