Preoperative high-dose radiation and chemotherapy in adenocarcinoma of the esophagus and esophagogastric junction

Outcomes of Definitive Chemoradiotherapy for Stage IVa (T4b vs. N4) Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma Based on the Japanese Classification System: A Retrospective Single-Center Study

The differences in prognoses or progression patterns between T4b non-N4 and non-T4b N4 esophageal squamous cell carcinoma post chemoradiotherapy (CRT) is unclear. This study compared the outcomes of CRT for stage IVa esophageal squamous cell carcinoma according to T/N factors. We retrospectively identified 66 patients with stage IVa esophageal squamous cell carcinoma who underwent definitive CRT at our center between January 2009 and March 2013. The treatment outcomes, i.e., progression patterns, prognostic factors, and toxicities based on version 5.0 of the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, were studied. The patients (56 men and 10 women) had a median age of 67 (range: 37-87) years. The T/N classifications were T4b non-N4 (28/66), non-T4b N4 (24/66), and T4b N4 (14/66). Objective response was achieved in 57 patients (86.4%, (95% confidence interval, 74.6-94.1%)). There were no significant differences between the T/N groups in terms of overall survival, progression-free survival, and progression pattern. We found no significant differences in prognoses or progression patterns among patients with T4b non-N4, non-T4b N4, and T4b N4 esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Thus, it seems impractical to modify CRT regimens based on T/N factors.

Esophageal Cancer: Recent advances

Esophageal carcinoma has, over the past decade, undergone a sea of change, not only in its pathological distribution, but also in the diagnosis, staging and subsequent management. Although the advent of better imaging techniques has helped in diagnosing patients at an earlier period, the majority of them have unresectable disease at the time of presentation. Despite aggressive treatment protocols involving either one or a combination of the options of surgery, radiation, and chemotherapy, the five-year survival remains dismal in the order of 10 to 15%. The two most commonly used surgical techniques for resecting the esophagus, the Ivor Lewis and the trans-hiatal esophagectomy, have similar results in terms of morbidity, mortality and, more importantly, five-year survival following resection. There has been an increasing interest in the surgical treatment of carcinoma esophagus by a minimally invasive approach, as meta-analysis of clinical series have shown that a faster recovery time without any statistically significant difference in the in-hospital mortality or morbidity when compared to conventional surgery. Nonrandomized studies suggest that patients receiving neoadjuvant chemo-radiation have a five year survival advantage compared with those treated with surgery alone, especially if they had a complete histological response to the preoperative regimen. Lastly, palliative procedures, form the mainstay of management of patients with non-resectable disease.

[Long-term outcome of neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy followed by surgery for esophageal cancer: a single institution retrospective study of 102 patients]

PURPOSE AND OBJECTIVES

To report survival and morbidity of a large homogeneous cohort of patients with a locally advanced esophageal or cardia carcinoma and put in evidence predictive factors of locoregional control and survival.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Hundred and two patients were treated at the university hospital of Tours between 1990 and 2010 and received neo-adjuvant chemoradiation therapy with external irradiation (40Gy-44Gy) and two courses of chemotherapy (5-fluoro-uracile and cisplatine). Esophagectomy associated with lymph node dissection was performed about ten weeks after the end of chemoradiation therapy.

RESULTS

The median follow-up was 22.4 months [6-185 months]. The overall survival rates at 2 and 5years were 53% and 27%, respectively. The median overall survival was estimated at 27months. The overall 2-year survival between patients "responders" and patients "non-responders" was 67% vs 26%, respectively (P<0.0001). In case of histological response, there was a benefit in terms of overall survival (P<0.0001), locoregional control (P<0.0036) and disease-free survival (P<0.001). Overall survival at 2years was 64% for ypN0 group vs 32% for ypN1 group (P<0.0001). The median survival was estimated at 37months against 15months in the absence of lymph node involvement (P<0.0001).

