Concomitant boost radiation and concurrent cisplatin for advanced head and neck carcinomas. Preliminary results of a phase II, single-institutional trial

Concurrent therapy with taxane versus non-taxane containing regimens in locally advanced squamous cell carcinomas of the head and neck (SCCHN): a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Platinum compounds remain the most widely utilized systemic agents in combination with radiation for treating SCCHN in the concurrent setting. Despite recent interest in using taxanes in this setting, there is a lack of randomized clinical trials to support this approach. We conducted a systematic review of published clinical trials of taxane-containing versus standard non-taxane-based regimens used in definitive treatment of SCCHN.

METHODS

Trials published between 1994 and 2012 were identified by an electronic search of public databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane library). All prospective studies were independently identified by two authors for inclusion. Studies were excluded if induction therapy was part of the regimen or if targeted agents were used. Trials using cisplatin- or carboplatin-based regimens and paclitaxel or docetaxel were included. Demographic data, treatment response, locoregional failure free rate (LFFR), progression-free and overall survival (PFS, OS) and toxicities were extracted and analyzed using Comprehensive Meta Analysis software (Version 2.0). Outcome data were pooled and reported as weighted response rate (RR), PFS and OS.

RESULTS

A total of 790 studies were retrieved and 42 studies with 3120 patients were included: 804 patients were treated with taxanes (80% males, median age 57years) and 2316 with non-taxanes (86% males, median age 56years). Progression free survival was not different between the two groups. Weighted median survival was compared from those studies that reported these data; taxanes=36.7months (N=197) versus non-taxanes=25months (N=503), P<0.001. Toxicity (grade 3 and above) was higher in non-taxane containing trials.

CONCLUSIONS

The improved overall survival observed supports the choice of taxane-based regimens in the concurrent setting but may also reflect the predominance of single arm multi-agent phase II trials in the taxane arm. Our findings urge the need for better standardization of taxane-based regimens.

Radical radiotherapy with concurrent weekly cisplatin in loco-regionally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: a single-institution experience

BACKGROUND

The dominant pattern of failure for squamous cell carcinoma of head and neck remains loco-regional, although distant metastases are now being increasingly documented. Radical radiotherapy with concurrent chemotherapy is contemporary standard of care in the non-surgical management of these loco-regionally advanced cancers, based on large randomized controlled trials utilizing high-dose cisplatin (80-100 mg/m2) cycled every three-weekly during definitive radiotherapy. Although efficacious, this is associated with high acute morbidity necessitating intensive supportive care with attendant resource implications. The aim of this retrospective study was to assess the efficacy and acute toxicity of an alternative schedule i.e. concurrent weekly cisplatin-based radical radiotherapy and it's potential to be an optimal regimen in advanced head and neck cancers.

METHODS

Outcome data of patients with Stage III & IV head and neck squamous cell carcinoma, excluding nasopharynx, planned for radical radiotherapy (66-70 Gy) with concurrent weekly cisplatin (30 mg/m2) treated in a single unit between 1996-2004 was extracted.

RESULTS

The dataset consisted of 264 patients with a median age of 54 years. The median radiotherapy dose was 70 Gy (range 7.2-72 Gy) and median number of chemotherapy cycles was 6 (range 1-7). Two-thirds (65%) of patients received > or = 85% of planned cisplatin dose. With a mean follow-up of 19 months, the 5-year local control; loco-regional control; and disease free survival was 57%; 46%; and 43% respectively. Acute grade 3 or worse mucositis and dermatitis was seen in 77 (29%) and 92 (35%) patients respectively, essentially in patients receiving doses > or = 66 Gy and 6 or more cycles of chemotherapy. Other toxicities (hematologic, nausea and vomiting) were mild and self-limiting. Overall, the acute toxicity of this concurrent weekly chemo-radiation regimen though mildly increased did not mandate intensive supportive care. Stage grouping, primary site, and intensity of treatment were significant predictors of loco-regional control and disease free survival.

CONCLUSION

Radical radiotherapy with concurrent weekly cisplatin has moderate efficacy and acceptable acute toxicity with potential to be an optimal regimen in loco-regionally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck, particularly in limited-resource settings. Stage grouping, primary site, and treatment intensity are important determinants of outcome.

[The impact of radiotherapy on quality of life -- a survey of 1411 patients with oral cancer]

PURPOSE

The therapy of patients with oral cancer often requires a combination of surgery and radiotherapy. This leads to trauma of healthy tissue. The impact of this side effect on quality of life was investigated. Additionally the impairment of 19 factors was determined (comprehension of speech for unknown others, comprehension of speech for familiar others, eating/swallowing, mobility of the tongue, opening range of the mouth, mobility of lower jaw, mobility of neck, mobility of arms and shoulders, sense of taste, sense of smell, appearance, strength, appetite, respiration, pain, swelling, xerostomia, halitosis).

METHODS

This retrospective multicenter study was conducted under the auspices of DOESAK (a German, Austrian and Swiss cooperative group on tumors of the maxillofacial region). The Bochum Questionnaire on Rehabilitation was used to determine 147 items. 3894 questionnaires where sent to 43 clinics in Germany, Austria and Switzerland. 1761 questionnaires where returned, while 1411 of them included all of the answers necessary for this study.

RESULTS

686 of 1411 patients where irradiated. Before the beginning of therapy the impairment of the 19 factors was not significantly higher in the group that later received radiotherapy. After therapy there is a significantly higher impairment of the irradiated patients. The factors that are especially worse are xerostomia, swallowing and understanding of speech. The quality of life was not significantly lower.

CONCLUSIONS

Although radiotherapy leads to trauma of healthy tissue this method is indicated as it has no significant impact on quality of life. During the rehabilitation physiotherapists should relieve the impairment of speech, eating and swallowing.