The relationship between the biosynthetic paths to the amino acids and their coding. I: The aliphatic amino acids and proline

A new classification scheme of the genetic code

Since the early days of the discovery of the genetic code nonrandom patterns have been searched for in the code in the hope of providing information about its origin and early evolution. Here we present a new classification scheme of the genetic code that is based on a binary representation of the purines and pyrimidines. This scheme reveals known patterns more clearly than the common one, for instance, the classification of strong, mixed, and weak codons as well as the ordering of codon families. Furthermore, new patterns have been found that have not been described before: Nearly all quantitative amino acid properties, such as Woese's polarity and the specific volume, show a perfect correlation to Lagerkvist's codon-anticodon binding strength. Our new scheme leads to new ideas about the evolution of the genetic code. It is hypothesized that it started with a binary doublet code and developed via a quaternary doublet code into the contemporary triplet code. Furthermore, arguments are presented against suggestions that a "simpler" code, where only the midbase was informational, was at the origin of the genetic code.

Coevolution theory of the genetic code at age thirty

The coevolution theory of the genetic code, which postulates that prebiotic synthesis was an inadequate source of all twenty protein amino acids, and therefore some of them had to be derived from the coevolving pathways of amino acid biosynthesis, has been assessed in the light of the discoveries of the past three decades. Its four fundamental tenets regarding the essentiality of amino acid biosynthesis, role of pretran synthesis, biosynthetic imprint on codon allocations and mutability of the encoded amino acids are proven by the new knowledge. Of the factors that guided the evolutionary selection of the universal code, the relative contributions of Amino Acid Biosynthesis: Error Minimization: Stereochemical Interaction are estimated to first approximation as 40,000,000:400:1, which suggests that amino acid biosynthesis represents the dominant factor shaping the code. The utility of the coevolution theory is demonstrated by its opening up experimental expansions of the code and providing a basis for locating the root of life.

The origin of the genetic code: theories and their relationships, a review

A review of the main theories proposed to explain the origin of the genetic code is presented. I analyze arguments and data in favour of different theories proposed to explain the origin of the organization of the genetic code. It is possible to suggest a mechanism that makes compatible the different theories of the origin of the code, even if these are based on a historical or physicochemical determinism and thus appear incompatible by definition. Finally, I discuss the question of why a given number of synonymous codons was attributed to the amino acids in the genetic code.

The beta-sheets of proteins, the biosynthetic relationships between amino acids, and the origin of the genetic code

Two forces are generally hypothesised as being responsible for conditioning the origin of the organization of the genetic code: the physicochemical properties of amino acids and their biosynthetic relationships (relationships between precursor and product amino acids). If we assume that the biosynthetic relationships between amino acids were fundamental in defining the genetic code, then it is reasonable to expect that the distribution of physicochemical properties among the amino acids in precursor-product relationships cannot be random but must, rather, be affected by some selective constraints imposed by the structure of primitive proteins. Analysis shows that measurements representing the 'size' of amino acids, e.g. bulkiness, are specifically associated to the pairs of amino acids in precurso-product relationships. However, the size of amino acids cannot have been selected per se but, rather, because it reflects the beta-sheets of proteins which are, therefore, identified as the main adaptive theme promoting the origin of genetic code organization. Whereas there are no traces of the alpha-helix in the genetic code table. The above considerations make it necessary to re-examine the relationship linking the hydrophilicity of the dinucleoside monophosphates of anticodons and the polarity and bulkiness of amino acids. It can be concluded that this relationship seems to be meaningful only between the hydrophilicity of anticodons and the polarity of amino acids. The latter relationship is supposed to have been operative on hairpin structures, ancestors of the tRNA molecule. Moreover, it is on these very structures that the biosynthetic links between precursor and product amino acids might have been achieved, and the interaction between the hydrophilicity of anticodons and the polarity of amino acids might have had a role in the concession of codons (anticodons) from precursors to products.