Long-term efficacy of endoscopic papillo-sphincterotomy for common bile duct stones and benign papillary stenosis

Comparison of long-term outcomes after endoscopic sphincterotomy versus endoscopic papillary balloon dilation: a propensity score-based cohort analysis

BACKGROUND

Endoscopic sphincterotomy (ES) is widely performed in patients with common bile duct stones (CBDS). However, the long-term outcomes of patients following ES have not been sufficiently elucidated. Impaired papillary function following ES may result in additional late complications. In contrast, endoscopic papillary balloon dilation (EPBD)-another option for treating CBDS-is expected to preserve papillary function. This study aimed to compare the long-term outcomes of patients with CBDS treated with ES to those treated with EPBD in a large cohort. In addition, a subgroup analysis was performed, according to gallbladder (GB) status.

METHODS

A cohort study was performed using propensity score matching to reduce treatment selection bias. This involved the analysis of follow-up data for 1086 patients who underwent EPBD or ES for CBDS.

RESULTS

Propensity score matching extracted 246 pairs of patients. The median (interquartile range) follow-up period after EPBD or ES was 93.5 (46.8-129.2) months and 90 (42-139.3) months, respectively. The incidence of CBDS recurrence after EPBD and ES were 8.5 and 15.0 %, respectively. The hazard ratio (95 % CI) was 0.577 (0.338-0.986) (P = 0.044). Based on the status of the GB, the incidence of CBDS recurrence was significantly different between post-EPBD and post-ES in the group with cholecystectomy after EPBD/ES (P = 0.013).

CONCLUSIONS

The incidence of biliary complications was significantly lower in patients after EPBD than in those after ES, and this outcome appeared most markedly in patients who also underwent cholecystectomy.

Comparison of endoscopic sphincterotomy and laparoscopic exploration of the common bile duct

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic exploration of the common bile duct is becoming more popular, although endoscopic sphincterotomy remains the usual treatment for bile duct stones. However, loss of the biliary sphincter causes permanent duodenobiliary reflux, and recurrent stone disease and biliary neoplasia may be a consequence.

METHODS

A systematic literature review was conducted to compare laparoscopic exploration with endoscopic sphincterotomy. A text word search of the Medline, Pubmed and Cochrane databases, and a manual search of the citations from these references, was used.

RESULTS

Endoscopic sphincterotomy is associated with a median (range) mortality rate of 1 (0-6) per cent, compared with 1 (0-5) per cent for laparoscopic bile duct exploration. The median (range) rate of pancreatitis following endoscopic sphincterotomy is 3 (1-19) per cent; this is a rare complication after laparoscopic duct exploration. The combined morbidity rate for laparoscopic cholecystectomy and endoscopic sphincterotomy is 13 (3-16) per cent, which is greater than 8 (2-17) per cent for laparoscopic bile duct exploration. Randomized trials are few and contain relatively small numbers of patients. They show little overall difference in rates of duct clearance, but a higher mortality rate and number of hospital admissions are noted for endoscopic sphincterotomy compared with laparoscopic bile duct exploration. Endoscopic sphincterotomy is associated with recurrent stone formation (up to 16 per cent) with associated cholangitis. It is also associated with bacterobilia and chronic mucosal inflammation. The late development of bile duct cancer has been reported in up to 2 per cent of patients.

CONCLUSION

Laparoscopic exploration of the common bile duct may be a better way of removing stones than endoscopic sphincterotomy plus laparoscopic cholecystectomy. :

Risk factors predictive of late complications after endoscopic sphincterotomy for bile duct stones: long-term (more than 10 years) follow-up study

OBJECTIVE

Widespread use of laparoscopic cholecystectomy has extended the indications for endoscopic sphincterotomy (ES) to young patients with choledocholithiasis; however, long-term results of ES and risk factors for late complications are largely unknown.

METHODS

Between 1977 and 1990, 145 patients aged 60 yr or younger underwent ES for choledocholithiasis. Long-term outcomes of ES were investigated in the year 2000, and prognostic factors for late complications were multivariately analyzed.

RESULTS

Long-term information was available in 135 cases (93.1%), with a median overall follow-up duration of 14.5 yr (range, 6.5-22.3 yr). There were neither biliary malignancies nor deaths attributable to biliary disease. Sixteen patients (11.9%) developed late complications, including choledochal complications (stone recurrence and/or cholangitis; 14 patients) and acute cholecystitis (two of 32 patients with the gallbladder in situ). Multivariate analysis identified two independent risk factors for choledochal complications: bile duct diameter > or = 15 mm and brown pigment stones at the initial ES. Choledochal complications were endoscopically manageable. All recurrent stones were brown pigment stones.

CONCLUSIONS

Approximately 12% of patients develop late complications after ES, but retreatment with ERCP is effective. ES is a reasonable alternative even in young patients with choledocholithiasis. Careful follow-up is necessary, however, particularly for patients with a dilated bile duct or brown pigment stones.

Sphincterotomy for biliary sphincter of Oddi dysfunction

BACKGROUND

The sphincter of Oddi regulates both bile and pancreatic juice flow into the duodenum. When dysfunction occurs it leads to problems relating to either the bile or pancreatic ducts. On the biliary side, the most common problem is recurrent biliary type pain following cholecystectomy.

OBJECTIVES

Is sphincterotomy effective treatment for biliary sphincter of Oddi dysfunction patients?

