Chromatin structure of the 5' flanking region of the yeast LEU2 gene

Analysis and development of the computer methods of nucleosome localization on DNA fragments with different AT-content

Trinucleotide parameter sets published previously were used for the development of the predictive method for the determining the nucleosome positions along the DNA. The choice of the type of parameter sets used depends upon AT-content of the fragment. Some limitations are imposed on these predictions due to the presence of A(n), T(n) tracts (in our case n>5 or =5) within the 145 bp fragment leading to the displacement or even the prohibition for the corresponding site to be occupied by nucleosomes. The predicted nucleosome positioning site with the large potential may influence on the choice of the proximal nucleosome positions with the weaker bending potentials as is revealed by the comparison with the micrococcal nuclease digestion map. Trinucleotide methods may be considered as advantageous in the comparison with the dinucleotide ones.

Analysis of the structure of a natural alternating d(TA)n sequence in yeast chromatin

We address here the question of the in vivo structure of a natural alternating d(TA)n sequence found at the 3' region of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae FBP1 gene. This sequence consists of 13 TA pairs interrupted by a TT dinucleotide in the middle of the tract. Previous experiments with cruciform-specific nucleases S1 and Endonuclease VII demonstrated the presence in vitro of a cruciform in this region. We also showed this region to be part of a nuclease hypersensitive site flanked by nucleosomes in yeast chromatin. Here we demonstrate, by means of S1 in vivo footprinting, that in yeast plasmids also adopts in vivo a non B-DNA structure where is not a cruciform. A theoretical analysis of this region that it contains a site susceptible to superhelical stress duplex destabilization. The locations and conditions under which alternative structures form in the wild-type sequence and in deletion mutants agree with these theoretical predictions, suggesting that some kind of denaturation is the alternative structure adopted by the sequence in vivo. This suggests that negative superhelical stress sufficient for local denaturation exists in nucleosomal DNA. We also demonstrate by micrococcal nuclease digestions that the deletion of the alternating d(TA)n sequence modifies the chromatin hypersensitive site but does not affect nucleosome positioning.

Multiple protein-DNA interactions over the yeast HSC82 heat shock gene promoter

We have utilized DNase I and micrococcal nuclease (MNase) to map the chromatin structure of the HSC82 heat shock gene of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. The gene is expressed at a high basal level which is enhanced 2-3-fold by thermal stress. A single, heat-shock invariant DNase I hypersensitive domain is found within the HSC82 chromosomal locus; it maps to the gene's 5' end and spans 250 bp of promoter sequence. DNase I genomic footprinting reveals that within this hypersensitive region are four constitutive protein-DNA interactions. These map to the transcription initiation site, the TATA box, the promoter-distal heat shock element (HSE1) and a consensus GRF2 (REB1/Factor Y) sequence. However, two other potential regulatory sites, the promoter-proximal heat shock element (HSE0) and a consensus upstream repressor sequence (URS1), are not detectably occupied under either transcriptional state. In contrast to its sensitivity to DNAase I, the nucleosome-free promoter region is relatively protected from MNase; the enzyme excises a stable nucleoprotein fragment of approximately 210 bp. As detected by MNase, there are at least two sequence-positioned nucleosomes arrayed 5' of the promoter; regularly spaced nucleosomes exhibiting an average repeat length of 160-170 bp span several kilobases of both upstream and downstream regions. Similarly, the body of the gene, which exhibits heightened sensitivity to DNase I, displays a nucleosomal organization under both basal and induced states, but these nucleosomes are not detectably positioned with respect to the underlying DNA sequence and may be irregularly spaced and/or structurally altered. We present a model of the chromatin structure of HSC82 and compare it to one previously derived for the closely related, but differentially regulated, HSP82 heat shock gene.

DNA structural patterns and nucleosome positioning

There is no clear picture to date of the mechanisms determining nucleosome positioning. Generally, local DNA sequence signals (sequence-dependent positioning) or non-local signals (e.g. boundary effects) are possible. We have analyzed the DNA sequences of a series of positioned and mapped nucleosome cores in a systematic search for local sequence signals. The data set consists of 113 mapped nucleosome cores, mapped in vivo, in situ, or in reconstituted chromatin. The analysis focuses on the periodic distribution of sequence elements implied by each of six different published DNA structural models. We have also investigated the periodic distribution of all mono-, di-, and trinucleotides. An identical analysis was performed on a set of isolated chicken nucleosome cores (nucleosome data from the literature) that are presumably positioned due to local sequence signals. The results show that the sequences of the isolated nucleosome cores have a number of characteristic features that distinguish them clearly from randomly chosen reference DNA. This confirms that the positioning of these nucleosomes is mainly sequence-dependent (i.e., dependent on local octamer-DNA interactions) and that our algorithms are able to detect these patterns. Using the same algorithms, the sequences of the mapped nucleosome cores, however, are on average very similar to randomly chosen reference DNA. This suggests that the position of the majority of these nucleosomes can not be attributed to the sequence patterns implemented in our algorithms. The arrangement of positioned nucleosomes seems to be the result of a dynamic interplay of octamer-DNA interactions, nucleosome-nucleosome interactions and other positioning signals with varying relative contributions along the DNA.

