Corneal hysteresis following descemetorhexis with endokeratoplasty

Appropriate stage of Descemet membrane removal during donor preparation in deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty

PURPOSE

To investigate the appropriate surgical stage for Descemet membrane (DM) removal during donor preparation in deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty (DALK).

METHODS

This study included 83 corneoscleral buttons that were used for DALK. The donor DM was removed randomly either before (group 1; 43 eyes) or after (group 2; 40 eyes) trephination. The time required for DM removal was recorded, and the geometric properties of cut buttons were evaluated after trephination. The intraoperative video recordings were reviewed to determine if the dissections were performed at the stroma-DM plane as it was intended. The time needed to remove the DM, the rate of correct dissection at the intended stroma-DM plane, and the roundness and precision of the donor cuts were compared between the groups.

RESULTS

The two groups were comparable in donor characteristics, including age, quality of the tissue, and trephination size. Time spent to remove DM was significantly shorter in group 1 (68.9 ± 48.2 s) than group 2 (117.7 ± 52.7 s, P = 0.001). DM stripping was performed incorrectly in 2 corneas (4.7%) in group 1 and in 12 corneas (30%) in group 2 (P = 0.01). No difference was found between the groups in the roundness and precision of donor button cuts.

CONCLUSIONS

DM removal before trephination did not detrimentally affect the geometric properties of punched donor tissues. When DM stripping was performed before trephination, the donor tissue was less traumatized and posterior graft surface was more likely to be regular; therefore, it is advisable to remove DM before trephination during donor preparation for DALK.

Comparison of corneal biomechanical properties following penetrating keratoplasty and deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty for keratoconus

IMPORTANCE

Keratoplasty is a surgical procedure to create a more regular optical surface following biomechanical weakening of the cornea in keratoconus. The ideal keratoplasty procedure should also restore corneal biomechanics to that of the healthy cornea.

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to evaluate and compare the biomechanical properties of corneas following penetrating keratoplasty (PKP) and predescematic deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty (DALK) to those of healthy eyes.

DESIGN

Prospective cross-sectional study.

PARTICIPANTS

Two cohorts of post-keratoplasty eyes (42 eyes with PKP and 27 eyes with DALK) with each other, and with a cohort of 152 healthy eyes.

METHODS

All eyes were examined by slit-lamp biomicroscopy, tomography, anterior segment-OCT and non-contact tonometry CorVis ST (CST).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

CST biomechanical parameters, maximum corneal deformation (MCD) and corneal energy dissipation were compared between keratoplasty techniques, and with healthy eyes.

RESULTS

The mean age of participants with PKP and DALK were 35 ± 13.7 and 36.1 ± 12.6 years, respectively. None of the CST parameters were significantly different between PKP and DALK eyes. However, when compared to healthy corneas, numerous parameters were significantly different for both keratoplasty techniques. Of note, MCD was significantly higher in PKP compared to DALK and healthy corneas, after controlling for co-factors.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

Neither type of keratoplasty technique utilized in keratoconus completely restored corneal biomechanical properties to that of healthy corneas. However, PKP resulted in a greater number of parameters significantly different to healthy corneas, compared to DALK.

Intraocular pressure measurements and corneal biomechanical properties using a dynamic Scheimpflug analyzer, after several keratoplasty techniques, versus normal eyes

PURPOSE

To evaluate the biomechanical properties of the cornea and their impact on intraocular pressure (IOP) measurement after lamellar keratoplasty, compared to healthy eyes, using a non-contact tonometer with a Scheimpflug camera.

METHODS

This study, from 2014 to 2015, included 22 primary DSAEK, 5 DALK, 6 DSAEK after PK, and 50 control eyes. Using a non-contact tonometer with a high-speed Scheimpflug camera (CORVIS ST, Oculus Optikgeräte GmbH, Wetzlar, Germany), several biomechanical parameters were recorded, including radius at highest concavity (R_hc) and defomation amplitude (DA). Central corneal thickness (CCT) and uncorrected IOP, were also recorded. For the control eyes only, a corrected IOP was calculated, based on age, central corneal thickness, and biomechanical parameters.

RESULTS

R_hc was significantly lower after DALK (R_hc=5.54±0.71, P=0.007) and DSAEK (R_hc=6.26±0.77, P=0.042) compared to control eyes (R_hc=6.82±0.76). DA was higher after DALK and DSAEK, but not significantly (respectively 1.24±0.09 P=0.41 and 1.22±0.15, P=0.923) compared to normal eyes (1.18±0.15). Uncorrected IOP was not significantly different between post-keratoplasty and control eyes. In control eyes, the corrected IOP (15.23±1.88) was lower than the uncorrected IOP (16.10±2.34); a statistically significant positive correlation between R_hc and CCT (R²=0.6020, P<0001), and a significant negative correlation between DA and CCT (R²=-0.641, P<0.0001) were found.

CONCLUSION

Our study showed that, after lamellar keratoplasty, corneal biomechanics are altered. Corneas with higher ocular rigidity will show a lower DA and a higher R_hc.

