Treatment of benzodiazepine withdrawal symptoms with carbamazepine

Bipolar mania and epilepsy pathophysiology and treatment may converge in purine metabolism: A new perspective on available evidence

Decreased ATPergic signaling is an increasingly recognized pathophysiology in bipolar mania disease models. In parallel, adenosine deficit is increasingly recognized in epilepsy pathophysiology. Under-recognized ATP and/or adenosine-increasing mechanisms of several antimanic and antiseizure therapies including lithium, valproate, carbamazepine, and ECT suggest a fundamental pathogenic role of adenosine deficit in bipolar mania to match the established role of adenosine deficit in epilepsy. The depletion of adenosine-derivatives within the purine cycle is expected to result in a compensatory increase in oxopurines (uric acid precursors) and secondarily increased uric acid, observed in both bipolar mania and epilepsy. Cortisol-based inhibition of purine conversion to adenosine-derivatives may be reflected in observed uric acid increases and the well-established contribution of cortisol to both bipolar mania and epilepsy pathology. Cortisol-inhibited conversion from IMP to AMP as precursor of both ATP and adenosine may represent a mechanism for treatment resistance common in both bipolar mania and epilepsy. Anti-cortisol therapies may therefore augment other treatments both in bipolar mania and epilepsy. Evidence linking (i) adenosine deficit with a decreased need for sleep, (ii) IMP/cGMP excess with compulsive hypersexuality, and (iii) guanosine excess with grandiose delusions may converge to suggest a novel theory of bipolar mania as a condition characterized by disrupted purine metabolism. The potential for disease-modification and prevention related to adenosine-mediated epigenetic changes in epilepsy may be mirrored in mania. Evaluating the purinergic effects of existing agents and validating purine dysregulation may improve diagnosis and treatment in bipolar mania and epilepsy and provide specific targets for drug development.

Review: Adjunctive pharmacologic approaches for benzodiazepine tapers

BACKGROUND

Many patients require discontinuation of benzodiazepines due to a reduction in drug efficacy over time, the development of a sedative use disorder, or unwanted side effects. Benzodiazepine discontinuation can pose a significant challenge for prescribing clinicians due to potential withdrawal symptoms and a recurrence of psychiatric complaints.

METHODS

A PubMed literature search was conducted using the medical subject heading of benzodiazepines in combination with the following key words: discontinuation, withdrawal, detoxification, cessation, dependence, addiction, substance use disorders, or long term. Twenty-one studies met the search criteria.

RESULTS

Few medications facilitated the successful discontinuation of benzodiazepines or relief from benzodiazepine withdrawal symptoms.

CONCLUSIONS

Studies were heterogeneous with respect to sample selection, sample size, and outcome measures. Medications targeting insomnia yielded mixed results. Similarly, studies of agents targeting anxiety symptoms demonstrated inconsistent findings in the reduction of anxiety, improvement in withdrawal symptoms, or enhancement of benzodiazepine completion rates. Anticonvulsants have supporting evidence from small case reports; carbamazepine shows some potential in assisting taper completion and reducing withdrawal severity. These conclusions should be considered in light of a number of inconsistencies across studies in the literature. The results of this review article highlight the need for additional research on optimal strategies for facilitating successful benzodiazepine tapers.

Analysis of EEG dynamics in epileptic children during carbamazepine therapy

Background: The analysis of the dynamics of background EEG characteristics on the different stages of CBZtherapy is very important for revealing the possible early predictors of benefit/adverse effects of the treatment and optimizing the anti-epileptic therapy. Objective: Evaluate the carbamazepine (CBZ) effect on the dynamics of EEG pattern in epileptic children at different stages of CBZ-monotherapy. Methods: Forty-five children (aged 3-9) with partial epilepsy were investigated. The EEG was recorded at rest and during functional tests prior to CBZ administration and three and six months after the initiation of CBZtherapy. Epileptiform graphoelements and baseline EEG activities were analyzed. Results: Following three months of CBZ-therapy an absolute power value in the low frequency bands of EEG spectrum increased while an average frequency of alpha waves decreased. During rest, CBZ reduced density of spontaneous epileptiform graphoelements and generalized epileptiform bursts. Generalized paroxysmal bursts decreased under functional tests. The EEG pattern maintained the same characteristics for six months. Deterioration of EEG pattern and clinical signs was observed in four children. Conclusion: Elevation of indices of low frequency bands, especially in occipital and parietal regions, concomitant with reduction of epileptiform elements and seizure frequency three months after initiation of therapy suggests that CBZ in appropriate doses might be continued. Otherwise, the strategy of antiepileptic therapy should be revised.

