Role of calcium and vitamin D in the prevention and the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis: an overview

Treatment for older men with fractures

Less than 10% of men receive osteoporosis treatment, even after a fracture. A study of 17,683 men revealed that older men, those with spinal fractures, and those taking steroids or antidepressants are more likely to receive treatment after a fracture. Seeing a primary care physician also increases osteoporosis treatment rates.

INTRODUCTION

In 2000, the FDA approved bisphosphonates for the treatment of osteoporosis in men. The purpose of this study is to estimate the frequency of bisphosphonate therapy within 12 months following a fracture and describe patient/physician factors associated with treatment.

METHODS

Health insurance claims for 17,683 men ≥ 65 years of age, who had a claim for an incident fracture from 2000 to 2005, were followed for at least 6 months post-fracture for the initiation of treatment with a bisphosphonate. Patient characteristics, diagnostic procedures, therapies, co-morbidities, and provider characteristics were compared for men who received treatment with those who did not.

RESULTS

Eight percent of men (n = 1,434) received bisphosphonate therapy. Overall treatment increased from 7% in 2001 to 9% in 2005 (p < 0.001). Treatment for hip fractures remained at 7% (p = 0.747). Treatment increased with age: 6% in men aged 65-69 compared to 11.6% in men aged 85-89 (p < 0.001). Factors associated with treatment included: diagnosis of osteoporosis (OR = 8.8; 95% CI, 7.7, 10.4), glucocorticoid therapy (OR = 3.2; 95% CI, 2.4, 4.3), bone mineral density measurement (OR = 3.4; 95% CI, 2.9, 4.0), and antidepressant therapy with tricyclics (OR = 2.0; 95% CI, 1.2, 3.5) or selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (OR = 1.7; 95% CI, 1.3, 2.4). Men with vertebral fractures (OR = 2.2; 95% CI, 1.8, 2.6) and men seen by primary physicians (OR = 2.6; 95% CI, 2.3, 3.1) were more likely to receive treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Less than 10% of men received bisphosphonate therapy following a low-impact fracture. Men with a primary physician were more likely to receive bisphosphonate therapy; however, <25% of men were seen by a primary physician.

Calcium intake in elderly patients with hip fractures

BACKGROUND

Dietary calcium intake is assumed important in the prevention and treatment of osteoporosis. However, people in countries with a high calcium intake from commodities such as milk and milk products have a high incidence of hip fracture. The effect and influence of calcium intake in the prevention of osteoporotic fracture vary from different studies.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate premorbid daily calcium intake in patients with low energy hip fractures during four consecutive years.

DESIGN

In total 120 patients (mean age 78+/-8.5 (SD) years) were included between 2002 and 2005. The patients answered a structured food frequency questionnaire (FFQ) and interviews on patients' daily calcium intake from food and supplements took place during a 6-month period before the fracture. Dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) was performed in a subgroup of 15 patients.

RESULTS

The mean daily calcium intake from food and supplementation was 970+/-500 mg. However, 38% of patients had an intake below the recommended 800 mg/day. There was no significant relationship between calcium intake and age, gender, bone mineral density, serum calcium or albumin, type of fracture or body mass index. The mean free plasma calcium concentration was 2.3+/-0.1, i.e. within the reference limit. In 2005, 80% of the patients who underwent DEXA had manifest osteoporosis. There was a trend towards decreased calcium intake over the observation period, with a mean calcium intake below 800 mg/day in 2005.

CONCLUSIONS

Hip fracture patients had a mean calcium intake above the recommended daily intake, as assessed by a FFQ. However, more than one-third of patients had an intake below the recommended 800 mg/day. The intake appeared to decrease over the investigated years. The relationship between calcium intake and fracture susceptibility is complex.

Clinical Outcome of Salmon Calcitonin Nasal Spray Treatment in Postmenopausal Women after Total Hip Arthroplasty

OBJECTIVE

The increasing rate of hip fractures is giving rise to a number of socio-economic problems for the aging community. In addition to being unable to resume their previous living habits, many patients fail to achieve full functional recovery after the fractures. Total hip arthroplasty (THA) is a successful operation for the majority of patients with all forms of hip fractures, being performed increasingly often throughout the world. Revision rates for THA range up to 20% per year. Aseptic loosening is the reason for 75% of the revisions. An additional problem post-THA is the rate of heterotopic soft tissue calcification after THA, resulting in severely impaired function, pain, and a reduced range of hip movement.

SUBJECTS

In an open study, 37 women who had undergone cementless THA after accidental hip fractures were treated twice daily with 200 IU of salmon calcitonin nasal spray for 12 months. Simultaneously the patients received one bag of 1,000 mg calcium plus 880 IU vitamin D daily throughout the treatment period of 1 year. A parallel group of 38 women with a similar clinical status in terms of hip fractures and cementless THA were treated with only one bag of 1,000 mg calcium plus 880 IU vitamin D daily through the treatment period.

