Beyond ribosomal DNA: on towards the telomere

The p-Arms of Human Acrocentric Chromosomes Play by a Different Set of Rules

The p-arms of the five human acrocentric chromosomes bear nucleolar organizer regions (NORs) comprising ribosomal gene (rDNA) repeats that are organized in a homogeneous tandem array and transcribed in a telomere-to-centromere direction. Precursor ribosomal RNA transcripts are processed and assembled into ribosomal subunits, the nucleolus being the physical manifestation of this process. I review current understanding of nucleolar chromosome biology and describe current exploration into a role for the NOR chromosomal context. Full DNA sequences for acrocentric p-arms are now emerging, aided by the current revolution in long-read sequencing and genome assembly. Acrocentric p-arms vary from 10.1 to 16.7 Mb, accounting for ∼2.2% of the genome. Bordering rDNA arrays, distal junctions, and proximal junctions are shared among the p-arms, with distal junctions showing evidence of functionality. The remaining p-arm sequences comprise multiple satellite DNA classes and segmental duplications that facilitate recombination between heterologous chromosomes, which is likely also involved in Robertsonian translocations.

Regulatory roles of nucleolus organizer region-derived long non-coding RNAs

The nucleolus is the largest sub-nuclear domain, serving primarily as the place for ribosome biogenesis. A delicately regulated function of the nucleolus is vital to the cell not only for maintaining proper protein synthesis but is also tightly associated with responses to different types of cellular stresses. Recently, several long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) were found to be part of the regulatory network that modulate nucleolar functions. Several of these lncRNAs are encoded in the ribosomal DNA (rDNA) repeats or are transcribed from the genomic regions that are located near the nucleolus organizer regions (NORs). In this review, we first discuss the current understanding of the sequence of the NORs and variations between different NORs. We then focus on the NOR-derived lncRNAs in mammalian cells and their functions in rRNA transcription and the organization of nucleolar structure under different cellular conditions. The identification of these lncRNAs reveals great potential of the NORs in harboring novel genes involved in the regulation of nucleolar functions.

Human NORs, comprising rDNA arrays and functionally conserved distal elements, are located within dynamic chromosomal regions

In this study, van Sluis et al. investigated the role of chromosomal context in nuclear organizer regions (NORs)/ribosomal gene (rDNA) in nucleolar formation and function. The analyses combined sequence capture and long-read sequencing to characterize the regions distal to rDNA arrays (DJ) on isolated acrocentric chromosomes, and their findings provide direct evidence for exchanges between heterologous human acrocentric p-arms, and uncover extensive structural variation between chromosomes and among individuals.

Human nucleolar organizer regions (NORs), containing ribosomal gene (rDNA) arrays, are located on the p-arms of acrocentric chromosomes (HSA13–15, 21, and 22). Absence of these p-arms from genome references has hampered research on nucleolar formation. Previously, we assembled a distal junction (DJ) DNA sequence contig that abuts rDNA arrays on their telomeric side, revealing that it is shared among the acrocentrics and impacts nucleolar organization. To facilitate inclusion into genome references, we describe sequencing the DJ from all acrocentrics, including three versions of HSA21, ∼3 Mb of novel sequence. This was achieved by exploiting monochromosomal somatic cell hybrids containing single human acrocentric chromosomes with NORs that retain functional potential. Analyses revealed remarkable DJ sequence and functional conservation among human acrocentrics. Exploring chimpanzee acrocentrics, we show that “DJ-like” sequences and abutting rDNA arrays are inverted as a unit in comparison to humans. Thus, rDNA arrays and linked DJs represent a conserved functional locus. We provide direct evidence for exchanges between heterologous human acrocentric p-arms, and uncover extensive structural variation between chromosomes and among individuals. These findings lead us to revaluate the molecular definition of NORs, identify novel genomic structural variation, and provide a rationale for the distinctive chromosomal organization of NORs.

Ribosomal RNA Genes Contribute to the Formation of Pseudogenes and Junk DNA in the Human Genome

Approximately 35% of the human genome can be identified as sequence devoid of a selected-effect function, and not derived from transposable elements or repeated sequences. We provide evidence supporting a known origin for a fraction of this sequence. We show that: 1) highly degraded, but near full length, ribosomal DNA (rDNA) units, including both 45S and Intergenic Spacer (IGS), can be found at multiple sites in the human genome on chromosomes without rDNA arrays, 2) that these rDNA sequences have a propensity for being centromere proximal, and 3) that sequence at all human functional rDNA array ends is divergent from canonical rDNA to the point that it is pseudogenic. We also show that small sequence strings of rDNA (from 45S + IGS) can be found distributed throughout the genome and are identifiable as an “rDNA-like signal”, representing 0.26% of the q-arm of HSA21 and ∼2% of the total sequence of other regions tested. The size of sequence strings found in the rDNA-like signal intergrade into the size of sequence strings that make up the full-length degrading rDNA units found scattered throughout the genome. We conclude that the displaced and degrading rDNA sequences are likely of a similar origin but represent different stages in their evolution towards random sequence. Collectively, our data suggests that over vast evolutionary time, rDNA arrays contribute to the production of junk DNA. The concept that the production of rDNA pseudogenes is a by-product of concerted evolution represents a previously under-appreciated process; we demonstrate here its importance.

