Antitumor activity of Ilmofosine (BM 41.440) in the 3Lewis-lung carcinoma model

Thioethers: An Overview

:

Spreading rapidly in recent years, cancer has become one of the causes of the highest mor-tality rates after cardiovascular diseases. The reason for cancer development is still not clearly under-stood despite enormous research activities in this area. Scientists are now working on the biology of cancer, especially on the root cause of cancer development. The aim is to treat the cancer disease and thus cure the patients. The continuing efforts for the development of novel molecules as potential anti-cancer agents are essential for this purpose. The main aim of this review was to present a survey on the medicinal chemistry of thioethers and provide practical data on their cytotoxicities against various cancer cell lines. The research articles published between 2001-2020 were consulted to pre-pare this review article; however, patent literature has not been included. The thioether-containing heterocyclic compounds may emerge as a new class of potent and effective anti-cancer agents in the future.

Alkylphospholipids are Signal Transduction Modulators with Potential for Anticancer Therapy

BACKGROUND

Alkylphospholipids (APLs) are synthetically derived from cell membrane components, which they target and thus modify cellular signalling and cause diverse effects. This study reviews the mechanism of action of anticancer, antiprotozoal, antibacterial and antiviral activities of ALPs, as well as their clinical use.

METHODS

A literature search was used as the basis of this review.

RESULTS

ALPs target lipid rafts and alter phospholipase D and C signalling cascades, which in turn will modulate the PI3K/Akt/mTOR and RAS/RAF/MEK/ERK pathways. By feedback coupling, the SAPK/JNK signalling chain is also affected. These changes lead to a G2/M phase cell cycle arrest and subsequently induce programmed cell death. The available knowledge on inhibition of AKT phosphorylation, mTOR phosphorylation and Raf down-regulation renders ALPs as attractive candidates for modern medical treatment, which is based on individualized diagnosis and therapy. Corresponding to their unusual profile of activities, their side effects result from cholinomimetic activity mainly and focus on the gastrointestinal tract. These aspects together with their bone marrow sparing features render APCs well suited for modern combination therapy. Although the clinical success has been limited in cancer diseases so far, the use of miltefosine against leishmaniosis is leading the way to better understanding their optimized use.

CONCLUSION

Recent synthetic programs generate congeners with the increased therapeutic ratio, liposomal formulations, as well as diapeutic (or theranostic) derivatives with optimized properties. It is anticipated that these innovative modifications will pave the way for the further successful development of ALPs.

Rationale and clinical application of alkylphospholipid analogues in combination with radiotherapy

Concurrent treatment with radiotherapy and chemotherapy has emerged as an effective strategy to improve clinical outcome of cancer. In addition to combining radiation with classical anticancer agents, several new biological response modifiers are under investigation in pre-clinical and clinical studies. Synthetic alkylphospholipids are anticancer agents that in contrast to most anticancer drugs, do not target DNA, but insert in the plasma membrane and subsequently induce a broad range of biological effects, ultimately leading to cell death. Alkylphospholipids kill tumor cells directly by induction of both apoptotic and non-apoptotic cell death, and indirectly by interference with critical signal transduction pathways involved in phospholipid metabolism and survival. Due to their distinct mode of action, these drugs are considered as attractive candidates to combine with radiotherapy. In this review, we will discuss several alkylphospholipids that reached clinical application. These include first-generation alkyl-lysophospholipids edelfosine and ilmofosine, second-generation alkylphosphocholine-prototype miltefosine and more recently developed analogues perifosine and erucylphosphocholine. We focus on mechanisms of action and the rationale to combine these agents with radiotherapy. The preclinical results on molecular targeting underlying this approach will be reviewed, concluded with first clinical data on combined treatment of radiotherapy with perifosine.

Advanced strategies in liposomal cancer therapy: problems and prospects of active and tumor specific drug release

Tumor specific drug delivery has become increasingly interesting in cancer therapy, as the use of chemotherapeutics is often limited due to severe side effects. Conventional drug delivery systems have shown low efficiency and a continuous search for more advanced drug delivery principles is therefore of great importance. In the first part of this review, we present current strategies in the drug delivery field, focusing on site-specific triggered drug release from liposomes in cancerous tissue. Currently marketed drug delivery systems lack the ability to actively release the carried drug and rely on passive diffusion or slow non-specific degradation of the liposomal carrier. To obtain elevated tumor-to-normal tissue drug ratios, it is important to develop drug delivery strategies where the liposomal carriers are actively degraded specifically in the tumor tissue. Many promising strategies have emerged ranging from externally triggered light- and thermosensitive liposomes to receptor targeted, pH- and enzymatically triggered liposomes relying on an endogenous trigger mechanism in the cancerous tissue. However, even though several of these strategies were introduced three decades ago, none of them have yet led to marketed drugs and are still far from achieving this goal. The most advanced and prospective technologies are probably the prodrug strategies where non-toxic drugs are carried and activated specifically in the malignant tissue by overexpressed enzymes. In the second part of this paper, we review our own work, exploiting secretory phospholipase A2 as a site-specific trigger and prodrug activator in cancer therapy. We present novel prodrug lipids together with biophysical investigations of liposome systems, constituted by these new lipids and demonstrate their degradability by secretory phospholipase A2. We furthermore give examples of the biological performance of the enzymatically degradable liposomes as advanced drug delivery systems.

