1
|
Hu N, Tanaka H, Kakino R, Yoshikawa S, Miyao M, Akita K, Isohashi K, Aihara T, Nihei K, Ono K. Evaluation of a treatment planning system developed for clinical boron neutron capture therapy and validation against an independent Monte Carlo dose calculation system. Radiat Oncol 2021; 16:243. [PMID: 34952608 PMCID: PMC8709965 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-021-01968-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/06/2021] [Accepted: 12/15/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Boron neutron capture therapy (BNCT) for the treatment of unresectable, locally advanced, and recurrent carcinoma of the head and neck cancer has been approved by the Japanese government for reimbursement under the national health insurance as of June 2020. A new treatment planning system for clinical BNCT has been developed by Sumitomo Heavy Industries, Ltd. (Sumitomo), NeuCure® Dose Engine. To safely implement this system for clinical use, the simulated neutron flux and gamma ray dose rate inside a water phantom was compared against experimental measurements. Furthermore, to validate and verify the new planning system, the dose distribution inside an anthropomorphic head phantom was compared against a BNCT treatment planning system SERA and an in-house developed Monte Carlo dose calculation program. The simulated results closely matched the experimental results, within 5% for the thermal neutron flux and 10% for the gamma ray dose rate. The dose distribution inside the head phantom closely matched with SERA and the in-house developed dose calculation program, within 3% for the tumour and a difference of 0.3 Gyw for the brain.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Naonori Hu
- Kansai BNCT Medical Center, Osaka Medical and Pharmaceutical University, Osaka-fu Takatsuki-shi Daigakumachi 2-7, Takatsuki, Japan. .,Institute for Integrated Radiation and Nuclear Science, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.
| | - Hiroki Tanaka
- Institute for Integrated Radiation and Nuclear Science, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Ryo Kakino
- Kansai BNCT Medical Center, Osaka Medical and Pharmaceutical University, Osaka-fu Takatsuki-shi Daigakumachi 2-7, Takatsuki, Japan
| | - Syuushi Yoshikawa
- Kansai BNCT Medical Center, Osaka Medical and Pharmaceutical University, Osaka-fu Takatsuki-shi Daigakumachi 2-7, Takatsuki, Japan
| | - Mamoru Miyao
- Central Department of Radiology, Osaka Medical and Pharmaceutical University Hospital, Takatsuki, Japan
| | - Kazuhiko Akita
- Kansai BNCT Medical Center, Osaka Medical and Pharmaceutical University, Osaka-fu Takatsuki-shi Daigakumachi 2-7, Takatsuki, Japan
| | - Kayako Isohashi
- Kansai BNCT Medical Center, Osaka Medical and Pharmaceutical University, Osaka-fu Takatsuki-shi Daigakumachi 2-7, Takatsuki, Japan
| | - Teruhito Aihara
- Kansai BNCT Medical Center, Osaka Medical and Pharmaceutical University, Osaka-fu Takatsuki-shi Daigakumachi 2-7, Takatsuki, Japan
| | - Keiji Nihei
- Kansai BNCT Medical Center, Osaka Medical and Pharmaceutical University, Osaka-fu Takatsuki-shi Daigakumachi 2-7, Takatsuki, Japan.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Osaka Medical and Pharmaceutical University Hospital, Takatsuki, Japan
| | - Koji Ono
- Kansai BNCT Medical Center, Osaka Medical and Pharmaceutical University, Osaka-fu Takatsuki-shi Daigakumachi 2-7, Takatsuki, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Chen Z, Yang P, Lei Q, Wen Y, He D, Wu Z, Gou C. COMPARISON OF BNCT DOSIMETRY CALCULATIONS USING DIFFERENT GEANT4 PHYSICS LISTS. RADIATION PROTECTION DOSIMETRY 2019; 187:88-97. [PMID: 31135899 DOI: 10.1093/rpd/ncz144] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/03/2018] [Revised: 04/28/2019] [Accepted: 05/11/2019] [Indexed: 06/09/2023]
Abstract