Nucleolar organizer regions: genomic 'dark matter' requiring illumination

Nucleoli form around tandem arrays of a ribosomal gene repeat, termed nucleolar organizer regions (NORs). During metaphase, active NORs adopt a characteristic undercondensed morphology. Recent evidence indicates that the HMG-box-containing DNA-binding protein UBF (upstream binding factor) is directly responsible for this morphology and provides a mitotic bookmark to ensure rapid nucleolar formation beginning in telophase in human cells. This is likely to be a widely employed strategy, as UBF is present throughout metazoans. In higher eukaryotes, NORs are typically located within regions of chromosomes that form perinucleolar heterochromatin during interphase. Typically, the genomic architecture of NORs and the chromosomal regions within which they lie is very poorly described, yet recent evidence points to a role for context in their function. In Arabidopsis, NOR silencing appears to be controlled by sequences outside the rDNA (ribosomal DNA) array. Translocations reveal a role for context in the expression of the NOR on the X chromosome in Drosophila Recent work has begun on characterizing the genomic architecture of human NORs. A role for distal sequences located in perinucleolar heterochromatin has been inferred, as they exhibit a complex transcriptionally active chromatin structure. Links between rDNA genomic stability and aging in Saccharomyces cerevisiae are now well established, and indications are emerging that this is important in aging and replicative senescence in higher eukaryotes. This, combined with the fact that rDNA arrays are recombinational hot spots in cancer cells, has focused attention on DNA damage responses in NORs. The introduction of DNA double-strand breaks into rDNA arrays leads to a dramatic reorganization of nucleolar structure. Damaged rDNA repeats move from the nucleolar interior to form caps at the nucleolar periphery, presumably to facilitate repair, suggesting that the chromosomal context of human NORs contributes to their genomic stability. The inclusion of NORs and their surrounding chromosomal environments in future genome drafts now becomes a priority.

The Nucleolus: Structure and Function

The nucleolus is the largest nuclear organelle and is the primary site of ribosome subunit biogenesis in eukaryotic cells. It is assembled around arrays of ribosomal DNA genes, forming specific chromosomal features known as nucleolar organizing regions (NORs) which are the sites of ribosomal DNA transcription. While the nucleolus main activity involve different steps of ribosome biogenesis, the presence of proteins with no obvious relationship with ribosome subunit production suggests additional functions for the nucleolus, such as regulation of mitosis, cell cycle progression, stress response and biogenesis of multiple ribonucleoprotein complexes. The many novel factors and separate classes of proteins identified within the nucleolus support this view that the nucleolus may perform additional functions beyond its known role in ribosome subunit biogenesis. Here we review our knowledge of the nucleolar functions and will provide a detailed picture of how the nucleolus is involved in many cellular pathways.

Inhibition of DNA methylation alters chromatin organization, nuclear positioning and activity of 45S rDNA loci in cycling cells of Q. robur

Around 2200 copies of genes encoding ribosomal RNA (rRNA) in pedunculate oak, Quercus robur, are organized into two rDNA loci, the major (NOR-1) and the minor (NOR-2) locus. We present the first cytogenetic evidence indicating that the NOR-1 represents the active nucleolar organizer responsible for rRNA synthesis, while the NOR-2 probably stays transcriptionally silent and does not participate in the formation of the nucleolus in Q. robur, which is a situation resembling the well-known phenomenon of nucleolar dominance. rDNA chromatin topology analyses in cycling root tip cells by light and electron microscopy revealed the minor locus to be highly condensed and located away from the nucleolus, while the major locus was consistently associated with the nucleolus and often exhibited different levels of condensation. In addition, silver precipitation was confined exclusively to the NOR-1 locus. Also, NOR-2 was highly methylated at cytosines and rDNA chromatin was marked with histone modifications characteristic for repressive state. After treatment of the root cells with the methylation inhibitor 5-aza-2′-deoxycytidine, we observed an increase in the total level of rRNA transcripts and a decrease in DNA methylation level at the NOR-2 locus. Also, NOR-2 sites relocalized with respect to the nuclear periphery/nucleolus, however, the relocation did not affect the contribution of this locus to nucleolar formation, nor did it affect rDNA chromatin decondensation, strongly suggesting that NOR-2 has lost the function of rRNA synthesis and nucleolar organization.

