Class-1 polypeptide chain release factors are structurally and functionally similar to suppressor tRNAs and comprise different structural-functional families of prokaryotic/mitochondrial and eukaryotic/archaebacterial factors

RNA-protein interactions at the initial and terminal stages of protein biosynthesis as investigated by Lev Kisselev (on the occasion of his 70th anniversary)

This review highlights studies by Lev L. Kisselev and his colleagues on the initial and terminal stages of protein biosynthesis, which cover the period of the last 45 years (1961-2006). They investigated spatial structure of tRNAs, structure and functions of aminoacyl-tRNA-synthetases of higher organisms, and the final step of protein synthesis, termination of translation. L. Kisselev and his team have made three major contributions to these fields of molecular biology; (i) they proposed the hypothesis on the role of anticodon triplet of tRNA in recognition by cognate aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase, which has been experimentally confirmed and is now included in textbooks; (ii) identified primary structures and functions of two eukaryotic protein factors (eRF1 and eRF3) playing a pivotal role in translation termination; (iii) characterized a structural basis for stop codon recognition by eRF1 within the ribosome and discovered the negative structural elements of eRF1, limiting its recognition of one or two stop-codons.

Molecular Basis for Bacterial Class I Release Factor Methylation by PrmC

Class I release factors bind to ribosomes in response to stop codons and trigger peptidyl-tRNA hydrolysis at the P site. Prokaryotic and eukaryotic RFs share one motif: a GGQ tripeptide positioned in a loop at the end of a stem region that interacts with the ribosomal peptidyl transferase center. The glutamine side chain of this motif is specifically methylated in both prokaryotes and eukaryotes. Methylation in E. coli is due to PrmC and results in strong stimulation of peptide chain release. We have solved the crystal structure of the complex between E. coli RF1 and PrmC bound to the methyl donor product AdoHCy. Both the GGQ domain (domain 3) and the central region (domains 2 and 4) of RF1 interact with PrmC. Structural and mutagenic data indicate a compact conformation of RF1 that is unlike its conformation when it is bound to the ribosome but is similar to the crystal structure of the protein alone.

The glutamine residue of the conserved GGQ motif in Saccharomyces cerevisiae release factor eRF1 is methylated by the product of the YDR140w gene

Polypeptide release factors from eubacteria and eukaryotes, although similar in function, belong to different protein families. They share one sequence motif, a GGQ tripeptide that is vital to release factor (RF) activity in both kingdoms. In bacteria, the Gln residue of the motif in RF1 and RF2 is modified to N(5)-methyl-Gln by the S-adenosyl l-methionine-dependent methyltransferase PrmC and the absence of Gln methylation decreases the release activity of Escherichia coli RF2 in vitro severalfold. We show here that the same modification is made to the GGQ motif of Saccharomyces cerevisiae release factor eRF1, the first time that N(5)-methyl-Gln has been found outside the bacterial kingdom. The product of the YDR140w gene is required for the methylation of eRF1 in vivo and for optimal yeast cell growth. YDR140w protein has significant homology to PrmC but lacks the N-terminal domain thought to be involved in the recognition of the bacterial release factors. Overproduced in S. cerevisiae, YDR140w can methylate eRF1 from yeast or man in vitro using S-adenosyl l-methionine as methyl donor provided that eRF3 and GTP are also present, suggesting that the natural substrate of the methyltransferase YDR140w is the ternary complex eRF1.eRF3.GTP.

The essential role of the invariant GGQ motif in the function and stability in vivo of bacterial release factors RF1 and RF2

Release factors RF1 and RF2 are required in bacteria for the cleavage of peptidyl-tRNA. A single sequence motif, GGQ, is conserved in all eubacterial, archaebacterial and eukaryotic release factors and may mimic the CCA end of tRNA, although the position of the motif in the crystal structures of human eRF1 and Escherichia coli RF2 is strikingly different. Mutations have been introduced at each of the three conserved positions. Changing the Gln residue to Ala or Glu allowed the factors to retain about 22% of tetrapeptide release activity in vitro, but these mutants could not complement thermosensitive RF mutants in vivo. None of several mutants with altered Gly residues retained activity in vivo or in vitro. Many GGQ mutants were poorly expressed and are presumably unstable; many were also toxic to the cell. The toxic mutant factors or their degradation products may bind to ribosomes inhibiting the action of the normal factor. These data are consistent with a common role for the GGQ motif in bacterial and eukaryotic release factors, despite strong divergence in primary, secondary and tertiary structure, but are difficult to reconcile with the hypothesis that the amide nitrogen of the Gln plays a vital role in peptidyl-tRNA hydrolysis.

Conversion of omnipotent translation termination factor eRF1 into ciliate-like UGA-only unipotent eRF1

In eukaryotic ribosomes, termination of translation is triggered by class 1 polypeptide release factor, eRF1. In organisms with a universal code, eRF1 responds to three stop codons, whereas, in ciliates with variant codes, only one or two codon(s) remain(s) as stop signals. By mutagenesis of the Y-C-F minidomain of the N domain, we converted an omnipotent human eRF1 recognizing all three stop codons into a unipotent 'ciliate-like' UGA-only eRF1. The conserved Cys127 located in the Y-C-F minidomain plays a critical role in stop codon recognition. The UGA-only response has also been achieved by concomitant substitutions of four other amino acids located at the Y-C-F and NIKS minidomains of eRF1. We suggest that for eRF1 the stop codon decoding is of a non-linear (non-protein-anticodon) type and explores a combination of positive and negative determinants. We assume that stop codon recognition is profoundly different by eukaryotic and prokaryotic class 1 RFs.

