Soft tissue sarcomas of the hand and foot: management and survival

Foot and Ankle Soft Tissue Sarcomas-Treatment and Oncologic Outcomes: A Systematic Review of the Literature

BACKGROUND

Foot and ankle soft tissue sarcomas (STSs) are rare neoplasms associated with a high risk of local recurrence and metastasis. Although amputation is often performed, its impact on prognosis remains unknown. The aims of our systematic review were identifying risk factors for (1) disease-specific death, (2) local recurrence, (3) metastasis, and assessing (4) whether the type of surgery (amputation or limb-salvage) affected disease-specific survival.

METHODS

This systematic review was conducted following PRISMA guidelines. The PubMed, Embase, and Scopus databases were searched. Our study was registered in PROSPERO (ID: 415624). Quality appraisal was done using STROBE guidelines.

RESULTS

A total of 7 studies and 123 patients were included. Metastasis was the only risk factor for disease-specific death (OR = 107.85, P< .001). Previous unplanned excision (OR = 22.29, P = .009) and positive margins (OR = 64.48, P = .011) were associated with higher risk of local recurrence. Patients with high-grade tumors (OR = 13.22, P = .023) and tumors ≥6 cm (OR = 7.40, P = .022) were more likely to develop metastases. After adjusting for confounders (age, sex, and presence of metastasis), amputation was not associated with poorer disease-specific survival.

CONCLUSION

Metastasis was the single most important risk factor for death with foot and ankle soft tissue sarcoma. Positive margins and history of previous unplanned excision are risk factors for local recurrence. The most important risk factors for metastasis are tumor grade and size ≥6 cm. Amputation was not associated with poorer disease-specific survival.

Classic Type of Epithelioid Sarcoma of the Distal Upper Extremity: Clinical and Oncological Characteristics

BACKGROUND

The classic type of epithelioid sarcoma (ES) is a rare, aggressive soft tissue neoplasm that most commonly affects the distal upper extremities of young patients. This study aimed to assess clinical features and provide a long-term report of the oncological outcome.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed our clinical database for patients with ES of the distal upper extremities.

RESULTS

Twenty-three patients with ES of the distal upper extremity were treated surgically between January 1990 and August 2018. ES affected most commonly the palmar side of young patients. The most common site affected by a sarcoma was the wrist in 47.8% of cases, followed by metacarpals and fingers with 34.8% and 17.4%, respectively. Most of the patients were treated according to the protocols of interdisciplinary tumor boards with multimodal therapy. A local recurrence was observed in 7 patients (30.4%). The 5 - and 10-year recurrence-free survival was 80.4% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 68.6-76.8) and 60.9% (95% CI: 53.5-68.3), respectively. The 5- and 10-years disease-specific survival was 89.9% (95% CI: 87-92.8) and 61.9% (95% CI: 56.5-67.3), respectively. Five patients (21.7%) had metastasis in regional lymph nodes.

CONCLUSION

The classic type of ES represents a group of high-grade sarcomas, which affect the dominantly distal upper extremity. Specific clinical, diagnostic, and oncological characteristics make it difficult to diagnose and therapy. Wide tumor resection as a part of multimodal therapy remains a more viable and common treatment option for patients with ES on distal extremities. High rates of lymph node metastasis are typical for ES.

Oncological and prognostic analysis of soft tissue sarcoma of the elbow: report using the bone and soft tissue tumor registry in Japan

OBJECTIVE

Soft tissue sarcomas in the elbow are extremely rare, and they have primarily been described in case series. Definitive concerning the prevalence and prognostic factors of elbow soft tissue sarcomas remain unknown. We examined the outcome of patients with elbow soft tissue sarcomas and identified the relevant prognostic factors.

METHODS

In total, 219 patients with elbow soft tissue sarcomas were identified using data from the bone and soft tissue tumor registry in Japan. Differences in demographics, disease characteristics, treatment and survival were compared among the patients. Survival analyses including local recurrence-free survival, distant metastasis-free survival, and overall survival were performed using the Kaplan-Meier method with log-rank tests and the Cox proportional hazards model.