Phase I and pharmacokinetic study of the cytotoxic ether lipid ilmofosine administered by weekly two-hour infusion in patients with advanced solid tumors

PURPOSE

A Phase I trial was performed to determine the dose-limiting toxicity and maximum tolerated dose, and to describe the pharmacokinetics of the alkyl-lysophospholipid, ilmofosine, when administered as a weekly 2-h infusion in patients with solid tumors.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

Thirty-nine patients were entered into a trial of ilmofosine administered weekly for 4 weeks followed by a 2-week rest period. Dose escalation occurred in 10 levels from 12 to 650 mg/m(2).

RESULTS

Thirty-six patients were evaluable for toxicity. The median number of cycles per patient was 1 (range, 1-4). Dose-limiting gastrointestinal toxicity occurred at 650 mg/m(2) with grade 3 nausea in two patients and grade 3 vomiting and diarrhea in one patient. Grade 2 diarrhea was observed in four of six patients treated at 550 mg/m(2). In addition, two patients treated at 550 mg/m(2) and two patients treated at 650 mg/m(2) experienced a decline in performance status of two or more levels that was determined to be due to treatment. There were no tumor responses. Stabilization of disease for at least 8 weeks occurred in six patients. Plasma concentrations of ilmofosine and its sulfoxide metabolite were evaluated by high-pressure liquid chromatography. The elimination of both compounds was biexponential with terminal half-lives of approximately 40 h for ilmofosine and 48 h for the sulfoxide. The area under the concentration-time curve was dose-proportional for each compound, and there was no evidence of saturable kinetics.

CONCLUSIONS

The dose-limiting toxicity of ilmofosine is gastrointestinal and the recommended dose for Phase II trials is 450 mg/m(2) as a 2-h weekly infusion. The relatively long half-life of ilmofosine and its active metabolite support the use of this intermittent schedule.

A phase II trial of ilmofosine in non-small cell bronchogenic carcinoma

We have conducted a study of ilmofosine (1-hexadecylthio; 2-methoxyethyl-rac-glycero-3-phosphocholine) in non-small cell bronchogenic carcinoma, using a schedule of continuous infusion for 5 days and a dose of 300 mg/m2/day. Toxicities were gastrointestinal (nausea, vomiting, diarrhea), fatigue and liver function abnormalities. These were severe and resulted in the removal of some patients from study. No consistent pattern of bone marrow suppression was seen. No tumor regressions occurred in 14 evaluable patients including 5 with no prior therapy. We conclude that ilmofosine is inactive in this tumor at this dose and schedule.

Phase I trial of ilmofosine as a 24 hour infusion weekly

Ilmofosine, an ether lipid derivative of lysophosphatidylcholine has antineoplastic activity in vitro and in vivo. Maximum efficacy in preclinical models is associated with prolonged exposure to the drug. In a Phase I trial of a weekly 2 hour infusion schedule of ilmofosine, a syndrome of lethargy, diminished performance status, and mild hepatotoxicity was dose-limiting at 550 mg/m2. To avoid the higher drug concentrations associated with a brief infusion, a Phase I study of a weekly 24 hour infusional schedule was undertaken in an attempt to maximize dose-intensity. Doses were escalated from 550 to 800 mg/m2. Toxicities included nausea, anorexia, fatigue, and minor elevations of liver function tests. The dose limiting toxicity at 800 mg/m2 was a syndrome of severe abdominal pain. No neutropenia or thrombocytopenia was observed except in one patient who was found to have a myelodysplastic syndrome, thought not to be related to drug therapy. The more prolonged infusion schedule of ilmofosine did not result in a substantial increase in the tolerable dose.

Analogs of alkyllysophospholipids: chemistry, effects on the molecular level and their consequences for normal and malignant cells

In the search for new approaches to cancer therapy, the first alkyllysophospholipid (ALP) analogs were designed and studied about two decades ago, either as potential immunomodulators or as antimetabolites of phospholipid metabolism. In the meantime, it has been demonstrated that they really act in this way. However, their special importance is based on the fact that, in addition, they interfere with key events of signal transduction, such as hormone (or cytokine)-receptor binding or processing, protein kinase C or phospholipase C function and phosphatidylinositol and calcium metabolism. There are no strict structural requirements for their activity. Differences in the cellular uptake or the state of cellular differentiation seem to be mainly responsible for higher or lower sensitivities of cells towards ALP analogs. Consequences of the molecular effects mentioned on the cellular level are cytostasis, induction of differentiation (while in contrast the effects of known inducers of differentiation such as 12-O-tetradecanoylphorbol-13-acetate are inhibited, probably as a consequence of protein kinase C inhibition) and loss of invasive properties. Already in sublytic concentrations, alterations in the membrane structure were observed, and lysis may begin at concentrations not much higher than those causing the other effects described. Few ALP analogs have already entered clinical studies or are in clinical use. ALP analogs are the only antineoplastic agents that do not act directly on the formation and function of the cellular replication machinery. Therefore, their effects are independent of the proliferative state of the target cells. Because of their interference with cellular regulatory events, including those failing in cancer cells, ALP analogs, beyond their clinical importance, are interesting model compounds for the development of new, more selective drugs for cancer therapy.