The role of nuclear matrix protein 22 in the detection of persistent or recurrent transitional-cell cancer of the bladder

Comparison of the clinical usefulness of different urinary tests for the initial detection of bladder cancer: a systematic review

Objectives:

The standard initial approach in patients with hematuria or other symptoms suggestive of bladder cancer (BC) is a combination of cystoscopy and urine cytology (UC); however, UC has low sensitivity particularly in low-grade tumors. The aim of the present review was to critically analyze and compare results in the literature of promising molecular urinary tests for the initial diagnosis of BC.

Methods:

We searched in the Medline and Cochrane Library databases for literature from January 2009 to January 2019, following the PRISMAguidelines.

Results:

In terms of sensitivity, ImmunoCyt showed the highest mean and median value, higher than UC. All tests analyses showed higher mean and median sensitivity when compared with UC. In terms of specificity, only UroVysion and Microsatellite analyses showed mean and median values similar to those of UC, whereas for all other tests, the specificity was lower than UC. It is evident that the sensitivity of UC is particularly low in low grade BC. Urinary tests mainly had improved sensitivity when compared to UC, and ImmunoCyt and UroVysion had the highest improvement in low grade tumors.

Conclusions:

Most of the proposed molecular markers were able to improve the sensitivity with similar or lower specificity when compared to UC. However, variability of results among the different studies was strong. Thus, as of now, none of these markers presented evidences so as to be accepted by international guidelines for diagnosis of BC.

BTA-TRAK Combined with Urinary Cytology is a Reliable Urinary Indicator of Recurrent Transitional Cell Carcinoma (TCC) of the Bladder

This study evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of BTA-TRAK in combination with urinary cytology (UC) in the follow-up of patients with a history of transitional cell carcinoma (TCC) of the bladder. The overall sensitivity of BTA-TRAK, UC and the two tests combined for the detection of recurrences was 82.7% (48/58), 84.2% (48/57) and 91.2% (52/57), respectively. BTA and UC showed comparable sensitivity for superficial recurrences (76.7% (33/43) and 78.5% (33/42), respectively) and for invasive recurrences (100% (15/15)); when the two tests were used in combination, the sensitivity for superficial lesions increased to 88% (37/42). BTA-TRAK was more sensitive than UC for G1 recurrences (81.2% (13/16) vs. 68.7% (11/16)), and when the two tests were combined the sensitivity increased to 87.5% (14/16). The sensitivity of the combination was 100% (15/15) for G3 lesions. The differences in urinary BTA-TRAK levels between patients with recurrences and those without evidence of disease were statistically significant (Wilcoxon's test, p<0.05); among patients with recurrences BTA levels were significantly higher in the invasive and poorly differentiated subtypes. In the series of patients studied by us, BTA-TRAK combined with UC was shown to be a non-invasive, accurate test to predict TCC recurrences. Periodic measurement of BTA-TRAK combined with urinary cytology seems to provide additional information for the monitoring of patients treated for TCC; however, due to the presence of false positive and false negative results, this test cannot replace cystoscopy. In a selected group of patients it could, if combined with cytology and ultrasonography and if correctly used and interpreted, orient the timing and indication for cystoscopy.

CA 19-9 as a serum marker in urothelial carcinoma

Introduction:

CA 19-9 is a carbohydrate antigen related to Lewis A blood group antigen. It is well-known marker for pancreatic carcinoma and is being investigated for other malignancies including carcinoma bladder. We evaluated the role of serum CA 19-9 as a tumor marker and correlated its level with tumor stage and grade.

Materials and Methods:

Seventy-five patients with histologically proven urothelial carcinoma were included in this study as case and 25 healthy volunteers as control. Preoperative 5 ml blood sample was collected. Serum level of CA 19-9 was measured using solid-phase enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay kit. The value of CA19-9 was expressed in U/ml and 37 U/ml was taken as cut-off upper value of normal.

Results:

The range of CA19-9 in patients of urothelial carcinoma was 2 to 122 U/ml with a mean of 26.33±29.28, while in control, it was 8.48±5.01 U/ml (P<0.001). The sensitivity of CA19-9 was 29%. Serum CA19-9 was significantly elevated in invasive disease in comparison with superficial disease (47.17±34.43 vs 16.53±20.13) (P<0.001). Significantly high proportion of patients with invasive disease had value ≥37 U/ml (14/24 [58.3%] vs 8/51 [15.7%]) with P value <0.001. High proportion of high-grade tumor had raised value, 14/34 (41.25%); all patients with metastatic disease had value more than 37 U/ml.

