Left thoracotomy approach in reoperative off-pump coronary revascularization: bypass grafting from the left axillary artery or descending thoracic aorta

The left axillary artery is a reasonable option as the inflow site for saphenous vein graft in minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting

Introduction

This study aims to clarify the good inflow site for saphenous vein grafts (SVG) in minimally invasive off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (mini-CABG), between the ascending aorta, the internal thoracic arteries (ITAs) and the left axillary artery (LAA).

Methods

This retrospective study included 126 patients who underwent Mini-CABG at our center between January 2014 and July 2023. Patients were divided into three groups according to the SVG inflow site for patency comparison: Aorta group (n = 56), LAA group (n = 23), and ITA group (n = 47).

Results

There were 84 males, with mean age of 65.9 ± 7.0 years. There were no significant differences in preoperative characteristics between groups. Mean operation times were 254.6 ± 72.2, 213.7 ± 57.6, and 253.0 ± 81.2 min, and the average numbers of distal anastomoses were 2.9 ± 0.9, 2.4 ± 0.7 and 2.9 ± 1.1 in the Aorta, ITA and LAA groups respectively. Days in intensive care, hospital stay, and major complications did not differ between the groups. Early patency of SVG did not significantly differ among groups: 93.0% in the Aorta group, 98.0% in the ITA group, and 100% in the LAA group. Mean follow-up period was 136.7 ± 295.7 days, and follow-up coronary CTA revealed 18 SVG occlusions (Aorta group n = 8, ITA group n = 5, LAA group n = 5). The Kaplan-Meier curve for SVG patency rates did not show any significant differences among the three groups.

Conclusion

The ascending aorta, the ITAs, and the LAA serve as reliable inflow sites with similar results in mini-CABG.

Reoperative off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting: current outcomes, concerns and controversies

Increasing numbers of patients have undergone coronary artery bypass grafting in the last four decades. As a result, the incidence of reoperative coronary artery bypass grafting is rising. Reoperative procedures pose several technical difficulties and are associated with increased operative risks, which exceed those of the initial revascularization. As the incidence of reoperative procedures is increasing so is the experience of reoperative coronary artery bypass grafting, with the resultant evolution of several alternative strategies to lower the operative risks. These strategies include alternative techniques for re-entry, strict avoidance of graft manipulation to minimize the risk of graft atheroembolism, and modification of the method of myocardial protection, depending on the status of the native coronary circulation and the patency of venous or arterial grafts. Off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting is one such technique that, through the avoidance of inherent risks of cardiopulmonary bypass, has the potential to reduce the morbidity associated with reoperative coronary artery bypass grafting. This article evaluates the current outcomes of reoperative off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting, and highlights the concerns and controversies associated with this strategy.

Common hepatic artery as an inflow site for off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting

We used the common hepatic artery (CHA) as an inflow site for a saphenous vein graft bypass to the right coronary system during off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting. The CHA is a suitable inflow vessel to provide sufficient blood flow and a short-distance bypass in case both the ascending aorta and the gastroepiploic artery are considered inadequate.

Coronary artery bypass grafting using an abdominal artery as an inflow

BACKGROUND

In multiple bypass surgery, when the ascending aorta cannot be used as an inflow, it is sometimes necessary to use an abdominal artery. This technique is useful when a re-median sternotomy might damage a patent graft in patients undergoing reoperations or when the gastroepiploic artery is unsuitable for use as a graft.

METHODS

The subjects were 17 patients in whom an abdominal artery was used as an inflow. In these 17 patients, 9 underwent surgery for the first operation, while 8 underwent surgery for the reoperation. As an inflow, the gastroduodenal artery was used in 8 patients, the common hepatic artery in 4 patients, the left gastric artery in 3 patients, the right gastric artery in 1 patient, and the middle colic artery in 1 patient. The target coronary artery was the right posterior descending artery in 13 patients, the atrioventricular artery in 2 patients, and the circumflex artery in 4 patients. Sequential bypass was performed on 2 patients.

RESULTS

None of the patients died during surgery. Symptoms disappeared postoperatively in all patients; postoperative angiography showed that all grafts were patent.

CONCLUSIONS

The present technique is useful when the ascending aorta cannot be used as an inflow or when a bypass to a region with a large perfusion area is needed in multiple bypass surgery.