RESULTS

Two hundred nineteen patients with elbow soft tissue sarcomas were identified, including 119 males (54.3%) and 100 females (45.7%). In total, 189 patients (86.3%) underwent surgery including re-excision. Of the surgically treated patients, 180 (95.2%) underwent limb salvage surgery, and nine patients (4.8%) underwent amputation. The 5-year overall survival, local recurrence-free survival, and distant metastasis-free survival rates for the entire patient cohort were 76.3, 70.1, and 69.3%, respectively. After adjusting for clinically relevant factors, overall survival was significantly worse among patients with tumors: >10 cm (hazard ratio = 4.34; 95% confidence interval = 1.03-18.2) and metastatic disease (hazard ratio = 6.94; 95% confidence interval = 1.55-31.0).

CONCLUSIONS

Tumor size was identified as an independent risk factor for poor prognosis.

Complex Microsurgical Reconstruction After Tumor Resection in the Trunk and Extremities

Reconstruction of soft tissue defects following tumor ablation procedures in the trunk and extremities can challenge the microsurgeon. The goal is not just to provide adequate soft tissue coverage but also to restore form and function and minimize donor site morbidity. Although the principles of the reconstructive ladder still apply in the trunk and extremities, free tissue transfer is used in many cases to optimally restore form and function. Microsurgery has changed the practice in soft tissue tumors, and amputation is less frequently necessary.

Factors associated with functional outcome in patients having limb salvage surgery for primary malignant bone sarcoma using TESS

INTRODUCTION

Achieving maximum functional outcome in primary malignant bone sarcoma surgery (PMBS) patients, is challenging for both patients and clinicians. This study, aimed to evaluate different factors that affect postoperative functional outcome of the primary malignant bone sarcoma patients following upper limb (UL) and lower limb (LL) salvage surgery using Toronto Extremity Salvage Score (TESS).

METHODS

136 PMBS adult patients were identified and were grouped as lower limb (LL) and upper limb (UL). Each group then sub-grouped to major and minor surgeries. Their functional outcome was compared using TESS by demographic variables(gender and age), neoadjuvant/adjuvant therapy and tumour variables (anatomical sites). In the UL groups, TESS was also compared for major and minor surgery subgroups based on their dominant or non-dominant limb.

RESULTS

The result of TESS has revealed that chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and gender have no effect on the functional outcome in PMBS patients. Functional outcome however was significantly affected by age in both LL and UL groups. The TESS was significantly different between major and minor subgroups in UL group with p= 0.0001. In patients with upper LSS on their dominant limb, no significant difference between major/ minor surgery subgroups was observed with p=0.077.

CONCLUSION

Our findings using TESS revealed that factors such as patient's age, and type of surgery (major or minor) in PMBS patients will affect the patients' functional outcome after LSS especially in those PMBS patients with upper LSS.

Complex Microsurgical Reconstruction After Tumor Resection in the Trunk and Extremities

Reconstruction of soft tissue defects following tumor ablation procedures in the trunk and extremities can challenge the microsurgeon. The goal is not just to provide adequate soft tissue coverage but also to restore form and function and minimize donor site morbidity. Although the principles of the reconstructive ladder still apply in the trunk and extremities, free tissue transfer is used in many cases to optimally restore form and function. Microsurgery has changed the practice in soft tissue tumors, and amputation is less frequently necessary.

Benefits Associated With Early Diagnosis and Treatment of Soft Tissue Sarcomas of the Foot and Ankle

Soft tissue sarcomas arising in the foot and ankle are often misdiagnosed, resulting in excision without adequate preoperative staging or surgical margins. The goal of the present study was to review a case series of soft tissue sarcomas of the foot and ankle with attention directed at unplanned excisions of sarcomas. An unplanned excision means that a patient either underwent an inadequate preoperative workup or the preoperative workup indicated a benign entity, resulting in surgical resection. We retrospectively analyzed the medical records of 10 patients with sarcomas of the foot and ankle treated at our institution. All soft tissue sarcomas were excised with the widest margin possible without any major bone or neurovascular resection to allow for preservation of the foot. All patients were followed up for a minimum of 8 months to assess pain, function, and complications. The patients were followed up for an average of 22.4 (range 8 to 44) months. Of the 10 patients, 6 had undergone preoperative magnetic resonance imaging without contrast and the sarcomas were read as benign or cystic masses. Two patients had undergone preoperative magnetic resonance imaging with contrast, and these scans were also misread. Despite having undergone previous unplanned surgery, none of these sarcomas had recurred after repeat resection with a wider margin at a mean follow-up of 22.4 (range 8 to 44) months. At the last follow-up point, 8 patients were alive without evidence of disease. Minor complications included lymph edema in 1, stress fracture in 1, and wound infection in 1 that resolved. Preoperative MRI with contrast is recommended before resecting any soft tissue masses of the foot and ankle. In the event of an unplanned excision of a soft tissue sarcoma, the patient should be referred to an orthopedic oncologist for definitive surgery to optimize the oncologic and functional results. In the present retrospective analysis, previous intervention did not seem to affect the prognosis, including local recurrence, distant metastasis, disease-free interval, and functional outcomes.

