Investigating body motion patterns in patients with Parkinson's disease using matching pursuit algorithm

A novel method based on matching pursuit decomposition of gait signals for Parkinson's disease, Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and Huntington's disease detection

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

An accurate detection of neurodegenerative diseases (NDDs) definitely improves the life of patients and has attracted growing attention.

METHODS

In this paper, a general automatic method for detection of Parkinson's disease (PD), Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) and Huntington's disease (HD) has been proposed based on the localized time-frequency information of gait signals. The new main part of the detection method is to obtain a small set of sparse coefficients for the local representation of gait signals with appropriate time and frequency resolution. For this purpose, a hybrid feature set based on sparse matching pursuit decomposition and two sets of nonlinear and linear features has been developed. Then, principal components of the proposed feature have been analyzed using a sparse coding classifier. Results The proposed approach has achieved high average accuracy rates of 93%, 94%, and 97% for PD, ALS, and HD detection, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The obtained results have indicated that combination of time and frequency information of the gait signals through adaptive localized window length in MP makes it more efficient in comparison with the existing time, frequency or other time-frequency gait parameters. The great potential of nonlinear sparse features for PD and HD detection and linear ones for ALS detection has also been shown.

A new approach: information gain algorithm-based k-nearest neighbors hybrid diagnostic system for Parkinson's disease

Parkinson's disease (PD) is a slow and insidiously progressive neurological brain disorder. The development of expert systems capable of automatically and highly accurately diagnosing early stages of PD based on speech signals would provide an important contribution to the health sector. For this purpose, the Information Gain Algorithm-based K-Nearest Neighbors (IGKNN) model was developed. This approach was applied to the feature data sets formed using the Tunable Q-factor Wavelet Transform (TQWT) method. First, 12 sub-feature data sets forming the TQWT feature group were analyzed separately after which the one with the best performance was selected, and the IGKNN model was applied to this sub-feature data set. Finally, it was observed that the performance results provided with the IGKNN system for this sub-feature data set were better than those for the complete set of data. According to the results, values of receiver operating characteristic and precision-recall curves exceeded 0.95, and a classification accuracy of almost 98% was obtained with the 22 features selected from this sub-group. In addition, the kappa coefficient was 0.933 and showed a perfect agreement between actual and predicted values. The performance of the IGKNN system was also compared with results from other studies in the literature in which the same data were used, and the approach proposed in this study far outperformed any approaches reported in the literature. Also, as in this IGKNN approach, an expert system that can diagnose PD and achieve maximum performance with fewer features from the audio signals has not been previously encountered.

Wearable sensor use for assessing standing balance and walking stability in people with Parkinson's disease: a systematic review

Background

Postural instability and gait disability threaten the independence and well-being of people with Parkinson’s disease and increase the risk of falls and fall-related injuries. Prospective research has shown that commonly-used clinical assessments of balance and walking lack the sensitivity to accurately and consistently identify those people with Parkinson’s disease who are at a higher risk of falling. Wearable sensors provide a portable and affordable alternative for researchers and clinicians who are seeking to objectively assess movements and falls risk in the clinical setting. However, no consensus currently exists on the optimal placements for sensors and the best outcome measures to use for assessing standing balance and walking stability in Parkinson’s disease patients. Hence, this systematic review aimed to examine the available literature to establish the best sensor types, locations and outcomes to assess standing balance and walking stability in this population.

Methods

Papers listed in three electronic databases were searched by title and abstract to identify articles measuring standing balance or walking stability with any kind of wearable sensor among adults diagnosed with PD. To be eligible for inclusion, papers were required to be full-text articles published in English between January 1994 and December 2014 that assessed measures of standing balance or walking stability with wearable sensors in people with PD. Articles were excluded if they; i) did not use any form of wearable sensor to measure variables associated with standing balance or walking stability; ii) did not include a control group or control condition; iii) were an abstract and/or included in the proceedings of a conference; or iv) were a review article or case study. The targeted search of the three electronic databases identified 340 articles that were potentially eligible for inclusion, but following title, abstract and full-text review only 26 articles were deemed to meet the inclusion criteria. Included articles were assessed for methodological quality and relevant data from the papers were extracted and synthesized.

