CO2 spray mini-injector for digital subtraction angiography versus PC-controlled injection system: experiments in dogs

Carbon Dioxide in Vascular Imaging and Intervention

Angiography with iodinated contrast agents is bound up with the risks of contrast-induced nephrotoxicity and hypersensitivity, which led to the idea of using carbon dioxide (CO2) gas as a negative contrast medium to eliminate these drawbacks. During the last decade, refinements and experiences have proved carbon dioxide digital subtraction angiography (CO2-DSA) to be an accurate, safe, and clinically promising vascular imaging modality, with the advantages of no hypersensitivity and no nephrotoxicity as well as minimal patient discomfort. In this article, we have reviewed the history, physical and chemical aspects, techniques, and pathophysiologic changes with the use of CO2-DSA as well as some clinical trials. Applications of CO2 gas in vascular interventions and other imagings, and the advantages and limitations of using CO2 gas in DSA are also discussed.

Mechanical aspects of CO₂ angiography

The aim of this paper is to clarify some physical-mechanical aspects involved in the carbon dioxide angiography procedure (CO₂ angiography), with a particular attention to a possible damage of the vascular wall. CO₂ angiography is widely used on patients with iodine intolerance. The injection of a gaseous element, in most cases manually performed, requires a long training period. Automatic systems allow better control of the injection and the study of the mechanical behaviour of the gas. CO₂ injections have been studied by using manual and automatic systems. Pressures, flows and jet shapes have been monitored by using a cardiovascular mock. Photographic images of liquid and gaseous jet have been recorded in different conditions, and the vascular pressure rises during injection have been monitored. The shape of the liquid jet during the catheter washing phase is straight in the catheter direction and there is no jet during gas injection. Gas bubbles are suddenly formed at the catheter's hole and move upwards: buoyancy is the only governing phenomenon and no bubbles fragmentation is detected. The pressure rise in the vessel depends on the injection pressure and volume and in some cases of manual injection it may double the basal vascular pressure values. CO₂ angiography is a powerful and safe procedure which diffusion will certainly increase, although some aspects related to gas injection and chamber filling are not jet well known. The use of an automatic system permits better results, shorter training period and limitation of vascular wall damage risk.

Carbon dioxide angiography: effect of injection parameters on bolus configuration

PURPOSE

Predict the intravascular distribution of carbon dioxide during angiography.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Mathematical modeling was used to predict the flow pattern of CO2 in a pulsatile system as a function of the CO2 flow rate. Findings were validated in an in vitro pulsatile circuit.

RESULTS

The annular flow pattern with filling of nearly the entire lumen with CO2 is the most desirable, followed by intermittent bubble flow (provided individual bubbles are large). Stratified flow relates to a continuous floating CO2 bubble. Configuration of the CO2 bolus depends on fluid properties, fluid velocity, flow rates, mean intraluminal pressure, pressure amplitude, pulse rate, and vessel diameter. In vessels with less than 10-mm inner diameter, annular flow can be achieved relatively easily with injection rates above 20-30 mL/sec. Higher rates are not expected to produce superior results. When imaging a 2-cm artery, the best that can be realized clinically is intermittent flow with large bubbles. Bubbles size increases with increasing CO2 flow rate. In aneurysms, only stratified flow can be achieved with reasonable injection rates. Periodicity of the flow patterns is determined by the pulsatile circuit and can produce indentations in the CO2 bolus, which can be mistaken for stenoses.

CONCLUSIONS

Flow regime maps can be used to optimize bolus configuration during CO2 angiography.

Imaging of the portal vein during transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt procedures: a comparison of carbon dioxide and iodinated contrast

We report our experience with wedged hepatic injections of carbon dioxide (CO2) in the imaging of the portal vein during transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) procedures. In all patients CO2 allowed quick and effective visualization of the portal vein. The image quality and extent of visualization of the portal vein was considered superior to iodinated contrast media in all cases. We suggest that CO2 should be used more frequently during TIPS.

1996 AUR Memorial Award. Densitometric analysis of eccentric vascular stenoses: comparison of CO2 and iodinated contrast media

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

The authors compared the accuracies of CO2 and iodinated contrast material in the densitometric quantification of eccentric vascular stenoses.

METHODS

Five precision-machined eccentric phantom stenoses of 50%, 60%, 70%, 80%, and 90% cross-sectional area narrowing were integrated into a pulsatile ex vivo flow model, imaged with digital subtraction angiography (DSA), and analyzed with densitometry. Relationships between the actual and measured (densitometric) degree of cross-sectional area narrowing were evaluated by using linear regression analysis and paired Student t tests. Comparison measurements were obtained in en face and profile projections. In addition, the effect of iodinated contrast material concentration was evaluated over a range of dilutions (47-282 mg iodine per milliliter).

RESULTS

CO2 yielded significantly more accurate results than did iodinated contrast material (282 mg iodine per milliliter) in the 50%, 60%, and 70% stenosis models when imaging was performed en face (P < .005). The best overall correlation was observed with CO2 DSA when imaging in profile (slope = 0.91, intercept = 2.42% actual stenosis, r = .99). The accuracy of densitometric stenosis estimation was inversely related to the concentration of iodinated contrast material.

CONCLUSION

CO2 DSA densitometry, under the conditions of these experiments, yields quantitative measures of relative cross-sectional area narrowing that are comparable with, and under some circumstances surpass, those obtained with iodinated contrast material-based DSA. In this model, CO2 was more useful than iodinated contrast material in 50%-70% stenosis when imaging in the least-optimal plane of stenosis quantification, the en face projection.