Reconstruction of Soft-Tissue Defects at the Foot and Ankle after Oncological Resection

Introduction

Solid malignancies at the foot and ankle region are rare and include mainly soft-tissue sarcomas, bone sarcomas, and skin malignancies. Complete surgical resection with clear margins still remains the mainstay of therapy in these malignancies. However, attainment of negative surgical margins in patients with locally advanced tumors of the foot and ankle region may require extensive surgery and could result in loss of extremity function. In these circumstances, plastic surgical techniques can frequently reduce functional impairment and cover soft-tissue defects, particularly in cases of large tumor size or localization adjacent to critical anatomic structures, thereby improving the quality of life for these patients. The aim of this article is to illustrate the various treatment options of plastic surgery in the multimodal therapy of patients with malignant tumors of the foot and ankle region.

Materials and methods

This article is based on the review of the current literature and the evaluation of the author’s own patient database.

Results

The local treatment of malignant extremity tumors has undergone major changes over the last few decades. Primary amputations have been increasingly replaced by limb-sparing techniques, preserving extremity function as much as possible. Although defect coverage at the foot and ankle region is demanding due to complex anatomical features and functional requirements, several plastic surgical treatment options can be implemented in the curative treatment of patients with malignant solid tumors in this area. Soft-tissue defects after tumor resection can be covered by a variety of local flaps. If local flaps are not applicable, free flap transfers, such as the anterolateral thigh flap, parascapular flap, or latissimus dorsi flap, can be utilized to cover nearly all kinds of defects in the foot and ankle region.

Conclusion

Soft-tissue reconstruction in the foot and ankle region is a vital component of limb-sparing surgery. It enables complete resection of locally advanced tumors and subsequent adjuvant radiotherapy. Modern plastic surgical techniques should, therefore, be integrated in the multimodal treatment concept of malignancies in the foot and ankle region.

Improvement in Overall Survival from Extremity Soft Tissue Sarcoma over Twenty Years

Several patient demographic factors, including marital status, have been demonstrated to have prognostic significance for survival in extremity soft tissue sarcoma (ESTS). A study population of 12,546 adult patients diagnosed with ESTS from 1991 to 2010 was identified from the SEER database, a large population-based registry, in order to determine whether overall survival had changed over this recent 20-year period. The study population was divided into three groups by year of diagnosis: 1991–1996, 1997–2003, and 2004–2010. We used the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazards regression to assess survival differences between different demographic groups and prognostic clinical characteristics. Over the course of time, the 5-year overall survival rates have increased from 28% in the earliest time period to 62% in the latest (P < 0.0001). On multivariate analysis, the mortality rate progressively declined from the 1991–1996 group (HR: 3.02, CI: 2.78–3.29) to the 1997–2003 group (HR: 2.21, CI: 2.06–2.37), with the 2004–2010 group having the best overall survival, despite increases in the proportion of patients with tumors greater than 5 cm in size (P < 0.0001), and those presenting with metastasis (P < 0.0001).

Local tendon transfer for knee extensor mechanism reconstruction after soft tissue sarcoma resection

PURPOSE

Aim of this study was to measure the outcome of hamstring transfer for quadriceps reconstruction after soft tissue sarcoma resection and to identify risk factors influencing postoperative results.

METHODS

43 patients underwent hamstring transfer after sarcoma resection. Medical records were reviewed for surgical technique and complications. Physical examination included assessment of range of motion and muscle strength as well as plantar pressure distribution by computerized dynamometer and podometry, respectively. Additionally, patients' satisfaction, quality of life and karnofsky index were assessed.