Changes in Corneal Biomechanical Properties After Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty for Pseudophakic Bullous Keratopathy

PURPOSE

To compare corneal biomechanical properties and intraocular pressure (IOP) in eyes with pseudophakic bullous keratopathy (PBK) before and after Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK).

METHODS

This prospective nonrandomized intrasubject comparative study was conducted on 44 eyes of 22 patients with the diagnosis of PBK who underwent DSAEK in one eye. IOP was measured by Goldmann applanation tonometer, and central corneal thickness was measured by ultrasound pachymetry. The ocular response analyzer was used to measure corneal hysteresis (CH), corneal resistance factor (CRF), Goldmann-related IOP, and cornea-compensated IOP. The same measurements were performed in the normal fellow eyes which served as controls. All measurements were performed preoperatively and 6 months postoperatively.

RESULTS

The mean patient age was 67 ± 14 years. Mean preoperative CH and CRF values in the DSAEK group were 5.77 ± 2.94 and 6.39 ± 2.72 mm Hg, respectively, which were significantly lower than those measured in the control group (8.2 ± 2.47 and 8.43 ± 2.49 mm Hg, respectively, P = 0.001 for both comparisons). Postoperatively, CH and CRF demonstrated a significant increase (7.09 ± 3.68 mm Hg, P = 0.05 and 8.21 ± 3.84 mm Hg, P = 0.03, respectively) in operated eyes approaching the normal values measured in the control eyes.

CONCLUSIONS

Corneal biomechanical parameters were significantly lower in PBK eyes than in the normal fellow eyes. These metrics significantly increased after DSAEK and reached values measured in the normal fellow eyes.

Ocular biomechanical measurements on post-keratoplasty corneas using a Scheimpflug-based noncontact device

AIM

To analyse ocular biomechanical properties, central corneal thickness (CCT) and intraocular pressure (IOP) in post-keratoplasty eyes, as compared to normal subjects, with a new Scheimpflug-based technology. Moreover, biomechanical data were correlated with the size and age of the donor and recipient corneas.

METHODS

Measurements were conducted on 46 eyes of 46 healthy patients without any corneal pathology (age: 53.83±20.8y) and 30 eyes of 28 patients after penetrating keratoplasty (age: 49.43±21.34y). Ten biomechanical parameters, the CCT and IOP were recorded by corneal visualization scheimpflug technology (CorVis ST) using high-speed Scheimpflug imaging. Keratometry values were also recorded using Pentacam HR system. Scheimpflug measurements were performed after 43.41±40.17mo (range: 11-128mo) after the keratoplasty and after 7.64±2.34mo (range: 5-14mo) of suture removal.

RESULTS

Regarding the device-specific biomechanical parameters, the highest concavity time and radius values showed a significant decrease between these two groups (P=0.01 and P<0.001). None of other biomechanical parameters disclosed a significant difference. The CCT showed a significant difference between post-keratoplasty eyes as compared to normal subjects (P=0.003) using the CorVis ST device. The IOP was within the normal range in both groups (P=0.84). There were no significant relationships between the keratometric data, the size of the donor and recipient, age of the donor and recipient and biomechanical properties obtained by CorVis ST.

CONCLUSION

The ocular biomechanics remain stable after penetrating keratoplasty according to the CorVis ST measurements. Only two from the ten device-specific parameters have importance in the follow-up period after penetrating keratoplasty.

Graft Biomechanics Following Three Corneal Transplantation Techniques

Purpose:

To compare corneal biomechanical properties following three different transplantation techniques, including Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK), deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty (DALK) and penetrating keratoplasty (PK) in comparison to normal eyes.

Methods:

This cross-sectional comparative study included 118 eyes: 17 eyes of 17 patients received DSAEK, 23 eyes of 21 patients underwent DALK using Anwar's big bubble technique, and 45 eyes of 36 patients had PK; 33 right eyes of 33 normal subjects served as the control group. Using the ocular response analyzer (ORA, Reichert Ophthalmic Instruments, Buffalo, New York, USA), corneal hysteresis (CH) and corneal resistance factor (CRF) were measured and compared among the study groups at least 3 months after all sutures were removed.

Results:

Mean patient age was 26.9 ± 5.0 years in the control group, 28.8 ± 4.2 in the PK group, 27.2 ± 6.5 in the DALK group, and 62.5 ± 16.8 in the DSAEK group (P < 0.001). Central corneal thickness (CCT) was 539.0 ± 24.8, 567.5 ± 38.8, 547.0 ± 42.6 and 631.1 ± 84.8 μm, respectively (P < 0.001). CH and CRF were significantly lower in the DSAEK group (7.79 ± 2.0 and 7.88 ± 1.74 mmHg, respectively) as compared to the PK (10.23 ± 2.07 and 10.13 ± 2.22 mmHg, respectively) and DALK (9.64 ± 2.07 and 9.36 ± 2.09 mmHg, respectively) groups. The two latter groups demonstrated biomechanical parameters comparable to normal subjects (9.84 ± 1.59 and 9.89 ± 1.73 mmHg, respectively).