A comparison of Geant4 physics lists is conducted in the calculation of the total absorbed dose, boron dose, and non-boron dose in phantom, and the total depth-dose, boron depth-dose, and non-boron depth-dose along the beam axis for neutrons in a range of 0.0253 eV to 10 MeV. Physics processes are included for neutrons, photons, and charged particles, and calculations are conducted for neutrons and secondary particles. The results obtained from QBBC, QGSP_BERT, and neutron high precision physics lists with and without S(α, β) data are compared with the FLUKA values. Neutron high precision physics lists with S(α, β) data showed the best agreement with FLUKA in the studied energy range.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhao Chen
- Key Laboratory of Radiation Physics and Technology (Sichuan University), Ministry of Education and Institute of Nuclear Science and Technology, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
| | - Peng Yang
- Key Laboratory of Radiation Physics and Technology (Sichuan University), Ministry of Education and Institute of Nuclear Science and Technology, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
| | - Qin Lei
- Key Laboratory of Radiation Physics and Technology (Sichuan University), Ministry of Education and Institute of Nuclear Science and Technology, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
| | - Yumei Wen
- Key Laboratory of Radiation Physics and Technology (Sichuan University), Ministry of Education and Institute of Nuclear Science and Technology, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
| | - Donglin He
- Key Laboratory of Radiation Physics and Technology (Sichuan University), Ministry of Education and Institute of Nuclear Science and Technology, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
| | - Zhangwen Wu
- Key Laboratory of Radiation Physics and Technology (Sichuan University), Ministry of Education and Institute of Nuclear Science and Technology, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
| | - Chengjun Gou
- Key Laboratory of Radiation Physics and Technology (Sichuan University), Ministry of Education and Institute of Nuclear Science and Technology, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
The essential role of radiobiological figures of merit for the assessment and comparison of beam performances in boron neutron capture therapy. Phys Med 2019; 67:9-19. [PMID: 31610302 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2019.09.235] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/20/2019] [Revised: 09/09/2019] [Accepted: 09/14/2019] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Boron Neutron Capture Therapy (BNCT) is a treatment modality that uses an external neutron beam to selectively inactive boron10-loaded tumor cells. This work presents the development and innovative use of radiobiological probability models to adequately evaluate and compare the therapeutic potential and versatility of beams presenting different neutron energy spectra. M&M: Aforementioned characteristics, collectively refer to as the performance of a beam, were defined on the basis of radiobiological probability models for the first time in BNCT. A model of uncomplicated tumor control probability (UTCP) for HN cancer was introduced. This model considers a NTCP able to predict severe mucositis and a TCP for non-uniform doses derived herein. A systematic study comprising a simplified HN cancer model is presented as a practical application of the introduced radiobiological figures of merit (FOM) for assessing and comparing the performance of different clinical beams. Applications involving treated HN cancer patients were also analyzed. RESULTS The maximum UTCP proved suitable and sensitive to assess the performance of a beam, revealing particularities of the studied sources that the physical FOMs do not highlight. The radiobiological FOMs evaluated in patients showed to be useful tools both for retrospective analysis of the BNCT treatments, and for prospective studies of beam optimization and feasibility. CONCLUSIONS The presented developments and applications demonstrated that it is possible to assess and compare performances of completely different beams fairly and adequately by assessing the radiobiological FOM UTCP. Thus, this figure would be a practical and essential aid to guide treatment decisions.