RESULTS

Sole biceps transfer was performed in 31 (74%) and combined biceps/semitendinosus or gracilis transfer in 12 patients (26%). In 91%of cases 3/4 or more of the quadriceps muscle had to be removed. Postoperative complications occurred in 16 patients (37%). 17 patients (40%) were available for physical examination. Mean follow-up was 61 months (22-107). Average knee flexion was 74° (35-110°). All patients had full knee extension. Average extension force was 44% (19-79%) and flexion-force 74% (55-100%) of the unaffected leg. Mean plantar pressure distribution was 119% (44-200%) on the forefoot and 107% (60-169%) on the heel. Average patient satisfaction score was 16 (9-25), quality of life assessment was 78 (54-92) and Karnofsky Index was 82% (70-90%). Besides patient's age and the extent of resection, the surgical technique had statistically significant influence on functional outcome and postoperative complications (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Hamstring transfer is feasible for quadriceps reconstruction after massive tumor resection from the thigh. In contrast to biceps alone, combined semitendinosus or gracilis transfer revealed comparable outcome but higher complication rates.

Analysis of immediate vascular reconstruction for lower-limb salvage in patients with lower-limb bone and soft-tissue sarcoma

BACKGROUND

Limb amputation has historically been the first choice of treatment for patients with bone or soft-tissue sarcomas involving major blood vessels. However, recent advances in surgical technique have allowed limb-salvage surgery. We reviewed our experiences with limb-salvage surgery and immediate vascular reconstruction following en bloc resection of bone or soft-tissue sarcomas of the lower extremity.

MATERIALS AND METHOD

We reviewed 23 patients (15 male and eight female; mean age, 43.6 years) who underwent limb-salvage surgery and immediate vascular reconstruction. Details of surgical factors and postoperative complications were evaluated.

RESULTS

Reconstructed vessels remained patent in 21 cases. The rate of limb oedema was higher in patients who underwent only arterial reconstruction after arteriovenous resection. Twenty patients could walk well without crutches a few months after reconstructive surgery. All patients avoided amputation. Two patients died of disseminated disease within 3 years after surgery.

CONCLUSION

The high rate of limb oedema suggests that venous reconstruction is necessary after arteriovenous resection. Vascular reconstruction and musculocutaneous flap techniques are useful in limb-salvage surgery and are indicated for patients who have achieved good disease control. Evidence Rating Scale for Therapeutic Studies: Level III.

[Soft tissue sarcoma of the upper extremities. Analysis of factors relevant for prognosis in 160 patients]

BACKGROUND

Soft tissue sarcomas (STS) are a rare entity with reduced prognosis due to their aggressive biology. For an optimal treatment of STS identification of independent prognostic factors is crucial in order to reduce tumor-related mortality and recurrence rates. The surgical oncological concept includes wide excisions with resection safety margins >1 cm which enables acceptable functional results and reduced rates of amputation of the lower extremities. In contrast, individual anatomy of the upper extremities, in particular of the hand, leads to an intentional reduction of resection margins in order to preserve the extremity and its function with the main intention of tumor-free resection margins. In this study, the oncological safety and outcome as well as functional results were validated by a retrospective analysis of survival rate, recurrence rate and potential prognostic factors.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 160 patients who had been treated for STS of the upper extremities were retrospectively included. Independent prognostic factors were analyzed (primary versus recurrent tumor, tumor size, resection status, grade of malignancy, additional therapy, localization in the upper extremity). Kaplan-Meier analyses for survival rate and local control were calculated. Further outcome measures were functional results validated by the DASH score and rate of amputation.

RESULTS

In 130 patients (81%) wide tumor excision (R0) was performed and in 19 patients (12%) an amputation was necessary. The 5-year overall survival rate was 70% and the 5-year survival rate in primary tumors was 81% whereas in recurrences 55% relapsed locally. The 10-year overall survival rate was 45% and the 5-year recurrence rate was 18% for primary STS and 43% for recurrent STS. Variance analysis revealed primary versus recurrent tumor, tumor size, resection status and grade of malignancy as independent prognostic factors. Analysis of functional results showed a median DASH score of 37 (0-100; 0=contralateral extremity).