BAP updated guidelines: evidence-based guidelines for the pharmacological management of substance abuse, harmful use, addiction and comorbidity: recommendations from BAP

The British Association for Psychopharmacology guidelines for the treatment of substance abuse, harmful use, addiction and comorbidity with psychiatric disorders primarily focus on their pharmacological management. They are based explicitly on the available evidence and presented as recommendations to aid clinical decision making for practitioners alongside a detailed review of the evidence. A consensus meeting, involving experts in the treatment of these disorders, reviewed key areas and considered the strength of the evidence and clinical implications. The guidelines were drawn up after feedback from participants. The guidelines primarily cover the pharmacological management of withdrawal, short- and long-term substitution, maintenance of abstinence and prevention of complications, where appropriate, for substance abuse or harmful use or addiction as well management in pregnancy, comorbidity with psychiatric disorders and in younger and older people.

Antiepileptic drugs in the treatment of psychiatric disorders

The clinical interface between psychiatry and neurology is epilepsy; the pharmacological expression of this interface is antiepileptic drugs (AEDs), as they are used to treat both epilepsy and psychiatric disorders, especially bipolar disorders. The prevalence of psychiatric comorbidity and the risk of suicidal behavior/ideation/suicide are markedly increased in patients with epilepsy (PWE). Though AEDs receive initial indications for the treatment of epilepsy, currently the majority of AEDs are used to treat pain and psychiatric disorders. Thus in selecting the appropriate AEDs for treatment of PWE, consideration should be given to which AEDs best treat the epileptic disorder and the psychiatric comorbidity. This review is an overview of 21 AEDs in which negative psychotropic properties, approved indications in psychiatry, off-label studied uses in psychiatry, and principal uses in psychiatry are presented with literature review. A total of 40 psychiatric uses have been identified. Of the 21 AEDs reviewed, only 5 have U.S. Food and Drug Administration and/or European Medicines Agency psychiatric approval for limited uses; the majority of AEDs are used off-label. Many of these off-label uses are based on case reports, open-label studies, and poorly controlled or small-sample-size studies. In some instances, off-label use persists in the face of negative pivotal trials. Further placebo-controlled (augmentation and monotherapy) parallel-arm research with active comparators is required in the complex field of AED treatment of psychiatric disorders to minimize the treatment gap not only for PWE with psychiatric disorders, but also for psychiatric patients who would benefit from properly studied AEDs while minimizing adverse effects.

Treatment of polydrug-using opiate dependents during withdrawal: towards a standardisation of treatment

BACKGROUND

The growing tendency among opioid addicts to misuse multiple other drugs should lead clinicians and researchers to search for new pharmacological strategies in order to prevent life-threatening complications and minimize withdrawal symptoms during polydrug detoxification.

METHODS

A non-randomised, open-label in-patient detoxification study was used to compare the short-time efficacy of a standardised regimen comprising 6 days Buprenorphine and 10 days Valproate (BPN/VPA) (n = 12) to a control group (n = 50) who took a 10-day traditional Clonidine/Carbamazepine (CLN/CBZ) regimen. Sixty-two dependent subjects admitted to a detoxification unit were included, all dependent on at least opioids and benzodiazepines. Other dependencies were not excluded.

