Second-look laparotomy in advanced ovarian cancer: a critical assessment of morbidity and impact on survival

Individualized Treatment of Patients With Early-Stage Epithelial Ovarian Cancer After Incomplete Initial Surgery

OBJECTIVES

Incomplete initial surgery complicates subsequent management of early-stage epithelial ovarian carcinoma (ESEOC). This study aimed to determine the most appropriate strategies for individualized treatment of these patients.

METHODS

Medical records of ESEOC patients treated at our hospital between 2000 and 2011 were reviewed, and 246 patients initially treated by incomplete surgery were included. A scoring system was established to assess the quality of initial surgery (QOIS).

RESULTS

Of 246 patients, 130 underwent restaging surgery and 116 received chemotherapy only. Follow-up duration ranged from 4 to 148 months (median, 72 months). The 5-year overall survival (OS) rates were 87.5% and 74.7% in the restaging and chemotherapy groups, respectively. Survival analysis showed significantly better recurrence-free survival (RFS) and OS in the restaging group (P = 0.043 and P = 0.029, respectively). Multivariate analysis showed that histologic grade was an independent predictor for RFS and OS in the restaging group (P = 0.035 and P = 0.038, respectively), and histologic grade (P = 0.005 and P = 0.015, respectively) and QOIS (P = 0.044 and P = 0.024, respectively) were independent predictors for RFS and OS in the chemotherapy group. Subgroup analysis showed that restaging surgery produced better RFS and OS than chemotherapy in patients with low QOIS and unfavorable histology (5-year RFS, 58.5% vs 33.4%, P = 0.007; 5-year OS, 82.2% vs 54.4%, P = 0.011), whereas the outcomes between the treatment options were comparable in patients with high QOIS or favorable histology.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results support individualized treatment of ESEOC patients initially treated by incomplete surgery. Restaging surgery is recommended only for patients with low QOIS and unfavorable histology.

Factors Related to Recurrence after Pathological Complete Response to Postoperative Chemotherapy in Patients with Epithelial Ovarian Cancer

Aims and background

It has been appreciated for some time that the lack of detection of ovarian cancer at clinical and pathological (second-look laparotomy) evaluation is not synonymous with cure. The goal of this study was to define clinical risk factors for recurrence after complete pathological response to postoperative chemotherapy in patients with epithelial ovarian cancer.

Methods

Fifty-seven patients who met the inclusion criteria of our study were evaluated. The characteristics (age, menopausal status, histological subtype, tumor grade, presence of ascites at diagnosis, type of omentectomy, FIGO stage, and residual tumor volume after primary surgery) of patients with and those without tumor recurrence were compared.

Results

The median follow-up was 52 months (range, 15–142 months). The overall survival rates of the patients were 100%, 96%, and 87% at 1, 3 and 5 years, respectively. At the time of the study analysis, 21 of 57 (37%) patients had recurrent disease. The median time to recurrence was 16 months. Recurrences were most frequent in the pelvis and abdominal cavity (38%). Age, menopausal status, stage at diagnosis, and residual tumor volume after initial surgery were significantly related to the risk of recurrence in univariate analysis (P = 0.039, 0.038, 0.004, and 0.000, respectively). Residual tumor volume after initial surgery was found to be the only significant independent prognostic factor (P = 0.049, HR: 0.16, 95% CI: 0.02–0.99).

Conclusion

We believe it is necessary to conduct randomized studies on this issue because insight into predictors of recurrence after pathological complete response to postoperative chemotherapy could be used to select patients for trials of consolidation therapy.

[Follow-up of 70 patients with advanced ovarian cancer after negative second-look laparotomy]

OBJECTIVES

To analyze the results of treatment of 70 patients with stage III and IV ovarian cancer after second look laparotomy with negative findings and to identify causes of failure and prognostic factors.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between 1985 and 1998, seventy patients with ovarian cancer stage III and IV were treated with surgery and at least six courses of chemotherapy with cisplatin doxarubicin and cyclophosphamide. Then a second look laparotomy was performed.