Results

Quality assessment of these included articles indicated that 31% were of low methodological quality, while 58% were of moderate methodological quality and 11% were of high methodological quality. All studies adopted a cross-sectional design and used a variety of sensor types and outcome measures to assess standing balance or walking stability in people with Parkinson’s disease. Despite the typically low to moderate methodological quality, 81% of the studies reported differences in sensor-based measures of standing balance or walking stability between different groups of Parkinson’s disease patients and/or healthy controls.

Conclusion

These data support the use of wearable sensors for detecting differences in standing balance and walking stability between people with PD and controls. Further high-quality research is needed to better understand the utility of wearable sensors for the early identification of Parkinson’s disease symptoms and for assessing falls risk in this population.

PROSPERO Registration

CRD42014010838

A gait abnormality measure based on root mean square of trunk acceleration

Background

Root mean square (RMS) of trunk acceleration is seen frequently in gait analysis research. However, many studies have reported that the RMS value was related to walking speed. Therefore, the relationship between the RMS value and walking speed should be considered when the RMS value is used to assess gait abnormality. We hypothesized that the RMS values in three sensing axes exhibit common proportions for healthy people if they walk at their own preferred speed and that the RMS proportions in abnormal gait deviate from the common proportions. In this study, we proposed the RMS ratio (RMSR) as a gait abnormality measure and verified its ability to discriminate abnormal gait.

Methods

Forty-seven healthy male subjects (24–49 years) were recruited to examine the relationship between walking speed and the RMSR. To verify its ability to discriminate abnormal gait, twenty age-matched male hemiplegic patients (30–48 years) participated as typical subjects with gait abnormality. A tri-axial accelerometer was attached to their lower back, and they walked along a corridor at their own preferred speed. We defined the RMSR as the ratio between RMS in each direction and the RMS vector magnitude.

Results

In the healthy subjects, the RMS in all directions related to preferred walking speed. In contrast, RMSR in the mediolateral (ML) direction did not correlate with preferred walking speed (rs = -0.10, p = 0.54) and represented the similar value among the healthy subjects. Moreover, the RMSR in the ML direction for the hemiplegic patients was significantly higher than that for the healthy subjects (p < 0.01).

Conclusions

These results suggest that the RMSR in the ML direction exhibits a common value when healthy subjects walk at their own preferred speed, even if their preferred walking speed were different. For subjects with gait abnormality, the RMSR in the ML direction deviates from the common value of healthy subjects. The RMSR in the ML direction may potentially be a quantitative measure of gait abnormality.

Accelerometry: a technique for quantifying movement patterns during walking

The popularity of using accelerometer-based systems to quantify human movement patterns has increased in recent years for clinicians and researchers alike. The benefits of using accelerometers compared to more traditional gait analysis instruments include low cost; testing is not restricted to a laboratory environment; accelerometers are small, therefore walking is relatively unrestricted; and direct measurement of 3D accelerations eliminate errors associated with differentiating displacement and velocity data. However, accelerometry is not without its disadvantages, an issue which is scarcely reported in gait analysis literature. This paper reviews the use of accelerometer technology to investigate gait-related movement patterns, and addresses issues of acceleration measurement important for experimental design. An overview of accelerometer mechanics is provided before illustrating specific experimental conditions necessary to ensure the accuracy of gait-related acceleration measurement. A literature review is presented on how accelerometry has been used to examine basic temporospatial gait parameters, shock attenuation, and segmental accelerations of the body during walking. The output of accelerometers attached to the upper body has provided useful insights into the motor control of normal walking, age-related differences in dynamic postural control, and gait patterns in people with movement disorders.