Refined staging by sentinel lymph node biopsy to individualize therapy in anal cancer

New approach to anal cancer: Individualized therapy based on sentinel lymph node biopsy

Oncological treatment is currently directed toward a tailored therapy concept. Squamous cell carcinoma of the anal canal could be considered a suitable platform to test new therapeutic strategies to minimize treatment morbidity. Standard of care for patients with anal canal cancer consists of a combination of radiotherapy and chemotherapy. This treatment has led to a high rate of local control and a 60% cure rate with preservation of the anal sphincter, thus replacing surgical abdominoperineal resection. Lymph node metastases represent a critical independent prognostic factor for local recurrence and survival. Mesorectal and iliac lymph nodes are usually included in the radiation field, whereas the inclusion of inguinal regions still remains controversial because of the subsequent adverse side effects. Sentinel lymph node biopsies could clearly identify inguinal node-positive patients eligible for therapeutic groin irradiation. A sentinel lymph node navigation procedure is reported here to be a feasible and effective method for establishing the true inguinal node status in patients suffering from anal canal cancer. Based on the results of sentinel node biopsies, a selective approach could be proposed where node-positive patients could be selected for inguinal node irradiation while node-negative patients could take advantage of inguinal sparing irradiation, thus avoiding toxic side effects.

Sentinel lymph node in patients with rectal cancer invading the anal canal

BACKGROUND

To assess the feasibility of the sentinel lymph node procedure in patients with rectal cancer extending to the anal canal.

METHODS

Between January 2005 and April 2008, 15 patients with adenocarcinoma of the rectum with direct invasion of the anal canal and no clinical evidence of inguinal involvement were prospectively enrolled in the study. The sentinel node procedure consisted of a combination of preoperative radiocolloid lymphoscintigraphy and intraoperative detection of the inguinal sentinel node with a gamma probe. Patent blue dye was also used to facilitate direct identification of the blue-stained lymph node. After removal, the sentinel node was studied by hematoxylin-eosin staining and immunohistochemistry.

RESULTS

Detection and removal of inguinal sentinel nodes was possible in all patients. Four patients (26.7%) had sentinel nodes identified as positive for metastatic adenocarcinoma. All positive cases also had metastases detected in perirectal lymph nodes; three of them developed hepatic or pulmonary metastases within 6 months after surgery. Of the 11 patients with negative sentinel nodes, only four (36.4%) also presented metastatic perirectal lymph nodes. Although none of the negative cases developed late inguinal metastases, three developed systemic or pelvic recurrence within 12 months after surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

The standardized procedure was highly effective in sampling inguinal sentinel nodes in very low rectal cancers, allowing the detection of subclinical metastatic disease. Although this technique can be potentially useful for a subgroup of patients with isolated inguinal metastases, it cannot be routinely recommended for patients with rectal tumors invading the anal canal at this moment.