Platinum and platinum/iridium electrode properties when used for extracochlear electrical stimulation of the totally deaf

Stimulation-induced changes at the electrode-tissue interface and their influence on deep brain stimulation

OBJECTIVE

During deep brain stimulation (DBS) the electrode-tissue interface forms a critical path between device and brain tissue. Although changes in the electrical double layer and glial scar can impact stimulation efficacy, the effects of chronic DBS on the electrode-tissue interface have not yet been established.

APPROACH

In this study, we characterised the electrode-tissue interface surrounding chronically implanted DBS electrodes in rats and compared the impedance and histological properties at the electrode interface in animals that received daily stimulation and in those where no stimulation was applied, up to eight weeks post-surgery. A computational model was developed based on the experimental data, which allowed the dispersive electrical properties of the surrounding encapsulation tissue to be estimated. The model was then used to study the effect of stimulation-induced changes in the electrode-tissue interface on the electric field and neural activation during voltage- and current-controlled stimulation.

MAIN RESULTS

Incorporating the observed changes in simulations in silico, we estimated the frequency-dependent dielectric properties of the electrical double layer and surrounding encapsulation tissue. Through simulations we show how stimulation-induced changes in the properties of the electrode-tissue interface influence the electric field and alter neural activation during voltage-controlled stimulation. A substantial increase in the number of stimulated collaterals, and their distance from the electrode, was observed during voltage-controlled stimulation with stimulated ETI properties. In vitro examination of stimulated electrodes confirmed that high frequency stimulation leads to desorption of proteins at the electrode interface, with a concomitant reduction in impedance.

SIGNIFICANCE

The demonstration of stimulation-induced changes in the electrode-tissue interface has important implications for future DBS systems including closed-loop systems where the applied stimulation may change over time. Understanding these changes is particularly important for systems incorporating simultaneous stimulation and sensing, which interact dynamically with brain networks.

Unraveling the mechanistic effects of electric field stimulation towards directing stem cell fate and function: A tissue engineering perspective

Electric field (EF) stimulation can play a vital role in eliciting appropriate stem cell response. Such an approach is recently being established to guide stem cell differentiation through osteogenesis/neurogenesis/cardiomyogenesis. Despite significant recent efforts, the biophysical mechanisms by which stem cells sense, interpret and transform electrical cues into biochemical and biological signals still remain unclear. The present review critically analyses the variety of EF stimulation approaches that can be employed to evoke appropriate stem cell response and also makes an attempt to summarize the underlying concepts of this notion, placing special emphasis on stem cell based tissue engineering and regenerative medicine. This review also discusses the major signaling pathways and cellular responses that are elicited by electric stimulation, including the participation of reactive oxygen species and heat shock proteins, modulation of intracellular calcium ion concentration, ATP production and numerous other events involving the clustering or reassembling of cell surface receptors, cytoskeletal remodeling and so on. The specific advantages of using external electric stimulation in different modalities to regulate stem cell fate processes are highlighted with explicit examples, in vitro and in vivo.

Electrode placements for cochlear implants: a review

Of the variety of different sites that have been proposed and used for cochlear implants, only two are now seeing widespread use. For single-channel electrodes, it appears that a placement at the round window, or just inside it, leads to no disadvantages (and perhaps some advantages) over deeper insertions. For multichannel implants, it appears that intra-cochlear electrodes are, generally speaking, preferable to extra-cochlear ones in a variety of ways, especially as the early fears about the dangers of intra-cochlear placement now seem exaggerated. One way in which extra-cochlear approaches may play an important accessory role in multichannel intra-cochlear implants is in allowing access to the apical end of the cochlea where residual nerve survival is likely to be best. Special considerations may apply for groups of patients who until recently have been implanted relatively infrequently--adults with significant residual hearing and children.