Multi-system coxsackievirus B-6 infection with findings suggestive of diabetes mellitus

Enteroviruses, hygiene and type 1 diabetes: toward a preventive vaccine

Enteroviruses and humans have long co-existed. Although recognized in ancient times, poliomyelitis and type 1 diabetes (T1D) were exceptionally rare and not epidemic, due in large part to poor sanitation and personal hygiene which resulted in repeated exposure to fecal-oral transmitted viruses and other infectious agents and viruses and the generation of a broad protective immunity. As a function of a growing acceptance of the benefits of hygienic practices and microbiologically clean(er) water supplies, the likelihood of exposure to diverse infectious agents and viruses declined. The effort to vaccinate against poliomyelitis demonstrated that enteroviral diseases are preventable by vaccination and led to understanding how to successfully attenuate enteroviruses. Type 1 diabetes onset has been convincingly linked to infection by numerous enteroviruses including the group B coxsackieviruses (CVB), while studies of CVB infections in NOD mice have demonstrated not only a clear link between disease onset but an ability to reduce the incidence of T1D as well: CVB infections can suppress naturally occurring autoimmune T1D. We propose here that if we can harness and develop the capacity to use attenuated enteroviral strains to induce regulatory T cell populations in the host through vaccination, then a vaccine could be considered that should function to protect against both autoimmune as well as virus-triggered T1D. Such a vaccine would not only specifically protect from certain enterovirus types but more importantly, also reset the organism's regulatory rheostat making the further development of pathogenic autoimmunity less likely.

Group B coxsackievirus diabetogenic phenotype correlates with replication efficiency

Group B coxsackieviruses can initiate rapid onset type 1 diabetes (T1D) in old nonobese diabetic (NOD) mice. Inoculating high doses of poorly pathogenic CVB3/GA per mouse initiated rapid onset T1D. Viral protein was detectable in islets shortly after inoculation in association with beta cells as well as other primary islet cell types. The virulent strain CVB3/28 replicated to higher titers more rapidly than CVB3/GA in the pancreas and in established beta cell cultures. Exchange of 5'-nontranslated regions between the two CVB3 strains demonstrated a variable impact on replication in beta cell cultures and suppression of in vivo replication for both strains. While any CVB strain may be able to induce T1D in prediabetic NOD mice, T1D onset is linked both to the viral replication rate and infectious dose.

Diabetogenic potential of human pathogens uncovered in experimentally permissive beta-cells

Pancreatic beta-cell antiviral defense plays a critical role in protection from coxsackievirus B4 (CVB4)-induced diabetes. In the present study, we tested the hypothesis that interferon (IFN)-induced antiviral defense determines beta-cell survival after infection by the human pathogen CVB3, cytomegalovirus (CMV), and lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus (LCMV). We demonstrated that mice harboring beta-cells that do not respond to IFN because of the expression of the suppressor of cytokine signaling-1 (SOCS-1) succumb to an acute form of type 1 diabetes after infection with CVB3. Interestingly, the tropism of the virus was altered in SOCS-1 transgenic (Tg) mice, and CVB3 was detected in islet cells of SOCS-1-Tg mice before beta-cell loss and the onset of diabetes. Furthermore, insulitis was increased in SOCS-1-Tg mice after infection with murine CMV, and a minority of the mice developed overt diabetes. However, infection with LCMV failed to cause beta-cell destruction in SOCS-1 Tg mice. These findings suggest that CVB3 can cause diabetes in a host lacking adequate beta-cell antiviral defense, and that incomplete target cell antiviral defense may enhance susceptibility to diabetes triggered by CMV. In conclusion, suppressed beta-cell antiviral defense reveals the diabetogenic potential of two pathogens previously linked to the onset of type 1 diabetes in humans.

