Proposed association between ileoanal j-pouch perforation and rapid consumption of a high-calorie, high-fiber meal: report of two cases

Two-time perforation of the ileal J-pouch 6 and 18 years after restorative proctocolectomy and ileal pouch–anal anastomosis for familial adenomatous polyposis: a case report

Background

Perforation of the ileal J-pouch after restorative proctocolectomy and ileal pouch–anal anastomosis are extremely rare. There has been no report of perforation of the ileal J-pouch occurring twice over several years. We report the first case of perforation at 6 and 18 years following restorative proctocolectomy.

Case presentation

The patient was a 52-year-old man who underwent a two-stage restorative proctocolectomy with a hand-sewn ileal J-pouch anal anastomosis due to familial adenomatous polyposis and sigmoid colon cancer at 34 years of age. At the age of 40, he underwent ileal pouch resection at its blind end, abdominal drainage, and anastomotic dilatation. The patient had a perforation of the blind end of the ileal J-pouch from increased intraluminal pressure, with anastomotic stricture and pervasive peritonitis. The patient had no symptoms for a few years; however, 18 years after the initial surgery and 12 years after the first perforation, the patient presented with severe abdominal pain. Computed tomography demonstrated pneumoperitoneum; accordingly, laparotomy was performed. Upon opening the abdominal cavity, contaminated ascites and inflammatory changes were documented involving the ileum. A 2-mm perforation involving the blind end of the ileal J-pouch was also observed and repaired, followed by temporary loop ileostomy creation. Postoperative endoscopy revealed an ulcer in the ileal J-pouch and a stricture located directly at the anastomosis.

Conclusions

The blind end of the J-pouch repeatedly perforated over the years due to recurrent anastomotic stricture. Regular surveillance is, therefore, considered necessary for the release of stricture, maintenance of anastomotic patency, and prevention of ileal J-pouch perforation.

Prospective evaluation of ileoanal pouch characteristics measured by barostat

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to evaluate pouch sensory and motor characteristics prospectively during the first postoperative year and to compare those with rectal characteristics.

METHODS

Twelve patients with an ileoanal J-pouch were studied at 3 and 12 months postoperatively. The results were compared with those obtained in 12 healthy controls. Visceral compliance was assessed using an electronic barostat by a pressure distention procedure, during which sensitivity was also scored by visual analog scales. The response to a meal was assessed during set pressure.

RESULTS

During the first postoperative year, pouch compliance increased significantly from 7.2 +/- 0.6 to 10.7 +/- 0.9 ml/mmHg (rectal compliance 10.6 +/- 1.1 ml/mmHg). The increase in pouch compliance significantly influences the 24-hour stool frequency (P = 0.42). Visceroperception scores remained unchanged. Postprandial decrease in intrabag volume was more pronounced in patients (45 +/- 13 percent at 3 months, 32 +/- 15 percent at 12 months) than in controls (9 +/- 6 percent, < 0.05), and residual postprandial bag volumes were significantly lower in patients at 3 months compared with patients at 12 months.

CONCLUSIONS

Ileoanal pouch compliance increases significantly during the first postoperative year to values in the range of rectal compliance. The increase in pouch compliance is related to a decrease in 24-hour stool frequency. Postprandial bag volumes increase during the first postoperative year but remain significantly smaller than in the rectum. Pouch sensitivity does not change.

Ileoanal pouch function is related to postprandial pouch tone

BACKGROUND

Functional impairments are frequently observed in patients with an ileoanal pouch. Meal ingestion increases pouch tone and motility. Little is known, however, about the influence of meal-stimulated pouch characteristics on pouch function. The aim was to characterize basal and postprandial pouch motor and sensory characteristics in relation to clinical pouch function in patients with an ileoanal pouch.

METHODS

Nineteen patients with an ileoanal pouch, without faecal incontinence but with either a high stool frequency (n = 8) or an adequate stool frequency (n = 11), underwent pressure distension of the pouch, by which pouch compliance and sensitivity characteristics were assessed using an electronic barostat. A set pressure procedure was performed to assess the influence of a meal on pouch tone and motility.

RESULTS

Mean(s.d.) compliance was 10(6) and 11(4) ml/mmHg in the groups with poor and adequate pouch function respectively (P not significant). Mean(s.d.) visual analogue scale scores (0-10 cm) for urge at the highest pressure of 28 mmHg were 2.3(1.0) versus 2.3(2.4) cm respectively (P not significant); those for pain were 0.8(1.0) versus 0.5(0.7) (P not significant). Postprandially mean(s.d.) pouch volume decreased by 70(24) per cent in the group with poor pouch function and 29(25) per cent in the group with adequate pouch function (P < 0.01). The frequency and amplitude of phasic pouch contractions increased significantly postprandially, but no differences in motility characteristics were observed between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

In patients with uniform pouch design and follow-up after pouch construction, pouch compliance and sensitivity were no different between patients with normal and high stool frequency; however, postprandial pouch tone was increased significantly in patients with a high stool frequency.