Collapse
|
4
|
Koivunoro H, Kankaanranta L, Seppälä T, Haapaniemi A, Mäkitie A, Joensuu H. Boron neutron capture therapy for locally recurrent head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: An analysis of dose response and survival. Radiother Oncol 2019; 137:153-158. [PMID: 31108276 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2019.04.033] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/11/2018] [Revised: 03/03/2019] [Accepted: 04/29/2019] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) that recurs locally is a therapeutic challenge. We investigated the efficacy of boron neutron capture therapy (BNCT) in the treatment of such patients and the factors associated with treatment response and survival. METHODS AND MATERIALS Seventy-nine patients with inoperable, locally recurred HNSCC were treated with l-boronophenylalanine-mediated BNCT in Espoo, Finland, between February, 2003 and January, 2012. Prior treatments consisted of surgery and conventionally fractionated radiotherapy to a median cumulative dose of 66 Gy (interquartile range [IQR], 59-70 Gy) administered with or without concomitant chemotherapy. Tumor response was assessed using the RECISTv.1.0 criteria. RESULTS Forty patients received BNCT once (on 1 day), and 39 twice. The median time between the 2 treatments was 6 weeks. Forty-seven (68%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 57-79%) of the 69 evaluable patients responded; 25 (36%) had a complete response, 22 (32%) a partial response, 17 (25%) a stable disease lasting for a median of 4.2 months, and 5 (7%) progressed. The patients treated with BNCT twice responded more often than those treated once. The median follow-up time after BNCT was 7.8 years. The 2-year locoregional progression-free survival rate was 38% and the overall survival rate 21%. A high minimum tumor dose and a small volume were independently associated with long survival in a multivariable analysis. CONCLUSIONS Most patients responded to BNCT. A high minimum tumor dose from BNCT was predictive for response and survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hanna Koivunoro
- Department of Oncology, Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki, Finland; Neutron Therapeutics Finland Ltd, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Leena Kankaanranta
- Department of Oncology, Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki, Finland
| | - Tiina Seppälä
- Department of Oncology, Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki, Finland
| | - Aaro Haapaniemi
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki, Finland
| | - Antti Mäkitie
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki, Finland
| | - Heikki Joensuu
- Department of Oncology, Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki, Finland.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Barth RF, Vicente MGH, Harling OK, Kiger WS, Riley KJ, Binns PJ, Wagner FM, Suzuki M, Aihara T, Kato I, Kawabata S. Current status of boron neutron capture therapy of high grade gliomas and recurrent head and neck cancer. Radiat Oncol 2012; 7:146. [PMID: 22929110 PMCID: PMC3583064 DOI: 10.1186/1748-717x-7-146] [Citation(s) in RCA: 291] [Impact Index Per Article: 24.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/14/2012] [Accepted: 07/23/2012] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Boron neutron capture therapy (BNCT) is a biochemically targeted radiotherapy based on the nuclear capture and fission reactions that occur when non-radioactive boron-10, which is a constituent of natural elemental boron, is irradiated with low energy thermal neutrons to yield high linear energy transfer alpha particles and recoiling lithium-7 nuclei. Clinical interest in BNCT has focused primarily on the treatment of high grade gliomas, recurrent cancers of the head and neck region and either primary or metastatic melanoma. Neutron sources for BNCT currently have been limited to specially modified nuclear reactors, which are or until the recent Japanese natural disaster, were available in Japan, the United States, Finland and several other European countries, Argentina and Taiwan. Accelerators producing epithermal neutron beams also could be used for BNCT and these are being developed in several countries. It is anticipated that the first Japanese accelerator will be available for therapeutic use in 2013. The major hurdle for the design and synthesis of boron delivery agents has been the requirement for selective tumor targeting to achieve boron concentrations in the range of 20 μg/g. This would be sufficient to deliver therapeutic doses of radiation with minimal normal tissue toxicity. Two boron drugs have been used clinically, a dihydroxyboryl derivative of phenylalanine, referred to as boronophenylalanine or “BPA”, and sodium borocaptate or “BSH” (Na2B12H11SH). In this report we will provide an overview of other boron delivery agents that currently are under evaluation, neutron sources in use or under development for BNCT, clinical dosimetry, treatment planning, and finally a summary of previous and on-going clinical studies for high grade gliomas and recurrent tumors of the head and neck region. Promising results have been obtained with both groups of patients but these outcomes must be more rigorously evaluated in larger, possibly randomized clinical trials. Finally, we will summarize the critical issues that must be addressed if BNCT is to become a more widely established clinical modality for the treatment of those malignancies for which there currently are no good treatment options.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rolf F Barth
- Department of Pathology, The Ohio State University, 165 Hamilton Hall, 1645 Neil Avenue, Columbus, OH, 43210, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Savolainen S, Kortesniemi M, Timonen M, Reijonen V, Kuusela L, Uusi-Simola J, Salli E, Koivunoro H, Seppälä T, Lönnroth N, Välimäki P, Hyvönen H, Kotiluoto P, Serén T, Kuronen A, Heikkinen S, Kosunen A, Auterinen I. Boron neutron capture therapy (BNCT) in Finland: technological and physical prospects after 20 years of experiences. Phys Med 2012; 29:233-48. [PMID: 22613369 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2012.04.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 42] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/26/2012] [Revised: 04/17/2012] [Accepted: 04/24/2012] [Indexed: 01/18/2023] Open
Abstract
Boron Neutron Capture Therapy (BNCT) is a binary radiotherapy method developed to treat patients with certain malignant tumours. To date, over 300 treatments have been carried out at the Finnish BNCT facility in various on-going and past clinical trials. In this technical review, we discuss our research work in the field of medical physics to form the groundwork for the Finnish BNCT patient treatments, as well as the possibilities to further develop and optimize the method in the future. Accordingly, the following aspects are described: neutron sources, beam dosimetry, treatment planning, boron imaging and determination, and finally the possibilities to detect the efficacy and effects of BNCT on patients.