CONCLUSION

Our results in terms of survival, tolerance and morbidity and mortality were comparable to those in the literature. Complete histological response of lymph node was associated with an improvement of local control, disease-free survival and overall survival.

[Radiochemotherapy for oesophageal cancer: a locoregional failure history]

Esophageal cancer is characterized by various degrees of lymph node invasion and metastasis, both of which are associated with a poor prognosis. Exclusive concomitant radiochemotherapy (RCT) at a dose of 50 Gy delivered over 25 sessions, according to the RTOG 85-01 protocol, has led to improved five-year survival in 25% of patients, whereas no patients survive for five years using radiotherapy alone. Surgery, even when combined with preoperative RCT, also gives disappointing results for locally advanced tumors, which casts serious doubts on the usefulness of preoperative radiotherapy. By varying the fractionation schedule, the length of treatment or the radiotherapy volumes, it has become possible to obtain levels of locoregional relapse of around 35 to 45%. The increasing incidence of adenocarcinoma, which differs from epidermoid cancer with regard to the degree of lymph node invasion, has revived discussion on radiotherapy volumes. Given this difference between these two histological forms, we propose here a number of recommendations concerning radiotherapy volumes for patients presenting with cancer of the esophagus. Finally, analysis of the results for locoregional relapse according to the dose of radiation and the recommended radiotherapy volumes, has led us to investigate why increasing the dose of radiation has no impact in esophageal cancers.

Treatment of thoracic esophageal carcinoma invading adjacent structures

T4 esophageal cancer is defined as the tumor invading adjacent structures, using tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) staging. For clinically T4 thoracic esophageal carcinoma, multimodality therapy, that is, neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT) followed by surgery or definitive CRT, has generally been performed. However, the prognosis of patients with these tumors remains poor. Another strategy is needed to achieve curative treatment. In the present article, the treatment strategies employed to date are reviewed. Furthermore, the strategies for these malignancies are reassessed, based on our experiences. R1/2 and R0 resections are regarded as those with residual and no tumor after surgery. The present data show that patients who underwent R1/2 resection after neoadjuvant CRT experienced little survival benefit, while complete response (CR) cases after definitive CRT had comparatively better results. Therefore, curative surgery should not be attempted without down-staging, and definitive CRT should be the initial treatment. Then surgery is indicated for the eradication of residual cancer cells. Close surveillance is essential for early detection of relapse even after CR, because the operation will gradually become increasingly difficult due to post-CRT fibrosis. In conclusion, multimodality therapy consists of definitive CRT followed by R0 resection, which can be the treatment of choice for T4 esophageal carcinoma. These challenging treatments have the potential to constitute the most effective therapeutic strategy.

Current status of neoadjuvant therapy for adenocarcinoma of the distal esophagus

Prospective studies dealing with preoperative therapy in adenocarcinoma of the esophagus alone are rare. The interpretation of the preferential phase II trials and a few phase III trials is complicated, as most studies include adenocarcinoma of the esophagus (i.e., Barrett's carcinoma), adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction (including cardia carcinoma and subcardia carcinoma), or squamous cell carcinoma. Preoperative chemotherapy, generally well tolerated, cannot decrease the incidence of local failure beyond the level achieved with surgery alone, but it might delay systemic relapse. Preoperative radiotherapy can enhance local control, but it fails to improve overall survival. Neoadjuvant chemoradiation was demonstrated in only one randomized trail to have a survival benefit, but survival in the surgery-alone group was unusually low. Generally, survival was ameliorated in patients responding to neoadjuvant treatment. However, preoperative chemoradiation was often accompanied by a remarkable increase in postoperative morbidity and mortality. Nonresponding patients have, in this respect, a worse prognosis than responders after resection. The prediction of responding patients to neoadjuvant therapy as well as the early identification of patients who will not respond is of utmost clinical importance. Today, there is no absolute evidence that neoadjuvant treatment for patients with potentially resectable Barrett's cancer prolongs survival. In patients with locally advanced, presumably not completely resectable adenocarcinoma of the esophagus, preoperative treatment appears to increase the chance for a curative resection and enhance survival in responding patients. Neoadjuvant treatment of adenocarcinoma of the esophagus, as a consequence, is currently not the standard treatment and should be performed only within controlled clinical trials.

