Hyperthermia in cancer growth regulation

Intraperitoneal chemotherapy from Armstrong to HIPEC: challenges and promise

OPINION

The treatment of advanced stage ovarian, primary peritoneal and fallopian tube cancer represents a therapeutic challenge as evidenced by the 70 %-80 % recurrence rate. Our understanding of the synergy between surgical cytoreduction and effective systemic chemotherapy continues to evolve, with research supporting maximal cytoreductive effort followed by intraperitoneal chemotherapy. Specifically, analysis of phase III clinical trials has shown a median survival of 110 months in those treated with intraperitoneal chemotherapy, when surgery results in no visible residual disease. Additionally, incorporation of hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy at the time of surgical resection has gained attention as an alternate therapeutic option, in an attempt to obviate toxicities encountered with repetitive cycles of intraperitoneal chemotherapy. Currently, surgical cytoreduction in the hands of an experienced gynecologic oncologist, followed by intraperitoneal chemotherapy is thought to portend the greatest survival benefit in patients with advanced stage ovarian cancer spectrum cancers. Additional investigation regarding the oncologic outcomes and morbidity of hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy is warranted.

Cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy in epithelial ovarian cancer: State of the art

Advanced stage epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) is difficult to treat with low overall cure rates. A new strategy combining maximal cytoreductive surgery (CRS) with intra-operative hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) has been proposed to treat advanced stage EOC in the primary setting. Numerous small, heterogeneous studies have been conducted exploring outcomes in patients with predominantly advanced, recurrent or refractory disease treated with CRS + HIPEC. Although morbidity rates approaching 35% have been reported, oncologic outcomes are promising. Incorporation of HIPEC for the treatment of primary EOC has continued to gain interest. Several prospective phase 2 clinical trials were recently completed evaluating the impact of CRS + HIPEC in the primary setting. This article will briefly discuss the benefits of optimal surgical cytoreduction and the theoretical basis of intraperitoneal chemotherapy in patients with advanced stage EOC, and will then review existing literature describing oncologic outcomes in EOC patients treated with HIPEC in the primary setting.

Secondary cytoreduction plus oxaliplatin-based HIPEC in platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer patients: a pilot study

OBJECTIVES

To assess feasibility, complications and efficacy of secondary surgical cytoreduction (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) in a selected group of platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer patients.

METHODS

Recurrent ovarian cancer patients with a platinum-free interval of at least 6 months were prospectively enrolled. After complete CRS they were submitted to intraperitoneal perfusion of oxaplatinum (460 mg/m(2)) heated to 41.5 degrees C for 30 min. Then they received systemic chemotherapy with taxotere 75 mg/m(2) and oxaliplatin 100 mg/m(2) for 6 cycles. Patients were followed up routinely until recurrence or death.

RESULTS

Twenty-five recurrent ovarian cancer patients were valuable for the study. The median Platinum Free Interval (PFI) was 25 months (range 7-67). The majority of the patients (76%) had diffuse carcinosis. Nobody had ascites. An optimal residual disease was obtained in all patients. The median duration of CRS+HIPEC was 312 min (range 138-619). Median intensive care unit (ICU) stay was 2 days (1-6), median hospital stay was 13 days (7-30). Post-operative major complications were observed in 7 patients (28%). Post-operative mortality was 0%. With a median follow-up time of 18 months (range 3-38), 24 patients (96%) are alive, but seven women (28%) have relapsed.

CONCLUSIONS

Adequate pre-operative selection can improve feasibility of CRS and HIPEC. Morbidity rate is comparable to aggressive cytoreduction without HIPEC. Although associated with some post-operative morbidity, long-term results are encouraging, waiting for larger series and longer follow-up data.

Intraperitoneal hyperthermic chemotherapy in ovarian cancer

We investigated the effect of intraperitoneal hyperthermic perfusion chemotherapy as consolidation therapy in stage IIIB-IIIC ovarian cancer, following cytoreductive surgery and systemic chemotherapy (cisplatin-cyclophosphamide--six cycles). Disease-free survival, overall survival, and side effects were compared with a control group of patients who refused a second-look surgery and intraperitoneal chemotherapy. In a multicenter prospective trial, 29 patients with complete or optimal cytoreductive surgery and systemic treatment were included in the consolidation group and received intraperitoneal hyperthermic perfusion chemotherapy. Patients were recruited between January 1991 and December 1997. The intraperitoneal hyperthermic perfusion was performed with open-abdomen technique, using physiologic solution containing cisplatin 100 mg/m2, for 60 min in hyperthermic phase (41-43 degrees C). Intraperitoneal hyperthermic perfusion chemotherapy was locally and systemically well tolerated. The consolidation therapy group showed a better 5-year survival rate and lower recurrent disease rate, but differences were not statistically significant. Our results suggest that intraperitoneal hyperthermic perfusion chemotherapy is a feasible, well-tolerated, and promising alternative as consolidation therapy in ovarian cancer.