Collapse
|
7
|
Boron Neutron Capture Therapy in the Treatment of Locally Recurred Head-and-Neck Cancer: Final Analysis of a Phase I/II Trial. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2012; 82:e67-75. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2010.09.057] [Citation(s) in RCA: 156] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/26/2010] [Revised: 09/13/2010] [Accepted: 09/28/2010] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
|
8
|
l-Boronophenylalanine-Mediated Boron Neutron Capture Therapy for Malignant Glioma Progressing After External Beam Radiation Therapy: A Phase I Study. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2011; 80:369-76. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2010.02.031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 74] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/04/2009] [Revised: 02/09/2010] [Accepted: 02/09/2010] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
|
9
|
Koivunoro H, Seppälä T, Uusi-Simola J, Merimaa K, Kotiluoto P, Serén T, Kortesniemi M, Auterinen I, Savolainen S. Validation of dose planning calculations for boron neutron capture therapy using cylindrical and anthropomorphic phantoms. Phys Med Biol 2010; 55:3515-33. [DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/55/12/016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
|
10
|
Abstract
Three treatment planning systems developed for clinical boron neutron capture therapy (BNCT) use are SERA developed by INL/Montana State University, NCTPlan developed by the Harvard-MIT and the CNEA group and JAEA computational dosimetry system (JCDS) developed by Japan Atomic Energy Agency (JAEA) in Japan. Previously, performance of the SERA and NCTPlan has been compared in various studies. In this preliminary study, the dose calculations performed with SERA and JCDS systems were compared in single brain cancer patient case with the FiR 1 epithermal neutron beam. A two-field brain cancer treatment plan was performed with the both codes. The dose components to normal brain, tumor and planning target volume (PTV) were calculated and compared in case of one radiation field and combined two fields. The depth dose distributions and the maximum doses in regions of interest were compared. Calculations with the treatment planning systems for the thermal neutron induced ((10)B and nitrogen) dose components and photon dose were in good agreement. Higher discrepancy in the fast neutron dose calculations was found. In case of combined two-field treatment plan, overall discrepancy of the maximum weighted dose was approximately 3% for normal brain and PTV and approximately 4% for tumor dose.
Collapse
|
11
|
Riley KJ, Binns PJ, Harling OK, Albritton JR, Kiger WS, Rezaei A, Sköld K, Seppälä T, Savolainen S, Auterinen I, Marek M, Viererbl L, Nievaart VA, Moss RL. An international dosimetry exchange for BNCT part II: computational dosimetry normalizations. Med Phys 2009; 35:5419-25. [PMID: 19175101 DOI: 10.1118/1.3005480] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022] Open
Abstract
The meaningful sharing and combining of clinical results from different centers in the world performing boron neutron capture therapy (BNCT) requires improved precision in dose specification between programs. To this end absorbed dose normalizations were performed for the European clinical centers at the Joint Research Centre of the European Commission, Petten (The Netherlands), Nuclear Research Institute, Rez (Czech Republic), VTT, Espoo (Finland), and Studsvik, Nyköping (Sweden). Each European group prepared a treatment plan calculation that was bench-marked against Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) dosimetry performed in a large, water-filled phantom to uniformly evaluate dose specifications with an estimated precision of +/-2%-3%. These normalizations were compared with those derived from an earlier exchange between Brookhaven National Laboratory (BNL) and MIT in the USA. Neglecting the uncertainties related to biological weighting factors, large variations between calculated and measured dose are apparent that depend upon the 10B uptake in tissue. Assuming a boron concentration of 15 microg g(-1) in normal tissue, differences in the evaluated maximum dose to brain for the same nominal specification of 10 Gy(w) at the different facilities range between 7.6 and 13.2 Gy(w) in the trials using boronophenylalanine (BPA) as the boron delivery compound and between 8.9 and 11.1 Gy(w) in the two boron sulfhydryl (BSH) studies. Most notably, the value for the same specified dose of 10 Gy(w) determined at the different participating centers using BPA is significantly higher than at BNL by 32% (MIT), 43% (VTT), 49% (JRC), and 74% (Studsvik). Conversion of dose specification is now possible between all active participants and should be incorporated into future multi-center patient analyses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K J Riley