RESULTS

The actuarial survival rate without evidence of disease was 50% at 5 years. Locoregional failure was observed in 31 patients (88%) and distant metastases in 9, but they were the sole reason for unsuccessful treatment in only 4 (12%). Adverse prognostic factors were: grade 3 differentiation, primary stage IIIC and IV, and residual infiltration exceeding 2 cm after first laparotomy.

CONCLUSION

Our results are comparable with reports in the literature. The actuarial survival rate without evidence of disease at 5 years in patients with advanced ovarian cancer after second look negative laparotomy is 50%.

Cytoreduction combined with intraperitoneal hyperthermic perfusion chemotherapy in advanced/recurrent ovarian cancer patients: The experience of National Cancer Institute of Milan

AIMS

We report the effects of cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and intraperitoneal hyperthermic perfusion (IPHP) in the treatment of advanced/recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) on survival, morbidity and mortality.

PATIENTS

Forty EOC patients were studied. Median age was 52.5 years (range: 30-68) and median follow-up 26.1 months (range: 0.3-117.6). Most patients presented advanced disease (stage III/IV). Previous systemic chemotherapy included cisplatin-based, taxol-based or taxol/platinum containing regimens.

RESULTS

After the CRS, 33 patients presented no macroscopic residual disease. Five-year overall survival was 15%; the mean overall and progression-free survivals were 41.4 and 23.9 months, respectively. The morbidity, toxicity and mortality rates were 5%, 15% and 0%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Our results suggest that CRS + IPHP merits further evaluation by a formal prospective trial.

Conservation of in vitro drug resistance patterns in epithelial ovarian carcinoma

PURPOSE

To compare the in vitro drug resistance profiles of advanced stage primary and recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer specimens using the tritiated thymidine uptake assay.

METHODS

Extreme drug resistance (EDR) to cisplatin, paclitaxel, 4-hydroxycyclophosphamide, and topotecan was determined for an unselected population of primary and metastatic malignant ovarian tissues, synchronous tumors (primary and metastatic tissues obtained from the same patient at diagnosis), and metachronous lesions (specimens from the same patient before and after chemotherapy).

RESULTS

For the large unselected population of malignant tissues (total, N = 6990; primary ovarian, N = 2031; metastatic ovarian, N = 4959), no statistically significant differences were discovered between primary tissues and metastatic lesions when a comparison was made between the percentage of tumors from each group that exhibited extreme drug resistance to the agents assayed. From the library of 6990 specimens, 119 synchronous pairings were identified. These synchronous lesions did not differ significantly in the %EDR between primary and metastatic sites in the same patient; approximately 10% shifted between low drug resistance and EDR. A total of 334 metachronous pairings were identified and the percentage of tissues that exhibited EDR also failed to show a significant difference when primary tumors were compared with matched recurrences in the same patient.

CONCLUSIONS

For the agents studied, acquired resistance was not a function of disease site. In vitro drug resistance observed at recurrence was not influenced significantly by intervening therapy. It is possible that assay results at diagnosis could be used to guide subsequent therapy at relapse, especially when recurrent tissue is not available for analysis.

Management of peritoneal surface component of ovarian cancer

Primary surgery followed by systemic platinum-based chemotherapy is the cornerstone of management for ovarian cancer. However, the majority of patients have an advanced disease (stage III/IV) at the time of diagnosis rendering the optimal primary cytoreduction feasible in only a small percentage of cases. A large tumor bulk limits the success of subsequent antiblastic therapy. There are two alternatives to overcome this unfavorable situation: (1) employment of ultra-radical interventions such as peritonectomy procedures, to increase the optimal cytoreduction rate; or (2) neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Whether such strategies would have an influence on the final outcome of patients is an issue to be defined in further prospective randomized studies. For second-line therapies no consensus regarding treatment has emerged. When previous effective drug combinations fail, there is virtually no chance of inducing a significant response with second-line treatment. The combination of secondary CRS and intraperitoneal hyperthermic perfusion constitutes a feasible and potential option for this subset of patients based on phase II studies. A randomized trial will be conducted to test the effectiveness of this strategy in patients with cisplatin-resistant disease. The indication for second-line treatment is macroscopic residual or relapse within 6 months after the completion of first line chemotherapy.