Conclusions:

Serum CA19-9 is a marker of aggressiveness of urothelial carcinoma and is almost invariably raised in patients with metastatic disease. Thus, it may be used as a prognostic marker but not as a screening tool due to its low sensitivity.

Bladder cancer diagnosis and identification of clinically significant disease by combined urinary detection of Mcm5 and nuclear matrix protein 22

Background

Urinary biomarkers for bladder cancer detection are constrained by inadequate sensitivity or specificity. Here we evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of Mcm5, a novel cell cycle biomarker of aberrant growth, alone and in combination with NMP22.

Methods

1677 consecutive patients under investigation for urinary tract malignancy were recruited to a prospective blinded observational study. All patients underwent ultrasound, intravenous urography, cystoscopy, urine culture and cytologic analysis. An immunofluorometric assay was used to measure Mcm5 levels in urine cell sediments. NMP22 urinary levels were determined with the FDA-approved NMP22® Test Kit.

Results

Genito-urinary tract cancers were identified in 210/1564 (13%) patients with an Mcm5 result and in 195/1396 (14%) patients with an NMP22 result. At the assay cut-point where sensitivity and specificity were equal, the Mcm5 test detected primary and recurrent bladder cancers with 69% sensitivity (95% confidence interval = 62–75%) and 93% negative predictive value (95% CI = 92–95%). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for Mcm5 was 0.75 (95% CI = 0.71–0.79) and 0.72 (95% CI = 0.67–0.77) for NMP22. Importantly, Mcm5 combined with NMP22 identified 95% (79/83; 95% CI = 88–99%) of potentially life threatening diagnoses (i.e. grade 3 or carcinoma in situ or stage ≥pT1) with high specificity (72%, 95% CI = 69–74%).

Conclusions

The Mcm5 immunoassay is a non-invasive test for identifying patients with urothelial cancers with similar accuracy to the FDA-approved NMP22 ELISA Test Kit. The combination of Mcm5 plus NMP22 improves the detection of UCC and identifies 95% of clinically significant disease. Trials of a commercially developed Mcm5 assay suitable for an end-user laboratory alongside NMP22 are required to assess their potential clinical utility in improving diagnostic and surveillance care pathways.

Evaluation of CA19-9 as a tumor marker in urothelial malignancy

OBJECTIVE

Carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9) is known to be a marker with a high positive rate in pancreatic cancer. There are limited data on the use of CA19-9 as a tumor marker in bladder carcinoma. We tested the expression of CA19-9 in transitional cell carcinoma (TCC) cell lines and bladder cancer patients to determine its usefulness in clinical applications.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The expression of CA19-9 was determined in six TCC cell lines and 42 bladder carcinoma tissues using two approaches: immunohistochemistry and enzyme immunoassay (EIA) analysis. EIA was used for testing CA19-9 levels in spent medium of cultured TCC cells and the urine of bladder tumor patients.

RESULTS

The CA19-9 value was low in spent media of the MGH-U1, MGH-U1R and MGH-U3 cell lines, but high in that of reactivity in MGH-U4 cells, while negative reactivity was found in high-grade MGH-U1 and MGH-U1R cells, both of which were derived from a stage B, grade 3 TCC. High incidences of negative CA19-9 staining were found in high-grade and invasive tumor tissues: 69.6% (16/23) and 70.8% (17/24), respectively. The sensitivity and specificity of urinary CA19-9 for detecting tumor recurrence were 83.3% and 50.8%, respectively. However, urinary tract infection also resulted in a high false-positive rate.

CONCLUSION

CA19-9 is promising for use as a biomarker for the detection and monitoring of low-grade and low-stage bladder cancer, with the proviso that patients to be tested should be free of infection.

Urine cytology and urine-based markers for bladder urothelial carcinoma detection and monitoring: developments and future prospects

Bladder cancer is currently diagnosed using cystoscopy and cytology in patients with suspicious signs and symptoms. These tests are also used to monitor patients with a history of bladder cancer. The recurrence rate for bladder cancer is high, thus necessitating long-term follow-up. Urine cytology has a high sensitivity and specificity for the detection of high-grade urothelial carcinoma, but lacks the sensitivity to detect low-grade tumors. Recently, multiple noninvasive urine-based bladder cancer tests have been developed. Many markers (BTA stat®, BTA TRAK®, ImmunoCyt™, NMP22® and UroVysion™) have already been approved by the US FDA for bladder cancer surveillance, while other markers are still undergoing development, preclinical and clinical investigation. An ideal bladder cancer test would be noninvasive, highly sensitive and specific, inexpensive, easy to perform and yield highly reproducible results. Many of the tests reviewed herein meet some, but not all, of these criteria.