- Nuclear Reactor Laboratory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Altieri S, Bortolussi S, Bruschi P, Chiari P, Fossati F, Stella S, Prati U, Roveda L, Zonta A, Zonta C, Ferrari C, Clerici A, Nano R, Pinelli T. Neutron autoradiography imaging of selective boron uptake in human metastatic tumours. Appl Radiat Isot 2008; 66:1850-5. [PMID: 18599300 DOI: 10.1016/j.apradiso.2008.05.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 46] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/19/2008] [Revised: 05/05/2008] [Accepted: 05/20/2008] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
The ability to selectively hit the tumour cells is an essential characteristic of an anti-tumour therapy. In boron neutron capture therapy (BNCT) this characteristic is based on the selective uptake of (10)B in the tumour cells with respect to normal tissues. An important step in the BNCT planning is the measurement of the boron concentration in the tissue samples, both tumour and healthy. When the tumour is spread through the healthy tissue, as in the case of metastases, the knowledge of the different kinds of tissues in the sample being analysed is crucial. If the percentage of tumour and normal tissues cannot be evaluated, the obtained concentration is a mean value depending on the composition of the different samples being measured. In this case an imaging method that could give information both on the morphology and on the spatial distribution of boron concentration in the sample would be a fundamental support. In this paper, the results of the boron uptake analysis in the tumour and in the healthy samples taken from human livers after boron phenylalanine (BPA) infusion are shown; boron imaging was performed using neutron autoradiography.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Altieri
- Department of Nuclear and Theoretical Physics, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Hsieh CH, Liu HM, Hwang JJ, Wang HE, Kai JJ, Chen FD. A simple model for quantification of the radiobiological effectiveness of the 10B(n,α)7Li capture reaction in BNCT. Appl Radiat Isot 2006; 64:306-14. [PMID: 16290295 DOI: 10.1016/j.apradiso.2005.08.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/06/2005] [Revised: 07/26/2005] [Accepted: 08/08/2005] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
A simple model has been developed for predicting radiobiological effectiveness of the neutron capture reaction in boron neutron capture therapy. This model was derived from the relationship between the cell survival from the boron capture reaction, the intracellular boron concentration, and the thermal neutron fluence. We found that the cell-killing effect of the boron capture reaction was well described using a power function of the intracellular boron concentration. Hence the relationship between cell survival from the boron capture reaction, intracellular boron concentration, and the thermal neutron fluence could be determined using a simple mathematical equation. We consider that our current approach is more appropriate and realistic than the conventional theoretical mathematical model used to estimate the radiobiological effectiveness of the neutron capture reaction in boron neutron capture therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C H Hsieh
- Department of Medical Radiation Technology and Institute of Radiological Sciences, National Yang-Ming University, 155 Li-Nong St., Sec.2, Peitou, Taipei, Taiwan
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Barth RF, Coderre JA, Vicente MGH, Blue TE. Boron neutron capture therapy of cancer: current status and future prospects. Clin Cancer Res 2005; 11:3987-4002. [PMID: 15930333 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-05-0035] [Citation(s) in RCA: 655] [Impact Index Per Article: 34.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Boron neutron capture therapy (BNCT) is based on the nuclear reaction that occurs when boron-10 is irradiated with low-energy thermal neutrons to yield high linear energy transfer alpha particles and recoiling lithium-7 nuclei. Clinical interest in BNCT has focused primarily on the treatment of high-grade gliomas and either cutaneous primaries or cerebral metastases of melanoma, most recently, head and neck and liver cancer. Neutron sources for BNCT currently are limited to nuclear reactors and these are available in the United States, Japan, several European countries, and Argentina. Accelerators also can be used to produce epithermal neutrons and these are being developed in several countries, but none are currently being used for BNCT. BORON DELIVERY AGENTS Two boron drugs have been used clinically, sodium borocaptate (Na(2)B(12)H(11)SH) and a dihydroxyboryl derivative of phenylalanine called boronophenylalanine. The major challenge in the development of boron delivery agents has been the requirement for selective tumor targeting to achieve boron concentrations ( approximately 20 microg/g tumor) sufficient to deliver therapeutic doses of radiation to the tumor with minimal normal tissue toxicity. Over the past 