RESULTS

The results of this 12-month clinical trial show that 200 IU of salmon calcitonin nasal spray per day significantly improves the clinical outcome of postmenopausal elderly women following THA. Treatment with a salmon calcitonin nasal spray significantly reduces bone turnover, loss of bone density, and pain. The functional status of the patients was improved and the risk of falling reduced by rehabilitation during the observation period of 12 months. Additionally, calcitonin promoted the repair of hip fractures and was associated with a significantly lesser rate of refractures as well as periprosthetic ossifications.

CONCLUSION

The increasing revision rate for THA during the first year and the patient's problem of resuming their previous living habits are the main foci of our study. Calcitonin nasal spray seems to cause few side effects. The additive treatment appears to improve the clinical outcome of THA in elderly postmenopausal women.

Skeletal Morbidity in Men with Prostate Cancer: Quality-of-Life Considerations throughout the Continuum of Care

OBJECTIVE

With current treatments, men usually survive many years after being diagnosed with prostate cancer. However, without supportive care, the systemic effects of prostate cancer and therapies such as androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) can undermine skeletal integrity, resulting in skeletal complications that may erode quality of life (QOL). Prostate cancer patients are at risk for fractures from cancer treatment-induced bone loss. In addition, they are also at risk for pathologic fractures, severe bone pain, and other sequelae from bone metastases, which almost invariably occur during the progression of prostate cancer. This review investigates the incidence and pathophysiology of bone loss and skeletal morbidity in prostate cancer patients and reviews available treatment options for maintaining skeletal health throughout the continuum of care for these patients.

METHODS

Studies were identified through MEDLINE searches, review of bibliographies of relevant articles, and review of abstracts from national meetings.

RESULTS

Several supportive care options are available to prevent generalized and localized bone loss, including calcium and vitamin D supplements and bisphosphonates. Oral calcium and vitamin D supplementation alone, however, appears to be insufficient to prevent bone loss during ADT. Zoledronic acid administered every 3 months during ADT or every 3 to 4 weeks for patients with bone metastases can reverse bone loss and reduce skeletal morbidity, respectively, in patients with prostate cancer.

CONCLUSIONS

Skeletal complications contribute to the erosion of QOL in prostate cancer patients. Palliative care can provide important benefits to these patients. Some agents, such as zoledronic acid, may provide skeletal health benefits throughout the course of prostate cancer progression. Further investigations of the QOL impact of these benefits are warranted.

Bone loss and the evolving role of bisphosphonate therapy in prostate cancer

Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) can result in significant loss of bone mineral density (BMD) but to date, there are no prospective studies that document the true severity of bone loss and resulting fracture rates. In the general population, however, the incidence of low BMD is increasing in elderly men. Men suffer more morbidity and mortality from fractures associated with low BMD than women. Problems of underdiagnosis and undertreatment in men can be addressed with enhanced awareness of the risk factors for bone loss in men and the available treatment options. Guidelines for diagnosis of low BMD in women can probably be applied to men. Treatment options have not been studied as extensively in men. For men treated with ADT for prostate cancer, however, use of intravenous zoledronic acid at the initiation of ADT has been shown to prevent and even reverse bone loss. Although the routine use of bisphosphonates to prevent bone loss is not yet recommended, zoledronic acid is a logical choice of therapy in men who have low BMD at baseline or who develop bone loss during the course of therapy. In addition to its effects on BMD, zoledronic acid has also been shown to decrease skeletal morbidity in men with metastatic hormone-refractory prostate cancer. Whether zoledronic acid or other bisphosphonates might actually prevent or delay the development of bone metastases remains to be studied in randomized clinical trials.

Biomarkers in disease and health

Biomarkers have considerable potential in aiding the understanding of the relationship between diet and disease or health. However, to assess the role, relevance and importance of biomarkers on a case by case basis it is essential to understand and prioritise the principal diet and health issues. In the majority of cases, dietary compounds are only weakly biologically active in the short term, have multiple targets and can be both beneficial and deleterious. This poses particular problems in determining the net effect of types of foods on health. In principle, a biomarker should be able to contribute to this debate by allowing the measurement of exposure and by acting as an indicator either of a deleterious or of an enhanced health effect prior to the final outcome. In this review, the examples chosen - cancer (stomach, colon/rectal, breast); coronary heart disease and osteoporosis - reflect three major diet-related disease issues. In each case the onset of the disease has a genetic determinant which may be exacerbated or delayed by diet. Perhaps the most important factor is that in each case the disease, once manifest, is difficult to influence in a positive way by diet alone. This then suggests that the emphasis for biomarker studies should focus on predictive biomarkers which can be used to help in the development of dietary strategies which will minimise the risk and be of greater benefit.

Calcium and vitamin D in osteoporosis

Calcium and vitamin D are useful adjunctive therapies in the prevention and treatment of osteoporosis. Peak BMD is optimally achieved with sustained optimal calcium and vitamin D intakes. Calcium and vitamin D intakes continue to be important after the third decade and into senescence. Although calcium and vitamin D are not therapies to be used alone to prevent early postmenopausal bone loss, they assume more prominent roles in late menopause and in the elderly to preserve bone health with advancing age. Calcium and vitamin D supplementation is an important adjunctive therapy to use together with antiresorptive therapies.

Treatment of osteoporosis: are physicians missing an opportunity?

