1
|
Antonello RM, Di Bella S, Maraolo AE, Luzzati R. Fosfomycin in continuous or prolonged infusion for systemic bacterial infections: a systematic review of its dosing regimen proposal from in vitro, in vivo and clinical studies. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 2021; 40:1117-1126. [PMID: 33604721 PMCID: PMC8139892 DOI: 10.1007/s10096-021-04181-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/05/2020] [Accepted: 02/01/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Fosfomycin (FOS) administered intravenously has been recently rediscovered for the treatment of systemic infections due to multidrug-resistant bacteria. Its pharmacokinetic properties suggest a time-dependent dosing schedule with more clinical benefits from prolonged (PI) or continuous infusion (CI) than from intermittent infusion. We revised literature concerning PI and CI FOS to identify the best dosing regimen based on current evidence. We performed a MEDLINE/PubMed search. Ninety-one studies and their pertinent references were screened. Seventeen studies were included in the present review. The activity of FOS against Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria was evaluated in fourteen and five studies, respectively. Six studies evaluated FOS activity in combination with another antibiotic. Daily dosing of 12, 16, 18 or 24 g, administered with different schedules, were investigated. These regimens resulted active against the tested isolates in most cases. Emergence of resistant isolates has been shown to be preventable through the coadministration of another active antibiotic. FOS is a promising option to treat systemic infections caused by multidrug-resistant bacteria. Coadministration with another active molecule is required to prevent the emergence of resistant bacterial strains. The results of our review suggest that a therapeutic regimen including a loading dose of FOS 8 g followed by a daily dose of 16 g or 24 g CI could be the best therapeutic approach for patients with normal renal function. The dosing regimens in patients with renal insufficiency and CI or PI superiority compared with intermittent infusion in clinical settings should be further investigated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roberta Maria Antonello
- Clinical Department of Medical, Surgical and Health Sciences, Trieste University, 34127 Trieste, Italy
| | - Stefano Di Bella
- Clinical Department of Medical, Surgical and Health Sciences, Trieste University, 34127 Trieste, Italy
| | - Alberto Enrico Maraolo
- First Division of Infectious Diseases, Cotugno Hospital, AORN dei Colli, 80131 Naples, Italy
| | - Roberto Luzzati
- Clinical Department of Medical, Surgical and Health Sciences, Trieste University, 34127 Trieste, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Antonello RM, Principe L, Maraolo AE, Viaggi V, Pol R, Fabbiani M, Montagnani F, Lovecchio A, Luzzati R, Di Bella S. Fosfomycin as Partner Drug for Systemic Infection Management. A Systematic Review of Its Synergistic Properties from In Vitro and In Vivo Studies. Antibiotics (Basel) 2020; 9:antibiotics9080500. [PMID: 32785114 PMCID: PMC7460049 DOI: 10.3390/antibiotics9080500] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/10/2020] [Revised: 08/01/2020] [Accepted: 08/03/2020] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
Fosfomycin is being increasingly prescribed for multidrug-resistant bacterial infections. In patients with systemic involvement, intravenous fosfomycin is usually administered as a partner drug, as part of an antibiotic regimen. Hence, the knowledge of fosfomycin pharmacodynamic interactions (synergistic, additive, indifferent and antagonistic effect) is fundamental for a proper clinical management of severe bacterial infections. We performed a systematic review to point out fosfomycin’s synergistic properties, when administered with other antibiotics, in order to help clinicians to maximize drug efficacy optimizing its use in clinical practice. Interactions were more frequently additive or indifferent (65.4%). Synergism accounted for 33.7% of total interactions, while antagonism occurred sporadically (0.9%). Clinically significant synergistic interactions were mostly distributed in combination with penicillins (51%), carbapenems (43%), chloramphenicol (39%) and cephalosporins (33%) in Enterobactaerales; with linezolid (74%), tetracyclines (72%) and daptomycin (56%) in Staphylococcus aureus; with chloramphenicol (53%), aminoglycosides (43%) and cephalosporins (36%) against Pseudomonas aeruginosa; with daptomycin (97%) in Enterococcus spp. and with sulbactam (75%) and penicillins (60%) and in Acinetobacter spp. fosfomycin-based antibiotic associations benefit from increase in the bactericidal effect and prevention of antimicrobial resistances. Taken together, the presence of synergistic interactions and the nearly total absence of antagonisms, make fosfomycin a good partner drug in clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roberta Maria Antonello
- Clinical Department of Medical, Surgical and Health Sciences, Trieste University, 34127 Trieste, Italy; (R.M.A.); (A.L.); (R.L.)
| | | | - Alberto Enrico Maraolo
- First Division of Infectious Diseases, Cotugno Hospital, AORN dei Colli, 80131 Naples, Italy;
| | | | - Riccardo Pol
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Udine University, 33100 Udine, Italy;
| | - Massimiliano Fabbiani
- Department of Medical Sciences, Tropical and Infectious Diseases Unit, University Hospital of Siena, 53100 Siena, Italy; (M.F.); (F.M.)
| | - Francesca Montagnani
- Department of Medical Sciences, Tropical and Infectious Diseases Unit, University Hospital of Siena, 53100 Siena, Italy; (M.F.); (F.M.)
- Department of Medical Biotechnologies, University of Siena, 53100 Siena, Italy
| | - Antonio Lovecchio
- Clinical Department of Medical, Surgical and Health Sciences, Trieste University, 34127 Trieste, Italy; (R.M.A.); (A.L.); (R.L.)
| | - Roberto Luzzati
- Clinical Department of Medical, Surgical and Health Sciences, Trieste University, 34127 Trieste, Italy; (R.M.A.); (A.L.); (R.L.)
| | - Stefano Di Bella
- Clinical Department of Medical, Surgical and Health Sciences, Trieste University, 34127 Trieste, Italy; (R.M.A.); (A.L.); (R.L.)
- Correspondence:
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Target Controlled Infusion in the ICU: An Opportunity to Optimize Antibiotic Therapy. ANNUAL UPDATE IN INTENSIVE CARE AND EMERGENCY MEDICINE 2019 2019. [DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-06067-1_38] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
|