20 years, other classes of boron-containing compounds have been designed and synthesized that include boron-containing amino acids, biochemical precursors of nucleic acids, DNA-binding molecules, and porphyrin derivatives. High molecular weight delivery agents include monoclonal antibodies and their fragments, which can recognize a tumor-associated epitope, such as epidermal growth factor, and liposomes. However, it is unlikely that any single agent will target all or even most of the tumor cells, and most likely, combinations of agents will be required and their delivery will have to be optimized. CLINICAL TRIALS Current or recently completed clinical trials have been carried out in Japan, Europe, and the United States. The vast majority of patients have had high-grade gliomas. Treatment has consisted first of "debulking" surgery to remove as much of the tumor as possible, followed by BNCT at varying times after surgery. Sodium borocaptate and boronophenylalanine administered i.v. have been used as the boron delivery agents. The best survival data from these studies are at least comparable with those obtained by current standard therapy for glioblastoma multiforme, and the safety of the procedure has been established. CONCLUSIONS Critical issues that must be addressed include the need for more selective and effective boron delivery agents, the development of methods to provide semiquantitative estimates of tumor boron content before treatment, improvements in clinical implementation of BNCT, and a need for randomized clinical trials with an unequivocal demonstration of therapeutic efficacy. If these issues are adequately addressed, then BNCT could move forward as a treatment modality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rolf F Barth
- Department of Pathology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio 43210, USA.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
Harling OK, Riley KJ, Binns PJ, Patel H, Coderre JA. The MIT User Center for Neutron Capture Therapy Research. Radiat Res 2005; 164:221-9. [PMID: 16038593 DOI: 10.1667/rr3403] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
Abstract
Neutron capture therapy (NCT) research encompasses a wide range of preclinical and clinical studies needed to develop this promising but complex cancer treatment. Many specialized facilities and capabilities including thermal and epithermal neutron irradiation facilities, boron analysis, specialized mixed-field dosimetry, animal care facilities and protocols, cell culture laboratories, and, for human clinical studies, licenses and review board approvals are required for NCT research. Such infrastructure is essential, but much of it is not readily available within the community. This is especially true for neutron irradiation facilities, which often require significant development and capital investment too expensive to duplicate at each site performing NCT research. To meet this need, the NCT group at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) has established a User Center for NCT researchers that is already being accessed successfully by various groups. This paper describes the facilities, capabilities and other resources available at MIT and how the NCT research community can access them.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Otto K Harling
- Department of Nuclear Science and Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139, USA.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
Abstract
Boron neutron capture therapy (BNCT) is based on the nuclear reaction that occurs when boron-10 is irradiated with neutrons of the appropriate energy to produce high-energy alpha particles and recoiling lithium-7 nuclei. BNCT has been used clinically to treat patients with high-grade gliomas, and a much smaller number with primary and metastatic melanoma. The purpose of this special issue of the Journal of Neuro-Oncology is to provide a critical and realistic assessment of various aspects of basic and clinical BNCT research in order to better understand its present status and future potential. Topics that are covered include neutron sources, tumor-targeted boron delivery agents, brain tumor models to assess therapeutic efficacy, computational dosimetry and treatment planning, results of clinical trails in the United States, Japan and Europe, pharmacokinetic studies of sodium borocaptate and boronophenylalanine (BPA), positron emission tomography imaging of BPA for treatment planning, and finally an overview of the challenges and problems that must be faced if BNCT is to become a useful treatment modality for brain tumors. Clinical studies have demonstrated the safety of BNCT. The next challenge is an unequivocal demonstration of therapeutic efficacy in one or more of the clinical trails that either are in progress or are planned over the next few years.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rolf F Barth
- Department of Pathology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, USA.
| |
Collapse
|