RESULTS

In the BPN/VPA group, 8 out of 12 patients (67%) completed treatment compared with 25 of 50 patients (50%) in the CLN/CBZ group; this difference between the groups was non-significant (p = 0.15). Withdrawal symptoms were reduced in both groups, but only the BPN/VPA group achieved a reduction in withdrawal symptoms from day one. The difference between the two groups was significantly in favour of the BPN/VPA group for days 2 (p < 0.001), 3 (p < 0.05), 4 (p < 0.001), 5 (p < 0.01), 7 (p < 0.01) and 8 (p < 0.05). The BPN/VPA combination did not affect blood pressure, pulse or liver function, and the total burden of side-effects was experienced as modest. There appeared to be no pharmacological interactions of clinical concern, based on measurement of Buprenorphine and Valproate serum levels. Both the patients and the staff were satisfied with the standardised treatment combination.

CONCLUSION

Overall, the combination of Buprenorphine and Valproate seems to be a safe and promising method for treating multiple drug withdrawal symptoms. The results of this study suggest that the BPN/VPA combination is potentially a better detoxification treatment for polydrug withdrawal than the traditional treatment with Clonidine and Carbamazepine. However, a randomised, double-blind study with a larger sample size to confirm our results is recommended.

Strategies for discontinuing long-term benzodiazepine use: meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The prevalence of benzodiazepine consumption in European countries remains at 2-3% of the general population despite the well-documented disadvantages of long-term use.

AIMS

To review systematically the success rates of different benzodiazepine discontinuation strategies.

METHOD

Meta-analysis of comparable intervention studies.

RESULTS

Twenty-nine articles met inclusion criteria. Two groups of interventions were identified; minimal intervention (e.g. giving simple advice in the form of a letter or meeting to a large group of people; n=3), and systematic discontinuation (defined as treatment programmes led by a physician or psychologist; n=26). Both were found to be significantly more effective than treatment as usual: minimal interventions (pooled OR=2.8, 95% CI 1.6-5.1); systematic discontinuation alone (one study, OR=6.1, 95% CI 2.0-18.6). Augmentation of systematic discontinuation with imipramine (two studies, OR=3.1, 95% CI 1.1-9.4) or group cognitive-behavioural therapy for patients with insomnia (two studies, OR=5.5, 95% CI 2.3-14.2) was superior to systematic discontinuation alone.

CONCLUSIONS

Evidence was found for the efficacy of stepped care (minimal intervention followed by systematic discontinuation alone) in discontinuing long-term benzodiazepine use.

Mood and affect during detoxification of opiate addicts: a comparison of buprenorphine versus methadone

Twenty-six in-patients with Diagnostic and Statistical Manual version IV (DSM-IV) criteria for opioid dependence were selected at random to receive either a combination of an 11-day low-dose buprenorphine and a 14-day carbamazepine regimen (n = 14) or a combination of an 11-day methadone and a 14-day carbamazepine regimen (n = 12) in a double-blind, randomized 14-day in-patient detoxification treatment. Patients with buprenorphine and carbamazepine showed a significantly better psychological state after the first and second weeks of treatment. Above all, the buprenorphine-treated patients demonstrated a less marked tiredness, sensitiveness and depressive state as well as a more prominent elevated mood during the detoxification process. Seven non-completers (after 7 days: four of 12 = 33.3%; after 14 days: seven of 12 = 58.3%) were treated with methadone and carbamazepine and five non-completers (after 7 days: two of 14 = 14.3%; after 14 days: five of 14 = 35.7%) received buprenorphine and carbamazepine. The difference in the overall dropout rate after day 14 was not significant. The present study supports the hypothesis that the combination of buprenorphine and carbamazepine leads to a better clinical outcome than does a combination of methadone and carbamazepine in the detoxification of opioid addicts with additional multiple drug abuse. The buprenorphine and carbamazepine-regimen provides a more effective short-term relief of affective disturbances than does methadone and carbamazepine. No severe side effects occurred during the treatment period in both groups.