A new look at viruses in type 1 diabetes

Type 1 diabetes (T1D) results from the destruction of pancreatic beta cells. Genetic factors are believed to be a major component for the development of T1D, but the concordance rate for the development of diabetes in identical twins is only about 40%, suggesting that nongenetic factors play an important role in the expression of the disease. Viruses are one environmental factor that is implicated in the pathogenesis of T1D. To date, 14 different viruses have been reported to be associated with the development of T1D in humans and animal models. Viruses may be involved in the pathogenesis of T1D in at least two distinct ways: by inducing beta cell-specific autoimmunity, with or without infection of the beta cells, [e.g. Kilham rat virus (KRV)] and by cytolytic infection and destruction of the beta cells (e.g. encephalomyocarditis virus in mice). With respect to virus-mediated autoimmunity, retrovirus, reovirus, KRV, bovine viral diarrhoea-mucosal disease virus, mumps virus, rubella virus, cytomegalovirus and Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) are discussed. With respect to the destruction of beta cells by cytolytic infection, encephalomyocarditis virus, mengovirus and Coxsackie B viruses are discussed. In addition, a review of transgenic animal models for virus-induced autoimmune diabetes is included, particularly with regard to lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus, influenza viral proteins and the Epstein-Barr viral receptor. Finally, the prevention of autoimmune diabetes by infection of viruses such as lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus is discussed.

Target cell defense prevents the development of diabetes after viral infection

The mechanisms that regulate susceptibility to virus-induced autoimmunity remain undefined. We establish here a fundamental link between the responsiveness of target pancreatic beta cells to interferons (IFNs) and prevention of coxsackievirus B4 (CVB4)-induced diabetes. We found that an intact beta cell response to IFNs was critical in preventing disease in infected hosts. The antiviral defense, raised by beta cells in response to IFNs, resulted in a reduced permissiveness to infection and subsequent natural killer (NK) cell-dependent death. These results show that beta cell defenses are critical for beta cell survival during CVB4 infection and suggest an important role for IFNs in preserving NK cell tolerance to beta cells during viral infection. Thus, alterations in target cell defenses can critically influence susceptibility to disease.

Acute onset of type I diabetes mellitus after severe echovirus 9 infection: putative pathogenic pathways

Enterovirus infections have been implicated in the development of type I diabetes mellitus. They may cause beta cell destruction either by cytolytic infection in the pancreas or indirectly by contributing to autoimmune reactivity. We sought evidence for these 2 mechanisms in a case of acute-onset diabetes mellitus that occurred during severe echovirus 9 infection. The virus was isolated and administered to cultured human beta cells. No viral proliferation was observed, and no beta cell death was induced, while parallel exposure to Coxsackie B virus serotype 3 resulted in viral proliferation and massive beta cell death. Although the viral protein 2C exhibited a sequence similar to that of the beta cell autoantigen glutamic acid decarboxylase (GAD(65)), no cross-reactive T cell responses were detected. The patient did not develop antibodies to GAD(65) either. Absence of evidence for direct cytolytic action or an indirect effect through molecular mimicry with GAD(65) in the present case raises the possibility of another indirect pathway through which enteroviruses can cause diabetes mellitus.

Enterovirus infections and insulin dependent diabetes mellitus--evidence for causality

BACKGROUND

Insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM) has a long subclinical period characterised by gradually progressing autoimmune damage of insulin producing beta-cells. Clinical IDDM is manifested when 90% of beta-cells have been destroyed. Several studies have indicated that enterovirus infections, coxsackievirus B (CVB) infections especially, are frequent at the manifestation of clinical IDDM suggesting that they can precipitate the symptoms of IDDM in individuals who already have an advanced beta-cell damage. Recently, the first prospective studies have been published suggesting that enterovirus infections can also initiate the process several years before clinical IDDM. This implies that enterovirus infections may have a crucial role in the pathogenesis of human IDDM.

OBJECTIVE

The recent findings have brought up the question whether the time has come when a causal association between enterovirus infections and IDDM could finally be confirmed. This review focuses on this question summarising the current knowledge and the prospects of future research.