Transhiatal esophagectomy for treatment of benign and malignant esophageal disease

Since our initial 1978 report, we have performed transhiatal esophagectomy (THE) in 1085 patients with intrathoracic esophageal disease: 285 (26%) benign lesions and 800 (74%) malignant lesions (4.5% upper, 22% middle, and 73.5% lower third/cardia). THE was possible in 97% of patients in whom it was attempted; reconstruction was performed at the same operation in all but six patients. The esophageal substitute was positioned in the original esophageal bed in 98%, stomach being used in 782 patients (96%) and colon in those with a prior gastric resection. Hospital mortality was 4%, with three deaths due to uncontrollable intraoperative hemorrhage. Major complications included anastomotic leak (13%), atelectasis/pneumonia prolonging hospitalization (2%), recurrent laryngeal nerve paralysis, chylothorax, and tracheal laceration (< 1% each). There were five reoperations for mediastinal bleeding within 24 hours of THE. Intraoperative blood loss averaged 689 ml. Altogether, 78% of the patients had no postoperative complications. Actuarial survival of the cancer patients mirrors that reported after transthoracic esophagectomy. Late functional results are good or excellent in 80%. Approximately 50% have required one or more anastomotic dilatations. With intensive preadmission pulmonary and physical conditioning, use of a side-to-side staple technique (which has reduced the cervical esophagogastric anastomotic leak rate to less than 3%), and postoperative epidural anesthesia, the need for an intensive care unit stay has been eliminated and the length of hospital stay was reduced to 7 days. We concluded that THE can be achieved in most patients requiring esophageal resection for benign and malignant disease and with greater safety and less morbidity than the traditional transthoracic approaches.

Does neoadjuvant chemoradiation downstage esophageal carcinoma?

BACKGROUND

Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy is administered to patients with esophageal carcinoma with the belief that this will both downstage the tumor and improve survival. Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) is currently the most accurate method of staging esophageal cancer for tumor (T) and lymph node (N) status. Because both EUS and neoadjuvant therapy for esophageal carcinoma are relatively new, there are few data examining the relationship between EUS stage and histological stage (the stage after resection) in patients receiving neoadjuvant therapy.

METHODS

To determine the effect of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy on T and N stage as determined by EUS, we retrospectively compared two groups of patients with esophageal cancer staged by EUS. One group (33 patients) underwent neoadjuvant therapy (Walsh protocol: 5-fluorouracil, cisplatin, and 4000 rads of external beam radiation) followed by resection. The second group (22 patients), a control group, underwent resection without neoadjuvant therapy. We then compared histological stage to determine if there was a downstaging in the patients receiving neoadjuvant therapy. Survival was evaluated as well.

RESULTS

EUS accurately predicted histologic stage. In the control group EUS overestimated T stage in 3 of 22 (13%), underestimated N stage in 2 of 22 (9%), and overestimated N stage in 2 of 22 (9%) of patients. Preoperative radiochemotherapy downstaged (preoperative EUS stage versus pathologic specimen) 12 of 33 (36%) of patients whereas only 1 of 22 (5%) of patients in the control group was downstaged. Complete response (no tumor found in the surgical specimen) was observed in 5 of 33 (15%) of patients receiving radiochemotherapy. Survival was prolonged significantly in patients receiving radiochemotherapy: 20.6 months versus 9.6 months for those (stage II or III) patients not receiving radiochemotherapy (P <0.01). Operative time, operative blood loss, and length of stay were not significantly different between groups. Perioperative mortality was higher in the radiochemotherapy group (13%) compared with the no radiochemotherapy group (5%) but did not achieve statistical significance.