SEARCH STRATEGY

Electronic data bases, including the Collaborative Review Group trial registers, MEDLINE, and EMBASE, as well as checking reference lists in as many languages as possible that had the titles: sphincter of Oddi dysfunction, biliary dyskinesia, papillary stenosis, biliary dyssynergia, odditis, papillitis, post-cholecystectomy pain, right upper quadrant pain, or unexplained right upper quadrant pain were included. These titles were matched with sphincterotomy.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised placebo-controlled trials performing sphincterotomy in patients with suspected biliary sphincter of Oddi dysfunction using manometry as part of the patient evaluation. A basal pressure > 40 mmHg was defined as abnormal. The primary outcome measure were symptomatic response (defined either as cure/improvement or not improved) to sphincterotomy.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Electronic data bases were used to search for the studies. Studies were attempted to be stratified as randomised clinical trials, controlled clinical trials (i.e., quasi-randomised clinical trials), well designed observational studies using a well matched control group, or other. These groupings were then entered into a meta-analysis.

MAIN RESULTS

Only two randomised clinical trials met the inclusion criteria. In 49 patients studied, sphincterotomy was more effective than placebo in treating patients with an elevated basal pressure (Peto odds ratio 9.08, 95% confidence interval 2.97-277.77). In 77 patients studied, sphincterotomy was no better than placebo in treating patients with a normal normal basal pressure (Peto odds ratio 1.28, 95% confidence interval 0.52-3.13). There was no data on quality of life or health economics.

REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS

These results suggest that sphincterotomy for biliary sphincter of Oddi dysfunction appears effective in those patients with an elevated sphincter of Oddi basal pressure (>40 mmHg), but is no better than placebo in those patients with a normal basal pressure. The results reported in this review must be interpreted with caution as there are only two studies and one of the reviewers (Toouli) has been an author in both studies. Further trials by independent groups are recommended.

Follow-up of more than 10 years after endoscopic sphincterotomy for choledocholithiasis in young patients

BACKGROUND

With the advent of laparoscopic cholecystectomy, the indications for endoscopic sphincterotomy (ES) have been extended to young patients with choledocholithiasis. However, the long-term results of ES are largely unknown.

METHODS

Between 1977 and 1986, 115 patients aged 60 years or less underwent ES for choledocholithiasis. Stone classification, and early and long-term outcomes of ES were analysed retrospectively.

RESULTS

Early complications occurred in nine patients (7.8 per cent), but there were no deaths. ES and stone clearance were successful in 110 patients. Long-term information was available in 103 of the 110 patients, with a mean overall follow-up duration of 14-2 (range 10.4-19.3) years. Ten patients (9.7 per cent) developed late complications, including stone recurrence and/or cholangitis (nine patients) and acute cholecystitis (one of 23 patients with the gallbladder in situ). The choledochal complication rate was somewhat higher in patients with calcium bilirubinate stones at ES (seven of 65 patients) than in those with cholesterol stones (two of 38 patients). Choledochal complications were manageable endoscopically.

CONCLUSION

Approximately 10 per cent of patients develop late complications. However, endoscopic retreatment is safe and effective. ES is a reasonable method for treating choledocholithiasis, even in young patients.

Long-term follow-up after endoscopic sphincterotomy for bile duct stones in patients younger than 60 years of age

BACKGROUND

Little is known about the long-term effects of endoscopic biliary sphincterotomy.

METHODS

We retrospectively evaluated the rate of late complications after endoscopic sphincterotomy (EST) for bile duct stones. Patients had to meet the following inclusion criteria: (1) treated between 1976 and 1980, (2) complete stone removal after EST, (3) prior cholecystectomy or elective cholecystectomy within 2 months after EST, and (4) 60 years old or younger at the time of ERCP. A total of 100 patients were identified. Information was obtained from general practitioners and patients by telephone. Patients completed a postal questionnaire and a blood sample was obtained for liver function tests.

RESULTS

Information was obtained for 94 patients (in the majority of cases [87%] from multiple sources). There were 26 men and 68 women with a mean age of 51 years at the time of ERCP (range, 23 to 60 years). Early complications (< 30 days) occurred in 14 patients (15%). One patient died of a retroperitoneal perforation secondary to EST. During a median period of 15 years (range, 3 to 18 years), 22 patients (24%) developed a total of 36 late complications. There were 21 patients with symptoms of recurrent bile duct stones and one patient with biliary pancreatitis. Other late complications, such as recurrent ascending cholangitis or malignant degeneration, were not observed. An ERCP was performed in 20 of the 22 patients with late complications and demonstrated bile duct stones in 13, combined with stenosis of the EST opening in 9 patients. Late complications were initially managed endoscopically and/or conservatively. One patient underwent surgery after failed endoscopic treatment and one patient died of cholangitis before she could undergo an ERCP. Twelve other patients died of unrelated causes during follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

After EST for bile duct stones, late complications occur in a significant proportion of patients. Stone recurrence remains the most important problem, but can in general be managed endoscopically.

An unusual case of a retained stone following laparoscopic cholecystectomy

A patient with gallstone pancreatitis was managed by endoscopic sphincterotomy followed by a laparoscopic cholecystectomy. At the time of surgery, an intraoperative cholangiogram disclosed the presence of a residual calculus, which was erroneously thought to be in the common bile duct. A repeat ERCP showed that the stone was, in fact, in a long cystic duct stump which was fortunately accessible to endoscopic extraction.