STUDY DESIGN

Review of the recent progress in studies evaluating the role of enterovirus infections in human IDDM.

CONCLUSIONS

The currently available information supports the assumption that the role of enterovirus infections may be more important than previously estimated. Enterovirus infections are obviously associated with increased risk of IDDM, but whether this association reflects causal relationship remains to be confirmed in future studies. Prospective birth-cohort studies will be among the most important ones giving important data on the etiologic fraction of enterovirus infections, the properties of diabetogenic virus variants and the mechanisms of beta-cell damage.

Diabetes mellitus due to viruses--some recent developments

Many different viruses belonging to several genera have the potential to damage beta cells. The mechanisms they employ are varied, and infection may result in either a direct destruction of islets and rapid insulin deficiency, or in a more gradual loss of functioning islets with the onset of diabetes many years later. Several case histories involving extensive cytolysis of beta cells can be directly linked to viral infection, whilst an example of diabetes occurring many years after viral infection is found in individuals who had a congenital infection with rubella virus. Here, the virus induces an autoimmune reaction against beta cells. Autoimmune phenomena have also been observed in islets following infections with viruses other than rubella, and thus activation of autoimmune mechanisms leading to beta-cell destruction may be a relatively frequent occurrence. Recent evidence shows that picornaviruses are not exclusively lytic, and can induce more subtle, long-term changes in beta cells, which may be important in the aetiology of diabetes. The exact mechanisms involved are not known, but it is clear that several viruses can directly inhibit insulin synthesis and induce the expression of other proteins such as interferons, and the HLA antigens. Strain differences in viruses are important since not all variants are tropic for the beta cells. Several laboratories are in the process of identifying the genetic determinants of tropism and diabetogenicity, especially amongst the Coxsackie B (CB) virus group. The sequence of one such diabetogenic CB4 strain virus has been determined.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Coxsackie B4 viruses with the potential to damage beta cells of the islets are present in clinical isolates

Infections with Coxsackie viruses (especially Coxsackie B4) are thought to be involved in the pathogenesis of diabetes. Many interdependent variables determine the outcome of an infection with a Coxsackie virus, one of them being the tropism of the virus for a specific tissue. The extent to which Beta cell tropic variants of Coxsackie B4 virus occur naturally was assessed. Human isolates of this virus were tested in an in vitro system in which elevated insulin release from infected islets incubated at a non-stimulatory (2 mmol/l) glucose concentration appears to be related to viral attack. Using this technique, 8/24 isolates tested, impaired secretory function in mouse islets. Some strains of Coxsackie B4 virus, therefore, will directly infect mouse islets in vitro leading to changes in islet cell function. In conclusion, these findings confirm that variants of Coxsackie B4 virus with the potential to damage Beta cells occur quite frequently in the natural population. In certain circumstances the damage they inflict on Beta cells may cause destruction of these cells, or precipitate overt diabetes.

Mononucleosis-like syndrome associated with a multisystem Coxsackie virus type B3 infection in adolescence

We describe a severe multisystem Coxsackie virus type B3 infection in a previously healthy 14-year-old girl who presented with a mononucleosis-like syndrome (MS). Initial observations included a prominent cervical lymphadenopathy, exudative pharyngitis and leucocytosis with atypical lymphocytosis. At the end of the 2nd week of illness the patient developed meningoencephalomyelitis and haemolytic anaemia. Subclinical myocarditis was also recorded. Prolonged hepatitis recrudescing at the time of recovery coincided with serological evidence of a reactivated Epstein-Barr virus infection. The diagnosis was based on a significant rise in serum antibody titres against Coxsackie virus type B3, using the neutralization test. Intrathecal synthesis of antibodies to Coxsackie virus type B3 was also demonstrated. Generalized Coxsackie virus infections in adolescence are rare and an MS has not, to our knowledge, been associated with Coxsackie virus type B3 infection.