CONCLUSION

The 5-year survival and local recurrence rates are comparable to STS wide resections with safety margins >1 cm for the lower extremities and the trunk. Analysis of prognostic factors revealed resection status and the tumor-free resection margins to be the main goals in STS resection of upper extremity.

Isolated limb perfusion with TNF-alpha and melphalan for distal parts of the limb in soft tissue sarcoma patients

BACKGROUND

Approximately 10% of soft tissue sarcomas (STS) occur in the most distal parts of the extremities. The standard therapy is local excision with adjuvant radiotherapy, but achieving wide resection margins might be difficult in the distal parts of the limb. Tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF) and melphalan-based isolated limb perfusion (TM-ILP) is effective in locally advanced STS of the extremities. We report the results of TM-ILP for STS in the most distal parts of the limb.

METHODS

Between 1991 and 2009, 34 ILPs were performed in patients with irresectable STS of the wrist, hand, ankle, or foot. Disease was unifocal in 21 (62%) patients.

RESULTS

Overall response rate was 71% (n = 24). After a median follow-up of 34 (range 1-143) months the local recurrence rate was 32%. Amputation was unavoidable in four patients (13%), four other patients (13%) underwent a partial amputation of the hand or foot.

CONCLUSION

With a limb salvage rate of 87%, TM-ILP is an effective treatment modality in patients with distal STS. In all patients with an indication for amputation surgery due to an STS in the distal part of the limb, TM-ILP should be considered.

Management of adult soft-tissue sarcoma of the extremities and trunk

Soft-tissue sarcomas are a heterogeneous group of tumors consisting of approximately 100 distinct diagnoses. Management requires a multimodality approach with the input of pathologists, surgeons, radiation oncologists, medical oncologists and radiologists. In localized disease, the primary modality of treatment is wide-resection surgery, and the use of radiation therapy has improved local control rates for high-grade tumors. Currently, most localized tumors can be managed with limb-sparing treatment, and local control rates of 80-90% can be seen with appropriate management. Improvements in classification and diagnosis of these tumors have led to the current idea that the specific histology is an important consideration when developing a treatment plan and may affect prognosis, although existing staging systems have not yet incorporated this parameter. Treatment of metastatic disease continues to be difficult, but current research focuses on clarifying molecular mechanisms of disease and identifying new potential targets for medical therapy. This review focuses on the current status of management of these tumors including a review of epidemiology, initial evaluation, and treatment including surgical, radiation, and medical aspects.

Limb salvage in malignant tumors

Limb-sparing resection and reconstruction has become the treatment of choice in extremity malignancies, as amputation does not provide better long-term survival rates or functional advantages. R0 resection, the removal of the tumor in sano, remains the prerequisite and most important oncologic parameter to avoid local recurrence. Successful treatment requires the combination of surgical eradication and the patient's specific functional and aesthetic rehabilitation. Our clinical rationale resulting from more than 2000 cases will be demonstrated. The problematic aspects of different tumor entities and the locoregional clearance of lymphatic pathways will be discussed. Differential diagnosis and multimodality treatment in high-volume tumor centers is likely to achieve superior oncologic statistics. Long-term survivors after microsurgical reconstructions and possible secondary malignancies will be addressed.

[Surgical treatment of musculoskeletal soft tissue sarcomas]

Treatment of soft tissue sarcomas requires an individual plan which considers interdisciplinary recommendations and the various clinical situations. Anatomical region, histological grading and typing, and tumor size necessitate adjusted methods of reconstruction. The biopsy should be performed at the institution where the patient is treated. In general surgical resection of the tumor will be the treatment of choice. Adjuvant therapies are applied according to anatomical region and size and grading of the tumor. Surgery alone is recommended only in small (<5 cm), superficial, low-grade sarcomas. Sarcomas larger than 5 cm in diameter should be treated by surgery and radiotherapy, achieving excellent results, although in high-grade sarcomas more than 50% of patients still will experience metastatic disease. In case of locally recurrent disease, surgical revision with tumor-free resection margins followed by radiotherapy should be the aim. This applies even for patients who had had radiotherapy after the first excision. In this case brachytherapy is a good modality of tissue-sparing treatment.