The shared genomic architecture of human nucleolar organizer regions

The short arms of the five acrocentric human chromosomes harbor sequences that direct the assembly and function of the nucleolus, one of the key functional domains of the nucleus, yet they are absent from the current human genome assembly. Here we describe the genomic architecture of these human nucleolar organizers. Sequences distal and proximal to ribosomal gene arrays are conserved among the acrocentric chromosomes, suggesting they are sites of frequent recombination. Although previously believed to be heterochromatic, characterization of these two flanking regions reveals that they share a complex genomic architecture similar to other euchromatic regions of the genome, but they have distinct genomic characteristics. Proximal sequences are almost entirely segmentally duplicated, similar to the regions bordering centromeres. In contrast, the distal sequence is predominantly unique to the acrocentric short arms and is dominated by a very large inverted repeat. We show that the distal element is localized to the periphery of the nucleolus, where it appears to anchor the ribosomal gene repeats. This, combined with its complex chromatin structure and transcriptional activity, suggests that this region is involved in nucleolar organization. Our results provide a platform for investigating the role of NORs in nucleolar formation and function, and open the door for determining the role of these regions in the well-known empirical association of nucleoli with pathology.

The new evidence of nucleolar ultrastructural dynamic change: fibrillar centre (FC) fusion in G1 phase and regeneration in S phase

In higher eukaryotes ribosome production starts at the end of mitosis, increases during G1, is maximal in G2 (Sirri et al., 2000) and stops during prophase (Gébrane-Younès et al., 1997). But the mechanism of the change is still uncovered. Especially in the actively growing mammalian somatic cells usually contain one or several giant fibrillar centres (GFCs) with many tiny fibrillar centre (FCs) (Koberna et al., 2002; Raška et al., 2004; Casafont et al., 2007). The process how the giant fibrillar centre (GFC) and the many tiny fibrillar centres (FCs) were formed is unknown. The present results showed there were processes of FCs fusion in G1 phase and FCs regeneration in S phase respectively in the nucleoli of A 375 cells. A few FCs fused each other in late G1 phase when the process of nucleoli fusion was completed. In S phase, a lot of tiny FCs were regenerated from the periphery of GFC, separated and scattered into nucleolar matrix in late S phase and early G2 phase. The GFC was found to be coexisted with numerous tiny FCs in the nucleolus in G2 phase. The present study provided a new evidence of nucleolar dynamic change during interphase: fibrillar centre (FC) was not to be a stable state subunit of nucleolar compartment but a highly dynamic process that may be the bases of nucleolar morphological architecture organization and its function taking place.

Structure and epigenetics of nucleoli in comparison with non-nucleolar compartments

The nucleolus is a nuclear compartment that plays an important role in ribosome biogenesis. Some structural features and epigenetic patterns are shared between nucleolar and non-nucleolar compartments. For example, the location of transcriptionally active mRNA on extended chromatin loop species is similar to that observed for transcriptionally active ribosomal DNA (rDNA) genes on so-called Christmas tree branches. Similarly, nucleolus organizer region-bearing chromosomes located a distance from the nucleolus extend chromatin fibers into the nucleolar compartment. Specific epigenetic events, such as histone acetylation and methylation and DNA methylation, also regulate transcription of both rRNA- and mRNA-encoding loci. Here, we review the epigenetic mechanisms and structural features that regulate transcription of ribosomal and mRNA genes. We focus on similarities in epigenetic and structural regulation of chromatin in nucleoli and the surrounding non-nucleolar region and discuss the role of proteins, such as heterochromatin protein 1, fibrillarin, nucleolin, and upstream binding factor, in rRNA synthesis and processing.

Pseudo-NORs: a novel model for studying nucleoli

Nucleolar organiser regions (NORs) are comprised of tandem arrays of ribosomal gene (rDNA) repeats that are transcribed by RNA polymerase I (Pol I), ultimately resulting in formation of a nucleolus. Upstream binding factor (UBF), a DNA binding protein and component of the Pol I transcription machinery, binds extensively across the rDNA repeat in vivo. Pseudo-NORs are tandem arrays of a heterologous DNA sequence with high affinity for UBF introduced into human chromosomes. In this review we describe how analysis of pseudo-NORs has provided important insights into nucleolar formation. Pseudo-NORs mimic endogenous NORs in a number of important respects. On metaphase chromosomes both appear as secondary constrictions comprised of undercondensed chromatin. The transcriptional silence of pseudo-NORs provides a platform for studying the transcription independent recruitment of factors required for nucleolar formation by this specialised chromatin structure. During interphase, pseudo-NORs appear as distinct and novel sub-nuclear bodies. Analysis of these bodies and comparison to their endogenous counterpart has provided insights into nucleolar formation and structure.

