Expression and purification of E2/NS1 protein of hepatitis C virus and detection of anti-E2/NS1 antibodies in chronic liver disease patients

Efficacy of Erenumab in the Treatment of Trigeminal Neuralgia: A Retrospective Case Series

Objective

Trigeminal neuralgia (TN) is a chronic, often refractory, pain condition, which adversely affects the lives of patients. Current treatments are only mildly effective. Anti-calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) monoclonal antibodies have been successfully studied in the treatment of migraines. CGRP plays a role in both TN and migraine. It is prudent to attempt CGRP monoclonal antibody therapy in TN. Erenumab, a human anti-CGRP monoclonal antibody medication, modulates CGRP, which is elevated in patients with TN. The primary objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of erenumab for patients with TN.

Methods

Retrospective analysis was performed on data collected from 10 patients diagnosed with TN and treated with erenumab for 6 months. Pain was tracked using a numeric pain rating scale (NPRS) from 0 to 10. The effect of erenumab on NPRS after 6 months' time was the primary end point. Secondary end points included side effects to therapy, improvement in headache frequency in those with comorbid migraine, evaluating mood following therapy, and global mood improvement using scale (worse, no change, improved).

Results

Nine of 10 patients (90.0%) reported improvement in pain severity and in global mood improvement. Three patients reported resolution of anxiety and/or depression. Side effects were minimal, with 3 patients reporting constipation, injection site reactions, or both.

Conclusions

Based on these results, erenumab appears to be an efficacious treatment option for patients with refractory TN. Patients experienced improvement in pain, reduced frequency of headache, and improvement in mood. Treatment was well tolerated with only mild side effects reported.

Classification of Evidence

This study provides Class IV evidence that erenumab increases the probability of improved pain control in patients with medication-resistant TN.

Analgesic efficacy and safety of medical therapy alone vs combined medical therapy and extraoral glossopharyngeal nerve block in glossopharyngeal neuralgia

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study is to compare medical therapy alone and medical therapy with add on extraoral glossopharyngeal nerve block in terms of analgesic efficacy and hemodynamic safety in patients with glossopharyngeal neuralgia (GPN). As GPN is a rare disease, our secondary targets were to review the demographic profile of the disease, clinical profile, and any associations with the disease.

DESIGN

This was a randomized, prospective, active-controlled, parallel group study conducted from 2007 to 2009 to determine the safety and efficacy of extraoral glossopharyngeal nerve block in GPN and compare it with pharmacological intervention. After institutional ethics committee approval and patient's consent, GPN patients were randomly allocated into two groups. Group A (N = 15) received standard medical therapy (gabapentin 300 mg, tramadol 50 mg TDS, methylcobalamin 500 μgm PO) and group B (N = 15) patients received extraoral glossopharyngeal nerve block together with standard medical therapy. Patients were analyzed for analgesic outcome using numerical pain scale (NPS) and brief pain inventory (BPI) assessing both analgesic effect and degree of interference in quality of life (QOL) during 3-month follow-up. They were also evaluated for any significant hemodynamic alterations.

RESULTS

Over the follow-up of 90 days, the mean NPS in group A decreased from 6 ± 2 to 3 ± 2 and in group B from 5 ± 1 to 2 ± 2. From the mean NPS scores, it can be interpreted that both the modalities were effective clinically in treating GPN. However, NPS scores were statistically similar by the end of 90 days. Improvement from baseline in BPI measurement of QOL (mood, interpersonal relationship, and emotion) was earlier in group B (1, 2, and 1 months, respectively) compared with group A (2, 3, and 2 months, respectively). However, there were no significant hemodynamic adverse outcomes after administration of the block.

CONCLUSION

This study found that patients in both the groups had significantly lower pain intensities, improved pain relief, and reduced pain interference with QOL, which was especially evident on fourth visit (2 months) after the initiation of treatment regimen. Both were safe and well tolerated. The study advocates rational polypharmacy approach (oral and block) in difficult to treat painful conditions. Further controlled trials are warranted to further define the impact of such a combination therapy.

Hepatitis C virus infection in dialysis and chronic liver patients: Viraemia dependent anti-E2-antibody response

Cryptic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection relates to patients infected chronically with HCV that are seronegative but have HCV-RNA. These patients are not identified by the standard serological tests for HCV, which are based on detection of antibodies to core, NS3 and NS5 antigens. They will, therefore, be wrongly diagnosed as non-infected, and are considered as a potential risk for others. Cryptic HCV infection in dialysis units occurs frequently and, due to medical procedures, is a major factor for contracting the virus when unrecognised. This study was conducted in order to assess the humoral immune responses to E2-antigen in sera of patients infected chronically with HCV. Recombinant E2 protein in enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and Western blot (WB) were used to test the occurrence of anti-E2 antibodies in the sera of patients from the liver clinic and of dialysis patients. The presence of E2 antibodies was found to be correlated with the presence of HCV-RNA and with viral load. Antibodies to the E2 protein could be detected in as many as 30% of the sera from dialysis patients with cryptic HCV infection (HCV-RNA only). The results suggest that detection of anti-E2 antibodies may enhance significantly HCV serological standard testing; especially among patients on dialysis, and that antibodies to envelope E2 protein appear to depend on and correlate with the presence of HCV particles.