Role of endothelin in the development of hemorrhagic pancreatitis in rats

Acute pancreatitis

Acute pancreatitis (AP) is an important cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide and the annual incidence appears to be increasing. It presents as a mild self-limiting illness in 80% of patients. However, one-fifth of these develop a severe complicated life-threatening disease requiring intensive and prolonged therapeutic intervention. Alcohol and gallstone disease remain the commonest causes of AP but metabolic abnormalities, obesity and genetic susceptibility are thought be increasingly important aetiological factors. The prompt diagnosis of AP and stratification of disease severity is essential in directing rapid delivery of appropriate therapeutic measures. In this review, the range of diagnostic and prognostic assays, severity scoring systems and radiological investigations used in current clinical practice are described, highlighting their strengths and weaknesses. Increased understanding of the complex pathophysiology of AP has generated an array of new potential diagnostic assays and these are discussed. The multidisciplinary approach to management of severe pancreatitis is outlined, including areas of controversy and novel treatments.

Endothelin receptor antagonists are not beneficial in the therapy of acute experimental pancreatitis

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Due to increased capillary permeability and the early appearance of vasoactive and toxic agents, patients suffering from necrotizing pancreatitis frequently develop a systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS). Endothelin, a potent vasoconstrictor, is thought to play a major role in these changes via the regulation of microcirculation. An improved outcome of acute experimental necrotizing pancreatitis by blocking the endothelin receptors ETA and ETB, either selectively (only ETA) or unselectively (ETA and ETB), has been suggested. The aim of this study was to investigate further the beneficial effects of new, highly potent endothelin-receptor (ET-R) antagonists in acute experimental pancreatitis.

METHODS

The influence of the selective ET-RA antagonist BSF208075 (1 mg/kg) on mortality was studied in three severity groups of acute necrotizing pancreatitis (retrograde injection of 4%, 5% and 6% of sodium taurocholate into the main pancreatic duct). The effects of the selective ET-RA antagonists LU135252 (LU13) and BSF208075 (BSF20) and of the unselective endothelin receptor (ET-R(A/B)) antagonist BSF420627 (BSF42) were additionally analyzed in 4% taurocholate-induced necrotizing pancreatitis. Furthermore, the significance of variable doses of the endothelin receptor antagonist LU13 (1 mg/kg, 3 mg/kg and 100 mg/kg) was determined in a 4% sodium taurocholate model and in a cerulein pancreatitis model.

RESULTS

Prophylactic ET-R antagonism increased the mortality rate in the 4% sodium taurocholate-induced pancreatitis. No reduction in pancreatic damage after induction of taurocholate pancreatitis was found by ET-R blockage. Application of ET-R antagonists had no beneficial influence in ascites development. However, administration of LU13 (100 mg/kg) resulted in a non-significant increase in pancreatic oedema, whereas peritoneal necrosis was not affected.

CONCLUSION

The selective and unselective ET-R antagonists BSF20, BSF42 and LU13 failed to improve survival and pancreatic damage during acute experimental pancreatitis. Therefore, previously reported beneficial effects of ET-R antagonists in experimental acute pancreatitis have to be critically evaluated before conclusions for further clinical development are made.

Effects of heparin in experimental models of acute pancreatitis and post-ERCP pancreatitis

BACKGROUND

Acute pancreatitis (AP) is a complication of diagnostic or therapeutic endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). In a recent clinical trial, a decreased rate of post-ERCP pancreatitis was shown after prophylactic heparin treatment. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of prophylactic heparin application in various experimental models of AP and pancreatic duct obstruction and to assess the underlying mechanisms.

METHODS

In various experimental models, pancreatic injury of graded severity was induced in Wistar rats: (1) mild pancreatitis by IV cerulein infusion over 6 hours; (2) severe pancreatitis by infusion of glycodeoxycholic acid into the pancreatic duct plus IV cerulein application over 6 hours. The clinical ERCP situation was imitated in groups (3) obstruction of the pancreatic duct and (4) infusion of contrast medium into the pancreatic duct plus obstruction. In every group the animals received either no heparin (n=six per group) or continuous IV heparin (n=six per group) starting before pancreatic injury. Histologic changes, amylase, and lipase in plasma were evaluated 12 hours after induction of pancreatic injury. Additional animals were treated to investigate pancreatic microcirculation by intravital microscopy (n=six per group).

RESULTS

In groups 1, 3, and 4 (mild AP/duct obstruction/duct obstruction plus contrast medium), IV heparin-treated animals showed reduced edema, inflammation, and peak amylase values compared with the corresponding non-heparin-treated animals (P<.05). Moreover, mean erythrocyte velocity was significantly higher and leukocyte-endothelium interaction was reduced in these groups after prophylactic administration of heparin. In contrast, group 2 (severe AP) did not show any difference between control animals and animals that received heparin as assessed by histology and intravital microscopy.

CONCLUSIONS

Prophylactic systemic application of heparin provides a protective effect in mild AP and in experimental post-ERCP pancreatitis. The mechanism of the protective effects of heparin seems to be the reduction of leukocyte-endothelium interaction and the normalization of pancreatic microcirculation.