CONCLUSIONS

EUS accurately stages esophageal carcinoma. Neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy downstages esophageal carcinoma for T and N status. In our nonrandomized study, neoadjuvant therapy conferred a significant survival advantage. Operative risk appears to be increased in patients receiving neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy prior to esophagectomy.

Preoperative (neoadjuvant) chemoradiotherapy in oesophageal cancer

BACKGROUND

Oesophageal cancer carries a poor prognosis. The 5-year survival rate following resection ranges from 10 to 35 per cent. Recent evidence suggests that the addition of non-surgical treatments to surgery may improve resection rates, reduce the risk of recurrence and improve survival. This review examines the role of preoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT) in oesophageal cancer.

METHODS

A Medline-based literature review (1980-2000) was performed using the key words 'neoadjuvant or preoperative' and 'chemoradiotherapy or radiochemotherapy'. Additional literature was obtained from original papers and published meeting abstracts.

RESULTS

Forty-six non-randomized and six randomized trials of preoperative CRT were found. Resection rates, pathological complete response (pCR), treatment-related mortality rates and relapse patterns are documented. Improved 5-year survival rates approaching 60 per cent may be achieved following pCR. Three of the six randomized trials show a benefit in either overall survival or disease-free survival compared with surgery alone. Treatment-related toxicity can be significant.

CONCLUSION

Preoperative CRT may improve survival. Emerging evidence suggests that CRT alone can achieve similar survival rates to surgery alone. New imaging modalities may help to select which patients require surgery. Larger randomized trials of preoperative CRT or chemotherapy are needed to define optimal regimens and produce higher pCR rates with acceptable toxicity.

Preoperative ECF chemotherapy in gastro-oesophageal adenocarcinoma

Epirubicin, cisplatin and continuous 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) infusion (ECF) has been reported to result in high clinical response rates in advanced gastro-oesophageal adenocarcinoma and is currently the 'gold standard' chemotherapy regimen for this tumour site. Despite this, its role as preoperative (neoadjuvant) treatment is unproven and therefore remains under investigation. We report our experience using ECF (intravenous epirubicin 50 mg/m2 and cisplatin 60 mg/m2 every 3 weeks, with continuous infusion of 5-FU 200 mg/m2 per day) as preoperative treatment in locally advanced adenocarcinoma of the lower oesophagus, gastro-oesophageal junction and stomach. Of the 23 patients treated (median age 54 years), 19 had potentially resectable disease, four were unresectable and seven had radiological evidence of lymph node involvement. A median of four cycles of ECF was delivered (range 1-6). Ten of 12 patients (83%) with dysphagia reported improvement of symptoms. Clinical disease progression occurred in six patients (26%) during chemotherapy. WHO grade 3 or 4 toxicity occurred in six patients (26%): four haematological, one mucositis, one vomiting. Seventeen patients (74%) proceeded to surgery; 14 (61%) were resected and three were unresectable. There were two (12%) postoperative deaths from respiratory failure. Major pathological response was seen in three patients (13%): one pathological complete response, two microscopic residual disease. Two patients had Stage II (T2N(0-1)) disease and nine were Stage III (T(3-4)N(0-1)). None of the patients with initially unresectable disease was rendered resectable. After a median follow-up interval of 33 months (range 26-53), the overall median survival was 12 months and 2-year survival was 30%. All patients who were initially unresectable or had radiological evidence of lymph node involvement have died. Therefore, despite good symptomatic response rates, ECF chemotherapy given in the preoperative setting did not appear to improve the outcome of patients with unresectable or radiologically lymph node-positive gastro-oesophageal adenocarcinoma. The role of ECF chemotherapy in resectable tumours is unclear and is currently under investigation in the randomized MRC Adjuvant Gastric Infusional Chemotherapy (MAGIC) study.

Is combined chemotherapy and radiation therapy equally effective as surgical resection in localized esophageal carcinoma?