Positioning of the mRNA stop signal with respect to polypeptide chain release factors and ribosomal proteins in 80S ribosomes

To study positioning of the mRNA stop signal with respect to polypeptide chain release factors (RFs) and ribosomal components within human 80S ribosomes, photoreactive mRNA analogs were applied. Derivatives of the UUCUAAA heptaribonucleotide containing the UUC codon for Phe and the stop signal UAAA, which bore a perfluoroaryl azido group at either the fourth nucleotide or the 3'-terminal phosphate, were synthesized. The UUC codon was directed to the ribosomal P site by the cognate tRNA(Phe), targeting the UAA stop codon to the A site. Mild UV irradiation of the ternary complexes consisting of the 80S ribosome, the mRNA analog and tRNA resulted in tRNA-dependent crosslinking of the mRNA analogs to the 40S ribosomal proteins and the 18S rRNA. mRNA analogs with the photoreactive group at the fourth uridine (the first base of the stop codon) crosslinked mainly to protein S15 (and much less to S2). For the 3'-modified mRNA analog, the major crosslinking target was protein S2, while protein S15 was much less crosslinked. Crosslinking of eukaryotic (e) RF1 was entirely dependent on the presence of a stop signal in the mRNA analog. eRF3 in the presence of eRF1 did not crosslink, but decreased the yield of eRF1 crosslinking. We conclude that (i) proteins S15 and S2 of the 40S ribosomal subunit are located near the A site-bound codon; (ii) eRF1 can induce spatial rearrangement of the 80S ribosome leading to movement of protein L4 of the 60S ribosomal subunit closer to the codon located at the A site; (iii) within the 80S ribosome, eRF3 in the presence of eRF1 does not contact the stop codon at the A site and is probably located mostly (if not entirely) on the 60S subunit.

Bacterial polypeptide release factor RF2 is structurally distinct from eukaryotic eRF1

Bacterial release factor RF2 promotes termination of protein synthesis, specifically recognizing stop codons UAA or UGA. The crystal structure of Escherichia coli RF2 has been determined to a resolution of 1.8 A. RF2 is structurally distinct from its eukaryotic counterpart eRF1. The tripeptide SPF motif, thought to confer RF2 stop codon specificity, and the universally conserved GGQ motif, proposed to be involved with the peptidyl transferase center, are exposed in loops only 23 A apart, and the structure suggests that stop signal recognition is more complex than generally believed.

The polypeptide chain release factor eRF1 specifically contacts the s(4)UGA stop codon located in the A site of eukaryotic ribosomes

It has been shown previously [Brown, C.M. & Tate, W.P. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 33164-33170.] that the polypeptide chain release factor RF2 involved in translation termination in prokaryotes was able to photocrossreact with mini-messenger RNAs containing stop signals in which U was replaced by 4-thiouridine (s4U). Here, using the same strategy we have monitored photocrosslinking to eukaryotic ribosomal components of 14-mer mRNA in the presence of tRNA(f)(Met), and 42-mer mRNA in the presence of tRNA(Asp) (tRNA(Asp) gene transcript). We show that: (a) both 14-mer and 42-mer mRNAs crossreact with ribosomal RNA and ribosomal proteins. The patterns of the crosslinked ribosomal proteins are similar with both mRNAs and sensitive to ionic conditions; (b) the crosslinking patterns obtained with 42-mer mRNAs show characteristic modification upon addition of tRNA(Asp) providing evidence for appropriate mRNA phasing onto the ribosome. Similar changes are not detected with the 14-mer mRNA.tRNA(f)(Met) pairs; (c) when eukaryotic polypeptide chain release factor 1 (eRF1) is added to the ribosome.tRNA(Asp) complex it crossreacts with the 42-mer mRNA containing the s(4)UGA stop codon located in the A site, but not with the s(4)UCA sense codon; this crosslink involves the N-terminal and middle domains of eRF1 but not the C domain which interacts with eukaryotic polypeptide chain release factor 3 (eRF3); (d) addition of eRF3 has no effect on the yield of eRF1-42-mer mRNA crosslinking and eRF3 does not crossreact with 42-mer mRNA. These experiments delineate the in vitro conditions allowing optimal phasing of mRNA on the eukaryotic ribosome and demonstrate a direct and specific contact of 'core' eRF1 and s(4)UGA stop codon within the ribosomal A site.

Translational termination comes of age

Translational termination has been a largely ignored aspect of protein synthesis for many years. However, the recent identification of new release-factor genes, the mapping of release-factor functional sites and in vitro reconstitution experiments have provided a deeper understanding of the termination mechanism. In addition, protein-protein interactions among release factors and with other proteins have been revealed. The three-dimensional structures of a prokaryotic ribosome recycling factor and eukaryotic release factor 1 (eRF1) mimic the shape of transfer RNA, indicating that they bind to the same ribosomal site. Post-termination events in bacteria have been clarified, linking termination, ribosomal recycling and translation initiation.