Soft-tissue sarcomas of the hand

We have investigated the oncological outcome of 63 patients with soft-tissue sarcomas of the hand managed at three major centres in the United Kingdom. There were 44 males and 19 females with a mean age of 45 years (11 to 92). The three most common diagnoses were synovial sarcoma, clear cell sarcoma and epithelioid sarcoma. Local excision was carried out in 45 patients (71%) and amputation in 18 (29%). All those treated by amputation had a wide margin of excision but this was only achieved in 58% of those treated by local excision. The risk of local recurrence was 6% in those treated by amputation compared with 42% for those who underwent attempted limb salvage. An inadequate margin of excision resulted in a 12 times greater risk of local recurrence when compared with those in whom a wide margin of excision had been achieved. We were unable to demonstrate any role for radiotherapy in decreasing the risk of local recurrence when there was an inadequate margin of excision. Patients with an inadequate margin of excision had a much higher risk of both local recurrence and metastasis than those with wide margins. The overall survival rate at five years was 87% and was related to the grade and size of the tumour and to the surgical margin.

We have shown that a clear margin of excision is essential to achieve local control of a soft-tissue sarcoma in the hand and that failure to achieve this results in a high risk of both local recurrence and metastastic disease.

Soft Tissue Tumors of the Hand. 2. Malignant

Soft tissue tumors of the hand arise from skin, subcutaneous tissue, tendons, nerve, and blood vessels. Many of these lesions occur on other parts of the body; however, the hand remains a unique site because these tumors have symptoms, appearances, treatments, and prognoses that may be quite different than when on other parts of the body. Their characteristics and the severity of symptoms vary markedly depending on the exact location, size, and type of tumor-and many of these tumors can have multiple forms of presentation. Two articles are intended to provide an overview of benign (previous article) and malignant tumors (this article) of the hand. The rarer and more deleterious tumors are discussed in detail while the common tumors and epidermal lesions with which practitioners are familiar are briefly overviewed. At the completion of these review articles, participants should be able to identify and diagnose various benign and malignant hand tumors as well as understand the accepted current treatment of these growths.

Bone invasion in extremity soft-tissue sarcoma

BACKGROUND

The purpose of the current study was to evaluate histologic bone invasion as a predictor of oncologic outcome in extremity soft-tissue sarcoma (STS) patients presenting to a specialty sarcoma center between 1986 and 2001.

METHODS

All patients who underwent surgery for extremity STS were identified from the prospective database at the study institution. Patient demographic features were compared using chi-square analyses or independent-sample Student t-tests. The disease outcomes were compared for those with and without bone invasion using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and Cox modeling.

RESULTS

In a review of 874 patients with STS of the extremity, 48 patients (5.5%) had evidence of bone invasion. Patients with bone invasion presented with larger tumors that were more frequently deep in the extremity and more often had metastases at presentation. Patients with bone invasion had lower metastasis-free survival but bone invasion was not found to be an independent prognostic factor (P = .274) on Cox modeling. Bone invasion was found to be prognostic of overall survival on multivariate analysis (P < .0001).

CONCLUSIONS

In a small percentage of patients with STS, bone resection may be required to obtain an adequate surgical margin, thereby limiting the risk of local tumor recurrence. Histologic bone invasion portends a poorer prognosis in terms of overall survival.

Optimizing radiation therapy and post-treatment function in the management of extremity soft tissue sarcoma

When treating soft tissue sarcomas (STS) of the extremities, the major therapeutic goals are survival, local tumor control, optimal function, and minimal morbidity. Surgical resection of the primary tumor is the essential component of treatment for virtually all patients. However, local control by surgery alone is poor for the majority of patients with extremity lesions unless the procedure removes large volumes of grossly normal tissue (ie, widely negative margins are attained, because sarcomas tend to infiltrate normal tissue adjacent to the evident lesion). Thus, removal of the gross lesion by a simple excision alone is followed by local recurrence in 60% to 90% of patients. Radical resections reduce the local recurrence rate to 10% to 30%, but may compromise limb function. The combination of function-sparing surgery and radiation achieves better outcomes than either treatment alone for nearly all patients with STS. Because both surgical and radiation technique are critically important for optimizing local control of tumor and functional outcome, it is important to manage these patients in dedicated multispecialty clinics comprised of physicians with expertise in sarcomas, including orthopedic and general oncologic surgeons, radiation oncologists, medical oncologists, sarcoma pathologists, and bone and soft tissue diagnostic radiologists. Radiation therapy can be given by external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) or brachytherapy (BRT) or combination thereof. External beam radiation can be given either preoperatively or postoperatively. The clinical considerations and the outcome data that must be considered in choosing the most appropriate treatment technique for the individual patient are discussed.