PURPOSE

This is a retrospective cohort comparison of combined chemotherapy and radiation versus esophagectomy in nonmetastatic esophageal cancers.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Between 1984 and 1994, 82 patients received concurrent chemotherapy and radiation as their primary treatment. Their treatment consisted of 50-60 Gy of radiation in 20-30 fractions over 4-6 weeks, concurrent with bolus mitomycin C (8 mg/m2) on day 1, 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) infusion (20 mg/kg/day) +/- leucovorin (20 mg/m2/day) on days 1-4 and 22-25. This group was compared to another cohort of 81 patients who had esophagectomy. Both groups were restaged according to the 1983 AJCC clinical staging system and there was more clinical Stage III disease in the chemoradiation group, 30% versus 16%.

RESULTS

The complete response rate was 68% after chemoradiation (by clinical assessment) and 83% for esophagectomy (by pathological assessment). At 5 years, the local relapse rate was 59% for chemoradiation and 51% for esophagectomy. The 5-year disease-free rate and survival were 23% and 25% for chemoradiation, and 21% and 23% for esophagectomy respectively. There was no significant difference in the disease control and survival between the two treatments. The pretreatment AJCC clinical stage was a strong prognosticator of outcome. The 5-year survival was 55% for Stage I, 16% for Stage II, and 8% for Stage III (p = 0.00003).

CONCLUSION

Combined chemotherapy and radiation appeared to be as effective as esophagectomy in localized esophageal cancer.

High dose chemoradiotherapy followed by esophagectomy for adenocarcinoma of the esophagus and gastroesophageal junction: results of a phase II study of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group

BACKGROUND

To assess the toxicity, local response, and survival associated with multimodality therapy in a cooperative group setting, patients with biopsy-proven clinical Stage I or II adenocarcinoma of the esophagus (staged according to 1983 American Joint Committee on Cancer criteria) or gastroesophageal junction were treated with concomitant radiation and chemotherapy followed by esophagectomy.

METHODS

Radiotherapy was administered in daily 2-gray (Gy) fractions 5 days a week until a total of 60 Gy was reached. 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) was infused continuously at a dose of 1000 mg/m2/day for 96 hours on Days 2-5 and 28-31. On Day 2, a 10 mg/m2 bolus of mitomycin was injected intravenously. Esophagectomy was performed 4-8 weeks following completion of the radiotherapy.

RESULTS

During the 18-month study period (August 1991 through January 1993), 46 eligible patients were accrued from 21 institutions. Eight patients were Stage I and 38 Stage II. Eighty-seven percent of patients (40 of 46) received 6000 centigray (cGy), and all received >5000 cGy. Seventy-eight percent of patients (36 of 46) received >90% of the planned 5-FU dose. Follow-up ranged from 11 to 36 months (median, 22 months). There were eight treatment-related deaths; two were preoperative (from adult respiratory distress syndrome) and six were postoperative. Complete or partial response prior to esophagectomy was observed in 63% of cases, stable disease in 15%, and progression in 20%. Thirty-three patients underwent esophagectomy (transhiatal, n=14; Ivor Lewis, n=16; other, n=3). No tumor was found in the specimens resected from 8 of these 33 patients; this represented a pathologic complete response rate of 17% overall and 24% for those who underwent esophagectomy. Overall median survival was 16.6 months, 1-year survival 57%, and 2-year survival 27%. Survival was significantly worse for patients with circumferential cancers (median, 18.1 months vs. 8.3 months; P <0.05).

CONCLUSION

High dose radiation therapy with concurrent 5-FU and mitomycin may be administered to patients with esophageal adenocarcinoma with acceptable morbidity. However, in a cooperative group setting, esophagogastrectomy following intensive chemoradiotherapy is associated with excessive morbidity and mortality. Circumferential tumor growth is a significant adverse prognostic factor.