The ade6 gene of the fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe has the same chromatin structure in the chromosome and in plasmids

We have analysed the chromatin structure of the ade6 gene of Schizosaccharomyces pombe and its flanking regions both in the chromosome and in plasmids. The chromatin structure is independent of the chromosomal or extrachromosomal location. The ade6 gene contains eight precisely positioned nucleosomes on the 5' half, 'not positioned' nucleosomes around the 3' end and a nuclease-sensitive promoter region. Precisely positioned nucleosomes, but no nuclease-sensitive region were also detected on the ura4 gene in the chromosome and on a plasmid. The results show that S. pombe chromosomal and extrachromosomal genes have chromatin structures similar to those of S. cerevisiae and higher eukaryotes.

Restoration of the yeast LEU2 gene by transcriptionally controlled recombination between tandem repeats

The LEU2 gene of a his3 strain was inactivated by inserting the HIS3 gene between two overlapping inactive leu2 gene fragments, and mitotic stability of the resulting leu2:HIS3::leu2 sequence was measured under leucine repression and derepression. Both inactive leu2 regions were transcribed under derepressing conditions (growth in low leucine), and the LEU2 gene was completely restored by illegitimate recombination between the overlapping tandem repeats, leading to the loss of the intervening HIS3 gene. In contrast, only the downstream leu2 fragment was transcribed upon leucine repression, and the HIS3 insert in the leu2 region remained intact. The reciprocal experiment (inactivation of the HIS3 gene by inserting the marker gene LEU2) revealed a moderate rate of HIS3 restoration and LEU2 excision, reflecting transcriptional activity of the HIS3 region intermediate between that of LEU2 transcription in the repressed and derepressed state.

Chromatin structure of transposon Tn903 cloned into a yeast plasmid

Transposon Tn903 contains the APH gene for kanamycin resistance, which is active in yeast [A. Jiménez and J. Davies (1980) Nature (London) 287, 869-871] and is flanked by two inverted repeats (IR) 1057 bp long. When plasmid pAJ50, carrying Tn903 and the 2-microns circle origin of replication, is cloned into Saccharomyces cerevisiae, nucleosomes are assembled in vivo on the prokaryotic DNA of the transposon. Indirect end labeling revealed that three nucleosomes are preferentially positioned on symmetrical sequences from both IRs. DNase I digestion also confirmed that the chromatin structure is symmetrical in both IRs. This suggests that sequence determinants are decisive for chromatin structure in these regions. We have calculated the rotational and translational fits [H. R. Drew and C. R. Calladine (1987) J. Mol. Biol. 195, 143-173] for the Tn903 sequence and the results indicate that the nucleosome positioning on the IRs is sequence-directed. Nucleosome deposition on the APH gene also occurs, but no clear positioning exists. Some sequence preference for positioning nucleosomes on the promoter can be predicted, especially from the translational fit. Experimental data indicate, however, that nucleosomes are absent from the promoter. Therefore, chromatin can be organized on prokaryotic DNA in a manner that resembles the typical eukaryotic chromatin structure.

In vivo assembly of chromatin on pBR322 sequences cloned into yeast plasmids

In order to study the in vivo assembly of chromatin on prokaryotic DNA templates, we have transformed yeast cells with plasmids pAJ50 and pRB58, which contain pBR322 sequences. In both cases nucleosomes are assembled in vivo on pBR322 DNA, although the nucleosomes are not homogeneous in size. To explore whether there is any preference for nucleosome assembly along pBR322 sequences, we have used an indirect end labeling method. The results indicate that most nucleosomes are placed at random on pBR322, although the probability for histone octamers to interact with some short regions is somewhat reduced. These regions coincide with sequences in which the frequency distribution of nucleosomes reconstituted in vitro (E. Caffarelli et al. (1988) Eur. J. Biochem. 171, 497-501) is low. Sequence determinants that direct chromatin assembly in vitro seem thereby to act to some extent in vivo.