Distal lower extremity sarcomas: frequency of occurrence and patient survival rate

BACKGROUND

Primary sarcomas in the distal leg, tibia, fibula, ankle, and foot are uncommon and are believed to be less malignant than those that arise in other sites, but only limited information is available to support this contention.

METHODS

Using a computerized system containing extensive information regarding over 14,000 patients, mostly with tumors treated by our center over a 25-year period, 175 sarcomatous lesions with MSTS stage I, II, and III were located in the distal lower extremity. These were compared with 2367 lesions of similar diagnoses in other body parts. The principal studies included diagnostic distribution and outcome (recorded as death as a result of disease). Data were compared for diagnosis, gender, age, Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS) stage, anatomic site, and treatment methods and evaluated statistically by chi-square methods.

RESULTS

The most frequent distal lower limb tumors were synovial cell sarcoma, osteosarcoma, and Ewing's tumor and the percentage distribution of the various tumors for that site as compared with the rest of the body was quite different. Of even more importance was the remarkable difference in outcome with the death rate for the lower limb tumors set at 10%, while the same tumors at other sites had a death rate of 27% (p <.000002). Furthermore, gender, stage, age, and the type of operative procedure showed highly significant differences between the tumors of the lower leg and those of the remainder of the body.

CONCLUSIONS

On the basis of these data, it is evident that far fewer sarcomas occur in the lower leg, tibia, fibula, ankle, and foot than in other body sites and that their diagnostic distribution is different. Of perhaps greater interest is the fact that the rate of metastasis and death is markedly reduced for this site as compared with others. The authors speculate on the causes of this remarkable alteration in numbers and outcome.

Upper-extremity sarcomas in the United States: analysis of the surveillance, epidemiology, and end results database, 1973-1998

PURPOSE

Upper-extremity soft-tissue sarcomas are a rare disease with unclear epidemiology and evolving treatment strategies. Our purpose is to evaluate the incidence of upper-extremity soft-tissue sarcomas and the use of adjuvant radiotherapy in this patient population.

METHODS

Using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database, a national population-based database, we identified all cases of primary upper-extremity sarcoma reported to the 9 national SEER registries in the Untied States from 1973 to 1998.

RESULTS

Of the 1,286 upper-extremity soft-tissue sarcomas the average incidence rate is 2.2 cases/million/y, which has not changed significantly from 1973 to 1998. Caucasians' average incidence rate is significantly higher than African Americans' (incidence rate ratio [IRR] = 1.3, p =.02); and men are at a significantly higher risk compared with women (IRR = 1.3, p <.01). The use of adjuvant radiotherapy has increased significantly from 17% in 1973 to 47% in 1998 (p <.01). African-Americans, compared with Caucasians, are significantly less likely to receive adjuvant radiotherapy (odds ratio [OR] =.5, p =.01).

CONCLUSIONS

The incidence of upper-extremity sarcomas has not changed significantly over the past 3 decades; however, the disease differentially affects the population with higher rates in Caucasians and men. Based on the results of this study the use of adjuvant radiotherapy is increasing but African Americans are less likely than Caucasians to receive this treatment for upper-extremity sarcoma.

Surgical management of soft tissue sarcomas of the hand and foot

BACKGROUND

Soft tissue sarcomas of the hand and foot present unique management challenges. The purpose of the current study study was to determine oncologic outcome, particularly with respect to factors affecting local recurrence, distant recurrence, and disease-specific survival.

METHODS

A retrospective study was performed on 115 patients with soft tissue sarcomas of the hand or foot who were evaluated, treated, and followed at the authors' institution between 1980 and 1998. The medical records and radiographs were reviewed. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to assess patient survival.