Conclusion:

Graft biomechanical parameters after DSAEK are lower than those following PK and DALK. After PK and DALK in keratoconic eyes, these metrics are increased to normal values. These differences may have implications for interpreting intraocular pressure or planning graft refractive surgery after keratoplasty.

Evaluation of corneal biomechanical properties following penetrating keratoplasty using ocular response analyzer

Purpose:

To evaluate corneal biomechanical properties in eyes that has undergone penetrating keratoplasty (PK).

Materials and Methods:

Retrospective observational study in a tertiary care centre. Data recorded included ocular response analyzer (ORA) values of normal and post-keratoplasty eyes [corneal hysteresis (CH), corneal resistance factor (CRF), Goldmann-correlated intraocular pressure (IOPg), and cornea-compensated intraocular pressure (IOPcc)], corneal topography, and central corneal thickness (CCT). Wilcoxon signed rank test was used to analyze the difference in ORA parameter between post-PK eyes and normal eyes. Correlation between parameters was evaluated with Spearman's rho correlation.

Results:

The ORA study of 100 eyes of 50 normal subjects and 54 post-keratoplasty eyes of 51 patients showed CH of 8.340 ± 1.85 and 9.923 ± 1.558, CRF of 8.846 ± 2.39 and 9.577 ± 1.631 in post-PK eyes and normal eyes, respectively. CH and CRF did not correlate with post-keratoplasty astigmatism (P =0.311 and 0.276, respectively) while a significant correlation was observed with IOPg (P =0.004) and IOPcc (P < 0.001).

Conclusion:

Biomechanical profiles were significantly decreased in post-keratoplasty eyes with significant correlation with higher IOP as compared with that in normal eyes.

Evaluation of the effects of circular Descemet's membrane incision on the biomechanical, topographic and optical properties of rabbit corneas

BACKGROUND

  Prospective interventional animal case series to investigate quantitatively changes in corneal light-scattering, corneal hysteresis, keratometry and pachymetry induced by circular Descemet's membrane incision.

METHODS

  Thirty mature New Zealand White rabbits were divided into three study groups: (i) surgical intervention with circular Descemet's incision; (ii) surgical control; and (iii) medical control. Group 1 eyes had two paracenteses placed 120 degrees apart and an 8.5-mm-diameter Descemetorhexis was created with a reverse Sinskey hook. Group 2 eyes had two paracenteses placed 120 degrees apart. The main outcome measures were scatterometry, corneal hysteresis, pachymetry and keratometry measurements, which were performed prior to and 2 weeks following the interventions. Histology and transmission electron microscopy were performed post-mortem in representative eyes.

RESULTS

  Eyes that had undergone circular Descemet's incision had significantly decreased mean keratometry (43.9 ± 0.7 dioptres [mean ± standard deviation] preoperatively vs. 43.5 ± 0.9 dioptres postoperatively, P = 0.007). Circular Descemet's membrane incision did not significantly change corneal hysteresis (4.4 ± 1.1 mmHg preoperatively vs. 4.6 ± 0.9 mmHg postoperatively, P = 0.664). Corneal light scattering decreased after Descemet's scoring (0.00254 ± 0.00059 preoperatively vs. 0.00206 ± 0.00031 postoperatively, P = 0.0025). Pachymetry measurements remained relatively stable (341.3 ± 18.6 µm preoperatively vs. 330.6 ± 20.0 µm postoperatively) without postoperative oedema.

CONCLUSIONS

  Circular Descemet's scoring flattened the corneal curvature by a mean of 0.4 dioptres without affecting corneal hysteresis in rabbit corneas. These findings may have important implications for ongoing developments in endothelial keratoplasty.

Is excimer laser corneal surgery appropriate after resolution of corneal edema in fuchs dystrophy by descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty?

PURPOSE

To report a case of apparent central corneal thinning diagnosed after treatment of Fuchs dystrophy by Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) and to discuss treatment options with laser refractive surgery.

METHODS

A pseudophakic patient with Fuchs dystrophy underwent DMEK, with removal of dysfunctional recipient endothelium and replacement with bare endothelium and Descemet membrane from a donor cornea. Subsequently, a standard preoperative evaluation for LASIK, including refraction, topography, Pentacam (Oculus Optikgeräte GmbH), and slit-lamp examination was performed.

RESULTS

After DMEK, refraction was +0.75 +2.50 × 115. Corneal topography did not show evidence of corneal ectasia or suspicion of keratoconus. Simulated keratometry was 43.03×40.49. Central corneal thickness was 481 μm by ultrasonic pachymetry. Pentacam evaluation of the anterior and posterior surfaces showed normal contours relative to a best-fit sphere on the anterior surface, but central elevation of 25 μm on the posterior surface. The typical increased central corneal thickness of Fuchs dystrophy could have masked a latent forme fruste keratoconus that became evident after the edema resolved with DMEK, or the central edema could have led to loss of stromal thickness causing the forward displacement of the posterior corneal surface.

CONCLUSIONS

It is uncertain whether this eye is safe for LASIK or PRK correction of the residual refractive error. This finding of posterior surface forward displacement would be difficult to impossible to detect in an eye after Descemet stripping endothelial keratoplasty due to the addition of stromal tissue on the graft.