Buprenorphine and carbamazepine as a treatment for detoxification of opiate addicts with multiple drug misuse: a pilot study

The growing tendency of opioid addicts to misuse multiple other drugs leads to the investigation of new pharmacostrategies to prevent patients from suffering life-threatening complications and minimize the withdrawal symptoms. The short-term efficacy of a 10-day low-dose buprenorphine/19-day carbamazepine regime (n = 15) to a 14-day oxazepam/19-day carbamazepine regime (n = 12) in an open-labelled 21-day inpatient detoxification treatment was compared. Twenty-seven men and women dependent on opioids and misusing other drugs admitted to a detoxification unit were included in this protocol. Eighteen of 27 patients (67%) completed the study. Four non-completers (27%) received buprenorphine/carbamazepine (four of 15) and five non-completers (42%) were treated with oxazepam/carbamzepine (five of 12), but the difference in the dropout rate between the two treatment strategies was not significant.The buprenorphine/carbamazepine regime provided significantly more effective relief of withdrawal symptoms during the first week of treatment. No severe side effects occurred during treatment in both groups. The present study supports the hypothesis that buprenorphine/carbamazepine is more effective than oxazepam/carbamazepine in rapid opioid detoxification in patients with additional multiple drug misuse and both regimens were safe with no unexpected side effects.

The association carbamazepine-mianserin in opiate withdrawal: a double blind pilot study versus clonidine

Our clinic has fortuitously developed the therapeutic use of the association of mianserin (maximum daily dose 90 mg) and carbamazepine (maximum daily dose 400 mg) in opiate withdrawal management. If animal studies have suggested efficacy of mianserin in such indication, no human studies have been performed. To test the efficacy of such an association, a comparison was made to clonidine (maximum daily dose 0.600 mg) in a one week treatment period according to a double blind pilot study design. Thirty-two patients were included (16 in each treatment group). The two treatments did not differ in the intensity of the withdrawal, according to the rate of retention in treatment and symptoms, and the psychic distress which were auto-evaluated every other day with the Opiate Withdrawal Questionnaire and several Visual Analog Scales (VAS). The clonidine group, however, scored significantly higher (P < 0.05) on the VAS rating of the global feeling of satisfaction on the last day. The patients in the mianserin group fortuitously had a moderately lower number of daily heroin intakes but there was no significant correlation between this variable and the global OWQ scores on Days 1, 3, 5 and 7. Given the size of the groups, we cannot conclude that the association carbamazepine-mianserin is as effective as clonidine, but a real effectiveness is probable. A study versus placebo would be necessary to draw more definitive conclusions.

The histories of withdrawal convulsions and delirium tremens in 1648 alcohol dependent subjects

A small proportion of alcohol-dependent men and women experience delirium tremens (DTs) and/or convulsions during alcohol withdrawal. While some characteristics of individuals most likely to show these severe sequelae of the abstinence syndrome have been described, it is not clear whether these risk factors operate independently in their association with severe withdrawal. The Semi-Structured Assessment for the Genetics of Alcoholism (SSAGA) interview was used to evaluate 1648 alcohol dependent men and women (including 540 women). The background characteristics and drinking histories of the 160 men and 51 women (12.8% of the subjects) who reported ever having had at least one episode of DTs and/or convulsions during withdrawal were compared with the characteristics of the remaining alcohol dependent individuals. Compared to other alcohol-dependent subjects, those with histories of severe withdrawal reported a greater maximum number of drinks in any 24-hour period (40.9 +/- 25.71 versus 24.9 +/- 17.72), more withdrawal episodes (28.2 +/- 33.74 versus 15.9 +/- 26.84), more non-medicinal use of sedative-hypnotics (56.4% versus 32.9%) and a greater number of medical problems. Hierarchical logistic regression analysis revealed that the most powerful differences between those with histories of more and less severe withdrawals related to the maximum number of drinks per day and the total number of withdrawal episodes. The remaining variables still added significantly to the relationship to more severe withdrawal. The etiology of DTs and convulsions is complex and involves the interaction of diverse characteristics representing relatively unique domains. It is hoped that these data will help clinicians identify individuals most likely to have experienced severe withdrawal syndromes and will aid researchers attempting to understand more about the etiology of these problems.