Apoptosis in esophageal cancer following induction chemoradiotherapy

BACKGROUND

The poor survival of patients with esophageal cancer following esophagectomy has led to intense investigation into combined modality therapy. Based on results from clinical trials examining chemoradiotherapy alone without surgery, resection has come under increased scrutiny and its necessity as a component of a multimodal approach has been questioned. In this study, we examined whether residual tumor cells in esophagectomy specimens following induction chemoradiotherapy are viable and, therefore, provide putative evidence for the appropriateness of esophagectomy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between August 1991 and January 1995, 46 patients were entered into an induction chemoradiotherapy trial consisting of 5-fluorouracil, cisplatin, alpha-interferon, and concurrent external beam radiotherapy followed by esophagectomy. Response was determined histologically and apoptosis assessed with a terminal deoxytransferase assay system. p53 status was determined by immunohistochemistry and mutational analysis.

RESULTS

Thirty-eight patients underwent esophagectomy, 33 of whom had either a complete (n = 10) or partial (n = 23) response. None of the 28 patients with residual tumor in the resected specimen had 100% apoptotic cells and the vast majority of specimens had less than a 10% apoptotic rate. The percentage of apoptotic cells did correlate with tumor differentiation but not with histologic type nor presence of p53 mutations.

CONCLUSIONS

These data suggest that resection following upfront chemoradiotherapy is a necessary component of a multimodality approach to esophageal cancer and will ultimately provide superior local-regional control to a nonsurgical approach.

Multimodality therapy for esophageal cancer

Over the past decade and a half, several strategies have been developed to improve the survival of patients with esophageal cancer. Two strategies employ either neoadjuvant chemotherapy or chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery to improve local-regional control and decrease the incidence of distant metastases. A third strategy uses nonsurgical therapy as definitive treatment for patients without metastatic disease. Single-institution pilot trials and randomized comparative trials have been conducted evaluating each approach. The rationale for these trials, results, and current recommendations are presented.

Biology of esophageal cancer and the role of combined modality therapy

1. The biology of esophageal cancer involves multifactorial environmental and genetic events. 2. The understanding of the clinical significance of molecular markers is rapidly evolving. 3. Combined-modality approaches should still include surgery in good performance status (ECOG scale < or = 2) patients. 4. Neoadjuvant chemoradiation is probably better than surgical resection alone for patients with potentially curable disease, but only validation of this approach by CALGB-9781 can justify this as a new "proven" standard-of-care in the United States. 5. A pathologic complete response to neoadjuvant therapy is the strongest predictor of long-term survival. 6. 5-FU, by either short course or protracted continuous infusion, comprises the backbone of combination chemotherapy in combined-modality design. 7. Radiation therapy should be given at standard 1.8 to 2 Gy/fraction without a scheduled break. 8. Only by enrolling sufficient numbers of patients in prospective clinical trials will clinicians be able to further define the optimal sequencing and actual necessity of each individual component of combined-modality therapy.

Management of dysplasia in the columnar-lined esophagus

The management of patients with high-grade dysplasia in Barrett's esophagus is complex and controversial with regard to electing continued endoscopic biopsy surveillance until an early adenocarcinoma is detected or proceeding with partial esophagogastrectomy. Clinical recommendations to patients for either option should be individualized and based on several parameters reflecting patient and clinician factors. Available data on interpretational variation in the diagnosis of dysplasia; limitation of diagnostic errors with the use of a rigorous, systematic endoscopic biopsy protocol; new information on the apparent benign natural history of high-grade dysplasia in some patients; and the morbidity and mortality of esophageal resection all suggest that recommendation for continued endoscopic biopsy surveillance is an appropriate clinical practice in selected patients. Ongoing research investigations on high-grade dysplasia in Barrett's esophagus aim to reduce the potential for diagnostic errors, simplify cancer surveillance, and develop therapeutic interventions that are safer than but as effective as surgery.

Photodynamic therapy of endobronchial and esophageal tumors: an overview

From 1982 to March 1996 we treated 211 patients with endobronchial tumors and 106 patients with esophageal tumors using photodynamic therapy (PDT) in an ongoing study of the efficacy of PDT. This paper is an overview of our results and the evolvement of our current techniques for using PDT.