RESULTS

Most patients (95%) were referred after previous surgery. The majority of tumors (75%) were T1 lesions (less than 5 cm), and most tumors (81%) were high grade. Patients who were treated by definitive, wide re-excision (n = 43) had a 10 year local recurrence-free survival of 88%, which was significantly better than the corresponding rate of 58% for patients who did not have re-excision (n = 40, P = 0.05). Radiation improved local control in patients who did not undergo re-excision (n = 17, P = 0.02). However, radiation did not improve local control in patients who had definitive re-excision with negative margins (n = 13, P = 0.51). The disease-specific survival at 5 and 10 years was 76% and 65%, respectively, for patients who presented with localized disease. Disease-specific patient survival was significantly worse for patients who had regional or distant metastasis. Radical amputation as initial surgical treatment did not decrease the likelihood of regional metastasis and did not improve disease-specific patient survival. The presence of distant metastasis at presentation was an independent predictor of local recurrence.

CONCLUSION

Limb sparing treatment is possible in many patients with soft tissue sarcomas of the hand and foot. Re-excision to achieve microscopically negative surgical margins is an effective method of achieving a high rate of local control in appropriately selected patients who present after unplanned excision of the primary tumor. There does not appear to be a survival benefit to immediate radical amputation, which should be reserved for cases where surgical excision or re-excision with adequate margins cannot be performed without sacrifice of functionally significant neurovascular or osseous structures.

Soft tissue sarcoma of the upper extremity: a 5-year experience at two institutions emphasizing the role of soft tissue flap reconstruction

BACKGROUND

The objective of this study was to define the impact of soft tissue flap reconstruction on multimodality therapy for patients with soft tissue sarcomas of the upper extremity. Treatment standards continue to evolve for these patients, and, with multimodality therapy, most of them are candidates for limb-preserving surgery. Consequently, the role of soft tissue flap reconstruction is expanding.

METHODS

A review was conducted of 100 consecutive patients with soft tissue sarcomas of the upper extremity who underwent surgery at several institutions between 1992 and 1997.

RESULTS

Seventy-one patients underwent direct closure of defects after tumor resection, and 29 patients required soft tissue reconstruction with flaps. These groups were similar in most respects, except that 52% of the patients who required soft tissue reconstruction presented with recurrent disease (P = 0.0004), and 79% of them had tumors measuring > 5 cm in greatest dimension (P = 0.0003). The patients who required flap reconstruction had larger skin deficits after undergoing tumor resection (140 cm2) compared with the patients who had wounds that were managed by direct closure (40 cm2; P < 0.00001). Margins around the resected tumors were larger (1.62 cm) when flaps were employed compared with margins when defects were closed directly (0.87 cm; P = 0.0005). However, the number of patients with intralesional, marginal, wide, and radical resections was the same regardless of wound management. Major complications occurred in 14% of patients, but none led to death or amputation. The median follow-up was 31 months, and 66% of patients had no evidence of disease at that time. Rates of local recurrence and survival were similar for patients who underwent flap reconstruction compared with patients who underwent direct closure.

CONCLUSIONS

Soft tissue flap reconstruction facilitates therapy for patients with soft tissue sarcomas of the upper extremity, so that patients with larger tumors can undergo resection, limiting complications and limb sacrifice.

Soft tissue sarcoma in adults

Soft tissue sarcomas are a heterogeneous group of tumors, consisting of numerous histiotypes that all share a putative common mesenchymal origin. Although prognosis of these tumors is determined by clinical parameters (size, location, and resection margin status) and pathologic features (mitotic activity and necrosis), the histologic subtype has never been shown to be a consistent independent prognostic factor. Some relevant differences among these histiotypes are emerging, in specific biological parameters such as proliferation indices, in integrin expression profiles, and with regard to drug sensitivity. Several biological factors are considered to be prognostically important. Most attention is directed to regulators of cell-cycle progression. The significance of p53 dysregulation is confirmed by the inhibition of cellular proliferation, both in in-vitro and in in-vivo sarcoma models, after reintroduction of wild type p53. A multidisciplinary approach is essential for the optimal treatment of soft tissue sarcomas. Multimodality treatment has led to a patient-tailored approach with limb-sparing resections integrated with external and/or interstitial irradiation. The value of chemotherapy both in the neoadjuvant and the adjuvant setting, although of critical value in other sarcomas such as Ewing's sarcoma and osteosarcoma, remains to be established for soft tissue sarcomas.