The laparoscopic approach to gastroenteropancreatic tumors

[Analysis of the Spanish National Registry of Laparoscopic Pancreatic Surgery]

INTRODUCTION

The reported experience with laparoscopic pancreatic surgery remains limited to case reports or small series of patients. A recent European multicenter study has allowed the limits and results of this technique to be known. This article presents an analysis of the results of the Spanish National Registry of Laparoscopic Pancreatic Surgery.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A total of 132 patients with lesions in the left pancreas were included in this series. The final diagnosis included 42 neuroendocrine tumors, 40 cystic neoplasms, 24 cysts and pseudocysts, 8 inflammatory tumors, 8 ductal carcinomas, 7 intraductal papillary mucinous tumors, 1 acinar carcinoma and 2 solid pseudopapillary tumors.

RESULTS

The conversion rate was 9.7%. Tumor enucleation was performed only in patients with insulinomas. The most frequent technique was spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy. There were no postoperative deaths. The overall rate of postoperative pancreatic-related complications was 16%.

CONCLUSIONS

Although only a few Spanish hospitals participated in the registry, a greater number of hospitals are expected to enroll patients in the very near future.

Minimally invasive surgery of the pancreas in progress

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic pancreatic surgery should be considered as an advanced laparoscopic procedure and should be performed only in institutions with experience in pancreatic surgery by a team with advanced laparoscopic skills.

AIM

This review discusses the current status of the laparoscopic approach for inflammatory pancreatic diseases and for benign-appearing pancreatic tumors.

RESULTS

Laparoscopic surgery has been shown to be beneficial in patients with inflammatory tumors located in the body-tail of the pancreas for chronic pancreatitis. Furthermore, patients with pancreatic pseudocysts may be managed with laparoscopic internal drainage (to the stomach, duodenum, or jejunum). Also, laparoscopic or retroperitoneoscopic necrosectomy has been used with success in patients with necrotizing pancreatitis. At present, laparoscopic surgery has proven to be beneficial in patients with cystic pancreatic neoplasms and neuroendocrine pancreatic tumors.

CONCLUSIONS

The laparoscopic pancreatic approach was recently shown to be feasible and safe. Laparoscopy may contribute to reduced operation time and perioperative blood loss, and reduces surgical stress because of developments in devices, improvements in procedures, and advanced techniques.

Distal pancreatectomy: en-bloc splenectomy vs spleen-preserving pancreatectomy

Distal pancreatectomy with en-bloc splenectomy has been considered the standard technique for management of benign and malignant pancreatic disorders. However, splenic preservation has recently been advocated. The aim of this study was to review the experiences of distal pancreatectomy using the open or the laparoscopic approach and to critically discuss the need to perform splenectomy. Original articles published in the English literature of peer-reviewed medical journals were selected for detailed analysis. In patients with malignant neoplasms in the body-tail of the pancreas, splenectomy has a negative influence on long-term survival after resection. The incidence of diabetes after spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy for chronic pancreatitis is less than after en-bloc splenectomy. Spleen salvage eliminates the risk of overwhelming infections. Laparoscopic spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy is feasible and safe. Laparoscopic spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy may be preferable for the advantages of a minimally invasive approach.

Laparoscopic pancreatic surgery in patients with neuroendocrine tumours: indications and limits

Laparoscopic pancreatic procedures are still at an evaluation stage with regard to their indications and techniques. Between January 1998 and December 2000, 13 patients with endocrine pancreatic tumours - 11 insulinomas and 2 non-functioning tumours-underwent laparoscopic surgery, laparoscopic ultrasonography being used in all the patients. Enucleation was performed in five patients. The operative time was 2-3 hours. Distal pancreatectomy was performed in six patients with insulinomas, and spleen preservation with intact splenic vessels was feasible in five. Splenectomy was necessary in one patient for technical reasons. Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy with splenic vessel preservation was performed in two patients with a large (6 and 8 cm) non-functioning tumour. The mean operative time for all the patients undergoing distal pancreatectomy was 4 hours, ranging from 3 to 5 hours. A pancreatic fistula occurred in three patients after tumour enucleation and in two patients after distal pancreatectomy; the mean hospital stay for all patients was 5 days. Enucleation guided by laparoscopic ultrasonography thus allows safe tumour dissection and excision, laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy also being feasible and safe. Splenic salvage with splenic vessel preservation is technically possible. The laparoscopic approach allows a shorter hospital stay and an earlier return to normal activities.