Photodynamic therapy for esophageal malignancy: a prospective twelve-year study

BACKGROUND

We wanted to determine factors affecting survival rates of benefits to, and complications in patients with esophageal cancer treated with photodynamic therapy.

METHODS

From 1982 to January 1994, we used photodynamic therapy to treat 77 patients with esophageal carcinoma and evaluated survival to July 1994. All patients had failed, refused, or were ineligible for surgical intervention, ionizing radiation therapy, or chemotherapy.

RESULTS

The only significant variable affecting survival was clinical stage. Median survival after photodynamic therapy was as follows: all patients, 6.3 months (mean survival, 9.2 months); stage I, not reached; stage II, 12 months; stage III, 6.2 months; and stage IV, 3.5 months. For stages III and IV, a Karnofsky performance status of 70 or higher had a significant effect. For stage III, the median survival was 6.3 months when the Karnofsky performance status was equal to or greater than 70 and 3.5 months when it was less than 70. For stage IV, the median survival was 5.5 months when the Karnofsky performance status was equal to or greater than 70 and 2.5 months when it was lower than 70. Seven stage I patients with no treatment prior to photodynamic therapy had an estimated 5-year survival rate of 62%. Three patients with stage I invasive adenocarcinoma and Barrett's mucosa diagnosed when they underwent endoscopy for dysphagia were alive with no evidence of disease 17, 44, and 59 months after photodynamic therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Photodynamic therapy for esophageal carcinoma caused minimal complications and no procedure-related deaths. Photodynamic therapy can be considered an alternative treatment for patients with Barrett's esophagus with severe dysplasia or patients with stage I carcinoma who are under consideration for operation but are high surgical risks. The length of palliation for patients having "noncurative" treatment was equal to or better than that reported historically for most other treatment regimens.

Management of adenocarcinoma of the esophagus with chemoradiation alone or chemoradiation followed by esophagectomy: results of sequential nonrandomized phase II studies

PURPOSE

The incidence of adenocarcinoma of the esophagus is increasing, but the optimal treatment for this disease is unknown. We evaluated the efficacy of chemoradiation and chemoradiation followed by esophagectomy as treatment for adenocarcinoma of the esophagus in sequential prospective nonrandomized phase II studies.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Between May 1981 and June 1992, all previously untreated patients (N = 35) with potentially resectable adenocarcinoma of the esophagus (clinical Stage I or II) were treated with curative intent in sequential prospective Phase II studies. From May 1981 to August 1987, 11 patients (median age 66) were treated with concurrent chemotherapy [mitomycin C, and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)] and radiotherapy to a median dose of 60 Gy (CRT group). From September 1987 to June 1992, 24 patients (median age 65) were treated with the same regimen of chemoradiation followed by planned esophagectomy (CRT+PE group). Of these, 12 patients (median age 62) actually underwent esophagectomy (CRT+E subgroup).

RESULTS

The median overall survival was 19 months for the CRT group and 15 months for the CRT+PE group. For the CRT+E subgroup, the median overall survival was 33 months. The 3-year actuarial overall survival for the CRT and the CRT+PE groups were 36 and 28% (p = 0.949). The subset of patients treated with chemoradiation followed by esophagectomy had a 3-year actuarial overall survival of 33% (p = 0.274). The 3-year actuarial freedom from local failure rates were similar: 62% in the CRT group vs. 58% in the CRT+PE group. Of the 12 patients who underwent esophagectomy (CRT+E group), 9 (75%) were free of local failure. Four of 12 (33%) patients had no pathologic evidence of malignancy in their surgical specimen. Six of 11 patients (55%) in the CRT group were free of local failure at the time of analysis. Two of five patients in this group who had local recurrence at 2 and 10 months underwent surgical salvage with subsequent survivals of 20 and 100 months, respectively. Treatment-related mortality was 0 out of 11 in the CRT group and 2 out of 24 in the CRT+PE group. Dysphagia relief was similar in the CRT group vs. the CRT+E subgroup; however, a greater percentage of patients treated with chemoradiation alone had normal long-term swallowing function when compared to those patients also undergoing esophagectomy (100% vs. 73%).