The benefits of comprehensive surgical staging in the management of early-stage epithelial ovarian carcinoma

OBJECTIVE

The management of understaged patients with apparent clinically early ovarian cancer is difficult. Options include offering chemotherapy based on histopathologic factors or reoperation to obtain the necessary information needed to assign an accurate surgical stage. This study aims to compare these two approaches and to define the role of staging surgery in this common patient population.

METHODS

Retrospective chart reviews were carried out at the Universities of Manitoba and Saskatchewan over the period 1975 to 1999. Demographic data and surgical findings were abstracted and entered into a computerized database for analysis. Patients not having surgical staging procedures were offered platinum-based chemotherapy based on high tumor grades, dense adhesions, and presence of surface excrescences or large necrotic areas. Patients with surgically proven stage I disease were treated with no further therapy regardless of histopathologic factors. Descriptive statistics are used to summarize the data. Logistic and Cox regression models are used to identify significant predicting factors for recurrences and progression-free intervals.

RESULTS

One hundred and thirty-eight patients presented with tumor macroscopically confined to the ovary at the time of laparotomy. The median age at presentation is 56.5 (18-90). The histology distribution was serous tumor in 28.3%, mucinous in 26.1%, endometrioid in 23.2%, clear cell in 14.5%, anaplastic in 2.2%, and mixed types in 5.8%. The grade distribution was 47.1% grade 1, 27.5% Grade 2, and 25.4% Grade 3. Sixty-eight percent of the patients had a comprehensive surgical staging procedure initially. Thirty-six percent of these patients were found to have extraovarian metastases and were subsequently treated with adjuvant chemotherapy. Forty-three percent of those not having staging laparotomy were offered chemotherapy based on high risk factors only. At a median follow-up of 58 months. 77% of patients remained disease-free and 23% had recurrent disease. Of 60 patients with surgically proven stage I treated expectantly, 6 (10%) recurred, whereas of 25 unstaged patients treated expectantly due to lack of risk factors 7 (28%) recurred (P = 0.036). In patients treated expectantly, a significant survival advantage was noted in the staged group. Logistic regression showed age (OR 1.032, P = 0.043), high grade (OR 4.16, P = 0.003), and lack of a proper staging surgery (OR 2.62, P = 0.032) to be important factors predicting recurrence. In terms of progression-free interval, only age (OR 1.027, P = 0.048) and tumor grade (OR 3.62, P = 0.05) are significant predictors.

CONCLUSION

Absence of surgical pathologic high-risk factors is inferior to comprehensive staging laparotomy findings in guiding recommendations for subsequent adjuvant therapy. Patients who have not been properly staged stand a significant risk of recurrent disease despite more frequent use of chemotherapy. All clinically early-stage ovarian cancer patients should be considered for comprehensive staging surgery prior to further treatment recommendations.

High-dose topotecan, melphalan, and cyclophosphamide (TMC) with stem cell support: a new regimen for the treatment of advanced ovarian cancer

OBJECTIVE

The goal of this study was to determine the optimal dose of topotecan when used in combination with high-dose melphalan and cyclophosphamide (TMC), and to assess the toxicity and efficacy of the regimen in patients with advanced ovarian cancer.

METHODS

Fifty-three patients with persistent or recurrent ovarian cancer were treated. Disease status at study entry included: platinum-sensitive recurrent disease (15 patients), platinum-resistant or refractory recurrent disease (15 patients), positive second-look surgery (16 patients), failure to achieve a primary clinical complete response (CR) (7 patients). Following stem cell mobilization and collection, patients were given cyclophosphamide 1 g/m(2)/day on Days -6, -5, -4; melphalan 70 mg/m(2)/day on Days -3, -2; and topotecan at escalating doses from 1.25 to 4.0 mg/m(2)/day on Days -6 to -2. Peripheral blood stem cells were infused on Day 0.

RESULTS

The optimal topotecan dose selected for future trials was 4.0 mg/m(2)/day x 5 days. The regimen had acceptable toxicity with no regimen-related death. Toxicity (Bearman toxicity criteria) was limited mostly to grade 1-2 mucositis and diarrhea. The overall response rate of patients with measurable or evaluable disease was 93%. Median survival has not yet been reached, but with a median follow up of 18 months (range: 11-37) 77% of patients are alive.