BACKGROUND

Medical treatment of women with established osteoporosis may decrease the incidence of future fractures. Postmenopausal women who have sustained a distal radial fracture have decreased bone-mineral density and nearly twice the risk of a future hip fracture. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the adequacy of diagnosis and treatment of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women following an acute fracture of the distal part of the radius.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was performed with use of a claims database that includes more than three million patients, from thirty states, enrolled in multiple health plans. All women, fifty-five years of age or older, who sustained a distal radial fracture between July 1, 1994, and June 30, 1997, were identified in the database. Only patients with at least six months of continuous and complete medical and pharmaceutical health-care coverage from the date of the fracture were enrolled, to ensure that all health-care claims would be captured in the database. This cohort of patients was then evaluated to determine the proportion who had undergone either a diagnostic bone-density scan or treatment with any recommended medication for established osteoporosis (estrogen, a bisphosphonate, or calcitonin) within six months following the fracture.

RESULTS

A search of the database identified 1,162 women, fifty-five years of age or older, who had a distal radial fracture. Of these 1,162 patients, thirty-three (2.8 percent) underwent a bone-density scan and 266 (22.9 percent) were treated with at least one of the medications approved for treatment of established osteoporosis. Twenty women had both a bone-density scan and drug treatment. Therefore, only 279 (24.0 percent) of the 1,162 women who sustained a distal radial fracture underwent either diagnostic evaluation or treatment of osteoporosis. There was a significant decrease in the rate of treatment of osteoporosis with increasing patient age at the time of the fracture (p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Current physician practice may be inadequate for the diagnosis and treatment of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women who have sustained a distal radial fracture.

Prescription attitudes among gynecologists towards two particular risk factors of osteoporosis: the patient's age and her bone mineral density

OBJECTIVE

The present report assesses, among Belgian gynecologists, the effect of age and bone mineral density on osteoporosis prescription strategy in postmenopausal women.

METHODS

Charts of postmenopausal women were summarized. We constructed cases by modifying some parameters. Ten years of age were added or subtracted to the real age of the patient. The bone mineral density (BMD) result was also modified (three levels: normal BMD, osteopenia, osteoporosis). A total of 612 cases were constructed. Twelve cases were sent out of these 612 files to every Belgian gynecologist (n = 1010). For each chart the gynecologists were asked whether they would treat the patient with HRT. They were also asked whether they would prescribe other therapies than HRT and if so, which ones.

RESULTS

The chance to have an osteoporosis prevention or treatment prescribed increased when BMD decreased (respectively 57.4% for normal BMD, 73.1% for osteopenia cases and 89.4% for osteoporosis cases; P < 0.001). HRT was the most frequently prescribed medication (67% of the cases), but its prescription rate does not reflect only osteoporosis prevention. Nevertheless, for similar cases with osteopenia, the HRT prescription rate increased by a factor 1.25 and for similar cases with osteoporosis, HRT prescription rate increased by a factor 1.39. Calcium was the 2nd most frequent prescribed regimen. It was prescribed in 17% of the cases. A 3.4-fold increase for osteopenia cases and 7.6-fold increase for osteoporosis cases was observed, compared to women with normal BMD. When calcium was prescribed, it was in association with HRT in 64% of the osteopenia cases and in 76% of osteoporosis cases. Other drugs were less often prescribed. For the "younger age group", that is, with a mean age of 55 years, a prescription rate of 82.9% for any osteoporosis regimen was reached, whereas in the age group that was 10 years older a 20% lower prescription rate was reached (62.6%, P < 0.001). This was mostly due to a decrease in HRT prescription.

CONCLUSIONS

Prescription of medication known to reduce osteoporosis occurred more often in cases with low BMD. In the older patients with osteoporosis, gynecologists prescribed HRT less frequently. This was not compensated by a higher prescription rate of other medication.

Increase of axial and appendicular trabecular and cortical bone density in established osteoporosis with intermittent nasal salmon calcitonin therapy

The aim of this study was to examine the effect of intranasal administration of salmon calcitonin to a group of 24 postmenopausal women with severe, established osteoporosis (t score < -2.5 SD) and more than one vertebral fracture. The patients were treated with 200 IU of nasal salmon calcitonin daily for 2 months with a subsequent pause of 2 months (3 cycles) and 500 mg calcium daily over a total of 12 months in an open randomized study. The patients were compared with an age matched control group of 18 women of a similar clinical status who were treated with calcium and vitamin D only. In the nasal calcitonin treatment group an increase in the trabecular axial bone density of 2.8% was achieved, as well as increase in trabecular appendicular (forearm) bone density of 1.6%, together with a cortical bone density increase of 1.8% axial and 1% appendicular. Initially, elevated values of urinary deoxypyridinoline were found in 12 women in the nasal calcitonin treatment group; these levels returned to normal under salmon calcitonin nasal therapy and documented the inhibition of increased osteoclastic activity. Cyclic intermittent calcitonin nasal therapy led to a general increase in trabecular and cortical axial and appendicular bone density, marked alleviation of the subjective sensation of pain, and a reduction in the daily dose of accompanying nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs by 50%.