CONCLUSION

High-dose chemoradiation alone appears to provide similar survival and relief of dysphagia compared with high-dose chemoradiation followed by esophagectomy for patients with potentially resectable esophageal adenocarcinoma. Local failure may be higher in patients undergoing chemoradiation compared to chemoradiation followed by esophagectomy, but surgical salvage is possible, thus providing similar overall local control. However, because of the small number of patients in each group, these treatment modalities need to be further evaluated in a prospective randomized Phase III study.

Downstaging of esophageal cancer after preoperative radiation and chemotherapy

OBJECTIVE

This retrospective, nonrandomized review evaluates 125 patients with esophageal carcinoma (adenocarcinoma and squamous cell) who underwent either surgery only or preoperative chemotherapy and/or radiation therapy followed by surgery. Major end points were survival and postchemoradiation downstaging.

METHODS

Forty-four patients underwent radiation therapy of 4500 cGy over 5 weeks. Fluorouracil and cisplatin were administered on the first and fifth week of radiotherapy. Ninety-eight patients underwent "potentially curative" resections-transhiatal esophagectomy (70), Lewis esophagogastrectomy (25), and left esophagogastrectomy (3). All patients with preoperative adjuvant therapy underwent endoscopy and biopsy before surgery.

RESULTS

There were no differences in overall mortality (5%) or surgical complications in either group. Fourteen of 44 patients (32%) downstaged to complete pathologic response, with 5-year survival of 57%. Fifteen of 44 patients (34%) downstaged to microscopic residual tumor, with 1- and 3-year survival of 77% and 31%, respectively. Twenty-eight of 29 patients in the two downstaged groups were lymph node negative. Overall, 5-year survival in the adjuvant therapy plus surgery group versus surgery only was 36% and 11% (p = 0.04). Five-year survival in lymph node-negative adjuvant therapy and surgery patients was 49% (p = 0.005). Positive nodes in the surgery only group was 48% versus 23% in the adjuvant therapy and surgery group (p = 0.02).

CONCLUSION

Although retrospective and nonrandomized, these results suggest that preoperative chemoradiation results in significant clinical and pathologic downstaging, increases survival, and may sterilize local and regional lymph nodes, accounting for both downstaging and survival statistics.

Intensive multimodality therapy for carcinoma of the esophagus and gastroesophageal junction

BACKGROUND

We designed a trial of intensive multimodality therapy for carcinoma of the esophagus and gastroesophageal junction to assess tumor response and operability after neoadjuvant chemotherapy and to determine the impact of trimodality therapy on longterm survival.

METHODS

Thirty-two patients with resectable (clinical stage IIa, n = 17; IIb, n = 1; III, n = 14) squamous cell cancer (n = 15) or adenocarcinoma (n = 17) were treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (cisplatin, 5-fluorouracil, leukovorin), resection, and postoperative chemoradiotherapy (hydroxyurea, 5-fluorouracil; 50-66 Gy).

RESULTS

Use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy yielded the following results: a measurable clinical response in 22 patients, stable disease in eight patients, disease progression in one patient, and death in one patient. Thirty-one patients underwent resection, with the following results: two operative deaths (6.5%) and nonfatal morbidity in 17 (59%); the median hospital stay was 13 days. Pathologic staging was stage 0, n = 1; I, n = 2; IIa, n = 11; IIb, n = 5; III, n = 7; and IV, n = 5. Postoperative chemoradiotherapy was completed in 23 patients with one death, for an overall treatment-related mortality rate of 12.5% (four of 32). At a mean follow-up of 22.5 months, median survival is 19.7 months and 14 patients are alive and disease free.

CONCLUSIONS

Neoadjuvant therapy for cancer of the esophagus and cardia results in good tumor response. Esophagectomy in this setting can be accomplished with acceptable morbidity and mortality. Results of an interim analysis of survival are encouraging and suggest that further investigation of this regimen is warranted.