Comparison of cytology and nuclear matrix protein 22 (NMP 22) for the detection and follow-up of bladder-cancer

OBJECTIVES

This study was designed to determine the clinical usefulness of the Nuclear Matrix Protein 22 (NMP 22) Test for the detection of bladder cancer in comparison to urine cytology.

METHODS

One hundred sixty-four patients suffering from or being suspicious for bladder cancer and 64 healthy controls participated in a prospective study. Freshly voided spot urine samples were taken for cytological examination and determination of NMP 22-levels by enzyme-linked immunoassay.

RESULTS

Sensitivity to the NMP 22 Test according to the tumor grading was (results of cytology in parentheses): GI 25.0% (20.0%), G2 68.2% (59.1%), and G3 100.0% (66.7%); overall sensitivity was 62.5% (45.0%). Sensitivity according to superficial bladder cancer was 46.7% (36.7%), and to invasive bladder cancer 90.0% (70.0%). Specificity was 65.9% (88.9%).

CONCLUSIONS

NMP 22 is a reliable tool for detecting invasive bladder cancer. Results for the well-differentiated superficial bladder cancer occurring frequently are as poor as those obtained with cytology. In addition, benign lesions such as urolithiasis or urinary tract infection lead to false positive results. Therefore, cystoscopy has to be performed when trying to detect and follow-up bladder cancer.

Current bladder cancer tests: unnecessary or beneficial?

Bladder cancer is currently diagnosed using cystoscopy and cytology in patients with suspicious signs and symptoms. These same tests are used to monitor patients with a history of bladder cancer for recurrence. The recurrence rate for bladder cancer is high, thus necessitating long-term follow-up. Urine cytology requires an experienced cytopathologist and is costly. It has high specificity, but low sensitivity for low-grade bladder tumors. Recently many non-invasive bladder cancer tests, utilizing markers found in the urine, have been developed. The FDA has approved several of these for the use is bladder cancer diagnosis, and many others are undergoing development and investigation. An ideal bladder cancer test would be non-invasive, highly sensitive and specific, inexpensive, easy to perform, and yield highly reproducible results. Many of the tests reviewed meet some, but not all, of these criteria.

Clinical usefulness of the novel marker BLCA-4 for the detection of bladder cancer

PURPOSE

Previous studies at our laboratory identified 6 bladder cancer specific nuclear matrix proteins termed BLCA-1 to 6. We recently developed an immunoassay that detects the bladder cancer specific nuclear matrix protein BLCA-4. We analyzed urine samples from patients with bladder cancer, those with spinal cord injury and normal volunteers to determine the BLCA-4 level in these 3 groups.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Urine samples obtained from 51 normal controls, and 54 patients with bladder cancer and 202 with spinal cord injury were tested for BLCA-4. We evaluated the association of BLCA-4 level with tumor grade and stage, urine cytology and bladder cancer history in the nonspinal cord injured population. Similarly we compared parameters associated with BLCA-4, such as spinal cord injury duration, catheterization, history of urinary tract infection, smoking and urine culture, in spinal cord injured patients.

RESULTS

We established a normal cutoff point of 13 optical density units per microg. protein for the BLCA-4 assay. The BLCA-4 level was less than the cutoff in all 51 normal controls, while in 53 of the 55 urine samples (96.4%) of patients with bladder cancer and 38 of the 202 (19%) of spinal cord injured patients urinary BLCA-4 was greater than the cutoff. There was no correlation of any individual factors studied in these cases, including urinary tract infection and urinary BLCA-4.

CONCLUSIONS

Elevated urinary BLCA-4 levels may accurately identify bladder cancer and distinguish these patients from normal individuals. There is no correlation of urinary BLCA-4 with a history of urinary tract infection, smoking, catheterization or cystitis considered independently. Urinary BLCA-4 determination appears to have high potential as a test for screening and monitoring bladder cancer in the general population and in groups at high risk for the disease, such as those with spinal cord injury.