Organization of chromosome ends in the rice blast fungus, Magnaporthe oryzae

Eukaryotic pathogens of humans often evade the immune system by switching the expression of surface proteins encoded by subtelomeric gene families. To determine if plant pathogenic fungi use a similar mechanism to avoid host defenses, we sequenced the 14 chromosome ends of the rice blast pathogen, Magnaporthe oryzae. One telomere is directly joined to ribosomal RNA-encoding genes, at the end of the ∼2 Mb rDNA array. Two are attached to chromosome-unique sequences, and the remainder adjoin a distinct subtelomere region, consisting of a telomere-linked RecQ-helicase (TLH) gene flanked by several blocks of tandem repeats. Unlike other microbes, M.oryzae exhibits very little gene amplification in the subtelomere regions—out of 261 predicted genes found within 100 kb of the telomeres, only four were present at more than one chromosome end. Therefore, it seems unlikely that M.oryzae uses switching mechanisms to evade host defenses. Instead, the M.oryzae telomeres have undergone frequent terminal truncation, and there is evidence of extensive ectopic recombination among transposons in these regions. We propose that the M.oryzae chromosome termini play more subtle roles in host adaptation by promoting the loss of terminally-positioned genes that tend to trigger host defenses.

The boundary of macaque rDNA is constituted by low-copy sequences conserved during evolution

In Macaca mulatta, the single rDNA array is flanked by a patchwork of sequences including subregions of human Yp11.2, 4q35.2, and 10p15.3. This composite DNA region is characterized by unique or low-copy sequences, resembling a potentially transcribed region. The analysis of Cercopithecus aethiops, Presbytis cristata, and Hylobates lar suggests that this complex sequence organization could be shared by Old World monkey and lesser ape species. After the lesser apes/great apes divergence, the unique or nonduplicated DNA region underwent amplification and spreading, preferentially marking the p arm of acrocentric chromosomes bearing the rDNA. The molecular analysis of human acrocentric chromosomes revealed some extent of remodeling of the rDNA boundary: near the human NOR, a large 4q35.2 duplication partially resembles that found in MMU; conversely, infrequently represented Yp11.2 sequences totally differed from those of the macaque, and 10p15.3 sequences were lacking. Thus, although evolutionary events modified the sequence organization of the MMU rDNA boundary, its overall sequence feature and the preferential location in vicinity to the NOR have been conserved.

Human rDNA: Evolutionary Patterns within the Genes and Tandem Arrays Derived from Multiple Chromosomes

Human rDNA forms arrays on five chromosome pairs and is homogenized by concerted evolution through recombination and gene conversion (loci RNR1, RNR2, RNR3, RNR4, RNR5, OMIM: 180450). Homogenization is not perfect, however, so that it becomes possible to study its efficiency within genes, within arrays, and between arrays by measuring and comparing DNA sequence variation. Previous studies with randomly cloned genomic DNA fragments showed that different parts of the gene evolve at different rates but did not allow comparison of rDNA sequences derived from specific chromosomes. We have now cloned and sequenced rDNA fragments from specific acrocentric chromosomes to (1) study homogenization along the rDNA and (2) compare homogenization within chromosomes and between homologous and nonhomologous chromosomes. Our results show high homogeneity among regulatory and coding regions of rDNA on all chromosomes, a surprising homogeneity among adjacent distal non-rDNA sequences, and the existence of one to three very divergent intergenic spacer classes within each array.

Preferential cleavage sites for Sau3A restriction endonuclease in human ribosomal DNA

Previous studies of cloned ribosomal DNA (rDNA) variants isolated from the cosmid library of human chromosome 13 have revealed some disproportion in representativity of different rDNA regions (N. S. Kupriyanova, K. K. Netchvolodov, P. M. Kirilenko, B. I. Kapanadze, N. K. Yankovsky, and A. P. Ryskov, Mol. Biol. 30, 51-60, 1996). Here we show nonrandom cleavage of human rDNA with Sau3A or its isoshizomer MboI under mild hydrolysis conditions. The hypersensitive cleavage sites were found to be located in the ribosomal intergenic spacer (rIGS), especially in the regions of about 5-5.5 and 11 kb upstream of the rRNA transcription start point. This finding is based on sequencing mapping of the rDNA insert ends in randomly selected cosmid clones of human chromosome 13 and on the data of digestion kinetics of cloned and noncloned human genomic rDNA with Sau3A and MboI. The results show that a methylation status and superhelicity state of the rIGS have no effect on cleavage site sensitivity. It is interesting that all primary cleavage sites are adjacent to or entering into Alu or Psi cdc 27 retroposons of the rIGS suggesting a possible role of neighboring sequences in nuclease accessibility. The results explain nonequal representation of rDNA sequences in the human genomic DNA library used for this study.