CONCLUSION

With a topotecan dose of 4.0 mg/m(2)/day x 5 days, the TMC regimen has acceptable toxicity and produces high response rates. In the setting of ovarian cancer, high-dose chemotherapy should be administered only as part of well-designed clinical trials. TMC should be considered a potential regimen for future randomized trials in patients with advanced ovarian cancer.

Second-look laparotomy for epithelial ovarian cancer: a reappraisal

Although second-look laparotomy (SSL) has been used in the management of ovarian cancer for over three decades, its current clinical use is limited. On average, over 50% of patients with a clinical complete response are noted to have disease at the time of SLL, emphasizing our lack of accurate noninvasive methods for determining pathologic response. Although findings at SLL have some prognostic significance, there is no definitive evidence that those patients undergoing SLL have improved survival, and even 50% of patients with negative findings at SLL have recurrences. The lack of survival advantage for patients enduring SLL highlights the need to identify consistently effective salvage and consolidation regimens. Few published studies provide definitive evidence regarding efficacy of treatment. Prospective, randomized, controlled trials are needed to evaluate the various therapies available. In general, the performance of SLL should be confined to those patients enrolled in clinical trials.

Second-look and second surgery: second chance or second best?

About 40 years ago, second-look laparotomy (SLL) was introduced to evaluate, surgically and pathologically, primary treatment in case a clinical complete remission was obtained in ovarian cancer patients. But does SLL increase the disease-free or overall survival? Important technical aspects of the procedure as: how many biopsies should be taken, can laparoscopy be replaced by laparotomy and should complete lymphadnectomy be performed at SLL, are still not clarified. This and maybe even more important issues, are disputed in literature: for instance, should a SLL be done at all, or should a SLL be performed in order to do a secondary cytoreduction in case tumour is found at the operation. If clinical remission is reached in more than 50% of the patients with advanced disease, tumour still can be found at SLL. If no tumour is found at SLL, macroscopically or microscopically, the operation is redundant. Apart from this, the recurrence rate after such a "negative SLL" is about 35%. Whether tumour found at SLL should be removed will depend on the fact if the tumour still is responsive to chemotherapy. To minimise the chance of tumour resistance, secondary surgery should be done as early as possible during treatment. Therefore, an interval debulking will be the intervention of choice. So, as long as there is no evidence that SLL increases the survival in ovarian cancer patients, it should be done in a research setting only. Also, the usefulness of secondary surgery for recurrent disease mainly depends on the chemo-sensitivity of the tumour. After a complete remission, which lasts for more than a year, complete secondary cytoreduction, again followed by chemotherapy, improves survival.

Second look for ovarian cancer: laparoscopy or Laparotomy? A prospective comparative study

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to evaluate, for patients with ovarian cancer, the feasibility, reliability, and complications of a laparoscopic second look and to compare them with those of a second look by laparotomy.

METHODS

Twenty patients treated by initial surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy for ovarian carcinoma underwent a laparoscopic second look, immediately followed by a comparative laparotomy. All were in complete remission after chemotherapy. Both operations were performed according to a predefined checklist, identical for both surgical techniques and for each patient: after liberation of adhesions, an exhaustive intraperitoneal inspection was performed, with systematic peritoneal cytology and biopsies. Each patient therefore was her own control for the two techniques.

RESULTS

The positive predictive value of laparoscopy for the diagnosis of residual disease was 100% (6 of 6 cases), while the negative predictive value was 86% (2 false-negative cases out of 14). Because of the presence of postoperative adhesions, the rate of complete intraperitoneal investigation was 95% for laparotomy versus 41% for laparoscopy. The complication rate of laparoscopy requiring laparotomy was 5.3%.

CONCLUSIONS

After treatment of ovarian cancer, a laparoscopic second look appears to be less reliable than one performed by laparotomy. The presence of severe postoperative adhesions is the main obstacle to an exhaustive, reliable, and safe laparoscopic second look.