Changes in axonal transport of phospholipids in the regenerating goldfish optic system

Optic nerve regeneration in adult fish and apolipoprotein A-I

Fish optic nerves, unlike mammalian optic nerves, are endowed with a high capacity to regenerate. Injury to fish optic nerves causes pronounced changes in the composition of pulse-labeled substances derived from the surrounding non-neuronal cells. The most prominent of these injury-induced changes is in a 28-kilodalton (kDa) polypeptide whose level increases after injury, as revealed by one-dimensional gel electrophoresis and autoradiography. The present study identified as apolipoprotein A-I (apo-A-I) a polypeptide of 28 kDa in media conditioned by regenerating fish optic nerves. The level of this polypeptide increased after injury by approximately 35%. Apo-A-I was isolated by gel-permeation chromatography from delipidated high-density lipoproteins (HDL) that had been obtained from carp plasma by sequential ultracentrifugation. Further identification of the purified protein as apo-A-I was based on its molecular mass (28 kDa) as determined by gel electrophoresis, amino acid composition, and microheterogeneity studies. The isolated protein was further analyzed by immunoblots of two-dimensional gels and was found to contain six isoforms. Western blot analysis using antibodies directed against the isolated plasma protein showed that the 28-kDa polypeptide in the preparation of soluble substances derived from the fish optic nerves (conditioned media, CM) cross-reacted immunologically with the isolated fish plasma apo-A-I. Immunoblots of two-dimensional gels revealed the presence of three apo-A-I isoforms in the CM of regenerating fish optic nerves (pIs: 6.49, 6.64, and 6.73). At least some of the apo-A-I found in the CM is derived from the nerve, as was shown by pulse labeling with [35S]methionine, followed by immunoprecipitation. The apo-A-I immunoactive polypeptides in the CM of the fish optic nerve were found in high molecular-weight, putative HDL-like particles. Immunocytochemical staining revealed that apo-A-I immunoreactive sites were present in the fish optic nerves. Higher labeling was found in injured nerves (between the site of injury and the brain) than in non-injured nerves. The accumulation of apo-A-I in nerves that are capable of regenerating may be similar to that of apo-E in sciatic nerves of mammals (a regenerative system); in contrast, although its synthesis is increased, apo-A-I does not accumulate in avian optic nerves nor does apo-E in rat optic nerves (two nonregenerative systems).

Molecular and cellular aspects of nerve regeneration

Injury of an axon leads to at least four independent events, summarized in Figure 1: first, deprivation of the nerve cell body from target-derived or mediated substances, which leads to a derepressed or a permissive state; second, disruption of anterograde transport, with a resultant accumulation of anterogradely transported molecules; third, environmental response with possible consequent changes in constituents of the extracellular matrix and substances secreted from the surrounding cells; and fourth, appearance of growth inhibitors and modified protease activity. It seems that the first three of these events are obligatory, but not sufficient, i.e., they lead to a growth state only if the cell body is able to respond to the injury-induced signals from the environment (a and b). The regenerative state is characterized by alterations in protein synthesis and axonal transport and by sprouting activity. The subsequent elongation of the growing fibers depends on a continuous supply of appropriate growth factors. These factors are presumably anchored to the appropriate extracellular matrix that serves as a substratum for elongating fibers. It should be mentioned that the proliferating nonneuronal cells have a conducive effect on regeneration by forming a scaffold for the growing fibers. Accordingly, the lack of regeneration may stem from a deficiency in the ability of glial cells to provide the appropriate soluble components or from insufficient formation of extracellular matrix. In this respect, one may consider regeneration of an injured axon as a process which involves regeneration of both the nonneuronal cells and the supported axons. The regeneration of glial cells may fulfill the rules which are applied to regeneration of any other proliferating tissue. Furthermore, the processes of regeneration in the axon and the glial cells are mutually dependent. Perhaps the triggering factors provided by the nonneuronal cells affect the nonneuronal cells themselves by modulating their postlesion gliosis and thereby inducing their appropriate activation. In such a case, regeneration of nonneuronal cells may resemble an autocrine type of regulation that exists also during ontogeny. The growth regulation is shifted back to the paracrine type upon neuronal maturation or cessation of axonal growth. When the elongating fibers reach the vicinity of the target organ, they are under the influence of the target-derived factors, which guide the fibers and eventually cease their elongation.